02-07-2005, 11:43 PM
The first misconception that people have is that very small muslim armies defeated very large hindu armies
Ghori and Ghazni for example had the resources of central asia behind them and
fielded large armies of 2 lakhs
In addition they had technical superiority in the form of mounted archers
Today the external muslim armies are primitive
The main threat comes from low level muslim rioting
and in this the key determinant is muslim concentration level
No society, including western europe has yet found a solution to low level muslim rioting
The only solution is hence symptomatic
The only reason we had partition was because muslims breeded from 15% in 1800 to 25% by 1950
and hindu society could not tackle muslim rioters
Islamic breeding even defeated stalin, who found that muslims breeded much faster than he could eradicate them
Basically if you dont want to lose your home, dont let muslims reach critical mass in your area and the only way is to prevent a demographic vacuum
Ghori and Ghazni for example had the resources of central asia behind them and
fielded large armies of 2 lakhs
In addition they had technical superiority in the form of mounted archers
Today the external muslim armies are primitive
The main threat comes from low level muslim rioting
and in this the key determinant is muslim concentration level
No society, including western europe has yet found a solution to low level muslim rioting
The only solution is hence symptomatic
The only reason we had partition was because muslims breeded from 15% in 1800 to 25% by 1950
and hindu society could not tackle muslim rioters
Islamic breeding even defeated stalin, who found that muslims breeded much faster than he could eradicate them
Basically if you dont want to lose your home, dont let muslims reach critical mass in your area and the only way is to prevent a demographic vacuum