HAREKRISHNA JI POSTED
Year 1-450$
1000-450$-
1500-550$
1700-550$
1820-533$
1870-533$
1884-551$
1900-599$
1933-700$
1950-619$
1960-753$
1970-868$
1980-938$
1990-1309$
2000-1892$
2006-2598$
Conclusion
1 to 1000-stagnation
1000-1500-economic growth(golden age of medieval India)
1500-1700-stagnation(Mughal empire)
1700-1870-decline
1870-1933-growth
1933-1950-decline
1950-2006-growth
The big picture is that India have a slow growth but steady -not big growth rate ,but
also no big declines.
THIS IS NO WAY HAREKRISHNA JI iS IT SOME SORT OF JOKE.I WAS TALKING POST INDEPENDENCE AND U BRING IN 2000 YRS IN A PERVERTED WAY MANIPULATING STATISTICS.
sometimes u talk of decline in 1000 yrs what sort of decline? were we looteed r**ped, killed . converted or what . No answers .
After this huge time scale of 1000 yrs. which u consider as decline u jump to periods of 200 yrs,170 years 56 yrs and brazenly 17 yrs. What sort of comedy tabulation is this. Just to prove your brazenly false and factually incorrect hypothesis u are using terribly massaged statistics.
There is something called common sense and a Hindu of even below average IQ will tell u that before the year 1 we were a flourishing civilization but seems u want to pick the christian calendar as your article of faith.
After the year one it is common knowledge that we had periods of prosperity and intense deprivation which u are conveniently overlooking by fudging these facts and tabulating them in a bizarre manner. This seems that this article whosoever is writing has zero understanding of statistics or tabulation or is brazenly papering over the misfortunes that we have faced since the year 1.
Everybody knows that the past 2000 yrs we have had dramatic declines because of camel riders and goras interspersed with growth. No need to project this bulls***t tabulated statistics just to prove your factually incorrect statements of stable growth.
We are not living in a vacuum, what about comparable statistics of other countries in Europe and china has been bugg**ed the same way since the last many yrs.
These sort of statistics can only convince a illiterate Hindu to provide solace for his bu***r**g in the last 2000 yrs. Maybe not him also.
Finally I projected that India will be 2.5 T economy in 2-3 yrs. Do u have anything worthwhile to debate or going off topic is the only answer u have?
Year 1-450$
1000-450$-
1500-550$
1700-550$
1820-533$
1870-533$
1884-551$
1900-599$
1933-700$
1950-619$
1960-753$
1970-868$
1980-938$
1990-1309$
2000-1892$
2006-2598$
Conclusion
1 to 1000-stagnation
1000-1500-economic growth(golden age of medieval India)
1500-1700-stagnation(Mughal empire)
1700-1870-decline
1870-1933-growth
1933-1950-decline
1950-2006-growth
The big picture is that India have a slow growth but steady -not big growth rate ,but
also no big declines.
THIS IS NO WAY HAREKRISHNA JI iS IT SOME SORT OF JOKE.I WAS TALKING POST INDEPENDENCE AND U BRING IN 2000 YRS IN A PERVERTED WAY MANIPULATING STATISTICS.
sometimes u talk of decline in 1000 yrs what sort of decline? were we looteed r**ped, killed . converted or what . No answers .
After this huge time scale of 1000 yrs. which u consider as decline u jump to periods of 200 yrs,170 years 56 yrs and brazenly 17 yrs. What sort of comedy tabulation is this. Just to prove your brazenly false and factually incorrect hypothesis u are using terribly massaged statistics.
There is something called common sense and a Hindu of even below average IQ will tell u that before the year 1 we were a flourishing civilization but seems u want to pick the christian calendar as your article of faith.
After the year one it is common knowledge that we had periods of prosperity and intense deprivation which u are conveniently overlooking by fudging these facts and tabulating them in a bizarre manner. This seems that this article whosoever is writing has zero understanding of statistics or tabulation or is brazenly papering over the misfortunes that we have faced since the year 1.
Everybody knows that the past 2000 yrs we have had dramatic declines because of camel riders and goras interspersed with growth. No need to project this bulls***t tabulated statistics just to prove your factually incorrect statements of stable growth.
We are not living in a vacuum, what about comparable statistics of other countries in Europe and china has been bugg**ed the same way since the last many yrs.
These sort of statistics can only convince a illiterate Hindu to provide solace for his bu***r**g in the last 2000 yrs. Maybe not him also.
Finally I projected that India will be 2.5 T economy in 2-3 yrs. Do u have anything worthwhile to debate or going off topic is the only answer u have?