Christian Subversion And Missionary Activities - 6

[Husky]

^





Just like islamism has been implementing Sharia in the part of Nigeria under its control, christianism has been forcing the Christian Sharia in Uganda.



www.smh.com.au/opinion/politics/the-role-of-us-evangelists-in-ugandas-kill-the-gays-bill-20100111-m2lf.html

via http://christianaggression.org/item_disp...1263492633

The role of US evangelists in [color="#FF0000"]Uganda's 'kill the gays' bill[/color]



Posted January 14, 2010





Jan 2, 2010

The Sydney Morning Herald

Source Link



A law proposing execution for homosexuals exposes a murderous fantasy.



A recent proposal in Uganda to legislate the execution of homosexuals has sparked international outrage. Although the Government has since revised its prescribed sentence from death to life imprisonment, the bill remains striking for its overt hostility towards gays.



The move is more than just a Ugandan oddity - it is the embodiment of a murderous fantasy, cherished by fanatics in the West, to extinguish homosexual life altogether.



It is easy for the West to dismiss the bill as a local phenomenon, emblematic of African opposition to ''civilised progress''. Deeply religious and protective of traditional family structures, Uganda has long been hostile to homosexuality.



But a disturbing link has been revealed between Uganda's Anti-Homosexuality Bill and US evangelism.

[color="#800080"](Has nothing to do with "US" christianism. Murderous intent against homosexuals, "witch-craft", ..., is biblical, it is christoislamic. Again, see Leviticus etc in the babble.)[/color]

According to The New York Times, three US evangelists travelled to Uganda last March and spoke at a conference that conference organiser Stephen Langa said was about ''the gay agenda - that whole hidden and dark agenda''.



The Americans were invited to speak about ways of ''curing'' gay people. It appears that their denunciations of homosexuality as a threat to family values added fuel to the fire. They were heard by thousands, including the future architects of the kill-the-gays bill.



The Americans have since sought to distance themselves from the bill. They insist their message is one of love, not murder. But the desire to eradicate homosexuality from human existence lies at the heart of the anti-gay movement, whether it is practised in Uganda or the West.



Central to the modern anti-gay movement is the proliferation of so-called ''ex-gay therapies''. These encourage individuals to ''convert'' from their homosexual behaviour, implying that being and acting gay somehow involves a choice.



It all sounds harmless enough. Ex-gay therapies have sprung up around the world, including in Australia, and are often connected to religious institutions. The American Psychological Association recently granted that some individuals, torn between their faith and their sexuality, might ultimately choose their faith and so find appropriate support in ex-gay therapy.



The prevailing view among ex-gay therapists is that theirs is a modern technology that offers unhappy homosexuals a happy alternative to their life of misery. The assumption is that homosexuality makes you miserable. Yet surely it is not being homosexual but the prevailing atmosphere of homophobia that makes some people miserable. Abundant proof exists that, in the 21st century, openly gay people can live full and happy lives.



The ''choice'' advocated by ex-gay therapists is ultimately a restatement of traditional anti-gay prejudice. Evangelicals and ex-gay therapists may use the language of pluralism, of ''choice'', to advance their arguments, but they do so only to oppose pluralism in practice.



''Curing'' gay people and incarcerating or executing them both treat homosexuality as a crime requiring surveillance. Each regards homosexuality as a moral problem in need of a medical or social cure. Yet the anti-gay advocates are the ones who appear to be in torment - they suffer from denial.



Take the example of Richard Cohen, a US ex-gay therapist who, now married with children, claims to have converted from homosexuality. The author of several books, including Coming Out Straight: Understanding and Healing Homosexuality, Cohen spoke at an anti-gay conference in Uganda last April.



Cohen claims his attitude towards gays is loving. On US television last month, he sought to disavow any relationship between his appearance in Uganda and the tabling of the Anti-Homosexuality Bill one month later. ''Since the 1950s, the Ugandan government has punished people for engaging in homosexual behaviour, so this is not new,'' Cohen declared.



What Cohen, who was struck off the American Counselling Register in 2003 for ethical reasons, did not explain was why he attended an anti-gay conference in a country that punishes gay people. As he is fond of saying, everybody has a choice.



It used to be easy to identify homophobia. But now even homophobes fail to recognise their prejudice. Bigotry is reassuringly cosseted by an evangelising rhetoric of love, and reinforced by a medicalising language that veils the savagery of its aims.



Ugandans rightly recognise Western homophobes as allies. Events in Uganda expose the fraud of ex-gay therapy. Anti-gay advocates may not all espouse murder, but the ramifications of their words are lethal.



Our outrage at Uganda should extend to the entire anti-gay movement.



Adrian Phoon is a Sydney writer.

This is christianism. Enough with the apologetics that's trying to somehow make this into a feature of uniquely American evangelical christianism. The babble - that terrorist manual - is what threatens gay people with execution. And hence it is the faithful christians - those who listen to the commandments of the deranged non-existent terrorist gawd of the babbling bible - who carry out its threats and orders.

American/evangelical christianism is simply more serious about obeying the demonic non-existent 'gawd' character of the bible.



It's hypocritical to pretend that islamic sharia - adherence to terrorist koranic laws - is somehow different from christianism where the same is expected: strict adherence to the biblical gawd's commandments. Uganda is very christian now. As is known, their christian political-militant outfit Lord's Resistance Army, LRA, (comparable to the NLFT, NSCN/Nagaland-for-Christ christoterrorists) has been trying to enforce christianism - full christianism, aka christian sharia - the same way the Taliban of Nigeria or Afghanistan etc have been trying to enforce islamic sharia. There is no difference.

http://freetruth.50webs.org/D4b.htm#HolyWarsInAfrica

The LRA is fighting for a Christian theocracy. Since March 2002 an agreement between Uganda and Sudan, which allows Uganda to pursue the LRA on Sudanes territory, is in force. Sudan was actively supporting the LRA before. The agreement is prolonged until the end of the year. All in all, 15,000 Ugandan troops are stationed in Sudan. Besides the military pressure, Uganda offers the LRA an amnesty, which is accepted mainly by former child soldiers. Until July, 246 out of the last 1,000 out of originally 3,000 LRA fighters accept the amnesty. From June 2002 to June 2003 the LRA abducts about 8,400 children, which adds up to some 20,000 since the start of the conflict. Due to the conflict 850,000 people have become refugees.

-- Heidelberg Institute on International Conflict Research (Germany), report

Christianism is NOT more enlightened, less "medieval" than islam or whatever excuse the ignorant pseculars aka christoconditioned today peddle. Because if christianism gets the chance to obtain total control, it will pursue it and take it. And it will then get christianism fully implemented down to the last letter. E.g.

- An American beauty pageant contestant - news posted in this thread not too long back - also quoted the bible's threats against gay people to denounce their rights. When [color="#0000FF"]True Christians (the more a christian adheres to the bible, the truer a christian they are, *because* the babble=the "word of gawd")[/color] get full power, the modern Uganda is what results.

- Catholicism too would usurp full power - Vatican has never given up its absolute power claims - except that it is prevented from doing so now due to semi-secularised rule.



In the past, when the True Church had absolute power, there were the inquisitions to deal with disobedience. Fortunately, at present the catholic church has been curtailed so it has to resort to its pressure power and the threat of excommunication and "hell" to 'persuade' its manipulable and intimidated sheep to comply.

E.g. of these plan/choice B methods at work in Philippines:



http://christianaggression.org/item_disp...1268454317

Philippine health chief, church fight over condoms



Posted March 12, 2010



TERESA CEROJANO

March 8, 2010

Associated Press

Source Link http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/arti...gD9EAAOP80



MANILA, Philippines — On Valentine's Day, Philippine government health workers hit the streets of Manila to hand out roses and condoms to passers-by.



The message was clear in a country with a relatively small but rapidly growing HIV-positive population: Avoid unprotected sex.



[color="#0000FF"]It didn't get far.[/color] Within days, leaders of the powerful Roman Catholic Church began urging the faithful to reject condoms, reigniting a long-running battle over contraception in the overwhelmingly Catholic nation.



Bishops issued angry statements slamming the Valentine's Day distribution as immoral and [color="#FF0000"]called for the resignation of Health Secretary Esperanza Cabral, who ordered the campaign.[/color] [color="#0000FF"]One archbishop said that Cabral already "has one foot in hell."[/color]



The bishops called for a ban on condom advertisements last week.



"The condom business is a multimillion dollar industry that heavily targets the adolescent market at the expense of morality and family life," said Bishop Nereo Odchimar, president of the Catholic Bishops' Conference of the Philippines. He called fidelity and premarital chastity "the only effective way to curb the spread of AIDS."



On Monday, about 100 people protested against the church's position, carrying two baskets of inflated condoms and paper roses as they picketed outside the Bishops' Conference building in downtown Manila. They held a placard reading, "Bless our reproductive right."

[color="#800080"](Comment on this is at end.)[/color]



The Catholic church is a powerful voice in a nation beset with poverty and political instability. Politicians court bishops' blessings and usually tiptoe around issues such as promoting contraception.



The bishops mobilized protests that toppled late dictator Ferdinand Marcos in 1986 and President Joseph Estrada in 2001 on corruption allegations.



More recently, the church has spearheaded opposition to a reproductive health bill that calls for contraceptives to be provided in government hospitals and sex education to be taught in public schools. The bill is languishing in the House of Representatives.



Cabral, the health secretary, said she doesn't take the church's word lightly. "They are very powerful and they can sometimes be vicious," she said.



But the Harvard-trained cardiologist, who was reshuffled to the Health Department from the Social Welfare Department in January, shrugged off the flak as something that comes with the territory.



"I feel it is just a job that I have to do because as the secretary of health I know that it is going to be very difficult for our country if we let ... (AIDS) become an epidemic," she told The Associated Press.



The number of diagnosed HIV/AIDS cases rose to four a day in November and December, up from one or two during the first 10 months of 2009, according to the Health Department. In January, 143 new cases were diagnosed, the largest number recorded in a month.



Without intervention, the nearly 4,600 cases recorded in the Philippines as of January could soar to 30,000 in three years, Cabral said.



The figures may be the tip of the iceberg. Cabral said health officials estimate that for every new case recorded, 10 are missed. About 95 percent results from sexual transmission.



The Health Department's program follows the ABC formula: abstinence, be faithful and use a condom.



The church rejects contraception, which it says causes abortion. The bishops claim that condoms contribute to the spread of HIV/AIDS, saying they have a high failure rate and create a false sense of security.



According to the World Health Organization, scientific evidence shows that latex condoms provide 80 percent or greater protection against HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases.



Under President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo, the national government does not distribute contraceptives and leaves it to local governments to decide how to deal with HIV/AIDS and reproductive health.



Condoms are sold at grocery and drug stores, but for those who cannot afford them — a third of the country's 90 million people live in poverty — free distribution often depends on where they live.



For now, Cabral has Arroyo's backing, although deputy presidential spokeswoman Charito Planas said the health secretary was reminded to consult the president and the Cabinet on any future condom distributions.



With national elections coming in May, the church is campaigning against politicians who promote birth control. Family planning advocates are calling on voters to ditch candidates opposed to allocating government funds for contraceptives.

About the philippino catholics - aka heretics - who

held a placard reading, "Bless our reproductive right."

Obviously they do not know christianism=the christian bible/gawd. Because they're wrong: the non-existent monstrous gawd of christianism won't bless any such thing. The bible gives them no rights (except full rights to murder heathens/homosexuals/'witches', etc). Instead, what christianism would do is get its very real cannibal sheep to destroy or else render powerless all those who flout christian "morality" laws (including the heretic philippinos).



After all, in the True Church (I mean catholicism this time), only christian paedophile priests have rights - supreme rights: no threat of excommunication, of hell-fire, of being handed over to the law by the church or of being turned in by their christian victims who *do* live in the very real fear of being excommunicated for breaking their silence. The paedophile priests can instead look forward to being moved to the safety of another parish with full identity protection ensured by the religion that protects them:

Can refer once more to the Vatican's Crimen Sollicitationes document specifying all this.

The World Uncovered: Sex crimes and the Vatican - BBC, October 21, 2006



A secret document which sets out a procedure for dealing with child sex abuse scandals within the Catholic Church is examined by Panorama.

.... Crimen Sollicitationis was written in 1962 in Latin and given to Catholic bishops worldwide who are ordered to keep it locked away in the church safe. It instructs them how to deal with priests who solicit sex from the confessional. It also deals with "any obscene external act ... with youths of either sex." It imposes an oath of secrecy on the child victim, the priest dealing with the allegation and any witnesses. Breaking that oath means excommunication from the Catholic Church.

[color="#FF0000"]Reporting for Panorama, Colm O'Gorman finds seven priests with child abuse allegations made against them living in and around the Vatican City.[/color]