02-14-2005, 06:51 PM
<b>Detention of Junior seer's kin under Goondas Act challenged</b><!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Claiming that there was no nexus or proximity between the incident and the January 21 last detention order, the petitioner alleged that the 'detaining authority has erred in branding the detenu as a goonda.' He contended that no material was disclosed to show why the detaining authority had concluded that Raghu was a goonda. Besides, there was not even a whisper about the extent of his brother's involvement in the murder case. he claimed.
Contending that the grounds for detention were vague and unclear and paralysed the detenu from effectively representing his case to the authority concerned, the petitioner alleged that Raghu had been arraigned in the case because he failed to toe the line of the investigating agency and become an approver.
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Contending that the grounds for detention were vague and unclear and paralysed the detenu from effectively representing his case to the authority concerned, the petitioner alleged that Raghu had been arraigned in the case because he failed to toe the line of the investigating agency and become an approver.
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->