With MMS capping Indian nuclear deterrence by signing teh deal with USA, the next poor mans option is stated in this article, that will allow alternate way to build and test thermo nuclear device, (at least that will allow determining the debugged design is in really fixed or not): Keyword is
[url="http://www.indiaresearch.org/WayToACredibleDeterrent.pdf"]Way To A Credible Nuclear Deterrent -Arun Vishwakarma @ IRF[/url]
[url="http://www.indiaresearch.org/WayToACredibleDeterrent.pdf"]Way To A Credible Nuclear Deterrent -Arun Vishwakarma @ IRF[/url]
Quote:Thermo-nuclear (TN) warhead:
Also known as a multi-stage nuclear warhead. The first stage of a TN device consists of a Fission
or FBF nuclear explosive whose energy in the form of soft X-rays is used to ablate a heavy
pusher material to compress and ignite the second stage consisting of Deuterium (in the form of
Lithium Deuteride) to undergo nuclear fusion. Nuclear fusion generates highly energetic neutrons
that in turn cause fission in the surrounding third stage fissile material. The third stage fissile
material can be ordinary natural-Uranium or some other kind of enriched fissile material. Such
weapons give very high yield. Most of the yield is generated by the third stage. TN warhead have
far higher yield per unit mass of warhead, as well as consume smaller quantity of enriched fissile
material. This type of light weight warhead can be delivered over greater range even by a small
missile.
The POK-II tests demonstrated Indian mastery of fission and boosted fission nuclear weapons.
Thermonuclear experiment (Shakti-1) based credible warhead however requires confirmatory
test. Submarine compatible TN warhead also requires testing a TN design that uses only
enriched Uranium or super-grade Plutonium.
Public information and trade estimates indicate following types of Indian RV warheads:
1. Mk-4: For light weight 17Kt Fusion Boosted Fission (FBF) warhead5. Mass6: ~180 Kg7.
2. Mk-5: For 50Kt FBF or 200Kt Thermo Nuclear (TN) warhead8. Mass: ~340 Kg
3. Mk-6: For 150Kt FBF warhead9. Mass: ~550 Kg.
Table 1: Comparative destruction area
Warhead Yield Destruction w.r.t 17Kt
50 Kt 2.0
150 Kt 4.2
200 Kt 4.9
500 Kt 10.3
If India wants to accede to CTBT it must conclude following tests10 in next nuclear test series:
1. 5 to 7 tests involving FBF's and TN's warheads of 150 Kt and 300-500 Kt ranges
respectively.
2. 5 to 7 sub-Kt tests, to significantly improve the database for future ICF11 simulations.
Pending the verification of thermonuclear warhead the high-yield Boosted Fission warhead sets
the upper limit of Indian warheads, thus Indian missile range is often quoted for 1,000 Kg
payload.
ââ¬ÅIndia-US Civil Nuclear Agreementââ¬Â has for all practical purposes capped Indian ability to field test
and proof high yield nuclear weapons till some time in future (about 20 years) when Indian three
stage nuclear fuel cycle based on Thorium fuel matures into mainstream power production, thus
eliminating Indian dependence on imported nuclear fuel from NSG countries or if there is a
breakout in global nuclear test monitorium.
An alternative to field nuclear test for India is to test and validate the nuclear warheads by
building two or more National Ignition Test Facilities (NITF). Incidentally NIFT is also required for
stewardship of Indian Nuclear weapon.
Nuclear Stewardship and National Ignition Test Facilities
It is clear that nuclear weapons will continue to exist in world for the foreseeable future. In the
absence of underground testing, the reliability, safety, and effectiveness of the remaining
stockpile can be assured only through advanced computational capabilities and above-ground
experimental facilities.
Indian Nuclear Stewardship program will involve:
1. An organization that will stay potent and survive lifespan of todayââ¬â¢s weapon designers,
fabricators and maintainers
2. Laser driven ICF (Inertial confinement fusion) experimental facility that strives to compress
fissile and/or fusion fuel isentropically before raising its plasma temperature to reproduce high
energy régimes encountered in boosted fission and fusion weapons. It is a potent tool in the
hands of nuclear weapons physicists.
3. Two teams of numerical modeling physicists who for a given weapon design partition and
validate weaponââ¬â¢s behavior model experimentally in various energy regime using ICF and
computer modeling. At least two independent teams are required keep the deterrence honest
and true12.
4. Full experimental verification of FBF and Thermonuclear designs that couldnââ¬â¢t be tested in
previous six years due to geo-political constrains.
5. Ensure credible enduring stockpile in spite of fissile material aging, replacement pit, newer
and safer chemicals for explosive lenses, arming and inertial containment.
6. Develop and proof test newer thermonuclear warheads using newer schemes other than
traditional TN devices using piston driven shock with a thermal precursor. P5 and other
western nations are doing these experiments, including the Chinese who have a fine laser
facility13 in Shanghai and another one for classified studies. These are the first steps to
achieving the Holy Grail ââ¬â The FISSIONLESS TRIGGER.
7. Stay abreast with worldwide development of Fourth Generation weapons (Small yield fusion
nuclear weapons without fission chain reaction)14.
India requires two NITF facilities one for classified weapons programs and other for scientific
research in civil domain to unambiguously demonstrate Indian facilities and competence in high
energy physics to develop and test fusion weapons. This will make credible Indian high yield FBF
and TN weapons that are otherwise not field tested, thereby significantly increasing Indian
deterrence and at the same time reduces total number of weapons required for credible
deterrence. The NITF will cost the government about Rs.6,000 crore (US$ 1.3 billion).
Civil and Weapons Facility Separation
Indian weapons program has been intertwined with the nuclear power program to minimize cost
as well to leverage on each other, including beating US/NSG ban on export of dual use material.
ââ¬ÅIndia-US Civil Nuclear Agreementââ¬Â now acknowledges the Indian weapons program, yet unlike
the privileges enjoyed by other nuclear weapons states, it proscribes continued NSG enforcement
of global ban on export of dual use material/equipment to Indian classified program consisting of
not just weapons programs but also R&D of Thorium based 3 stage fuel cycle for power
generation. The continued embargo will thus impose high cost on weapons program as well as
thorium based electric power generation.
Per the separation plan most of the facilities will go to civilian side, yet the facilities in the
classified weapons side are fast approaching end of life thus requiring even more investments.
Lacking the investment of about US$ 30 billion over the next 5 years, it is clear that the nuclear
weapons program will be crippled. The above cost is for:
1. 7 -10 research reactors (150 MW modified and scaled up R-5/Dhruv design)
2. 3 - 4 heavy water plants15
3. 2 - 3 re-processing plants physically removed from the safeguarded sites
4. 2 - 3 fuel fabrication plants
5. Scientific facilities - hot cells, plutonium foundries, libraries etc.
6. Duplication and up gradation of scientific skills built on knowledge over 40 years
7. Laser Ignition ICF Facility including two independent design and review teams
8. Fast Breeder Reactor test facility
9. Physics collaboration programs in universities