Still on Alexandrian libraries. I forgot about the following last time...
Repeat of some old stuff collated by Michael Kalopoulos. Belongs here because it's more of "Christoterrorism Caught With Red Hands: Back When It Was Still Proud of It" -
Relevant bit in blue. (My insert in purple.) Also replaced angle brackets used in the original for content quoted from ancient sources with italic bookends and/or with embedding quotes.
http://web.archive.org/web/2006110808021...tail&id=21
1. The christians did NOT preserve it. But they destroyed it. Examples of evidence are in the above quoteblock and the preceding post.
2. Early christianism (and its corporeal body, christians) sucked out the Hellenistic host. It stole from Hellenismos and killed it. Completely. It was achieved through the process of inculturation: appropriation.
3. A great many centuries later, christians once more stole and stole and then stole again from Hellenismos (e.g. the philosophical aspect of Hellenismos, which is actually intrinsic and inseparable from it). And then christianism started claiming they preserved Greco(Roman) "culture".
So when christists today are inculturating (appropriating from) Hindu Dharma, it really ought to be a deafening wake up call for Hindus. Because this is exactly what christianism did to Hellenismos. Every aspect of the religious Hellene's life was copied and perverted, trivialised, inverted. All of these were mimicked in an ugly distorted mirror by the christoterrorists. Because christoism is not a religion (jeebus never existed) it has no creativity. Christianism can therefore only inculturate parasitically to gain what it does not have: a culture shell to surround its ideology with (acquired by first divorcing *heathen* culture from the very heathen religion it is innately part of) - and then kill the host heathenism.
Every single encroachment of christoism on Hindu religion should be recognised by Hindus for what it is: a step in christianism's process of destroying Hindu Dharma by first stealing from it. I.e. inculturation forms part of christianism's Replacement Theology.
- Hindus should stop feeling "complimented" by christists' thievery.
- They should stop feeling "glad" in their blind nationalism that christists are "integrating" and becoming more 'Indian'/'indigenous'. This is NOT integration, it is inculturation. It is a fatal stab wound administered by a dark-alley mugger/serial-killer. Then there's also church-mandated infiltration (not just inter-marriage, but also christian insinuation into Hindu events and into Hindus' company: they go out looking for events of heathens congregating, to insinuate themselves=their christianism into Hindus' lives. This too is church mandate by the way. And apparently missionaries' PhDs as well.)
- Hindus really ought to stop pretending that deeply Hindu (i.e. religious) things are merely 'Indian' or some unaffiliated 'culture' with a token Hindu prefix (or "Indian culture"), let alone something 'universal' to be shared with the rest of the world (Yoga etc).
Hmmm. There was one more thing on Chrysostom, the archbishop of Constantinople and a "Father of the Church" (= one of those early important christians who defined what christianism was) - who had railed against Alexandria's Temple of Serapis and its Library to further inflame his faithful christo sheep into destroying it. Like bishop Cyrillus, Chrysostom is yet another revered Santa:
http://freetruth.50webs.org/C1.htm
Repeat of some old stuff collated by Michael Kalopoulos. Belongs here because it's more of "Christoterrorism Caught With Red Hands: Back When It Was Still Proud of It" -
Relevant bit in blue. (My insert in purple.) Also replaced angle brackets used in the original for content quoted from ancient sources with italic bookends and/or with embedding quotes.
http://web.archive.org/web/2006110808021...tail&id=21
Quote:WERE THE FATHERS OF THE CHRISTIAN CHURCH PHILHELLENES?The bits above that aren't about the Alexandrian lib are included so that anyone unfamiliar will learn that the christians HATED all of Greek religion (including, as you see, Greek philosophy - which was part of Hellenistic religion). Christianism's hatred of Hellenistic religion (dubbed merely "Greek culture" as Indians do of Hindu Dharmic tradition) is important to remember because:
Saint Basil the Great, Bishop of Caesarea (alias Santa Claus)
"The Greeks are enemies, for they delight in devouring Israel with their mouth wide open"
"By mouth the prophet means (see Isaiah 9.11) the power of the sophists speech that will use every argument to confuse the simple believers"
> Saint Basil of Caesarea ON PROPHET ISAIAH
My Order is, (!!!) Show no cowardice when you are faced with the Greeks hypotheses, which resemble wood, or rather a used up torch that has lost its liveliness and all power of the wood, and neither does it display any more the torches glow. Indeed like extinguished, smoking torches they will stain black and dishonor he who would reach for them and bring tears to the eyes of those who would venture near them. The same effect has (The Greeks ) falsely named knowledge to the people who would use it
JOHN CHRYSOSTOM Archbishop of Constantinople
Should you look into (Greek ideas) you will see ashes and dust and nothing wholesome but a gaping grave that is the larynx (Of the Greek philosophers) and everything filled with impurities and pus, their doctrines swarming with vermin this is what the Greeks begot and expanded, taking over from the philosophers as for ourselves we will not resign from the fight against them.
> John Chrysostom (344-407AD) ON SAINT JOHN THE APOSTLE (SPEECH ÞÃâãÃâ) 59.369.12-370.11
Note the philobarbarian attitude of Saint John Chrysostom:
The more a nation looks barbaric and is estranged from Greek culture, the more our teachings shine this (faithful) barbarian has conquered the entire world and while all Greek culture is extinguished and destroyed, his (the barbarian s) shines brighter every day.
> Saint John Chrysostom TO JOHN 59.31.33
Saint John Chrysostom undermines the status of the library of Alexandria with torching statements:
Why therefore, should the Temple of Serapis (The Library of Alexandria) be considered sacred on account of the books? It should not be! but demons occupy the place rather these are ( the Greeks) demons themselves an invisible altar stands next to them on which human souls are sacrificed so understand and spread the word that demons occupy the place.
> John Chrysostom ADVERSUS JUDAEOS 48.851.38 to 852.35
Demons according to the wise Archbishop were the books of the Library of Alexandria and soul-sacrificing altars the Greek Libraries!
Accordingly the PATRIARCE OF ALEXANDRIA THEOPHILUS finally demolished the Library in 391 A.D.:
In Alexandria all the buildings of the Temple of Serapis had a fate similar to the poetic tales of the Giants during the Kingdom of Theodosius and presiding of Theophilus, the votive offerings were destroyed-And they fought the statues and the votive offerings so "valiantly" that they not only triumphed but stole them as well of the Temple of Serapis it was only the foundation stones they did not remove, and that because of the weight of the stones, that (the foundation stones) were immovable. These militant and avaricious "braves" considered the desecration to be a commendable act. Then we were invaded by so called monks, a sort of people, who lead a pig s life and are obviously deranged, perpetrating millions of unheard of evil acts, thinking these were acts of devotion.. At that time any man wearing a black robe had a tyrant s power and could perpetrate any ugly act in public. To this "virtue" were people transformed by the new religion.
> EUNAPIOS (346-414AD) VITAE SOPHISTORUM 6.11.4
(In the above, note the description of christianism and christians (=people possessed by christianism/jeebus) which the Hellene Eunapios has left us. Nothing has changed. It is the same today: e.g. the christoterrorist Deivanayakan who threatens to storm Kapaleeshwarar Kovil. Or compare the subtle "secular"-looking but very christist destruction of Hindu temples and sacred sites like Ramarsethu, Amarnath, Chidambaranatha Kovil and other Mandirams under the christist HR&CE 'temple' board <- compare that with the way the christoterrorist emperors of the 4th century systematically destroyed the Alexandrian Museum which contained the Royal Library of Alexandria: "The cutting off of imperial revenue by 4th century Christian Emperors sent the Museum into terminal decline." http://www.jesusneverexisted.com/hypatia.html
No, it's *not* coincidence. It is the proverbial frog being slowly boiled: the anti-Hindu process is so 'slow' and of such a vast scale and there's so much media-fog and secular-fog that the general Hindu is unable to add 2 and 2 together, since they first don't see that there are numbers to be added. And when they finally note one or two things happening - some blatant, some random-looking - they don't tie it to other similar events going on in the nation to notice that it is not a one-off, but part of a larger pattern. When they finally notice the larger trend, they blame some 'secular anti-Hinduism'. But anti-Hinduism, like all anti-heathenism, has a name. It's christoislamicommunism. But in cases like the systematic, secular-looking destruction of our temples and Hindu education centers etc, it is called CHRISTIANISM. But I forget: seculars are too sensitive to name the beast.)
[image caption (image not in archive page):] Library of alexandria
EUSEBIUS BISHOP OF CAESAREA IN PALESTINE (265-340AD)
Your poor and wretched people, you have raised from the manure of the Greek excrements and you have seated him among the Lords of Israel, his own people.
> Eusebius Praep Evang./ON PSALMS / HALLELUJAH. áÃâ¢ÃâÃâ(23.1352.34)
Relevant passages from the Writings of Eusebius:
"Abandoning the Greek follies is an act of wisdom."
"Abandon all the Greeks philosophers have proposed on the beginning of things."
"(The Greeks) perform witchcraft and therewith force the minds of persons".
"Their statues are created with witchcraft and they lead you to sorcery."
"Of ancient Hebrews and why we preferred their Scriptures over the Greek words."
"The Greeks benefited in everything from the barbarians."
"Thieves of ideas are the Greeks."
"Why after reasonable judgment and wise deliberation we admitted the truth of the Hebrew history."
> MIGNE PATROLOGY
GEORGE THE MONACHUS CHRONOGRAPHER
As for myself I consider the Greek culture nonsense, uttered by an evil demon and the saddest of affairs
> GEORGIUS MONACHUS Chronogr. ON THARRA
JOHN CHRYSOSTOM forbids use of Greek names
None must call his children the (Greek) ancestors names, be that of their father, their mother, their grandfather or their great grandfather, but instead you must use those of the righteous (of the Old Testament)
> John Chrysostom De inani gloria et de educandis liberis (690) 641.65
John Chrysostom recruited mercenaries to systematically demolish the Greek majestic buildings:
John the Great (Chrysostom) gathered monks inflamed with the zeal of the Lord (fanatical monks), armed them with royal mandate and sent them against the heathen (Greek) shrines. The money paid to those working in demolition and to their assistants he did not obtain from the royal treasury (!) but from wealthy ladies he convinced to contribute so they would obtain the blessing of the Lord with the splendor of their faith. In this way he razed to the ground the rest of the buildings (Temples, monuments, graves, houses).
> THEODORETUS ECCLESIASTICAL Ãâ¢Ã£Ã¤Ãâ HISTORY TO DAMASIUS (Vol.5, 329/8-330/8)
1. The christians did NOT preserve it. But they destroyed it. Examples of evidence are in the above quoteblock and the preceding post.
2. Early christianism (and its corporeal body, christians) sucked out the Hellenistic host. It stole from Hellenismos and killed it. Completely. It was achieved through the process of inculturation: appropriation.
3. A great many centuries later, christians once more stole and stole and then stole again from Hellenismos (e.g. the philosophical aspect of Hellenismos, which is actually intrinsic and inseparable from it). And then christianism started claiming they preserved Greco(Roman) "culture".
So when christists today are inculturating (appropriating from) Hindu Dharma, it really ought to be a deafening wake up call for Hindus. Because this is exactly what christianism did to Hellenismos. Every aspect of the religious Hellene's life was copied and perverted, trivialised, inverted. All of these were mimicked in an ugly distorted mirror by the christoterrorists. Because christoism is not a religion (jeebus never existed) it has no creativity. Christianism can therefore only inculturate parasitically to gain what it does not have: a culture shell to surround its ideology with (acquired by first divorcing *heathen* culture from the very heathen religion it is innately part of) - and then kill the host heathenism.
Every single encroachment of christoism on Hindu religion should be recognised by Hindus for what it is: a step in christianism's process of destroying Hindu Dharma by first stealing from it. I.e. inculturation forms part of christianism's Replacement Theology.
- Hindus should stop feeling "complimented" by christists' thievery.
- They should stop feeling "glad" in their blind nationalism that christists are "integrating" and becoming more 'Indian'/'indigenous'. This is NOT integration, it is inculturation. It is a fatal stab wound administered by a dark-alley mugger/serial-killer. Then there's also church-mandated infiltration (not just inter-marriage, but also christian insinuation into Hindu events and into Hindus' company: they go out looking for events of heathens congregating, to insinuate themselves=their christianism into Hindus' lives. This too is church mandate by the way. And apparently missionaries' PhDs as well.)
- Hindus really ought to stop pretending that deeply Hindu (i.e. religious) things are merely 'Indian' or some unaffiliated 'culture' with a token Hindu prefix (or "Indian culture"), let alone something 'universal' to be shared with the rest of the world (Yoga etc).
Hmmm. There was one more thing on Chrysostom, the archbishop of Constantinople and a "Father of the Church" (= one of those early important christians who defined what christianism was) - who had railed against Alexandria's Temple of Serapis and its Library to further inflame his faithful christo sheep into destroying it. Like bishop Cyrillus, Chrysostom is yet another revered Santa:
http://freetruth.50webs.org/C1.htm
Quote:St John Chrysostom: He hated Greek civilization and was bent upon its destruction. He gathered monks to destroy ancient Greek buildings and their "idols". Like many another Churchfather, he was a great anti-semite who added much to the Church's teachings on the matter. He was also an advocate of slavery. And like Bishop Eusebius, John was a well-known author of outrageous Christian fiction which he passed off as fact. He was also a self-confessed proponent of lying:So Chrysostom is anti-semite, pro-slavery, destroyer of Temples and images of Gods and heathen libraries, and liar for gawd? Of course he's a christian saint.
Quote:"Do you see the advantage of deceit? ...
For great is the value of deceit, provided it be not introduced with a mischievous intention. In fact action of this kind ought not to be called deceit, but rather a kind of good management, cleverness and skill, capable of finding out ways where resources fail, and making up for the defects of the mind ...
And often it is necessary to deceive, and to do the greatest benefits by means of this device, whereas he who has gone by a straight course has done great mischief to the person whom he has not deceived."
-- St John Chrysostom, in Treatise On The Priesthood, Book 1"
Link http://www.jesusneverexisted.com/lying.htm
Death to traitors.

