07-28-2010, 01:07 AM
RE: UPA now admits Saraswati existed
Good! Now they have to admit that the earth revolves around the sun and not the "son" or SG! That will be a difficult task. Don't these people know that the Atharva Veda explicitly states that it was written on the banks of the Saraswati, which was the great river (often called a "Samudra" in some ancient texts) whose tributaries were the other two great rivers-the Sutlej and the Yamuna. Going by recent satellite data, it appears likely that the present day Rann of Kutch was the delta of the Saraswati river and referring to the Saraswat as a "mythological" or "fabled" river is tantamount to fraud and disinformation!
Good! Now they have to admit that the earth revolves around the sun and not the "son" or SG! That will be a difficult task. Don't these people know that the Atharva Veda explicitly states that it was written on the banks of the Saraswati, which was the great river (often called a "Samudra" in some ancient texts) whose tributaries were the other two great rivers-the Sutlej and the Yamuna. Going by recent satellite data, it appears likely that the present day Rann of Kutch was the delta of the Saraswati river and referring to the Saraswat as a "mythological" or "fabled" river is tantamount to fraud and disinformation!