Removing The Sheen From Buddhism

[HareKrishna]

[quote name='Husky' date='29 July 2010 - 05:47 PM' timestamp='1280405372' post='107678']



But why are you so adamant in trying to establish a Saguna-only Parabrahman independent of/at the expense of (denying) the Nirguna Brahman?

If you were merely attached exclusively to the Saguna Parabrahman, it would be possible for you to turn only to that and simply not think of the Nirguna (like a great many traditional Hindoos have successfully done; it is not *necessary* for them). But the fact that you want to de-link it entirely - in contradiction to what remains very much established Hindoo religion - suggests something else.



[/quote]

I didnt see were I denied the nirguna and propose only saguna. <img src='http://www.india-forum.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/blink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':blink:' />

It seems for me that you minimize the saguna at the expense of nirguna.

I just that exist a person that is the source of all other persons.Brahman is also one and also many .But that one it doesn't mean only the nirguna aspect.

I didnt make that up ,just like you i pointed to the hindu writings that say so.

As you say ,hinduism has multi-views.Anyway i think we do here,hair splitting activity.