08-05-2010, 09:36 PM
AV,
Why are you such a predictable comedian? Read what I wrote, dude. I was mocking your hyper unrealism: your extending invites to parties* you can't afford to host (not to mention a zillion other impossibilities tied to them, even if your opponent were serious.)
*And yes, your "Feel free to talk to me in person if you have the guts" is specifically an invitation for confrontation: because actual talking in person would require no guts (nor would talking even require a face-to-face meeting; besides, people can already 'talk' on a forum, and that's exactly what IF is. You were fishing with that ridiculous grandstanding finale of yours: it's typical teenager talk.
But I note at least your verbal rabies is gone for now. Perhaps it wasn't as chronic as was suspected?)
Until then, I'm just going to have let go of your address, PM and all.
(Ooh I know, I could blackmail you into giving me the money anyway: to prevent me from publicising the address you so foolishly sent me. It would be a suitable lesson for you on Internet Stupidity And Why To Avoid It. Tragically, the annoying Ethics Commission - known more formally as "IF Admin" - may frown for the Unethics involved. Thwarted in every way.)
(Of course I support Civil Unions: I'm an equal opportunity Husky.)
About this, though:
(While there is some innovation/contribution of Shankara in this area, I really ought to revisit his views before I can confidently parrot my earlier statements on the subject. But - sadly - I have no interest in revisiting anything at present.)
Why are you such a predictable comedian? Read what I wrote, dude. I was mocking your hyper unrealism: your extending invites to parties* you can't afford to host (not to mention a zillion other impossibilities tied to them, even if your opponent were serious.)
*And yes, your "Feel free to talk to me in person if you have the guts" is specifically an invitation for confrontation: because actual talking in person would require no guts (nor would talking even require a face-to-face meeting; besides, people can already 'talk' on a forum, and that's exactly what IF is. You were fishing with that ridiculous grandstanding finale of yours: it's typical teenager talk.
But I note at least your verbal rabies is gone for now. Perhaps it wasn't as chronic as was suspected?)
Quote:Check your messages, you can reach me at that address if you wish and it's for your use only.Sure OK. But then, where's the other half of the deal for me to show up to your little teenage high school fight/drama/musical? Like I said: no money, no show.
Quote:We know how "serious" you are with those terms. I won't be paying for your travel expenses.Oh look, you can do Reading and Comprehension. And yet you sent me an address anyway.... What's with that?
Quote:I have plenty of training to defend myself incase you initiate any aggression.And yet none of this can happen until I see my money first.
Until then, I'm just going to have let go of your address, PM and all.
(Ooh I know, I could blackmail you into giving me the money anyway: to prevent me from publicising the address you so foolishly sent me. It would be a suitable lesson for you on Internet Stupidity And Why To Avoid It. Tragically, the annoying Ethics Commission - known more formally as "IF Admin" - may frown for the Unethics involved. Thwarted in every way.)
Quote:hey love-birds,love declaration give them on pm not forum.Romani, you romantic heart, you sound so single, what with the hint of jealousy and all. But there's really no need: there was never any competition, as you're so *obviously* better matched with Agnivayu. I never stand in the way of True Love: you can (and must) have him - it's ordained! - and with all my best wishes for your combined future.
(Of course I support Civil Unions: I'm an equal opportunity Husky.)
About this, though:
Quote:The world as maya was the teaching of ShankaraShankara did not invent that. It is part of Shaktam (and not exclusively Shaktam) that this is Maya.
(While there is some innovation/contribution of Shankara in this area, I really ought to revisit his views before I can confidently parrot my earlier statements on the subject. But - sadly - I have no interest in revisiting anything at present.)