Can't remember if all the following characters were covered on this thread already. As seen at the link to follow:
Admiral Ramdas + wife Lalita Ramdas + their spawn Kavita Ramdas + her Paki husband and islamic offspring + Lalita's brother + his wife the muslimah.
http://rajeev2004.blogspot.com/2010/08/n...ugust.html
The comments:
http://rajeev2004.blogspot.com/2009/09/j...s-for.html
this bit from Radha Rajan:
Ain't cryptoism grand. And that's why exposing people's ideological motivations - i.e. their christoislamicommuni "sympathies" or rather identities - would have been useful (~2 decades ago).
A little sidetracking, but cryptos with Hindu names reminded me: recently came across a link - I think via acta indica? - on an "Indian journalist" and cryptochristist on fire for jeebus called "Vishal Arora", complete with his openly hyper-evangelical connections like wife etc. Of course he doesn't want to publicly admit to being on fire for jeebus. And that is why heathens should expose just *that* aspect of cryptos. Everything else becomes self-destructive collusion.
At least this Vishal Arora admits to being a christian - once his religious affiliation are brought to light - but it's his wife's affiliations that show the extent of what motivates these people in everything they do, especially everything they (wish to) appear as doing "secularly". <- There is no such thing as "secular" anti-heathen activism in christoislamaniacs. It is always religiously/ideologically motivated.
And more generally: when it comes to christoislamism, spouses are always indicative. And that's why exposing the spousal connection - such as with Lalita Ramdas' brother and her daughter Kavita Ramdas, such as with the christianism of both wives of N.Ram - is always ... enlightening to those (who ought to be) concerned.
Anyway, when the ideologies driving people are not transparent (and are kept hidden), the onlooking audience - assuming impartiality where there is none in reality - can easily be manipulated into drawing the wrong conclusions. E.g. in the case of the original article of this post: "Oh, how sweet, Indian Hindu people and Paki muslim people are joining hands under a unified identity of Friends of South Asia to work towards bringing about peace. Obviously they are the Good Guys."
Something that's self-evident, but it doesn't hurt to explicitly state it: [color="#0000FF"]there is no such thing as a Hindu married to a christoislamic. Whatever else it may or may not be, it's not a Hindu.[/color] By definition.
I recently read somewhere that Aristotle left behind this: "Tolerance and apathy are the last virtues of a dying society."
Sounds about right. (Actually, I'd make that last bit "a practically dead society".)
And is modern de-Hinduising India, apathetic as it now is towards all Dharmic interests, not suddenly "mystifyingly" the most tolerant towards inter-marriage with christoislamania - when in all preceding Hindu generations, the family would very Dharmicly break all ties with such traitors and would never recognise these as Hindus (because they specifically aren't Hindu for marrying into something that is in its very essence inimical to the Hindu religion - i.e. christoislamism). And this is but symptomatic of the larger error, which originates in how de-Hinduising India is tolerant towards the religion of christoislamism itself (and is incapable of any other position than tolerance, because it was programmed into exactly this attitude, which is but the other aspect of the de-Hinduisation/secularisation process): everything from protectionism to outright defence/apologetics is to be witnessed.
And saying No to christoislamania - which is the natural Hindu reaction-mechanism/anti-body - is now decried as "intolerant, fundamentalist, communalist" by even the seculars of Hindu parentage. When, in reality, such a reaction is simply Hindu (and more than Hindu, it is universally "heathen"). All response/behaviour contrary to this is simply the effects of subversion.
Admiral Ramdas + wife Lalita Ramdas + their spawn Kavita Ramdas + her Paki husband and islamic offspring + Lalita's brother + his wife the muslimah.
http://rajeev2004.blogspot.com/2010/08/n...ugust.html
Quote:nice place to drop a neutron bomb: August 14 in SF: Joint Celebration of India and Pakistan's Independence days
aug 9th, 2010
you can get a whole lot of the appeasers, wagah candle-holders, and other assorted traitors and useful idiots in one fell swoop.
why aren't vijay prashad, angana, and biju mathew not present, i wonder? more pressing engagements -- like pressing their lips to pakistani bottoms?
why are there so many addled cockamamie hindu women (eg. lalita ramdas who coyly does not mention that she is married to a mohammedan pakistani) [color="#800080"](actually, her daughter)[/color] involved in this nonsense? notice that every single pakistani woman speaks up for pakistan's interests, but half the indian hindu women do too.
[color="#800080"](But they're *not* Hindus: people aren't Hindus just 'cause their names are still Hindu. There are many seculars with Hindu names in India. And, nowadays, many christians besides - wandering around with stolen Hindu names.
Moreover, people who bat for christoislamism are by definition not Hindus: they are anti-Hindus and always traitors. Hence Lolita Rammdas and her daughter Cavity are both islamaniacs, just like her husband and brother.)[/color]
must be something in the education system in india.
[color="#800080"](Yeah. It's called de-Hinduisation. 1) Hindu -> 2) Cultural-Hindu/Nationalist -> 3) nationalist/patriot [i.e. sentimentality] -> 4) secular/general disinterest and apathy -> 5) psecular/crypto anti-Hindu -> 6) public christoislamaniac.
The point of no return happened in step 2 - with the de-Hinduisation of the Hindu. The rest simply followed, usually taking place from one generation to the next. Humans are strange ideological creatures. Some weed of an ideology always takes the place when a space is created.)[/color]
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Tatiana Deogirikar <tanya@stanford.edu>
[color="#800080"](What an "interesting" name.)[/color]
Date: 2010/8/9
Subject: August 14 in SF: Joint Celebration of India and Pakistan's Independence days
To: Center for South Asia <southasia@lists.stanford.edu>
On the 64th Anniversary of Pakistan and India's Independence
[color="#0000FF"]Friends of South Asia and Global Fund for Women[/color]
[color="#800080"](Really? So, will the women of the globe actually get to see these funds? Hmmm?)[/color]
invite you to
We Refuse to Be Enemies:
A panel discussion on the peace process between India and Pakistan
[color="#800080"](Where peace, as we're told, means islam. (But islam does not mean peace, of course: the meaning is not two-way. Islam means submission. So the sentence actually reads: "A panel discussion on the submission process btw India and Pukestan.)[/color]
[...]
The comments:
Quote:4 Comments
Close this window
Jump to comment form
rraajjeevv said...
Lalita Ramdas is the wife of Admiral L Ramdas. It is their daughter, Kavita Ramdas who is married to a Pakistani.
8/09/2010 10:13 AM
KapiDhwaja said...
Where is 'South Asia' btw, can't find it on the map. Tried google earth too:-)
8/09/2010 11:22 AM
abhijna said...
Ms. Lalita Ramdas married to Ret. Adm. L. Ramdas. Their daughter (Kavita Ramdas) married to a Pakistani. I am not sure whether she converted to Islam or not, but her daughter's name is a typical Muslim name.
Anyway, Ms. Lalita Ramdas's brother married to a Muslim woman. May be you should go through this article.
www.rmaf.org.ph/Awardees/Biography/pdfbio/RamdasLax.pdf
8/09/2010 12:43 PM
M. Patil said...
This Ramdas family is a disgrace to Hindu community and India.
b.t.w the crowd at these South Asian events is sparce. There is more crown at family gatherings in Bay Area. South Asian tag is just for SAJA type folks, not for highly qualified and high achieving Desis.
8/09/2010 9:26 PM
http://rajeev2004.blogspot.com/2009/09/j...s-for.html
Quote:that idiot admiral ramdas -- his daughter married a paki, and now he's the pakis' biggest ambassador in india.I'm sure he was always Pukestan's ambassador. And that's why his wife and brother-in-law are perfect for him, and the apple didn't far fall from the tree: his daughter is a Mrs Paki and granddaughter is a muslimah.
this bit from Radha Rajan:
Quote:Defaming the army and the police takes me back to two events -- the meeting that Nirmala Deshpande and Admiral Ramdas arranged in madras with 150 Pakistanis among whom were retired army men. One of them, Gen.Karamat Ali declared, don't take too much pride in your army. There will come a day when your army will be as defamed as the Pakistani army.Ramdas is buddies with Nirmala Deshpande who works with that infiltrator smarmy uglyface ("swamy Agnivesh") who works closely with evangelicals. All anti-Hindus motivated by their individual ideologies to destroy heathenism which stands in their way of dar-ul-islam/India-for-jeebus/communotopia.
Ain't cryptoism grand. And that's why exposing people's ideological motivations - i.e. their christoislamicommuni "sympathies" or rather identities - would have been useful (~2 decades ago).
A little sidetracking, but cryptos with Hindu names reminded me: recently came across a link - I think via acta indica? - on an "Indian journalist" and cryptochristist on fire for jeebus called "Vishal Arora", complete with his openly hyper-evangelical connections like wife etc. Of course he doesn't want to publicly admit to being on fire for jeebus. And that is why heathens should expose just *that* aspect of cryptos. Everything else becomes self-destructive collusion.
At least this Vishal Arora admits to being a christian - once his religious affiliation are brought to light - but it's his wife's affiliations that show the extent of what motivates these people in everything they do, especially everything they (wish to) appear as doing "secularly". <- There is no such thing as "secular" anti-heathen activism in christoislamaniacs. It is always religiously/ideologically motivated.
And more generally: when it comes to christoislamism, spouses are always indicative. And that's why exposing the spousal connection - such as with Lalita Ramdas' brother and her daughter Kavita Ramdas, such as with the christianism of both wives of N.Ram - is always ... enlightening to those (who ought to be) concerned.
Anyway, when the ideologies driving people are not transparent (and are kept hidden), the onlooking audience - assuming impartiality where there is none in reality - can easily be manipulated into drawing the wrong conclusions. E.g. in the case of the original article of this post: "Oh, how sweet, Indian Hindu people and Paki muslim people are joining hands under a unified identity of Friends of South Asia to work towards bringing about peace. Obviously they are the Good Guys."
Something that's self-evident, but it doesn't hurt to explicitly state it: [color="#0000FF"]there is no such thing as a Hindu married to a christoislamic. Whatever else it may or may not be, it's not a Hindu.[/color] By definition.
I recently read somewhere that Aristotle left behind this: "Tolerance and apathy are the last virtues of a dying society."
Sounds about right. (Actually, I'd make that last bit "a practically dead society".)
And is modern de-Hinduising India, apathetic as it now is towards all Dharmic interests, not suddenly "mystifyingly" the most tolerant towards inter-marriage with christoislamania - when in all preceding Hindu generations, the family would very Dharmicly break all ties with such traitors and would never recognise these as Hindus (because they specifically aren't Hindu for marrying into something that is in its very essence inimical to the Hindu religion - i.e. christoislamism). And this is but symptomatic of the larger error, which originates in how de-Hinduising India is tolerant towards the religion of christoislamism itself (and is incapable of any other position than tolerance, because it was programmed into exactly this attitude, which is but the other aspect of the de-Hinduisation/secularisation process): everything from protectionism to outright defence/apologetics is to be witnessed.
And saying No to christoislamania - which is the natural Hindu reaction-mechanism/anti-body - is now decried as "intolerant, fundamentalist, communalist" by even the seculars of Hindu parentage. When, in reality, such a reaction is simply Hindu (and more than Hindu, it is universally "heathen"). All response/behaviour contrary to this is simply the effects of subversion.