Quote:I do not think she needs to read anything. Question that "the experts" need to
figure out is, a point which Angela tries alluding to albeit not strongly
enough, accent in European languages would never have been understood and made
into a law by Verner without taking help from Sanskrit. Every time Verner got
stuck in trying to figure out where to put stress he had to seek help from
sanskrit.
What this means is that the fundamental issues related to the structure of
european languages would never have been understood if it was not for sanskrit.
It is bizzare that "learned people" do not understand this and this is the same
group which is hanging on to Aryan invasion theory for dear life.
I will try and give an analogy. Suppose an arab/european comes and tells a Hindu
"you know what arabs taught you the numerals and even the zero!". Hindu would
laugh at him and shake his head and walk away. Now the arab/european is pissed
and says alright it is ok if you don't believe us but we are certain that "we
all" learned numerals from common "proto numeral knowers who even knew the proto
zero!"
-Shivraj
By contrast, in monotheism, the phantasm and shadow race (the israeilite, the aryan) is used as a mask for imperial subjugation. But, in reality (i.e., at a deeper level), the construct is one of defeat and admission, as the above shows..
What is surprising is how the construct can reproduce itself while being plainly ironic, satiric, and self-flagellating at the most obvious level.. for example, mohammad bargains down the number of prayers and abraham had done the same when he dissuaded the lord god from smiting some waywards. Either, the progenitor of Islam (i.e, the RCC) was aware of the ironic instance in which their Deity is shown as a powerless, fake, and a sham and they do not take their construct as seriously as presumed; or the construct can reproduce itself at the level of discourse.. Thus, Liguistics and statistics, the two authentically normative disciplines, are the refuges of these shams...