08-23-2010, 09:15 AM
[quote name='Husky' date='22 August 2010 - 02:48 AM' timestamp='1282462817' post='108019']
Your original sentence was perfectly fine, it was clear even then that you were
In choosing to comment with reference to it, I was merely stressing the same ridiculous position we're in and our hopelessly ineffectual response (petitioning), but unfortunately didn't copy the rest of your containing sentence which made your point obvious.
Selective assassination.... If only we were like the Israelis eh, and didn't give a hoot about public opinion concerning our handling of all the threats standing in the way of the indigenous people's collective future.
Now wouldn't that be something. De-colonised at last. When everyone else is acting out of selfish (ideological/religious) interests in Indian territory, Hindus/other Dharmics seem adamant in their reticence to do anything, let alone the necessary, to remotely safeguard their own future. At best - and this itself shows the degree of how desperate is our state - we muster some non-distinct "nationalist" motivation, which more often than not ends up including our very enemies in the fold, even as the said enemies never leave the opportunity to pounce on this unnatural identity as a means to attack us (e.g. "they're saffron fundamentalist communal Hindu nationalists oppressing our poor christoislamiterrorist selves").
We lack the will to resist, or sometimes - the even more fundamental problem: - the recognition that these are situations that demand resistance from us.
The enemy when outside the gate is easy to recognise and beat off. E.g. the tyranical christo colonial powers were recognisably not one of ours, and the Indian resistance came naturally. And the same vis-a-vis islamania earier.
But, like with Rome, the enemies are now inside. They look like us, they have taken our labels and claim indigenousness through local ancestry (even as they have rejected the fundamental identity of that ancestry, which actually renders them anything but indigenous), and then they make impossible demands of Hindus that they would *never* accord to us (even in fraction) when the tables are reversed. Parasitic demands which, even as it benefits them, are simultaneously meant to destroy us.
We are paving the way to our own destruction since, by complying (even though unwillingly), we are feeding christoislamism - not merely tolerating its growing presence. All the money, all the compromises that Hindu society has been making/been forced to make towards christoislamism are enabling it to grow faster. And are simultaneously cutting the ground from beneath our own feet. We retreat, they advance.
It is brainwashing into secularism (christoconditioning) that has made this "miracle" possible.
[/quote]
Thought this was relevant:
Your last statement is very true, even a majority of so called English educated Hindu "activists" are brainwashed.
Note the amount of ink and effort they waste on the Christian vs Muslim issue of Cordoba House which has very little relevance to us. These are the same people who won't lift a finger about this very important issue of Veda Pathashala's. All because they have been brainwashed by the American narrative of USA being the "land of the free and home of the brave" etc and don't even have the wisdom to note whose interests they are serving when they ally themselves with the various Christian kooks who lead the opposition to this Muslim building.
I had asked them why Cordoba house is so offensive yet Christians building Churches all over US after genociding the Natives is fine. Surely if one is offensive the other should be even more offensive for it had not stopped with a terrorist act but committed an outright genocide over whole continents. Never got an answer.
To these kind of people it is fine if future generations of Hindus forget Vyasa and Valmiki and repeat the latest trendy fads from the West, just as long as there is no Muslim takeover they are happy.
Your original sentence was perfectly fine, it was clear even then that you were
In choosing to comment with reference to it, I was merely stressing the same ridiculous position we're in and our hopelessly ineffectual response (petitioning), but unfortunately didn't copy the rest of your containing sentence which made your point obvious.
Selective assassination.... If only we were like the Israelis eh, and didn't give a hoot about public opinion concerning our handling of all the threats standing in the way of the indigenous people's collective future.
Now wouldn't that be something. De-colonised at last. When everyone else is acting out of selfish (ideological/religious) interests in Indian territory, Hindus/other Dharmics seem adamant in their reticence to do anything, let alone the necessary, to remotely safeguard their own future. At best - and this itself shows the degree of how desperate is our state - we muster some non-distinct "nationalist" motivation, which more often than not ends up including our very enemies in the fold, even as the said enemies never leave the opportunity to pounce on this unnatural identity as a means to attack us (e.g. "they're saffron fundamentalist communal Hindu nationalists oppressing our poor christoislamiterrorist selves").
We lack the will to resist, or sometimes - the even more fundamental problem: - the recognition that these are situations that demand resistance from us.
The enemy when outside the gate is easy to recognise and beat off. E.g. the tyranical christo colonial powers were recognisably not one of ours, and the Indian resistance came naturally. And the same vis-a-vis islamania earier.
But, like with Rome, the enemies are now inside. They look like us, they have taken our labels and claim indigenousness through local ancestry (even as they have rejected the fundamental identity of that ancestry, which actually renders them anything but indigenous), and then they make impossible demands of Hindus that they would *never* accord to us (even in fraction) when the tables are reversed. Parasitic demands which, even as it benefits them, are simultaneously meant to destroy us.
We are paving the way to our own destruction since, by complying (even though unwillingly), we are feeding christoislamism - not merely tolerating its growing presence. All the money, all the compromises that Hindu society has been making/been forced to make towards christoislamism are enabling it to grow faster. And are simultaneously cutting the ground from beneath our own feet. We retreat, they advance.
It is brainwashing into secularism (christoconditioning) that has made this "miracle" possible.
[/quote]
Thought this was relevant:
Quote:Some fall into the trap of setting traps for others, by referring to 'National Issues' centered solely on expanding the rule of the Modern Greek State. This confidence trick is related to the swindle that considers innumerable Hellenic-descended people as Turks or Italians, simply because they are not Orthodox Christians and do not reside within the borders of the Modern Greek State.
An Ethnos is not defined simply on the basis of a country's political borders and may be smaller or greater than that defined by them. We therefore inform those who would present issues centered on which state a piece of land or sea belongs to as 'National'; that the Pontians, the Muslim converts of Asia Minor, the latinised Southern Italians and the native Pomaks belong to the Hellenic Ethnos. Whereas, many Orthodox Christians, who just happened to fall within certain borders, do not belong to it. The state idiotically and dishonestly defies historical facts and with great cunning identifies 'Hellenism' with 'Orthodoxy', for itself and the Church it serves.
http://ysee.gr/index-eng.php?type=english&f=faq#10
Quote:Firstly, an important point that Sitaram Goel and Ram Swarup brought to the fore should be remembered here: Hindus are by definition a nation. It is the sanAtana dharma that gives them their nationhood. The geography that they occupy is secondary to the role of the sanAtana dharma. The geography of India is important today because it constitutes the natural habitat of the Hindus.
However, this habitat of the Hindus has been historically attacked by the two violent monotheisms and its safety is compromised. The freedom from the British reign did not result in a freedom from the Hindu mind. Sadly rather than re-establishing a state under the natural principles of sanAtana dharma, fooled by the West the founders of the new Indian empire established a secular state. The result of this secular state is a further defanging of the Hindus. Secularism has eroded Hindu traditions that are the only scaffold of India- if we wanted a secular state we did not require freedom from the British. We could have happily continued under the secular rule of a Western powers, after all England and the rest of Europe were secularizing. We needed freedom only to have a state under dharma not under secularism. But now secularism has had an even more threatening aspect: It denuded the spirit of dharma amongst the Hindus and replaced it with crap in the form puerile Hindi cinema, blind imitation of the West like the proverbial jackal with a blue hide in viShNusharmanââ¬â¢s tale, decadence of brahminical social leadership, and atheism a direct consequence of secularism. In contrast it embolded the two monotheists to act with impunity funded respectively by their Western evangelist and Middle Eastern Ghazi masters.
http://manasataramgini.wordpress.com/200...rata-safe/
Your last statement is very true, even a majority of so called English educated Hindu "activists" are brainwashed.
Note the amount of ink and effort they waste on the Christian vs Muslim issue of Cordoba House which has very little relevance to us. These are the same people who won't lift a finger about this very important issue of Veda Pathashala's. All because they have been brainwashed by the American narrative of USA being the "land of the free and home of the brave" etc and don't even have the wisdom to note whose interests they are serving when they ally themselves with the various Christian kooks who lead the opposition to this Muslim building.
I had asked them why Cordoba house is so offensive yet Christians building Churches all over US after genociding the Natives is fine. Surely if one is offensive the other should be even more offensive for it had not stopped with a terrorist act but committed an outright genocide over whole continents. Never got an answer.
To these kind of people it is fine if future generations of Hindus forget Vyasa and Valmiki and repeat the latest trendy fads from the West, just as long as there is no Muslim takeover they are happy.
Quote:The country is a Palimpsest. Barbarians are writing over the scrapped history and culture of Hellas. . . . Greek children and students sing the praises of Christian saints, some of them with abominable records of anti-Hellenism, but barely know the poetry, or even the names of, Homeros, Hesiodos, Aischylos, Sophocles.
http://mq.dukejournals.org/cgi/reprint/19/1/97