[quote name='Bharatvarsh2' date='25 August 2010 - 04:22 AM' timestamp='1282689899' post='108051']
"Moderate" Muslim Amir Khan:
[/quote]Aamir Khan = other (Indian) islamaniac males.
And exactly the same as every Indian christomaniac female (male): all the kids get baptised. <- But for some reason that last goes over the heads of the secular 'Hindu' (wo)men who marry them (though from what I can tell, it seems more common for 'Hindu' men to marry christowomen - mainly because the church has explicitly planned it that way: Stupid Pagan Men - Partie Deux).
Either way, they don't see that the only reason the christoislamaniac spouse allows their 'religious freedom', if at all they allow that much, is because it is at the expense of the religious freedom (or, rather, freedom to be Hindu) of the entire next generation - i.e. their brood. These alleged 'Hindus' essentially sold their kids away upon marriage, and then - mystifyingly - count themselves lucky in doing so: "Look how my christoislamaniac spouse let's me be a Hindu, so you see there is no religious bigotry in our inter-religious marriage (minus the fact that all our kids have to be islamic/christist). We're all very secular."
Secular, yes. Because Hindus never marry christoislamaniacs. By definition. De-Hinduised kaffirs are a danger to themselves and everyone. Hindu society ought to ostracise these people. They made their choice, let them live and die with it.
Anyway, wasn't there was some IF member who once complained on IF's "recent updates" list about why there were suddenly all these foreign people hired for bollywood movies, and that foreign movies would in return only cast Indjuns in SlumMovies?
A recent very pleasant TV program reminded of something sort of related.
Why complain about foreigners in bollywood - 'full-blooded' foreigners, presumably - when a lot of Indian cinema is half so already?
Off the top of my head, from various sources:
- 1/2 Scottish, extreme Catholic christist Lara Dutta
- 1/2 Italian, 1/4 Portuguese, 1/4 Indian Catholic christist Dino Morea
- 1/2 british Katrina Kaif slow turn to islam-sympathiser (Her dad's 'Kashmiri' muslim - which means he can be anything ethnically. Anyway, one needs religion to obtain a national identity for this foreign person, since India works with religious/ideological identities and Indians are most comfortable with people having clear religious identities. Same reasoning for Diya Mirza getting an 'Indian' surname.)
- 1/2 German non-religious ("should I be Hindu like my mum, christian like my dad or muslim like my current stepfather") Diya 'Mirza' Handrich
- 1/2 Iranian, 1/2 Syrian Catholic christist John Abraham (claims a Parsee woman married his dad - blunder).
- 1/2 German Parvathi Melton (or something) - she moved to India to do bollywood movies. No idea as to religious affiliation, but am not guessing.
- 1/2 Polish Catholic (or other type christist) Lisa Ray
- there were a few more that had come to me, but I've forgotten already while typing the above. But blablabla. Need I go on?
(Notice also the pattern in religion. If there's a single 'Hindu' parent in the mix, the offspring is still never Hindu. Then again, the same results when a traditional Hindu accidentally gets married to a cultural-only Hindu. A type of unacceptable accident that unfortunately seems to be on the rise for some inconceivable reason.)
If the people chosen to hog the screen were good looking, that would at least be something. But bollywho can't even manage that. They keep getting uglier characters with every new addition. So there's the destitute man's Natalie Portman wannabe-lookalike in Lara Dutta, "her face is sooo long when will I see the end of it" Katrina Kaif, "why are my eyebrows so far apart, maybe I should pencil a few more in between" John Abraham, etc. (<- Sorry, all that was almost cruel. But then, they're the ones shoving their bland faces on TV: so I can fairly critique when I accidentally catch eyesores, can't I?) But then, to be fair, are there *any* goodlooking actors in bollywho? Where do they dig these people up.
Anyway, so yeah, why do people complain about 'foreigners', when Indian film-making with plain-model-turned-talentless actors (practically everyone in the above list) is in love with half-foreign already. Why not go the whole hog. Apparently it finds actual Indians too ugly, even if representative, and obviously it figures any indigenous audience is supposedly unable to bear watching Indians. (Or this large influx of semi-alien is calculated social engineering. Don't know/don't care.) And so, IMO, they should at the minimum get some actually *attractive* half-foreign people for a change, or better yet: go full foreign. (Last I heard, Jessica Alba wanted to "do" Bollywood. At least she cares about the environment. Or something. So, there you go, bollywho scored 1 volunteer.) Bring in the foreign contingent, say I. At last Indians can get some *good* looking people on the islam-usurped Indian silver screen and christomedia (the last is most famous for its really bad English with their invented=unnatural accents).
Not that anyone with a choice or else taste was watching: lame plots, bad acting with uglier actors, bad music, below zero taste and mental subversions all make bollywho even worse than the junk America keeps spinning out (if one can imagine that). But at least America on occasion makes good sci-fi. I take it back then: foreign actors should remain on foreign soil where there's a *chance* for proper acting opportunities. Bollywho is *the* lamest screen production factory. Evah. Bar none.
There was a time when Indian cinema was actually decent to excellent. But all things actually Hindu has been booted out of visible Indian visual media-production and only seculars and religious/ideological terrorisms are making movies now, even daring to occasionally encroach on 'Hindu' themes (only to subvert them - such as the various perversions of "Ramayana" and other epics etc. being produced by christist channels in India. The seculars likewise invariably manage to turn Hindu goldmines into junk metal when they turn their vapidness on it. <- The level of junk in the metal is proportional to the degree of de-Hinduisation of the secular 'Hindu'. See various garbage productions called "Ramayana" and "Mahabharata" and their spin-offs today, including those marketed for kids. People actually like this? *Hindus* actually like this? Have they sold all taste? Did they have any taste? Do I need an answer.)
Here comes my brilliant scheme (I'm not saying it is feasible, but brilliant it IS):
Indian screens/TV ought to steal the Number One Treasure Of England (David Attenborough, is there any other). For the duration of India keeping him, we can waive the accruing interest on the Hindu jewels stolen by christoBritain. It's a fair deal. Anyway, he loves nature, sincerely and appreciatively smiles at animals, says sensible things, imparts exciting, useful and interesting information [facts!], naturally opted for the superior atheism that resulted upon dumping unnatural christianism, isn't uppity about heathens and their heathenism=Gods. He appreciates life. What's not to like. He will light up our screens! (We may get momentarily blinded by his natural dazzling, only 'cause we weren't used to such good programming.) Plus his stuff is wholesome goodness. He can replace all of bollywho and Indian christomews channels - they are all garbage anyway - and no one would look back twice after the initial surprise. His lovely narration can be subtitled into Bharatiya languages for broadcast and help more people become perfectly literate in their pristine language, all while they learn about our wondrous natural world.
One Stolen Jewel *Can* Give Joy To A Billion. (<- Okay, I was never good at making up tag lines.)
More realistically, Indian channels with any Hindus influencing their content can broadcast re-runs of Attenborough's many doco series on the natural world.
And then I won't have to complain about the bleh faces, the baaad hyper-insipid 'progressive' (regressive) 'Indian' christoislamicommunisecular programming and the strained efforts at various *concocted* unIndian accents in attempted "English" flashing across channel-zapped Indian TV, but will actively tune in to watch.
"Moderate" Muslim Amir Khan:
Quote:Did you face any religious dilemma while you were married to a Hindu lady Reena Dutta and later on to Kiran Rao?
No, none whatsoever. We never practiced each other's religion neither did we force each other to do so. But, of course, I had made it very clear that my kids will always follow only Islamic religion.
http://www.santabanta.com/cinema.asp?pid=39457
[/quote]Aamir Khan = other (Indian) islamaniac males.
And exactly the same as every Indian christomaniac female (male): all the kids get baptised. <- But for some reason that last goes over the heads of the secular 'Hindu' (wo)men who marry them (though from what I can tell, it seems more common for 'Hindu' men to marry christowomen - mainly because the church has explicitly planned it that way: Stupid Pagan Men - Partie Deux).
Either way, they don't see that the only reason the christoislamaniac spouse allows their 'religious freedom', if at all they allow that much, is because it is at the expense of the religious freedom (or, rather, freedom to be Hindu) of the entire next generation - i.e. their brood. These alleged 'Hindus' essentially sold their kids away upon marriage, and then - mystifyingly - count themselves lucky in doing so: "Look how my christoislamaniac spouse let's me be a Hindu, so you see there is no religious bigotry in our inter-religious marriage (minus the fact that all our kids have to be islamic/christist). We're all very secular."
Secular, yes. Because Hindus never marry christoislamaniacs. By definition. De-Hinduised kaffirs are a danger to themselves and everyone. Hindu society ought to ostracise these people. They made their choice, let them live and die with it.
Anyway, wasn't there was some IF member who once complained on IF's "recent updates" list about why there were suddenly all these foreign people hired for bollywood movies, and that foreign movies would in return only cast Indjuns in SlumMovies?
A recent very pleasant TV program reminded of something sort of related.
Why complain about foreigners in bollywood - 'full-blooded' foreigners, presumably - when a lot of Indian cinema is half so already?
Off the top of my head, from various sources:
- 1/2 Scottish, extreme Catholic christist Lara Dutta
- 1/2 Italian, 1/4 Portuguese, 1/4 Indian Catholic christist Dino Morea
- 1/2 british Katrina Kaif slow turn to islam-sympathiser (Her dad's 'Kashmiri' muslim - which means he can be anything ethnically. Anyway, one needs religion to obtain a national identity for this foreign person, since India works with religious/ideological identities and Indians are most comfortable with people having clear religious identities. Same reasoning for Diya Mirza getting an 'Indian' surname.)
- 1/2 German non-religious ("should I be Hindu like my mum, christian like my dad or muslim like my current stepfather") Diya 'Mirza' Handrich
- 1/2 Iranian, 1/2 Syrian Catholic christist John Abraham (claims a Parsee woman married his dad - blunder).
- 1/2 German Parvathi Melton (or something) - she moved to India to do bollywood movies. No idea as to religious affiliation, but am not guessing.
- 1/2 Polish Catholic (or other type christist) Lisa Ray
- there were a few more that had come to me, but I've forgotten already while typing the above. But blablabla. Need I go on?
(Notice also the pattern in religion. If there's a single 'Hindu' parent in the mix, the offspring is still never Hindu. Then again, the same results when a traditional Hindu accidentally gets married to a cultural-only Hindu. A type of unacceptable accident that unfortunately seems to be on the rise for some inconceivable reason.)
If the people chosen to hog the screen were good looking, that would at least be something. But bollywho can't even manage that. They keep getting uglier characters with every new addition. So there's the destitute man's Natalie Portman wannabe-lookalike in Lara Dutta, "her face is sooo long when will I see the end of it" Katrina Kaif, "why are my eyebrows so far apart, maybe I should pencil a few more in between" John Abraham, etc. (<- Sorry, all that was almost cruel. But then, they're the ones shoving their bland faces on TV: so I can fairly critique when I accidentally catch eyesores, can't I?) But then, to be fair, are there *any* goodlooking actors in bollywho? Where do they dig these people up.
Anyway, so yeah, why do people complain about 'foreigners', when Indian film-making with plain-model-turned-talentless actors (practically everyone in the above list) is in love with half-foreign already. Why not go the whole hog. Apparently it finds actual Indians too ugly, even if representative, and obviously it figures any indigenous audience is supposedly unable to bear watching Indians. (Or this large influx of semi-alien is calculated social engineering. Don't know/don't care.) And so, IMO, they should at the minimum get some actually *attractive* half-foreign people for a change, or better yet: go full foreign. (Last I heard, Jessica Alba wanted to "do" Bollywood. At least she cares about the environment. Or something. So, there you go, bollywho scored 1 volunteer.) Bring in the foreign contingent, say I. At last Indians can get some *good* looking people on the islam-usurped Indian silver screen and christomedia (the last is most famous for its really bad English with their invented=unnatural accents).
Not that anyone with a choice or else taste was watching: lame plots, bad acting with uglier actors, bad music, below zero taste and mental subversions all make bollywho even worse than the junk America keeps spinning out (if one can imagine that). But at least America on occasion makes good sci-fi. I take it back then: foreign actors should remain on foreign soil where there's a *chance* for proper acting opportunities. Bollywho is *the* lamest screen production factory. Evah. Bar none.
There was a time when Indian cinema was actually decent to excellent. But all things actually Hindu has been booted out of visible Indian visual media-production and only seculars and religious/ideological terrorisms are making movies now, even daring to occasionally encroach on 'Hindu' themes (only to subvert them - such as the various perversions of "Ramayana" and other epics etc. being produced by christist channels in India. The seculars likewise invariably manage to turn Hindu goldmines into junk metal when they turn their vapidness on it. <- The level of junk in the metal is proportional to the degree of de-Hinduisation of the secular 'Hindu'. See various garbage productions called "Ramayana" and "Mahabharata" and their spin-offs today, including those marketed for kids. People actually like this? *Hindus* actually like this? Have they sold all taste? Did they have any taste? Do I need an answer.)
Here comes my brilliant scheme (I'm not saying it is feasible, but brilliant it IS):
Indian screens/TV ought to steal the Number One Treasure Of England (David Attenborough, is there any other). For the duration of India keeping him, we can waive the accruing interest on the Hindu jewels stolen by christoBritain. It's a fair deal. Anyway, he loves nature, sincerely and appreciatively smiles at animals, says sensible things, imparts exciting, useful and interesting information [facts!], naturally opted for the superior atheism that resulted upon dumping unnatural christianism, isn't uppity about heathens and their heathenism=Gods. He appreciates life. What's not to like. He will light up our screens! (We may get momentarily blinded by his natural dazzling, only 'cause we weren't used to such good programming.) Plus his stuff is wholesome goodness. He can replace all of bollywho and Indian christomews channels - they are all garbage anyway - and no one would look back twice after the initial surprise. His lovely narration can be subtitled into Bharatiya languages for broadcast and help more people become perfectly literate in their pristine language, all while they learn about our wondrous natural world.
One Stolen Jewel *Can* Give Joy To A Billion. (<- Okay, I was never good at making up tag lines.)
More realistically, Indian channels with any Hindus influencing their content can broadcast re-runs of Attenborough's many doco series on the natural world.
And then I won't have to complain about the bleh faces, the baaad hyper-insipid 'progressive' (regressive) 'Indian' christoislamicommunisecular programming and the strained efforts at various *concocted* unIndian accents in attempted "English" flashing across channel-zapped Indian TV, but will actively tune in to watch.
Death to traitors.