Ayodhya

[acharya]

Summary of the Ayodhya title dispute judgement delivered by Allahabad

High Court today.



1. Whether the disputed site is the birth place of Bhagwan Ram?

The disputed site is the birth place of Lord Ram. Place of birth is a

juristic person and is a deity. It is personified as the spirit of

divine worshipped as birth place of Lord Rama as a child. Spirit of

divine ever remains present every where at all times for any one to

invoke at any shape or form in accordance with his own aspirations and

it can be shapeless and formless also.





2. Whether the disputed building was a mosque? When was it built? By whom?

The disputed building was constructed by Babar, the year is not

certain but it was built against the tenets of Islam. Thus, it cannot

have the character of a mosque.



3. Whether the mosque was built after demolishing a Hindu temple?

The disputed structure was constructed on the site of old structure

after demolition of the same. The Archaeological Survey of India has

proved that the structure was a massive Hindu religious structure.



4. Whether the idols were placed in the building on the night of

December 22/23rd, 1949?

The idols were placed in the middle dome of the disputed structure in

the intervening night of 22/23.12.1949.





5. Whether any of the claims for title is time barred?

O.O.S. No. 4 of 1989, the Sunni Central Board of Waqfs U.P., Lucknow

and others Vs. Gopal Singh Visharad and others and O.O.S. No.3 of

1989, Nirmohi Akhara and Another Vs. Sri Jamuna Prasad Singh and

others are barred by time.





6. What will be the status of the disputed site e.g. inner and outer courtyard?

It is established that the property in suit is the site of Janm Bhumi

of Ram Chandra Ji and Hindus in general had the right to worship

Charan, Sita Rasoi, other idols and other object of worship existed

upon the property in suit. It is also established that Hindus have

been worshipping the place in dispute as Janm Sthan i.e. a birth place

as deity and visiting it as a sacred place of pilgrimage as of right

since time immemorial.



After the construction of the disputed

structure it is proved the deities were installed inside the disputed

structure on 22/23.12.1949. It is also proved that the outer courtyard

was in exclusive possession of Hindus and they were worshipping

throughout and in the inner courtyard (in the disputed structure) they

were also worshipping. It is also established that the disputed

structure cannot be treated as a mosque as it came into existence

against the tenets of Islam.

- Info. from an e group