BJP Future - 7

[Bharatvarsh2]

[quote name='Swamy G' date='08 October 2010 - 12:02 PM' timestamp='1286556899' post='108748']

Yup, I can guess based on your rants and whines here. There is no way in hell can I take you to a comprehension class. If the suggestion is for BJP to reach out, it does not preclude Muslims behavior.



Such fanatic thinking has done a whole lot more harm to us Hindus over centuries. Sad.

[/quote]

"fanatic thinking" <img src='http://www.india-forum.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' /> more like realistic assessment of the situation.



Notice that you couldn't answer any of my questions regarding these alleged "moderate Muslims" or the Muslim behavior pattern in post independence India.



When getting exposed call the other guy "fanatic", typical commie and secular tactic.



The thinking that has done by far the most damage is the "thinking" displayed by dumbasses like you who want to hold the nation hostage to the whims of a 14% fanatical group. The same tactic of "reaching out" was tried by the Congress before partition which far from placating Muslims only incited them to more fanaticism because they rightly realized that only weaklings will go court a minority even after getting spat upon.



Your kind was the same people who prevented the sensible and far less bloody solution of population exchange as proposed by Ambedkar with your multi culti dreams.

December 30, 1939



(A disciple There are some people who object to “Vande Mataram” as a national song. And some Congressmen support the removal of some parts of the song.



In that case the Hindus should give up their culture.



The argument is that the song speaks of Hindu gods, like Durga, and that is offensive to the Muslims.



But it is not a religious song: it is a national song and the Durga spoken of is India as the Mother. Why should not the Muslims accept it?[2] It is an image used in poetry. In the Indian conception of nationality, the Hindu view would naturally be there. If it cannot find a place there, the Hindus may as well be asked to give up their culture. The Hindus don't object to “Allah-ho-Akbar”....



Why should not the Hindu worship his god? Otherwise, the Hindus must either accept Mohammedanism or the European culture or become atheists....



I told C. R. Das [in 1923] that this Hindu-Muslim question must be solved before the Britishers go, otherwise there was a danger of civil war. He also agreed and wanted to solve it....



Instead of doing what was necessary the Congress is trying to flirt with Jinnah, and Jinnah simply thinks that he has to obstinately stick to his terms to get them. The more they try, the more Jinnah becomes intransigent.



May 28, 1940



Have you read what Gandhi has said in answer to a correspondent? He says that if eight crores of Muslims demand a separate State, what else are the twenty-five crores of Hindus to do but surrender? Otherwise there will be civil war.



(A disciple I hope that is not the type of conciliation he is thinking of.



Not thinking of it, you say? He has actually said that and almost yielded. If you yield to the opposite party beforehand, naturally they will stick strongly to their claims. It means that the minority will rule and the majority must submit. The minority is allowed its say, “We shall be the ruler and you our servants. Our harf [word] will be law; you will have to obey.” This shows a peculiar mind. I think this kind of people are a little cracked.



http://voiceofdharma.com/books/ir/IR_part5.htm

(Sri Aurobindo I am sorry they are making a fetish of this Hindu-Muslim unity. It is no use ignoring facts; some day the Hindus may have to fight the Muslims and they must prepare for it. Hindu-Muslim unity should not mean the subjection of the Hindus. Every time the mildness of the Hindu has given way. The best solution would be to allow the Hindus to organize themselves and the Hindu-Muslim unity would take care of itself, it would automatically solve the problem. Otherwise, we are lulled into a false sense of satisfaction that we have solved a difficult problem, when in fact we have only shelved it.



http://voiceofdharma.com/books/ir/IR_part3.htm

Aurobindo must have been one huge fanatic!



Get a life, instead of lecturing here go lecture your local mullah about the virtues of reaching out to the "kaffirs".