Islamism - 7

[Husky]

This is going to be disturbing. With no apologies.



2 posts.





Christoislamism. Episode: "More Equal" Part I



Islamic brotherhood. Their casta system in action. How Indonesian islamic maids and male African sex slaves of faithful islamic Saudis fare. The former non-Arabian muslims get brutally tortured and the latter get brutally murdered. Meanwhile, the Saudis themselves - non-existent allah's Chosen, Mohammed the Puppet's Own - get away scottfree, if they can.

And then there are the kaffiri victims.



People would probably have heard, but in case you didn't -





1. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-11764129

Indonesian president condemns Saudi torture of maid



Indonesian President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono has demanded justice for the "extraordinary torture" of an Indonesian maid in Saudi Arabia.



Sumiati Binti Salan Mustapa, 23, is in a stable condition in a hospital.



Her injuries include gashes to her face and cuts to her lips, allegedly inflicted by her employers using scissors. She was also burned with an iron, officials say.



Mr Yudhoyono said he would send a team to Saudi Arabia to investigate.



The young woman went to Saudi Arabia four months ago to look for work.



A doctor at a hospital in Medina where she is being treated told the Saudi Gazette that Sumiati was unconscious when admitted and "was wounded from head to toe".



The Saudi Gazette reported that she had had skin cut from her head and would need plastic surgery.



"I want to convey the very shocking news about what happened to an Indonesian in Saudi Arabia," Mr Yudhoyono told a cabinet meeting.



"I have instructed the foreign minister to handle it seriously. Sumiati was subjected to extraordinary torture. I want justice to be upheld. I want all-out diplomacy," he said.

Harsh conditions



On Monday the Indonesian government summoned the Saudi ambassador.



"We conveyed our stand and condemned what happened," said Foreign Minister Marty Natalegawa.



"The Saudi government also condemned it and considered the action to be inappropriate and a violation of humanity. Together, we'll ensure that the party responsible is punished."

(*But of course* they will. See the rest of this post and the next below. The list of victims is endless. And the terrorist islamaniacs at the top of the islamic casta hierarchy keep getting away with it.)



Rights organisations say many foreign domestic maids in Saudi Arabia work in harsh circumstances and often suffer abuse from their employers.



The Saudi Labour Ministry has in the past acknowledged some problems, but the government also says foreign workers' rights are protected under Islamic law.

(Yeah sure, "protection under islamic law" which repeatedly declares that the lesser islamics "deserved it." And the kaffirs... well, kaffirs come later in this post-session.)

And 2 years back:



2. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7415290.stm

Thursday, 22 May 2008 16:47 UK



Saudi maid verdict 'outrageous'



Ms Miyati's condition was compelling physical evidence of abuse, HRW says





Human Rights Watch has called on Saudi judges to overturn a decision to drop charges against a Saudi couple accused of severely abusing an Indonesian maid.



A judge in Riyadh awarded $670 damages to the maid, Nour Miyati, but dropped all charges against her employers.

(Wow 670 dollars. That makes it all better doesn't it? Because islam/non-existent allah certainly thinks it does.)



The female employer, who admitted the abuse and was originally sentenced to 35 lashes, had her sentence overturned.



Human Rights Watch said the ruling on Monday was "outrageous", and sent "a dangerous message" to Saudi employers.



Ms Miyati, 25, contracted gangrene after allegedly being tied up for a month and left without food in 2005. She had to have several fingers and toes amputated.



New York-based Human Rights Watch called for an appeals court to "impose stiff penalties on the employers, including imprisonment, and payment of significant financial compensation".



Saudi officials have not commented on the report.

(Of course not. No one thought they would, except when they come out to pronounce that the most favourite of allah, those faithful islamics of Arabia, are free of all charges - for being islamics of Arabia.)



'Impunity'



Human Rights Watch says Ms Miyati was treated in a Riyadh hospital in March 2005 for gangrene, malnourishment and other injuries.



All charges against Ms Miyati's male employer were dropped early in the investigation, Human Rights Watch says.



On Monday a Riyadh judge found the female employer not guilty, despite her earlier admission and "compelling physical evidence", the group says.



(Now here it comes. Recall how a muslimah's witness is 1/4 that of her male counterpart? Here's an example of what the witness of non-Arab muslims is worth when facing off in court against the highest casta muslims - mohammed's own



A prior Saudi judgement, subsequently overturned, had seen Ms Miyati convicted of falsely accusing her employers and sentenced to 79 lashes.

(Very like how, in islamaniac pardeesiacs, muslimah rape victims get sentenced to death for "their adultery", and the islamaniac rapists get rewarded - sorry, slip - 'awarded' the token few lashes, if that.)



Human Rights Watch said the latest ruling "sends a dangerous message to Saudi employers that they can beat domestic workers with impunity and that victims have little hope of justice".



Rights organisations say many foreign domestic maids in Saudi Arabia work in harsh circumstances and often suffer abuse by their employers.



The Saudi Labour Ministry has acknowledged some problems, but the government also says foreign workers' rights are protected under Islamic law.

Good old Beeb News for parroting that last line of what the Al Faithful Saudi Labour Ministry always says - note that line is the same as the last line of the previous article. BeebNews still living in the age of the tape recorder when it comes to apologetics.





3. And now here is what happens to male African muslims under the power of the more priviliged muslims of Arabia. The news item is well-known, I'm sure: faithful Saudi prince brutally murders his male islamic African sex slave. "Because he can." Because aren't Arabian faithfuls of islam mohammed's own? But this happened in Britain. And Sharia isn't ruling Britain just yet.

There was a video of the islamofascist's habitual mistreatment of the poor unfortunate (a part of the evidence in the court-case), but no sane creature wants to see that.

Anyway, first Al Faithful tried to duck the charge of preying upon men: because among the lower/poorer ranks at least, islam is supposed to be very strict about gayness. And because islam doesn't appreciate men of the upper islamic castas being all open about their sexually assaulting men - public flaunting of islamic terrorism against the oppressed male converts seems so much like the famed christo hypocrisy then. And aren't christoislamaniacs all supposed to be busy hypocritically pretending that homosexuality is a crime and stone people for it. So this kind of publicity just doesn't sell islamania all that well. Hence the initial denial by the Upper Faithful.

More recent news will tell it like it is, but first the older:



http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/wor...5934802604

Saudi prince denies servant sex murder in London

David Brown From:The Times October 06, 2010 11:35AM



A SAUDI prince strangled his servant during a sexually motivated attack in their London hotel suite after beating him throughout their three-week stay in Britain, the Old Bailey was told yesterday.



Prince Saud bin Abdulaziz bin Nasir al Saud, 34, has admitted unlawfully killing Bandar Abdulaziz after visiting a restaurant together on Valentine's Day.



The Prince, a grandson of King Abdullah, and Mr Abdulaziz arrived in London on January 20 after visiting several other countries. While the Prince travelled business class his companion flew economy to London, the court was told.



Jonathan Laidlaw, QC, for the prosecution, said: "They did not travel as equals or friends. Bandar was treated as an aide or servant. He would beat Bandar up and the abuse was not confined to physical violence, there was a sexual element to it as well."



Hotel staff noticed that Mr Abdulaziz, 32, always walked a couple of steps behind the Prince and that they rarely spoke to each other.



The Prince told police that he was not homosexual but detectives discovered that he had been visited by two gay escorts at the Landmark Hotel in Marylebone. Both carried out a sex act on the Prince, the court was told.



On the night of the killing the Prince asked the hotel concierge to make bookings for them at the Chinawhite or Whisky Mist nightclubs. The men visited the Jumeirah Carlton Hotel in Knightsbridge for drinks before having dinner at the Signor Sassi restaurant.



As they left the restaurant a CCTV camera appeared to record the Prince kicking his servant in the street, the court heard.



When they returned to the Landmark Hotel the Prince ordered a bottle of champagne in the bar and six shots of a cocktail before they went to their suite.



Prince Saud called the Saudi Arabian Embassy at 3.30pm the following day to say that Mr Abdulaziz was unwell. He initially told police that his servant had been robbed while withdrawing 3000 euros from a cash machine before claiming that he had fallen in their bedroom after drinking.



[color="#0000FF"]A post-mortem examination found that Mr Abdulaziz was strangled and had head and abdominal injuries as the result of punching or kicking. It showed he had been bitten on his cheeks and possibly his ears, which one expert said might have a sexual element, the court was told.



Traces of his blood were found throughout the suite and in a room where the men had initially stayed at the Landmark, the court was told.[/color]



Detectives discovered that the Prince's laptop computer had been used to visit websites of gay escorts and saunas. They also found semi-naked pictures of Mr Abdulaziz on the Prince's mobile telephone and discovered a copy of the 2009 Spartacus International Gay Guide in their hotel room.



There was one double bed in the suite shared by the men and there were occasions when the two men might have shared it, the court heard.



During the investigation police recovered security camera footage from the hotel lift which allegedly showed the Prince beating his servant twice in the lift in the weeks before the killing.



The footage played in court showed Mr Abdulaziz offering no resistance while he was punched repeatedly in the head and body. Mr Laidlaw said: "What is evident from the victim's behaviour is that by this point he is almost entirely submissive. He could not or did not at any stage offer any sort of resistance."



Prince Saud denies murdering Mr Abdulaziz on February 15 and causing him grievous bodily harm with intent on January 22. The jury was told that it has to decide if the attack on February 15 was manslaughter or murder.



The trial continues.

Why again do islamic African-origin citizens in America want to be part of this religion? It's the same as christianism. Can they even *tell*? The converted Africans of Africa have no choice. They've been forced into this prison, even when they had bravely resisted in the past.

But in America, the converts originating in sub-saharan Africa can be free. Why this willing slavery to a non-existent demon gawd and to a 'brotherhood' possessed by it, one that takes delight in torturing and destroying them? I just don't understand. They can be free. And they choose to not to be.



As already stated, more recent news tells of what has been revealed/established since about the murder case. Links to the following can be found at the same source as above:

Related Coverage



Saudis may seek killer Prince transfer

The Australian, 20 Oct 2010

(Anyone else note a recurring pattern in islamoarabians' response to their crimes against muslims lower in the islamic casta system? (And same in their crimes against heathens 'servants'.)



Saudi prince jailed for killing servant

Adelaide Now, 20 Oct 2010

(Except that faithfuls of his casta seek to transfer him, see above.)



Saudi prince guilty of sex attack murder

The Australian, 19 Oct 2010



Saudi prince murdered gay 'slave'

Adelaide Now, 19 Oct 2010



Prince guilty of murdering servant

Adelaide Now, 19 Oct 2010

And so:

4. http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/global-filipi...der-london

Saudi prince jailed for life for servant's murder in London

Agence France-Presse

Posted at 10/20/2010 7:11 PM | Updated as of 10/20/2010 7:11 PM





LONDON, United Kingdom - A Saudi prince, the grandson of King Abdullah, was jailed for life by a British court Wednesday for murdering his male servant in a brutal attack at a London hotel after a long campaign of sexual abuse.



Saud Bin Abdulaziz Bin Nasir al Saud, 34, was ordered to serve a minimum of 20 years by a judge at London's Old Bailey, also known as the Central Criminal Court.



"It is very unusual for a prince to be in the dock on a murder charge. No one in this country is above the law," judge David Bean told Saud as he sentenced him.

(Well, until the Sharia is implemented in Englestan. <- It's why the Engelsen shouldn't be wanting the Sharia. Because islamaniacs become Above the law then.)



The court convicted Saud on Tuesday of beating and strangling Bandar Abdullah Abdulaziz to death on February 15 at the culmination of a lengthy period of sexual violence towards his employee.



"It would be wrong for me to sentence you either more severely or more leniently because of your membership of the Saudi royal family," added the judge.



Saud -- whose mother is a daughter of Saudi Arabia's king -- had tried to claim diplomatic immunity when he was arrested following the discovery of his servant's body in their shared suite at the luxury Landmark hotel.



He reportedly had a diplomatic passport but Britain's Foreign Office confirmed he had no diplomatic status when asked by police.

(Tee hee hee.)



The two-week trial heard that Saud was fuelled by champagne and cocktails when he murdered the 32-year-old Abdulaziz in a ferocious attack after the pair had returned from a Valentine's Day night out.



The victim, also a Saudi, was left with severe injuries including bite marks on both cheeks which prosecutors said showed a clear "sexual element" to the killing.



The prince's lawyers argued that he could face the death penalty in Saudi Arabia over the revelations of homosexuality aired at the trial.

(So? He'll get executed.)



Saud had denied murder and a second charge of grievous bodily harm with intent in relation to an earlier alleged assault in a hotel lift that was captured on CCTV footage. He had admitted manslaughter.



The prince had claimed the pair were friends and that he was heterosexual, but the court heard the prince had ordered gay escorts in London and had frequently looked at websites for gay massage parlours and escort agencies.



Prosecutors said he repeatedly assaulted Abdulaziz and that two attacks were captured on CCTV by the hotel lift. The victim was so worn down by the violence that he let Saud kill him without a fight, they said.

(Poor, poor victim.

But here comes the 'revelation' of how a free man was made a victim of islamania. Rather like how islamic slavery and its slave markets famously lasted all the way into the first half of the 20th century. Did I say first half. I meant Until Even Now



Witnesses had told the court that Bandar -- an orphan who was adopted into the family of a low-ranking civil servant in Jeddah -- was treated "like a slave".

(Obviously it's the mercy of allah and his casta system - I mean, his islamaniac brotherhood.

The abuse must indeed have lasted a long time, no wonder he gave up resisting his murder.)



A post-mortem found Abdulaziz had suffered chipped teeth, heavy blows to the head, injuries to the brain and ears and severe neck injuries consistent with strangulation by hand, the trial heard.

Remember the revelations from not so long ago about the male sex slaves (including "ethnic" males, such as Africans etc) 'employed' by the faithfuls of the Vatican? Involved with the "Papal Gentlemen" or something? Whatever, news items on that are in the christianism thread. But just goes to show that

christianism = islamism = torture, slavery and tyranny.



But the subtopic was islam for the moment. So what was the spiel about 'islam being a brotherhood' or something again? I am sure people all over the free world puke absolutely every time they hear that pox of a joke.



But puke later. Because there's more to come.