12-09-2010, 10:52 PM
While it is clear that the Christian tyrants (aka British) managed to murder at a faster rate keep in mind that India also had a higher population in 19th century than it did during Muslim rule.
Let's say Muslims killed 10 million out of a total of 50 million and Christians 25 out of 150 million, that's 20% for the former and 17% for the latter.
So when you account for that the contest becomes closer though the Christians might still manage to win out in the end.
Though overall there is no doubt that the British Xtians did far more damage. Consider for example that hardly any Hindu today has a gun at home where as even at the height of Muslim tyranny India was teeming with weapons which Hindus used for their resistance. It just shows you how thoroughly successfull they were in disarming Hindus and also brainwashing them so that in so called "independent" India the same Xtian inspired laws are followed to keep Hindus unarmed.
The Brits were also far more thorough in mental colonization.
Let's say Muslims killed 10 million out of a total of 50 million and Christians 25 out of 150 million, that's 20% for the former and 17% for the latter.
So when you account for that the contest becomes closer though the Christians might still manage to win out in the end.
Though overall there is no doubt that the British Xtians did far more damage. Consider for example that hardly any Hindu today has a gun at home where as even at the height of Muslim tyranny India was teeming with weapons which Hindus used for their resistance. It just shows you how thoroughly successfull they were in disarming Hindus and also brainwashing them so that in so called "independent" India the same Xtian inspired laws are followed to keep Hindus unarmed.
The Brits were also far more thorough in mental colonization.