This is probably old news to others here and has likely been discussed to death in some IF thread. But I just saw this and thought it was worth posting nevertheless.
Very scary (but not unforeseen) stuff.
Wow they're moving fast to consolidate their grip of death and to utterly undermine Hindus in Hindus' own land. (Stove suddenly turned up more on The Frog In The Frying Pan.)
http://rajeev2004.blogspot.com/2011/05/c...-only.html
What's most amazing of all is that despite The Most Undemocratic behaviour by a govt - over and over again - Hindus no doubt think that all this anti-Hinduness can still be sorted out democratically. (The way the tyranny of the christoBrits, the christoPortuguese and the Mughals/other islamic tyrannies were democratically brought to a halt?)
Very scary (but not unforeseen) stuff.
Wow they're moving fast to consolidate their grip of death and to utterly undermine Hindus in Hindus' own land. (Stove suddenly turned up more on The Frog In The Frying Pan.)
http://rajeev2004.blogspot.com/2011/05/c...-only.html
Quote:Friday, May 27, 2011
Communal Violence Bill punishes only the Majority Community says Arun Jaitley
may 27th, 2011 CE
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From:
Date: Fri, May 27, 2011 at 3:38 PM
Subject: Communal Violence Bill punishes only the Majority Community says Arun Jaitley
To: esams Nayyar <esamskriti@suryaconsulting.net>
Key points
[color="#0000FF"]1. Law and Order is a state subject. If it becomes Law then the Centre would usurp the authority of States.
2. The Bill assumes that communal riots are caused by the Majority community only. Note the Indian Constitution does not define the word 'Minority'.
3. Rape is punishable under this bill if the lady belongs to a minority group. If lady is Hindu she is not covered by this bill.
4. So also A 'hate propaganda' is an offence against minority community and not otherwise.
5. No member of the minority community can be punished under this act for having committed an offence against the majority community.
6. Terrorists from the minority community shall create communal riots instead of terror strikes because they cannot be tried under this Law since assumption is only Hindus riot.[/color]
Wish the NAC and Courts spend time on convicting those responsible for Bomb Blasts in India starting with 1993 Mumbai blasts where case is pending with the Supreme Court for nearly 3 years.
Also read:
1. Who is a Minority by sanjeev nayyar - http://www.esamskriti.com/essay-chapters...ity-1.aspx
2. Religious Apartheid in Modern India: Transforming of a Civilisation by Dr M Muthuswamy - http://www.esamskriti.com/essay-chapters...ion-1.aspx
sanjeev
http://www.rediff.com/news/column/arun-j...110526.htm
BJP leader Arun Jaitley [ Images ] argues that it is a dangerous and discriminatory bill which presumes that the majority community is always to blame for communal violence
A draft of a proposed legislation titled 'Prevention of Communal and Targeted Violence (Access to Justice and Reparations) Bill, 2011' has been put in the public domain. The draft bill ostensibly appears to be a part of an endeavour to prevent and punish communal violence in the country.
... deleted
Posted by nizhal yoddha at 5/27/2011 07:13:00 AM
Reactions:
3 comments:
Inferno said...
This post has been removed by the author.
5/28/2011 2:34 AM
Vijay said...
Would Jaitley/BJP raise this issue during election times? Not likely. All are after the minority votes.
5/28/2011 3:38 AM
m said...
Pakistan's anti-blasphemy law is implicitly anti-hindu, curtails free speech but it does not apply to a group clash; However, India's CVB is explicitly anti-hindu, automatically assumes that a hindu is guilty, and curtails free-speech and criticism directed at non-hindu faiths. In many respect, CVB is Supra Blasphemy law.
6/22/2011 5:09 PM
(That's why it's a *christian* bill. Islam/TSP is just not that clever/capable - of getting away with murder in broad daylight. Christianism IS.
Only christoislamism makes anti-Hindu laws. Only christianism has the brazenness to (1) come up with blatant and exclusively anti-Hindu - plus peculiarly pro-violent christoislami 'minority' - laws and (2) to pretend such laws are "secular" while getting to walk away unidentified as christianism. It's how you can *tell* it's christianism - if finger-pointing were allowed, that is.)
What's most amazing of all is that despite The Most Undemocratic behaviour by a govt - over and over again - Hindus no doubt think that all this anti-Hinduness can still be sorted out democratically. (The way the tyranny of the christoBrits, the christoPortuguese and the Mughals/other islamic tyrannies were democratically brought to a halt?)
Death to traitors.