http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/ar...403057.ece
You know, it's irresponsible for people to have children and then off yourself. You can either (a) off yourself (with or without reason - up to you) OR - exclusive OR - (b ) get happily married+have children. NOT (a) AND then (b ). I thought everyone knew this.
But the news piece does at least show that some - everyday - people actually care less about themselves (yet also care less/insufficiently about their own families - tsss, who cares about kids, right?) than they do for other people. And they're at least ready to prove that they mean business: after all, she did - oh-so-foolishly and so wastefully - kill herself over this uh sloganised 'cause' (it doesn't mean what she thinks it means/it isn't what it's made out to be and it's not all that clear who the puppeteers are).
But what I'd really like to know is what's to become of her husband and children. Trivial question, I know. But maybe her husband doesn't want to "marry again" like she selfishly insisted he did, did she even consider that? And maybe her kids have a right and claim on her (incl her life) that far superceded whatever claim she felt unknown others have on her? They ARE underage children after all. Don't her husband and their kids deserve a say in what she should do with her life? And if not, then why did she get married in the first place and worse: have kids. Selfish.
All this talk about Poor Other People means dust, if she can't see there are Unfortunate Other People under her very nose.
Anyway, this event seems to be part of a large pattern: The masses of unsaved Indian kaffirs are willing to readily die - "sacrifice themselves" - for ... "Something", without even taking anyone of their enemies with them. What is up with that? I confess I don't get it. Callously throwing your life away isn't heroism. Sounds like loser mentality instead. (There are things worth dying for - and just 'cause I can't think of any examples at this very moment doesn't mean there aren't any. Just like there are people under certain circumstances who have a right to sacrifice themselves, if ever they so choose. But *she* is not one of them. She has no such right.)
I know SE Asian Buddhists tend to resort to immolating themselves in protest - but the ruling christian tyrants were very pleased when they did that: played right into christianism's hands.
Here too: One less Hindu.
Brilliant. Just brilliant.
Why do Hindus keep dying, yet Gandhianism doesn't? Can't Gandhianism fast itself to death, instead of feeding itself on Hindus?
I know it's called India. But Dodoland sounds increasingly more appropriate. Bunch of lemmings.
Quote:Kolhapur, August 27, 2011
Woman commits suicide in bid to support Hazare
A Correspondent
A woman at Miraj in Sangli district has committed suicide by hanging in her house in a bid to support Anna Hazareââ¬â¢s fast, with an appeal to the government to respond to Mr. Hazareââ¬â¢s demands in the interest and welfare of the poor in the country.
Shubhangi Karande, 33, was found dead after she hung herself with a sari on Friday evening. Her children returned from school, and relatives and neighbours later opened the front door to find her dead.
[color="#0000FF"]In her suicide note, Shubhangi has stated, ââ¬ÅI am committing suicide for the demand of redeeming the country from corruption. The poor are starving, which I cannot see. They do not get adequate wages. Even in private companies, wages are low and dearness is increasing. I can eat and survive on jawar from the farm. But those who have no farmland are suffering pangs of starvation. The poor have dreams that they will meet their requirements after they get employment. But even for getting employment, money is demanded. From where will they get money?[/color]
Anna Hazare is on fast but the Government is not responding. What then should be done? I am doing this for the society and my family members should not feel sorry for this. Let the government realize that such a deed of a woman will reduce inflation and my brothers and sisters will have a happy life. My husband should marry again and keep my children happy with love and care.ââ¬Â
Her husband Vinayak Karande is working as a fabricator in Miraj industrial estate. The family stays in a two room house with 13-year-old daughter Monika and 10-year-old son Ganesh. The current cost of living indicates that the family is also under financial hardship.
You know, it's irresponsible for people to have children and then off yourself. You can either (a) off yourself (with or without reason - up to you) OR - exclusive OR - (b ) get happily married+have children. NOT (a) AND then (b ). I thought everyone knew this.
But the news piece does at least show that some - everyday - people actually care less about themselves (yet also care less/insufficiently about their own families - tsss, who cares about kids, right?) than they do for other people. And they're at least ready to prove that they mean business: after all, she did - oh-so-foolishly and so wastefully - kill herself over this uh sloganised 'cause' (it doesn't mean what she thinks it means/it isn't what it's made out to be and it's not all that clear who the puppeteers are).
But what I'd really like to know is what's to become of her husband and children. Trivial question, I know. But maybe her husband doesn't want to "marry again" like she selfishly insisted he did, did she even consider that? And maybe her kids have a right and claim on her (incl her life) that far superceded whatever claim she felt unknown others have on her? They ARE underage children after all. Don't her husband and their kids deserve a say in what she should do with her life? And if not, then why did she get married in the first place and worse: have kids. Selfish.
All this talk about Poor Other People means dust, if she can't see there are Unfortunate Other People under her very nose.
Anyway, this event seems to be part of a large pattern: The masses of unsaved Indian kaffirs are willing to readily die - "sacrifice themselves" - for ... "Something", without even taking anyone of their enemies with them. What is up with that? I confess I don't get it. Callously throwing your life away isn't heroism. Sounds like loser mentality instead. (There are things worth dying for - and just 'cause I can't think of any examples at this very moment doesn't mean there aren't any. Just like there are people under certain circumstances who have a right to sacrifice themselves, if ever they so choose. But *she* is not one of them. She has no such right.)
I know SE Asian Buddhists tend to resort to immolating themselves in protest - but the ruling christian tyrants were very pleased when they did that: played right into christianism's hands.
Here too: One less Hindu.
Brilliant. Just brilliant.
Why do Hindus keep dying, yet Gandhianism doesn't? Can't Gandhianism fast itself to death, instead of feeding itself on Hindus?
I know it's called India. But Dodoland sounds increasingly more appropriate. Bunch of lemmings.