09-26-2011, 10:44 AM
[quote name='sumishi' date='12 September 2011 - 12:19 AM' timestamp='1315766473' post='112833']
X-posting from topic Sarasvati Civilization
[size="3"] Here's a followup 2002 article to the one by David Lewis I posted a few posts above: The Enigma of India's Origins.
Written by Michael Cremo, who identifies himself as a "Vedic" creationist. Needless to say, the mainstream/propagandastream "scholars" are generally hammer and tongs after him.
[/size][indent][size="3"]
[/size][/indent]
[/quote]
Can you please give references to Gulf of Cambay findings being characterized as "city" ? I've read Kathiroli, Badrinarayanan, Rao et al's publication in Journal of Indian Ocean Archaeology'2004. But there are no claims the authors make for there being a "city". They characterize the houses as "wattle and daub" structures, and findings of microliths and fired (albeit ill-fired) pottery.
X-posting from topic Sarasvati Civilization
[size="3"] Here's a followup 2002 article to the one by David Lewis I posted a few posts above: The Enigma of India's Origins.
Written by Michael Cremo, who identifies himself as a "Vedic" creationist. Needless to say, the mainstream/propagandastream "scholars" are generally hammer and tongs after him.
[/size][indent][size="3"]
[/size][/indent]
[/quote]
Can you please give references to Gulf of Cambay findings being characterized as "city" ? I've read Kathiroli, Badrinarayanan, Rao et al's publication in Journal of Indian Ocean Archaeology'2004. But there are no claims the authors make for there being a "city". They characterize the houses as "wattle and daub" structures, and findings of microliths and fired (albeit ill-fired) pottery.