In heathen countries, Korea included, to be secular means that the heathen (and only the heathen) is made to think "all religions" (with which only enemy religions are meant) are equal to their own. In fact, it particularly means that one is brainwashed into thinking christianism is more progressive than one's heathen religion. It's the result of christianism moulding people's minds in its own direction. It comes after de-heatenisation in the sequence:
1. de-heathenisation (no longer heathen) -> 2. secularisation (subconscious conversion) -> 3. christianisation (conscious conversion)
In Korea it is not Americanisation, it is the secularisation of an already largely de-heathenised population, which makes even those who have abandoned religion congenial to conversion to christianism. The objective for secularism is to position christianism as the culmination. I.e. it is set as the outcome of the de-heathenising heathens.
The previous post's definition of secularism is the modern western definition of it, which applies only in the converted west, not in heathen nations. Of course the original western definition of the term can be seen in how christian governments and their kings were considered the "secular arm of the church": i.e. acting for the church but pretending they were not acting for their religion's interest. Can see even McCabe still use it in that sense: the "secular arm of the church" was used since the various inquisitions to officially condemn Jews, heretics and "witches", so that the church would not be accused of having blood on its hands.
In India secularism is pseudo-secularism. Pseudo-secularism is all the secularism that exists or can exist in a country when the majority is still heathen. Thereafter all pretence to secularism will disappear and the christoislamics will genocide heathenism.
In India, secularism is the freedom to attack the majority heathens with impunity. (But this specifically will not be allowed to happen if the majority became followers of jeebusjehovallah.) Secularism is the "right" of the heathen majority to remain silent, their temples to be looted to feed christoislamism etc.
In fact, secularism in India is the right of christoislamism to riot against Hindus and for Hindus to get blamed and punished if they dare to ever react to christomaniac/islamaniac violence:
http://rajeev2004.blogspot.com/2011/05/c...-only.html
The above works on the christian dawaganda principle that the native Hindus are communal by definition, and that christoislamics are secular by definition.
1. de-heathenisation (no longer heathen) -> 2. secularisation (subconscious conversion) -> 3. christianisation (conscious conversion)
In Korea it is not Americanisation, it is the secularisation of an already largely de-heathenised population, which makes even those who have abandoned religion congenial to conversion to christianism. The objective for secularism is to position christianism as the culmination. I.e. it is set as the outcome of the de-heathenising heathens.
The previous post's definition of secularism is the modern western definition of it, which applies only in the converted west, not in heathen nations. Of course the original western definition of the term can be seen in how christian governments and their kings were considered the "secular arm of the church": i.e. acting for the church but pretending they were not acting for their religion's interest. Can see even McCabe still use it in that sense: the "secular arm of the church" was used since the various inquisitions to officially condemn Jews, heretics and "witches", so that the church would not be accused of having blood on its hands.
Quote:Secularization protect people of different believes from the dictatorship of majority.This statement is actually proof that secularisation means different things in the converted countries (esp. west) and in the still-heathen countries: in India, the dictatorship is by the "minority" alien religions which terrorise Hindus who are expected to accept the tyranny of the minority in the name of "secularism". The "minorities" are then further "defended" by the "seculars" who join in to attack the Hindus for the unforgivable crime of being a heathen majority.
In India secularism is pseudo-secularism. Pseudo-secularism is all the secularism that exists or can exist in a country when the majority is still heathen. Thereafter all pretence to secularism will disappear and the christoislamics will genocide heathenism.
In India, secularism is the freedom to attack the majority heathens with impunity. (But this specifically will not be allowed to happen if the majority became followers of jeebusjehovallah.) Secularism is the "right" of the heathen majority to remain silent, their temples to be looted to feed christoislamism etc.
In fact, secularism in India is the right of christoislamism to riot against Hindus and for Hindus to get blamed and punished if they dare to ever react to christomaniac/islamaniac violence:
http://rajeev2004.blogspot.com/2011/05/c...-only.html
Quote:Friday, May 27, 2011
Communal Violence Bill punishes only the Majority Community says Arun Jaitley
may 27th, 2011 CE
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From:
Date: Fri, May 27, 2011 at 3:38 PM
Subject: Communal Violence Bill punishes only the Majority Community says Arun Jaitley
To: esams Nayyar <esamskriti@suryaconsulting.net>
[color="#0000FF"]Key points
1. Law and Order is a state subject. If it becomes Law then the Centre would usurp the authority of States.
2. The Bill assumes that communal riots are caused by the Majority community only. Note the Indian Constitution does not define the word 'Minority'.
3. Rape is punishable under this bill if the lady belongs to a minority group. If lady is Hindu she is not covered by this bill.
4. So also A 'hate propaganda' is an offence against minority community and not otherwise.
5. No member of the minority community can be punished under this act for having committed an offence against the majority community.
6. Terrorists from the minority community shall create communal riots instead of terror strikes because they cannot be tried under this Law since assumption is only Hindus riot.[/color]
The above works on the christian dawaganda principle that the native Hindus are communal by definition, and that christoislamics are secular by definition.
Death to traitors.