The evidence will be suppressed I am sure about it.
It is pretty clear that Asiatic R1a1 is found coeval with india-specific SNPs.
This is non-controversial in the case of Arabia but is also true of C Asia and shuts off the Ruski Scythian fantasy.
This also conforms Mittani and Kassite expansions out of India.
The second Asia-specific expansion impinges and intrudes dramatically into Europe, more importantly it sets the trajectory model for the prior Centum expansion out of Afpak.
Now, they are even quite clear about R1b expanding directly out of South Asia and they do not stop at Anatolia as before.
To maintain a contrary movement for R1a1 out of the E Euro landscape is just not possible.
All European R1a1 hangs off a single SNP and extends neither into the ME or C Asia; a prior line found and delimited to Scandinavia surfed the R1a1 expansion northward.
The surfing and positing of minor archaisms at the extreme NW (where the wavefront ends) mimics the Nichols' "archaism of the periphery" model. It is just a general feature of steppe transmission from E to W. Underhill's wave model was a real breakthorugh.
The diversity of lines in S Asia at each stage in Eurasiatic expansion is tremendous.
Prior lines get crowded out by new indigenous expansions but the old diversity remains, this happened with Q which must have been quite frequent in India prior to the Ice age.
From an even earlier stage, the missing IJ of Europe is hiding somewhere among the dominant F in S India, every geneticist is searching for it.
Retention of Paleolithic lines in Europe is increasingly quite unlikely other than for I, these lines were crowded out by ME neolithic and then Iranian R1b and Indic R1a1 which was Neolithic pastoral.
Europe does not have the generative capacity for these lines and evidences only the branches.
You will see that R1a1 being proposed out of neutral territory in the ME (already happening) or an extreme contrarian position will be taken with a locus in Scandinavia.
A proto-gypsy model for Indic expansion is needed at the moment.
It is pretty clear that Asiatic R1a1 is found coeval with india-specific SNPs.
This is non-controversial in the case of Arabia but is also true of C Asia and shuts off the Ruski Scythian fantasy.
This also conforms Mittani and Kassite expansions out of India.
The second Asia-specific expansion impinges and intrudes dramatically into Europe, more importantly it sets the trajectory model for the prior Centum expansion out of Afpak.
Now, they are even quite clear about R1b expanding directly out of South Asia and they do not stop at Anatolia as before.
To maintain a contrary movement for R1a1 out of the E Euro landscape is just not possible.
All European R1a1 hangs off a single SNP and extends neither into the ME or C Asia; a prior line found and delimited to Scandinavia surfed the R1a1 expansion northward.
The surfing and positing of minor archaisms at the extreme NW (where the wavefront ends) mimics the Nichols' "archaism of the periphery" model. It is just a general feature of steppe transmission from E to W. Underhill's wave model was a real breakthorugh.
The diversity of lines in S Asia at each stage in Eurasiatic expansion is tremendous.
Prior lines get crowded out by new indigenous expansions but the old diversity remains, this happened with Q which must have been quite frequent in India prior to the Ice age.
From an even earlier stage, the missing IJ of Europe is hiding somewhere among the dominant F in S India, every geneticist is searching for it.
Retention of Paleolithic lines in Europe is increasingly quite unlikely other than for I, these lines were crowded out by ME neolithic and then Iranian R1b and Indic R1a1 which was Neolithic pastoral.
Europe does not have the generative capacity for these lines and evidences only the branches.
You will see that R1a1 being proposed out of neutral territory in the ME (already happening) or an extreme contrarian position will be taken with a locus in Scandinavia.
A proto-gypsy model for Indic expansion is needed at the moment.