01-14-2012, 01:08 PM
[quote name='Pusan' date='07 January 2012 - 07:29 PM' timestamp='1325944300' post='114154']
Sanskrit as we know it, was formed on the Indian subcontinent, not on the eurasian steppes. It's not realistic to expect Sanskrit on the eurasian steppes. What existed on the Eurasian steppes were various forms of the Proto Indo European language. To illustrate my point, the homeland of Finno-Ugric languages is the forest region north of the Eurasian steppes, but one does not expect Finnish to be spoken in modern Russia.
[/quote]
I know Sanskrit was formed and written first only in India. The hypothesis was to bring forth the fallacy that someone called Aryans came in from Central Asia, invented Sanskrit here and wrote our vedas etc.
On one side Central Asia is believed to be the homeland of Aryans and then there is absolutely no trace of Sanskrit at all. The Sanskrit that supposedly they invented.
Sanskrit as we know it, was formed on the Indian subcontinent, not on the eurasian steppes. It's not realistic to expect Sanskrit on the eurasian steppes. What existed on the Eurasian steppes were various forms of the Proto Indo European language. To illustrate my point, the homeland of Finno-Ugric languages is the forest region north of the Eurasian steppes, but one does not expect Finnish to be spoken in modern Russia.
[/quote]
I know Sanskrit was formed and written first only in India. The hypothesis was to bring forth the fallacy that someone called Aryans came in from Central Asia, invented Sanskrit here and wrote our vedas etc.
On one side Central Asia is believed to be the homeland of Aryans and then there is absolutely no trace of Sanskrit at all. The Sanskrit that supposedly they invented.