Hindu/Indian Culture Outside India

[Husky]

Directly related to posts 64, 65, [color="#0000FF"]66[/color] and 71 above - else this next is far off from the topic of this thread.



Aliens who had kidnapped a Shiva moorti have been conducting "scientific experimentation" on it to work out how the Hindoos had fashioned it. This is another aspect of their "art appreciation".





http://haindavakeralam.com/HKPage.aspx?P...305&SKIN=W

Shiva Natarja statue in Netherland Museum. Demand return of the statue to the temple where it belongs.

21/01/2012 06:18:27 Dr S Kalyanaraman



Pratima of Hindu Divinities worshipped in temples should NOT become museum pieces. If Museums have to play their role in educating about heritage, this can be accomplished by using replicas instead of taking the sacred pratima away from temples where they rightly belong.



Such museum-mongering is sacrilege. Sacrilege is the violation or injurious treatment of a sacred object.



This image of Shiva Nataraja is said to be 1,000 years old. Such pratima are normally installed and worshipped in temples. Govt. of Netherlands should inquire and ascertain the temple from which the pratima was taken. The pratima (statue) should be returned forthwith since a temple is a temple forever and pratima of devata should stay in the temple where the sacred installation took place.



[color="#0000FF"]See a related post http://bharatkalyan97. blogspot.com/2011/09/petition- in-london-court-asking- british.html. blogspot.com/2011/09/petition- in-london-court-asking- british.html This states the imperative of British Museum returning thepratima of Devi Saravati to Dhar, Bhojashala where the devotees are worshipping an empty niche and are on a round-the-clock prayer vigil asking for the re-installation of Sarasvati pratima there for continued worship.[/color]

[color="#800080"](Never doubt that India's heathens - the Hindoos - love their Divine Parents=the Hindoo Gods (Virinchi-Patnee in this case).

What RSmith quoted Gibbon as saying of Julian applies here.)[/color]



Kalyanaraman, Sarasvati Research Center.





Jan. 16, 2012

Ref:

P E R S B E R I C H T

PRESS RELEASE . PRESSEBERICHT . COMMUNIQUE DE PRESSE

POSTBUS 74888

1070 DN AMSTERDAM

TELEFOON 020 6 74 70 00

TELEFAX 020 6 74 70 01

PRESSOFFICE@RIJKSMUSEUM.

NL

WWW.RIJKSMUSEUM.NL



Amsterdam, Jan. 10, 2012





Dancing Shiva X-rayed





Indian masterpiece shown to be solid bronze

[color="#800080"](It's not "Indian", it is (ethnic) Hindu religion - "ethnic" added in to make it clear that it does NOT belong to dabbling alien "collectors" who fancy themselves "Hindus".

There is a reason it's important to *always* make the differentiation between what is called "Indian" and what is actually (ethnic) Hindoo.)[/color]



Research recently revealed that the Rijksmuseum’s monumental bronze statue of Shiva was cast in solid bronze. [color="#0000FF"]The thousand-year-old temple statue was X-rayed,[/color] along with the lorry transporting it, in the most powerful X-ray tunnel for containers of the Rotterdam customs authority. It is the first research of its kind on a museological masterpiece.





At 153 cm x 114.5 cm, the Rijksmuseum’s Shiva is the largest known bronze statue from the Chola Dynasty (9th to 12th century) kept in a museological collection outside of India. Given its weight (300 kg), the statue has always been suspected of not being hollow, as has been common practice in Europe since the Greek Antiquity. As part of an earlier investigation, an X-ray was taken of the statue in a Rijksmuseum gallery in 1999 while visitors were evacuated as a precaution against radiation. Unfortunately, the equipment used at the time (280 KeV) was not powerful enough to determine anything definitively. The Rotterdam X-ray tunnel of the Rotterdam customs authority offered a solution. Normally used to scan sea containers for suspicious contents, the high-energy digital radiation (9.3 MeV) offers sufficient resolution and range to distinguish between a 1mm copper wire and a 30 cm piece of steel.



The Rijksmuseum renovation project has provided conservators and curators the opportunity to carry out in-depth research on special pieces from the Rijksmuseum collection, including this masterpiece from the Asian Art Collection. The statue was created ca. 1100 in South India. This region, the area that is now the state of Tamil Nadu in particular, is famous for its impressive Shiva temples, the most important of which were erected during the rule of the Chola Dynasty (9th to 12th century). Each temple had its own set of bronze statues which were carried through the city during major temple festivals. This gives the statues their name: utsavamurti, which is Sanskrit for ‘festival images’. Chola bronzes were considered masterpieces of Indian bronze casting.



Anna Ślączka, curator of South Asian [color="#FF0000"]Art[/color], comments, ‘We had expected that the statue itself would prove to be solid, but it was a complete surprise to discover that the aureole and the demon under Shiva’s feet are also solid.’



According to the literature, there is always at least one hollow element. A solid statue is much heavier and costly than a hollow one, and the high volume can cause damage to the bronze due to shrinking occurring during cooling. This solid bronze Shiva is evidence of a high level of mastery of bronze casting, as well as just how highly prized such statues were in the Hindu faith. Thanks to this research, it has now been possible to determine the date of the statue more accurately. [color="#0000FF"]With a view to conservation work,[/color] the research has also revealed useful information on the statues' condition.

[color="#800080"](They have the nerve to call their theft and interference "conservation" work. If people haven't noticed, such a statement pretends that Hindoos are already extinct.

Otherwise, they'd have admitted that the only conservation would be conservation of the living Hindoos' living religion, which in this case is to Give Back the Shiva moorti to the native (i.e. ethnic/ancestral) Hindoos.)[/color]



The appointment of the curator of South Asian Art, Anna ÅšlÄ…czka, was sponsored by Staal aan Zee, Tata Steel B.V., a named fund of the Rijksmuseum.



For more information:

Rijksmuseum

Press Office

Jacobien Schneider

T. +31(0)20-6747330

E. pressoffice@rijksmuseum.nl





X-ray of the Shiva statue in the lorry. The dark solid shading indicates solid bronze casting.





http://tinyurl.com/6ndg9v2

Of all those who are to blame, the nastiest is the nearest. I.e. the treacherous. In this case: the class of pompous self-conceited Indians who encourage the viewing of sacred Hindoo imagery/the moorties of Hindu Gods as "art" instead of what it actually is (religion), because that is all they themselves are able to see. They probably found the Dutch experiment in dissection and inspection of the Shiva moorti - to ascertain whether any part of it was "hollow as in the literature" or not - to be "interesting" and provide "valuable and important insight".



The Shiva moorti belongs to *Hindoos* alone. Not to aliens OR the alienated. (It was fashioned by Hindoos, not by the alienated. The two are not related.)