Both news items are very much related.
1. sbs.com.au/news/article/1681130/UK-gives-millions-in-aid-to-Syria-rebels
The west were propagandising for them even in movies until a recent decade. E.g. remember the Dalton Bond, with the British Paki playing the Friendly Afghan Taliban leader who together with his band of helpful mujahideens* side with MI6 to bring down the evil Russian/World communism's "Spiert Spionem" plot.
[* As they were admittedly called even in the film, though it didn't have a negative connotation then, of course. But portrayed as revolutionary "native" Afghan heroes. As was typical of that time period in western history.]
Of course, today, AmeriKKKa and its sycophant western govts pretend that the Taliban/Al Qaeda were Public Enemy #1 since Day #1. (When these only became public enemy when they became AmriKKKa's enemy: which was I think when the Taliban blew up a couple of buildings in the US or something - I can't remember, it all happened so long ago, like when I was quite young.)
Anyway, the comments to the above article: Unlike AmriKKKa, apparenly the rest of the world *isn't* (nearly) filled with a population of self-delusionals -
Well, to answer the first comment's question:
Methinks *AmeriKKKa* would be supplying the weapons (as it usually does), while the Brits - as seen above - are providing the dough, and the French are providing Syrian rebels with - umm - "non-lethal" but yet "military" aid:
2. dailytelegraph.com.au/news/breaking-news/france-gives-syria-non-lethal-military-aid/story-e6freuz9-1226456089489
The west - in particular the US (but not just the US) - has been manipulating the current events in Syria since inception. Even to the extent of American (ethnically non-Syrian) *male* army/intelligence personnel stationed in the US and Scotland posing as lesbians on their famous blogs set up for this purpose. One of them posed as a Syrian female *lesbian* who supposedly *was* in Syria, and who then pretended to be "disappeared" by the "Syrian govt" all in order to stoke revolution among a worried Syrian populace duped into believing her (played by a him).
Not to mention that at least the poser playing the Syrian was revealed to be nothing less than a Mennonite christian: a famous missionary organisation specifically working for the US govt, often seen converting South Americans to north American christian cults in order to make them more pliable for the US purpose interests. Relevant news items on those little stunts were posted already in this thread, post 299.
But far more interesting than the (let's face it, predictable) news above is what *part* of the global geography is reporting these PA/AAP bulletins: while I originally found one in an Indian online ragazine and another in a "global empire" warning source - and except for Australian papers - only islamic (and hence Indian papers) are visibly carrying these two news items.
I just checked again: can't find the 2nd news item on even the UK Telegraph. Only its Australian branch hosts the article.
Meanwhile obscure sources like FoxYemen, AlArabiya, as well as Iranian, TSP and Bangladeshi news papers are all carrying the above news reports, encouraging as it would be for islamics to read it.
Also Lankan news (including esp. Tamil). Also anti-Empire online sources who are hosting copies, of course.
*Plus* naturally TimesOfIndia and other Indian christomedia specifically targetted (by the Puppeteers) at reassuring the massive numbers of islamics of India too that the "west is looking out for the interests of the islamic brotherhood". I.e. that the west is supporting *islamic* rule in the ME.
I'm trying to think if any other conclusions can even be drawn from the matter. (Or maybe I'm mistaken and there are some news agencies in *major* western nations that are carrying the above after all?)
Speaking of Targeted and Selective reporting:
- international news covering TSP's taking action against its christian downs-syndrome girl who is to have burnt Koranic verses, as well as reporting on how Amnesty has already officially jumped in to support her individual case by lecturing TSP, and how christians in the affected part of TSP are already fleeing in fear (from their islamic brothers in monotheism, apparently they don't get along when there are no Hindus on the scene to terrorise),
- silence (else misrepresentation) on Assam in international news. Sends the message that the subcontinent's muslims can get away with not only infiltration but also ethnic cleansing on a grand scale thanks to a most cooperative silence. (Or even inversion of the true state of things: like the British-made Slumdog movie turned islamaniacs into the unprovoked victims, and Hindus into a rabid army going on blind rampages of hate. The film was specifically created by its publicly-christist British director to reinforce the stereotype of "evil Hindoos, poor islamaniac victims" that's being generated in the international mind, and despite it being a lame movie, it was awarded with its oscar by the specifically in order to make sure it would get wide international viewership, to propagate its obvious propaganda.)
3. Hmm, was Morocco already on the list of discontented ME nations? I forget. But if not, perhaps it should be added now:
The west appears to have managed to stage another revolution in Morocco. I mean, a revolution appears to be spontaneously brewing in Morocco too, with hundreds already starting to boo and hiss at the govt there, it seems, just as equivalent pawns had done the same in other parts of the islamic ME before.
And when Morocco boils over like Syria, Egypt etc have done, will Turkey be next? Or is Turkey happily exempted from the treatment because of its EU connections? I mean, I doubt France or even the UK let alone the rest of the EU would want to be supporting islamic Turkish islamic rebels if it was Turkey that was on fire in place of Syria...
1. sbs.com.au/news/article/1681130/UK-gives-millions-in-aid-to-Syria-rebels
Quote:UK gives millions in aid to Syria rebelsUh, wait, Al Qaeda? Now didn't *AmriKKKa* sponsor the taliban just yesterday, I mean in the 80s?
11 Aug 2012, 9:55 am - Source: PA
Britain will give 5-million-pounds ($AU7.8million) worth of equipment to Syrian rebels trying to topple President Bashar Al-Assad, the Foreign Office (FCO) said today.
The aid will include radios and medical supplies but not weapons. Foreign Secretary William Hague is expected to reveal more details later.
An FCO spokesman said: "As the Foreign Secretary says, we need to work with the Syrian opposition to ensure they prepare for the inevitable day of Assad's fall, including representatives of the Free Syria Army.
"We are therefore meeting political elements of the Free Syria Army. "This is not taking sides in a civil war.
The spokesman added: "The risk of total disorder and a power vacuum in Syria is so great that we must build relationships now with those who may govern Syria in the future.
"If we do not work with those Syrians who want to see a democratic and open Syria, we leave a void to be exploited by al Qaeda and others with extremist agendas who wish to hijack the conflict."
The west were propagandising for them even in movies until a recent decade. E.g. remember the Dalton Bond, with the British Paki playing the Friendly Afghan Taliban leader who together with his band of helpful mujahideens* side with MI6 to bring down the evil Russian/World communism's "Spiert Spionem" plot.
[* As they were admittedly called even in the film, though it didn't have a negative connotation then, of course. But portrayed as revolutionary "native" Afghan heroes. As was typical of that time period in western history.]
Of course, today, AmeriKKKa and its sycophant western govts pretend that the Taliban/Al Qaeda were Public Enemy #1 since Day #1. (When these only became public enemy when they became AmriKKKa's enemy: which was I think when the Taliban blew up a couple of buildings in the US or something - I can't remember, it all happened so long ago, like when I was quite young.)
Anyway, the comments to the above article: Unlike AmriKKKa, apparenly the rest of the world *isn't* (nearly) filled with a population of self-delusionals -
Quote:The UK isn't supplying weapons?
Mona - from Australia, 14 days ago
Then who is? No prizes for guessing America and it's CIA. The UK is definitely taking sides in this civil war. The British Foreign Office quite rightly knows that when the trillion dollar self righteous USA military machine is operative, even covertly, it is formidable and best to be on side. It does perversely mean creating the revolution against the Syrian government. It only costs a mere 5 million quid. Ah America, you're doing it again. Don't you remember Vietnam?
Agree 4 Disagree 0 Mr
Ian - from Noosa, 15 days ago
As ex English I am ashamed at UK taking sides in a civil war and helping the rebel cause.
Agree 4 Disagree 1
Well, to answer the first comment's question:
Methinks *AmeriKKKa* would be supplying the weapons (as it usually does), while the Brits - as seen above - are providing the dough, and the French are providing Syrian rebels with - umm - "non-lethal" but yet "military" aid:
2. dailytelegraph.com.au/news/breaking-news/france-gives-syria-non-lethal-military-aid/story-e6freuz9-1226456089489
Quote:France gives Syria non-lethal military aid
From: AAP August 22, 2012 8:22PM
FRANCE is providing the Syrian opposition with "non-lethal" military aid, Prime Minister Jean-Marc Ayrault said Wednesday.
Speaking on BFMTV-RMC radio, Ayrault said France had responded positively to a request for help from the rebels seeking to overthrow Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.
"On the military level, what we have done is we have responded to a request by the Syrian National Council and the Syrian resistance to provide a certain number of non-lethal elements... means of communication and protection," Ayrault said.
The premier reiterated that there was no question of France becoming directly involved in military action in Syria without UN backing, citing the example of former US president George W. Bush's 2003 Iraq invasion.
"We have the example of Iraq where George Bush alone decided to go to war," Ayrault said. "We were opposed and we were proved right. It ended in chaos."
Ayrault also reiterated France's position that Assad must step down, a day after Syria's deputy prime minister indicated that the regime was open to discussing the leader's departure.
The west - in particular the US (but not just the US) - has been manipulating the current events in Syria since inception. Even to the extent of American (ethnically non-Syrian) *male* army/intelligence personnel stationed in the US and Scotland posing as lesbians on their famous blogs set up for this purpose. One of them posed as a Syrian female *lesbian* who supposedly *was* in Syria, and who then pretended to be "disappeared" by the "Syrian govt" all in order to stoke revolution among a worried Syrian populace duped into believing her (played by a him).
Not to mention that at least the poser playing the Syrian was revealed to be nothing less than a Mennonite christian: a famous missionary organisation specifically working for the US govt, often seen converting South Americans to north American christian cults in order to make them more pliable for the US purpose interests. Relevant news items on those little stunts were posted already in this thread, post 299.
But far more interesting than the (let's face it, predictable) news above is what *part* of the global geography is reporting these PA/AAP bulletins: while I originally found one in an Indian online ragazine and another in a "global empire" warning source - and except for Australian papers - only islamic (and hence Indian papers) are visibly carrying these two news items.
I just checked again: can't find the 2nd news item on even the UK Telegraph. Only its Australian branch hosts the article.
Meanwhile obscure sources like FoxYemen, AlArabiya, as well as Iranian, TSP and Bangladeshi news papers are all carrying the above news reports, encouraging as it would be for islamics to read it.
Also Lankan news (including esp. Tamil). Also anti-Empire online sources who are hosting copies, of course.
*Plus* naturally TimesOfIndia and other Indian christomedia specifically targetted (by the Puppeteers) at reassuring the massive numbers of islamics of India too that the "west is looking out for the interests of the islamic brotherhood". I.e. that the west is supporting *islamic* rule in the ME.
I'm trying to think if any other conclusions can even be drawn from the matter. (Or maybe I'm mistaken and there are some news agencies in *major* western nations that are carrying the above after all?)
Speaking of Targeted and Selective reporting:
- international news covering TSP's taking action against its christian downs-syndrome girl who is to have burnt Koranic verses, as well as reporting on how Amnesty has already officially jumped in to support her individual case by lecturing TSP, and how christians in the affected part of TSP are already fleeing in fear (from their islamic brothers in monotheism, apparently they don't get along when there are no Hindus on the scene to terrorise),
- silence (else misrepresentation) on Assam in international news. Sends the message that the subcontinent's muslims can get away with not only infiltration but also ethnic cleansing on a grand scale thanks to a most cooperative silence. (Or even inversion of the true state of things: like the British-made Slumdog movie turned islamaniacs into the unprovoked victims, and Hindus into a rabid army going on blind rampages of hate. The film was specifically created by its publicly-christist British director to reinforce the stereotype of "evil Hindoos, poor islamaniac victims" that's being generated in the international mind, and despite it being a lame movie, it was awarded with its oscar by the specifically in order to make sure it would get wide international viewership, to propagate its obvious propaganda.)
3. Hmm, was Morocco already on the list of discontented ME nations? I forget. But if not, perhaps it should be added now:
The west appears to have managed to stage another revolution in Morocco. I mean, a revolution appears to be spontaneously brewing in Morocco too, with hundreds already starting to boo and hiss at the govt there, it seems, just as equivalent pawns had done the same in other parts of the islamic ME before.
And when Morocco boils over like Syria, Egypt etc have done, will Turkey be next? Or is Turkey happily exempted from the treatment because of its EU connections? I mean, I doubt France or even the UK let alone the rest of the EU would want to be supporting islamic Turkish islamic rebels if it was Turkey that was on fire in place of Syria...
Death to traitors.