03-19-2005, 09:02 AM
Gangajalji,
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->The world and souls depend on God, though they are separate and distinct from Him. <!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
a) Doesnt the above look similar to Ramanuja's theory that the plurality exists but that plurality doesnt have an existence independent of Brahman?
b) But When he says
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->They are neither one with God nor different from Him.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd--> leaving aside
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--> There is an incomprehensible difference- non-difference (Achintya Bhedabheda<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
is it not closer to Madhva?
Can you expound Chaitanya's Philosophy a bit more for ignorant folks a bitter.
Another question
did Chaitanya criticize others like Sankaras in their Baskhya?
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->The world and souls depend on God, though they are separate and distinct from Him. <!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
a) Doesnt the above look similar to Ramanuja's theory that the plurality exists but that plurality doesnt have an existence independent of Brahman?
b) But When he says
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->They are neither one with God nor different from Him.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd--> leaving aside
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--> There is an incomprehensible difference- non-difference (Achintya Bhedabheda<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
is it not closer to Madhva?
Can you expound Chaitanya's Philosophy a bit more for ignorant folks a bitter.
Another question
did Chaitanya criticize others like Sankaras in their Baskhya?