Muzaffarnagar (2013)

[Husky]

4. This is just to show double-standards in reporting and demonstrate the unspoken code in the English Language Media (ELM) as to when they will identify the victims' community and when it won't. What started off as a christian tactic to further enable heathens to get genocided in silence is now employed by all EN-language reporters. Secularisation aka christo-conditioning works that way.



Getting back to this next bit again in the India Today piece:



indiatoday.intoday.in/story/muzaffarnagar-headlines-today-sting-riots-for-votes-up-cops-admit-pressure/1/310303.html

On August 27, when a boy was killed for harassing a teen in Kawal village and then his alleged killers were lynched too, police caught all the suspects. Then, all eight were let off.

Important to note in the above is that when the ELM news explains how *Hindus* were the ones shortchanged by the christoislamic govt/law - as in the above - the victims are not mentioned as Hindus and the perpetrators are not named as islamanics.



But here follows another ELM, Firstpost, *most* ready to refer to who is muslim and who is Hindu, but only because - apparently unaware of the news 'uncovered' by IndiaToday - FirstPost pretends the islamics were the victims, unfairly treated by the police ("fir for no reason") while the Hindus were "picking a fight about some motorcycle" and got "understandably" clobbered by muslims. Note the headline shows this piece is obviously plugging for KKKangress with its "Riots are SP/BSP -even BJP's- fault" hence "vote KKKangress" [though body of text has a small note admitting KKKangress involvement too, but then, NYT prints important retractions in fine print too]:



firstpost.com/politics/muzaffarnagar-riots-how-bjp-sp-and-bsp-fanned-the-flames-1110023.html

The face-off between the Jats and Muslims, which led to riots that spread to villages in the interior of the district for the first time in the history of Uttar Pradesh, is in fact rooted in a systematic hate campaign initiated by leaders of all political parties over the past several months.

Ostensibly, the narrative begins on August 27, when two Jat boys – Gaurav and Sachin – reportedly killed a Muslim boy named Shahnawaz. In retaliation, Shahnawaz’s relatives killed Gaurav and Sachin. All three murders took place in the tiny village of Kawal, Jansath tehsil, over 20 km away from Muzaffarnagar city.

While it has been widely reported that the fight was sparked off when Shahnawaz harassed Gaurav and Sachin’s cousin sister, the FIR in the murder astonishingly makes no mention of sexual harassment or molestation. According to police records, Gaurav and Sachin picked a fight with Shahnawaz over a motorcycle accident.

Yes and IndiaToday has revealed that the FIR was deliberately falsely filed, and that there was indeed a [Hindu] teen molested by the [islamaniac] "boy", and that the poor "underage" [islamaniac] molester was killed by the 2 [Hindoo] brothers of the teen [girl], which 2 [Hindu] brothers were then killed by [islamaniacs], 8 of these [islamamaniacs] were "caught", but police released them anyway as admitted above because the police lodged the FIR falsely *deliberately*. (Though usually these days, the police in Muzaffarnagar don't even bother catching the criminals as per earlier news reports). Again: indiatoday.intoday.in/story/muzaffarnagar-headlines-today-sting-riots-for-votes-up-cops-admit-pressure/1/310303.html (etc).

All part of head islamaniac Azam Khan's plans/instructions - i.e. christoislamania as usual. indiatoday.intoday.in/story/muzaffarnagar-headlines-today-sting-riots-for-votes-azam-khan-responsible/1/310315.html



Yet media go on repeatedly about how there was no teen molested (aka the 'Godhra Hindus spontaneously combusted' excuse). That - "as per the FIR" (which coppers admitted was deliberately lodged in such a way as to let the 8 islamics off) - the 2 Hindu brothers of the girl just started a fight about some motorcycle with muslims and got killed for that.

Even m.indianexpress.com/news/muzaffarnagar-riots-they-harassed-me-daily-and-killed-my-uncles/1171547/

which supposedly tries to tell the female victim's side of the story,

speaks of her "alleged tormenter". It's absurd how Indian media keep lecturing the choir for how Indian female assault victims get blamed and shouldn't be, but when it comes to *Hindu* victims of islamic assault, the islamic criminal merely becomes the "alleged" criminal.



Meanwhile when the Orissa nun yelled "gangrape by <insert random Hindus>" - immediately after a christian mob finally attacked Swami Lakshmanananda for the last time and killed him - her assailants weren't "alleged" criminals in the news. They were guilty before the line up. Then the woman christianism hired to play an Orissa nun - who wasn't even from Orissa - admitted she wasn't gangraped after all, but it "was" a rape. Her story kept... evolving as typical christolies do.



Another line from firstpost on the riots:

Rallyists returning from the Mahapanchayat were attacked on their way back. Amit Kumar, a student and resident of Kakada, told Firstpost that the trolley was full of people and there was a sudden shower of stones from the rooftops of Muslim-dominated villages. Those who fell down from the trolley were killed.’’

About 49 deaths are confirmed and bodies are still being fished out from the canal. Majority of the people who died were Muslims (37).

Firstpost - so ready to name the "majority" victims when the timeframe of events are constrained to suit their storytelling to make islam the victim - conveniently forgot to cover the Islamic Jolly Canal Massacre of Dharmics preceding the riots: it merely mentions bodies being fished out of the canal implying these were muslims by tying it with the subsequent riot victims. (The DNA article had studiously refused to mention the Jolly Canal victims' religious identity - since they were Dharmics - and declared that the assailants were only "alleged" to be muslims (thus protecting the perpetrators). But at least it didn't pretend that the Hindus imagined the initiating violence.)



So why does firstpost not mention the Hindu victims of the preceding Jolly Canal massacre and their unguessed numbers (which even DNA reported on)?



And why is its description of the riots so like the train burning preceding the Godhra riots of "they were Hindu Karsevakas chanting anti-islamic slogans, and so the muslims [understandably] got angry and the Hindus [of course] deserved it" (before declaring the Hindus spontaneously combusted anyway). In that case too, I recall the reports of the Hindu girl being molested were declared just "imaginary". All islamic initiating violent action against Hindus are declared "imaginary" and as Hindu hate-mongering - which is sort of like the anti-majority Riot act already implemented - and all Hindu reaction against islamania is turned into the originating action, after which islamaniacs "retaliated" which is always justified.



Firstpost goes into length on hearsay (or is this merely Firstpost-invention? as no sources are even referred to in 3rd person) of Hindus carrying lathis and chanting anti-islamic chants on the way to their assembly. Yet it does not care to mention that the islamaniacs were not merely hailing *stones* down on Hindus returning from the assembly, but the islamaniacs were specifically armed with guns shooting at the Hindus. Possession of firearms by the everday possy is illegal in India - this is not the US - and Hindus certainly have no access to arms even to defend themselves thanks to careful christogovt conniving, but KKKangress ensures that the jihadi infiltrators they invited from TSP and BD down to the local jihadis are all armed in their pre-organised anti-Hindu riots: in India, islam is *always* armed and always riots with pre-meditation. Hindus riot in *reaction* to this organised, pre-planned christoislamic violence). Not a mention in Firstpost of the islamaniac shooting at the Hindus, or even of the islamaniac *snipers* shooting at the Indian army who were later called in to quell the riots. No question on how it was that the "poor innocent muslims" - caught so "unawares" by "evil Hindoos" - should have been armed to the teeth, lying in wait for Hindus who were returning from an assembly that never concerned islamaniacs.



The whole "49 dead, 37 of which were muslim" in Firstpost flies in the face of the number of registered missing on the Dharmic side let alone the unregistered missing: Omkar Singh Rana relayed how, after the Jolly Canal Killngs, at least 100s of people were missing (in his known surroundings, so who knows how many Dharmics more overall). Further, the Dharmic side noted that the bodies of their own kind were flushed speedily through the canal by the "govt", as well as how police colluded to allow the massacre of the unsaved infidels by the monotheism. Clearly, Firstpost in its selective numbering scheme, silenced that actual pre-planned genocide of the Dharmic natives by christoislamics, and in direct conspiracy with the genocidal maniacs, inverted victim and persecutor (which also required minimising the numbers, unless they're ready to make up numbers of islamic victims).



Repeating an excerpt from dnaindia.com/india/1888043/report-dna-special-jolly-canal-killings-triggered-the-muzaffarnagar-riots

Baliyan, 24, was among a group of 2,000 villagers returning home after attending the Mahapanchayat hosted by several Jat communities of western Uttar Pradesh in nearby Kawal village, when they were ambushed by a mob, armed with assault rifles and other sophisticated weapons.



“Since, I was with the NCC for more than three years during my school days, I could easily tell that our assailants were using AK47 rifles and other weapons,” he told dna at the site of the massacre. The mob set on fire 18 tractor trollies and three motorbikes of the villagers.



Local people say the Jolly canal massacre turned into the communal riots of Muzaffarnagar, in which the official death toll is 45. But local people say the number is much higher.



Eyewitnesses say after the mass killings, the attackers dumped the bodies in the canal, which meets the Ganges river in adjoining Haridwar district. So far, six bodies have been fished out.



“We were unarmed. And they(attackers) ambushed us like Naxals. They started firing indiscriminately,” Baliyan said.



Omkar Singh Rana of Baseda village, cannot find his elder brother Brijpal Singh Rana since the attack on Saturday. “It is not only my elder brother... there are hundreds of people who have gone missing after the massacre. Though six bodies have been found, we are sure there will be many more,” Rana told dna.



The villagers accused the local administration of not acting swiftly.



The police allowed the attackers to flee, some said. “The district administration has not made any effort to track the missing persons or find the bodies. Even the water flow in the canal was not controlled; it was deliberately increased to sweep away the dumped bodies,” said Bhanwar Singh, pradhan of Baseda village.



District magistrate Kaushal Raj Sharma admitted that the number of missing persons is more than the registered cases. “In case of the Jolly canal, we have recovered six bodies so far. Work is on to trace others, if any,” he said. “But in some cases people have migrated to other places. And since there is no contact with family members, they lodge missing complaints.”

(Oh of course, 40 people suddenly decide to "migrate" just then. And *all* of them coincidentally without telling their families. "Very normal" behaviour. So they're not really "missing", you see, just spontaneously combusted, I mean migrated.)

Now can count the numbers in the above and compare with FirstPost's selective counting.