IndiaToday presented its series of stings as "Riots for Votes". Yet not a single newspaper (obviously ignoring the overt christomedia) calls such events for what they are:
It is the Jihad. And it's back on in India.
These things are happening with increasing frequency, with the full *will* and aid and organisation and planning (not mere blessing) of the christogovt, which is why their christonews arm is instructed to not report on any cases of islamaniac genocide of Hindus (i.e. to make the genocide of Hindus silent), and why the christogovt wants to implement that Riot Act where the "majority" (i.e. Hindus) is automatically to be declared as the aggressors in any riot against the demonic christoislamaniac "minority". Note that Hindus will still be declared the 'majority' in the christianised northeast in those cases where christoterrorists blow up Hindus en-masse again and Hindus protest. But the roles of the actors of the Riot Act will of course be Reversed when the Hindus cease to be the majority and christoislamaniacs become the majority instead: at which point the law will declare "only the minorities riot". Same as how (obvious crypto) MadMoron Singh's statement that "minorities must have first claim on resources in India" meant *christoislamics* must have first claim on resources in India. And which becomes double obvious when the roles get reversed and Hindus become the minority: christogovt will then declare that the majority christoislamics must "of course" have the first claim.
Yesterday, came across a sane comment on one of these IndiaToday "Riot for Votes" reports which I can't seem to locate now, but which observed that if this is how the Hindu victims of christoislamania are treated by the law before the Riot Act comes into effect, imagine how they will be treated thereafter. The Riot Act reminds me of a famous piece of legislation christian Rome passed against Jews. It was rather chilling. I really have to look it up to make sure I'm strictly adhering to what I read. (In all essentials, christianism is repeating in India the tactics it applied to ancient Rome.)
Hindus ought not to put with such laws. No other population in no other free country of the world would ever stand for it. India is not a democracy. It is not a nation where the rights of civilians are protected and equal under the law. It is a *theocratic* state - i.e. a christoislamic one (so obviously a crypto-christogovt) - where the non-adherents, majority though they still be, are virulently persecuted in their lands, in the media, in education and history-writing and in the law. For the insupportable crime of being pagan infidels. India is a country where the greatest enemy of the native population is in charge. Hindus should send tell all these alien terrorisms to Quit India. Hindus need to make a War of Independence against the christoislamic tyranny in Bharatam. Didn't the Americans fight a "War of Independence" against the tyrant British monarchy (though in that case, neither the brits nor the americans were native to the US). Every other nation has the right to r/eject the enemy, Hindus should do so too.
It is the Jihad. And it's back on in India.
These things are happening with increasing frequency, with the full *will* and aid and organisation and planning (not mere blessing) of the christogovt, which is why their christonews arm is instructed to not report on any cases of islamaniac genocide of Hindus (i.e. to make the genocide of Hindus silent), and why the christogovt wants to implement that Riot Act where the "majority" (i.e. Hindus) is automatically to be declared as the aggressors in any riot against the demonic christoislamaniac "minority". Note that Hindus will still be declared the 'majority' in the christianised northeast in those cases where christoterrorists blow up Hindus en-masse again and Hindus protest. But the roles of the actors of the Riot Act will of course be Reversed when the Hindus cease to be the majority and christoislamaniacs become the majority instead: at which point the law will declare "only the minorities riot". Same as how (obvious crypto) MadMoron Singh's statement that "minorities must have first claim on resources in India" meant *christoislamics* must have first claim on resources in India. And which becomes double obvious when the roles get reversed and Hindus become the minority: christogovt will then declare that the majority christoislamics must "of course" have the first claim.
Yesterday, came across a sane comment on one of these IndiaToday "Riot for Votes" reports which I can't seem to locate now, but which observed that if this is how the Hindu victims of christoislamania are treated by the law before the Riot Act comes into effect, imagine how they will be treated thereafter. The Riot Act reminds me of a famous piece of legislation christian Rome passed against Jews. It was rather chilling. I really have to look it up to make sure I'm strictly adhering to what I read. (In all essentials, christianism is repeating in India the tactics it applied to ancient Rome.)
Hindus ought not to put with such laws. No other population in no other free country of the world would ever stand for it. India is not a democracy. It is not a nation where the rights of civilians are protected and equal under the law. It is a *theocratic* state - i.e. a christoislamic one (so obviously a crypto-christogovt) - where the non-adherents, majority though they still be, are virulently persecuted in their lands, in the media, in education and history-writing and in the law. For the insupportable crime of being pagan infidels. India is a country where the greatest enemy of the native population is in charge. Hindus should send tell all these alien terrorisms to Quit India. Hindus need to make a War of Independence against the christoislamic tyranny in Bharatam. Didn't the Americans fight a "War of Independence" against the tyrant British monarchy (though in that case, neither the brits nor the americans were native to the US). Every other nation has the right to r/eject the enemy, Hindus should do so too.