10-28-2013, 07:56 PM
[quote name='MehtaRahulC' date='28 October 2013 - 07:15 AM' timestamp='1382924229' post='116876']
What are your reactions on NaMo's formal ditching Tridevalaya issue i.e. RJB, KJB and KV via his landmark Sb4D statement?
Amit Shah also said that "development will be their issue and not RJB Devalaya.
[/quote]Uh, what do the abbreviations mean and what is the specific overall issue being referred to? Try as I might, I'm unable to work out what the abbreviations stand for other than my guess that Sb4D stands for Modi's statement: "pehle shauchalaya, phir devalaya (toilet first, temple later)" [sb4d = shauchala before/b4 devalaya?]. Still can't work out the rest.
There is no pro-Hindu option, no matter how much western news and Indian christomedia hisses at Modi.
Hindus ought to vote for BJP presumably because that will put off the evil day. But that's all it will do at best: put it off. Postpone and delay the extinction. Drag it out some more.
Because ironically, the one thing Hindus don't have is Time on their side: the longer Hindus stick around in the current climate (which is all the foreseeable climate there is), the more that the gangrene (de-Hinduisation and alienation) grows - producing more non-Hindu progeny in future generations - and the greater the christoislamic demographics stacked against Hindus becomes etc. So that, when it all finally starts to blow up at last, it will blow up pretty ugly.
But more gangrene at that point in time (and fewer heathens) means fewer people to care/worry about when things do go south.
But whatever.
Whatever happens, happens.
There's a massive momentum to India's future. I've never seen a nation so fixed into an unalterable course. Sadly, can't say it wasn't all the natives' fault: some of it was. There's a 1001 things they did wrong, but can leave that for the future J. McCabe types to enumerate in detail. (But will Indian history writing get one, the way Rome got one in McCabe?)
I don't think India will christianise successfully (drop-out rate from christianism is high in this age even in the medieval christian backwater of India, and rate of "secularism" and atheism among current and future generations is higher still) but India is likely to successfully islamise.
In any case, the nation will never be able to revert to Hindu religion properly. Even now - with the religion still living all around - you can see alienated people get only so far as new-ageism and neo-paganism (and dabbling in multiple Indian religions at the same time, which is also new-age actually). But no one is actually heathenising. I'm not talking about reverts from christoislamism here, I'm talking about the secularised angelsk-speaking (middle-aged) crowd of "Hindu ancestry" that regularly threatens that it is or will become "pagan" (else it will talk about "paganism").
When the reversion rate is at an all time low, and when enemies - of multiple massively frightening kinds all mustering at the same time - as well as alienation/subversion are at an all-time high, it all means Hindus are facing odds they've never faced before. Hindus actually never even fully recovered from ancient subversions or the repercussions from medieval (christoislamic) invasions: from every historical ideological victory, we've managed to slide back (some of this is courtesy new-agey vocalists in our own period).
Survival is not always a good thing. What will remain of 'Hindus' "afterwards" isn't really worth it.
But then: good doesn't always win (e.g. Native Americans, Hellenismos) and truth doesn't always triumph (e.g. jesus/christianism, islam etc are still around).*
It's not pretty to say - it's not what people were taught when they were kids - but it's the reality of our world. We don't live in the hypothesised parallel dimensions where things work out, but in this world.
* If people don't agree with the observed rule, they should by all means create the exception. Good luck with that.
What are your reactions on NaMo's formal ditching Tridevalaya issue i.e. RJB, KJB and KV via his landmark Sb4D statement?
Amit Shah also said that "development will be their issue and not RJB Devalaya.
[/quote]Uh, what do the abbreviations mean and what is the specific overall issue being referred to? Try as I might, I'm unable to work out what the abbreviations stand for other than my guess that Sb4D stands for Modi's statement: "pehle shauchalaya, phir devalaya (toilet first, temple later)" [sb4d = shauchala before/b4 devalaya?]. Still can't work out the rest.
Quote:NaMo will never get Muslim votes or Hindu votes from this ditch.And yet Hindus only have 2 choices: KKKangress (anti-Hindu) or BJP (nationalist at the expense of being Hindu).
There is no pro-Hindu option, no matter how much western news and Indian christomedia hisses at Modi.
Hindus ought to vote for BJP presumably because that will put off the evil day. But that's all it will do at best: put it off. Postpone and delay the extinction. Drag it out some more.
Because ironically, the one thing Hindus don't have is Time on their side: the longer Hindus stick around in the current climate (which is all the foreseeable climate there is), the more that the gangrene (de-Hinduisation and alienation) grows - producing more non-Hindu progeny in future generations - and the greater the christoislamic demographics stacked against Hindus becomes etc. So that, when it all finally starts to blow up at last, it will blow up pretty ugly.
But more gangrene at that point in time (and fewer heathens) means fewer people to care/worry about when things do go south.
But whatever.
Whatever happens, happens.
There's a massive momentum to India's future. I've never seen a nation so fixed into an unalterable course. Sadly, can't say it wasn't all the natives' fault: some of it was. There's a 1001 things they did wrong, but can leave that for the future J. McCabe types to enumerate in detail. (But will Indian history writing get one, the way Rome got one in McCabe?)
I don't think India will christianise successfully (drop-out rate from christianism is high in this age even in the medieval christian backwater of India, and rate of "secularism" and atheism among current and future generations is higher still) but India is likely to successfully islamise.
In any case, the nation will never be able to revert to Hindu religion properly. Even now - with the religion still living all around - you can see alienated people get only so far as new-ageism and neo-paganism (and dabbling in multiple Indian religions at the same time, which is also new-age actually). But no one is actually heathenising. I'm not talking about reverts from christoislamism here, I'm talking about the secularised angelsk-speaking (middle-aged) crowd of "Hindu ancestry" that regularly threatens that it is or will become "pagan" (else it will talk about "paganism").
When the reversion rate is at an all time low, and when enemies - of multiple massively frightening kinds all mustering at the same time - as well as alienation/subversion are at an all-time high, it all means Hindus are facing odds they've never faced before. Hindus actually never even fully recovered from ancient subversions or the repercussions from medieval (christoislamic) invasions: from every historical ideological victory, we've managed to slide back (some of this is courtesy new-agey vocalists in our own period).
Survival is not always a good thing. What will remain of 'Hindus' "afterwards" isn't really worth it.
But then: good doesn't always win (e.g. Native Americans, Hellenismos) and truth doesn't always triumph (e.g. jesus/christianism, islam etc are still around).*
It's not pretty to say - it's not what people were taught when they were kids - but it's the reality of our world. We don't live in the hypothesised parallel dimensions where things work out, but in this world.
* If people don't agree with the observed rule, they should by all means create the exception. Good luck with that.