^ [color="#0000FF"]Important news[/color] but the important point isn't properly highlighted as it got lost under the disproportionate emphasis on "Udit Raj's" racist fetishes.
a. I don't see why it should bother people that a virulent anti-Hindu and probable crypto-christo married some woman equally worthless. (She's obviously anti-Hindu too, else she wouldn't have married him.) What's worrying is rather that said virulent anti-Hindu and probable crypto-christo is being allowed into the BJP.
This seems to be a growing problem: [color="#0000FF"]every single anti-Hindu cretin sees that the BJP's victory may be inevitable* and has decided to seize a position of power in the BJP so that the old guard ultimately never changes in India. (Tomorrow the entire Congress back catalogue may join up too.) So even if BJP wins, then - thanks to whichever BJP brains allowed Udit Raj types and Goa's christos/church into BJP - Hindus will still end up having the same old christoislamicommunist politicians in power. Nothing changes.[/color] How many infiltratis are there in the BJP that are issuing all these invites to anti-Hindus?
Udit Raj specifically making a grand show of how he will antagonise AAP from within BJP is the same as AAP's erstwhile public campaign that it would antagonise the corrupt Congress, and it turned out (as everyone knew it would) that AAP=Congress. And likewise, Udit Raj=AAP=christoCongress, just like every other anti-Hindu [color="#0000FF"]pretending to join BJP to scupper Indian nationalism from within. Shortsighted BJP has positioned yet another enemy on the inside.[/color] Is BJP going to make a habit of letting every worthless anti-Hindu join up?
* Unless the US does some serious intervening - as they might, considering the US christomedia has been focused on creating the myths that
1. "India becoming more nationalist and this is proportional to it increasingly becoming 'rape central'" (yet specifically christo western news never mentions that the rape victims are all Hindu women and the rapist men are exclusively christoislamicommunists and occasionally psecular rapists working in tandem with christoislamic ringleaders in the gangrapes.)
2. "India is become more nationalist and this is proportional to the stifling of freedom of speech", specifically ignoring how the native Hindus were always the ones against those idiot anti-free-speech laws and it was the successive christocommunist-govts that enforced it on Hindus and that christoislamanicommunits have been using these laws to suppress Hindu freedom of speech.
Not to mention the christian Congress' crackdown on everything from social networking, policing everything anyone says against the congress. That was never mentioned.
Doniger got her publisher to self-censor her works and whines "persecution" (=a famous christian tactic, it's how one can tell someone's a christian) and now all of a sudden the world pretends great sorrow at the censorship laws that have existed for decades in India. And these draconian decades-old laws are being passed off as owing to the rising "nationalist Hindus". What a joke. It's so obvious that the christo US is up to every last card before they decide they may have to take "drastic" measures as one Gautam Sen noted.
In stating a few posts up that "All was quiet on the western front ('Im Westen nichts neues') - too quiet" obviously it was because I've never seen AmeriKKKa wait so long before playing their next card. Probably Wendy "The Paedophile" Doniger was the next to be given the green light to go through her drama script to project a nationalist India as dangerous.
b. [color="#0000FF"]Said the virulent anti-Hindu Udit Raj: "my wife is as fair as an English woman"
So is he married to an Indian albino then?
niggers:[/color] (I've never seen a fully native Indian woman of Hindu ancestry as fair as a European. Only as fair as a fair Iranian. So either URag is married to an Indian albino or he's married to a European. Since his statement indicates she's not the latter, the former must be the case.)
[color="#0000FF"]"my wife is as fair as an English woman <-> I found her fair skin very attractive, says Udit Raj"
which just proves that the anti-Hindu and now-obvious cryptochristo URag secretly prefers English women but "settled" for his Indian albino wife.
What a racist.[/color]
Had he lived in the US/Europe, he'd have been trying to get with one of the poor European women, who'd probably have been creeped out by his rather sick fetishising about how her "fair skin is very attractive" to him.
[color="#0000FF"]Anyway, I've noticed how lots of anti-Hindu dalit activist men/neo-Buddhist men when in position of power - URag above, Ambedkar and several other famous persons whose names escape me now - tend to marry people outside their community, and particularly choose women of community backgrounds that the male activists have specifically maligned, and especially suffer some delirium that "fairer" Indian women are somehow better. <- IMO, says something deeply sinister about how they view (and de-value) their own community's women.[/color] They're spitting on their Mothers faces. Disgusting. But then, these men are not Hindus, so of course they would forget their women once they've achieved power for themselves.
Reminds me of the similar case in the US where a certain type of young African-origin men who achieve some popularity (such as in media or in late high school) stop dating African women and become the willing trophee prizes of young European-origin women. It's the usual story of an "innocent preference" covering Inter-Racial Disparity. The thing is, the minute they achieved a certain degree of 'success', these men dumped their own community's women. So who will take their speaking on identity matters seriously thereafter?
(The earlier example: [color="#0000FF"]web.archive.org/web/20120212205836/http://www.thefighting44s.com/archives/2007/08/10/browns-wall-of-shame-in-inter-racial-dating/[/color])
In both cases, the men dumping their own community's women seem to imagine that there's some advantage in marrying out with the "fairer" women (a racist fetish in URag et al's case vs improved social standing/wider social acceptance in America in the case of African American men). Weird mentality. In the case of India's anti-Hindu dalit activists, their choice of spouse is of course consciously imagined by the activists as a retaliation against their trophee spouse's community background or else against Hindu religion, but subconsciously they are mentally so damaged that they don't really like their own women - because they have developed a deeply racist "preference" and that's their real reason for betraying their women. They never seem to consider their own women. These women have become invisible to their men, like Hindu men have become invisible to secularised Indian women busy chasing after psecular or - if really desperate - even christoislamic types.
[color="#0000FF"]I note the women stuck in the same community as anti-Hindu dalit activists have "never had a revolution"[/color] - as communists might put it. I'm surprised these women don't take significant action against their men and create a serious revolution: they don't have to stand for it. They're Indian women, and as such they can easily get anyone they want, so maybe [color="#0000FF"]they should dump "dalit activist" aka anti-Hindu circles/society (which is not their ancestral religion after all) - since such an ideology only breeds the kind of men that betray and de-value them the minute the men can afford to - and instead, they would do well to revert properly to Hindoo religion and marry themselves to one of the ocean of Hindoo men. After all, Hindoo men tend to be deeply loyal animals[/color], very loyal toward and caring of their wives and all their family, and so these women will get exactly what they can offer too: loyalty and people who value them for who they are. There's nothing quite like heathen (wo)men after all - nothing that feels so much like coming home.
Really, these women should dump the disloyal=anti-Hindoo dalit activist men who betrayed them, and Come Back Home to heathen society. Let the treacherous male dalit activists chase after other women for the latter's "imitation English skin" - let them marry out with like-minded racist twits. It's all they're good for.
[Disclaimer: no offence was meant to actual Indian albinos. The aim was to tastelessly lampoon URag's fetish, not anyone else.]
And the news was:
[quote name='Kowshika' date='24 February 2014 - 03:45 AM' timestamp='1393193275' post='117061']
India Today
--
Senior Dalit leader Udit Raj will join BJP on Monday saying he wanted to help the party in taking on Aam Aadmi Party and BSP.
Read more at: indiatoday.intoday.in/story/dalit-leader-udit-raj-to-join-bjp-on-monday/1/345176.html
--
The same scumbag who has appeared on Xtian missionary platforms[/quote]
a. I don't see why it should bother people that a virulent anti-Hindu and probable crypto-christo married some woman equally worthless. (She's obviously anti-Hindu too, else she wouldn't have married him.) What's worrying is rather that said virulent anti-Hindu and probable crypto-christo is being allowed into the BJP.
This seems to be a growing problem: [color="#0000FF"]every single anti-Hindu cretin sees that the BJP's victory may be inevitable* and has decided to seize a position of power in the BJP so that the old guard ultimately never changes in India. (Tomorrow the entire Congress back catalogue may join up too.) So even if BJP wins, then - thanks to whichever BJP brains allowed Udit Raj types and Goa's christos/church into BJP - Hindus will still end up having the same old christoislamicommunist politicians in power. Nothing changes.[/color] How many infiltratis are there in the BJP that are issuing all these invites to anti-Hindus?
Udit Raj specifically making a grand show of how he will antagonise AAP from within BJP is the same as AAP's erstwhile public campaign that it would antagonise the corrupt Congress, and it turned out (as everyone knew it would) that AAP=Congress. And likewise, Udit Raj=AAP=christoCongress, just like every other anti-Hindu [color="#0000FF"]pretending to join BJP to scupper Indian nationalism from within. Shortsighted BJP has positioned yet another enemy on the inside.[/color] Is BJP going to make a habit of letting every worthless anti-Hindu join up?
* Unless the US does some serious intervening - as they might, considering the US christomedia has been focused on creating the myths that
1. "India becoming more nationalist and this is proportional to it increasingly becoming 'rape central'" (yet specifically christo western news never mentions that the rape victims are all Hindu women and the rapist men are exclusively christoislamicommunists and occasionally psecular rapists working in tandem with christoislamic ringleaders in the gangrapes.)
2. "India is become more nationalist and this is proportional to the stifling of freedom of speech", specifically ignoring how the native Hindus were always the ones against those idiot anti-free-speech laws and it was the successive christocommunist-govts that enforced it on Hindus and that christoislamanicommunits have been using these laws to suppress Hindu freedom of speech.
Not to mention the christian Congress' crackdown on everything from social networking, policing everything anyone says against the congress. That was never mentioned.
Doniger got her publisher to self-censor her works and whines "persecution" (=a famous christian tactic, it's how one can tell someone's a christian) and now all of a sudden the world pretends great sorrow at the censorship laws that have existed for decades in India. And these draconian decades-old laws are being passed off as owing to the rising "nationalist Hindus". What a joke. It's so obvious that the christo US is up to every last card before they decide they may have to take "drastic" measures as one Gautam Sen noted.
In stating a few posts up that "All was quiet on the western front ('Im Westen nichts neues') - too quiet" obviously it was because I've never seen AmeriKKKa wait so long before playing their next card. Probably Wendy "The Paedophile" Doniger was the next to be given the green light to go through her drama script to project a nationalist India as dangerous.
b. [color="#0000FF"]Said the virulent anti-Hindu Udit Raj: "my wife is as fair as an English woman"
So is he married to an Indian albino then?
niggers:[/color] (I've never seen a fully native Indian woman of Hindu ancestry as fair as a European. Only as fair as a fair Iranian. So either URag is married to an Indian albino or he's married to a European. Since his statement indicates she's not the latter, the former must be the case.)[color="#0000FF"]"my wife is as fair as an English woman <-> I found her fair skin very attractive, says Udit Raj"
which just proves that the anti-Hindu and now-obvious cryptochristo URag secretly prefers English women but "settled" for his Indian albino wife.
What a racist.[/color]
Had he lived in the US/Europe, he'd have been trying to get with one of the poor European women, who'd probably have been creeped out by his rather sick fetishising about how her "fair skin is very attractive" to him.
Quote:I am very dark, almost black, but my wife is as fair as an English woman and I must say that although ours was a love marriage in which her intrinsic qualities mattered more than looks, I found her fair skin very attractive, says Udit Raj.Total racist. He keeps thinking about his skin and his wife's skin. Yuck. Does his moronic wife know? Or maybe she "fell in luuuv" with him over his skin-colour fetish: after all, she did *choose* to be with such a racist character. So he must be her type as much as she's his type. They deserve each other.
[color="#0000FF"]Anyway, I've noticed how lots of anti-Hindu dalit activist men/neo-Buddhist men when in position of power - URag above, Ambedkar and several other famous persons whose names escape me now - tend to marry people outside their community, and particularly choose women of community backgrounds that the male activists have specifically maligned, and especially suffer some delirium that "fairer" Indian women are somehow better. <- IMO, says something deeply sinister about how they view (and de-value) their own community's women.[/color] They're spitting on their Mothers faces. Disgusting. But then, these men are not Hindus, so of course they would forget their women once they've achieved power for themselves.
Reminds me of the similar case in the US where a certain type of young African-origin men who achieve some popularity (such as in media or in late high school) stop dating African women and become the willing trophee prizes of young European-origin women. It's the usual story of an "innocent preference" covering Inter-Racial Disparity. The thing is, the minute they achieved a certain degree of 'success', these men dumped their own community's women. So who will take their speaking on identity matters seriously thereafter?
(The earlier example: [color="#0000FF"]web.archive.org/web/20120212205836/http://www.thefighting44s.com/archives/2007/08/10/browns-wall-of-shame-in-inter-racial-dating/[/color])
In both cases, the men dumping their own community's women seem to imagine that there's some advantage in marrying out with the "fairer" women (a racist fetish in URag et al's case vs improved social standing/wider social acceptance in America in the case of African American men). Weird mentality. In the case of India's anti-Hindu dalit activists, their choice of spouse is of course consciously imagined by the activists as a retaliation against their trophee spouse's community background or else against Hindu religion, but subconsciously they are mentally so damaged that they don't really like their own women - because they have developed a deeply racist "preference" and that's their real reason for betraying their women. They never seem to consider their own women. These women have become invisible to their men, like Hindu men have become invisible to secularised Indian women busy chasing after psecular or - if really desperate - even christoislamic types.
[color="#0000FF"]I note the women stuck in the same community as anti-Hindu dalit activists have "never had a revolution"[/color] - as communists might put it. I'm surprised these women don't take significant action against their men and create a serious revolution: they don't have to stand for it. They're Indian women, and as such they can easily get anyone they want, so maybe [color="#0000FF"]they should dump "dalit activist" aka anti-Hindu circles/society (which is not their ancestral religion after all) - since such an ideology only breeds the kind of men that betray and de-value them the minute the men can afford to - and instead, they would do well to revert properly to Hindoo religion and marry themselves to one of the ocean of Hindoo men. After all, Hindoo men tend to be deeply loyal animals[/color], very loyal toward and caring of their wives and all their family, and so these women will get exactly what they can offer too: loyalty and people who value them for who they are. There's nothing quite like heathen (wo)men after all - nothing that feels so much like coming home.
Really, these women should dump the disloyal=anti-Hindoo dalit activist men who betrayed them, and Come Back Home to heathen society. Let the treacherous male dalit activists chase after other women for the latter's "imitation English skin" - let them marry out with like-minded racist twits. It's all they're good for.
[Disclaimer: no offence was meant to actual Indian albinos. The aim was to tastelessly lampoon URag's fetish, not anyone else.]
And the news was:
[quote name='Kowshika' date='24 February 2014 - 03:45 AM' timestamp='1393193275' post='117061']
India Today
--
Senior Dalit leader Udit Raj will join BJP on Monday saying he wanted to help the party in taking on Aam Aadmi Party and BSP.
Read more at: indiatoday.intoday.in/story/dalit-leader-udit-raj-to-join-bjp-on-monday/1/345176.html
--
The same scumbag who has appeared on Xtian missionary platforms[/quote]
Death to traitors.