Constant AmriKKKan and European meddling in Ukraine (as also in other parts of E Europe, e.g. the Swedes air-dropping teddy bears advertising for "democracy" into Belarus was it?) has resulted in the current situation in Ukraine.
The native loyalists and Russians aren't willing to let their identity fall apart.
And so here come the AmriKKKans (who asked them):
news.yahoo.com/sarah-palin-nukes-best-putin-containment-strategy-005149323.html
It's true. Since
- the Bad Guy is obviously Palin and gang/the US.
- the Good Guy is obviously Putin/Russia/Ukraine/everyone else minding their own business ("Ra Ra Ras-Putin, lover of the Russian Queen. They wouldn't quit, they wanted his head". OK, I'm not very familiar with Boney-M, but even I have heard a couple of their songs, and this just seemed to fit.)
Now dimwitted Palin's threat puts Putin and the Russians in general into a deep moral quandary, with only one answer - however ugly - staring them in the face.
The US - which, unlike Russia, does not have nukes for deterrence but in order to use them against other populations (e.g. as already seen in Hiroshima, Nagasaki) - has effectively threatened to bring out their nukes on this one. AmriKKKan nukes are obviously not for show.
The mathematics Russia is now faced with is an unpleasant but inevitable one. It's "nuke them before they nuke you". Because - and clearly - the US will nuke Russia (that's what the US *does* right?)
Russians are - certainly in comparison - a very ethical and humane people, and while they don't seem the kind to nuke others as an offensive, in this case they are forced to having to nuke the US on the Principle Of Defence. Aka Total War. There's really no choice for Russia. The US has given them none. US is a self-righteous trigger-happy nightmare. And the fact that Palin brings up the threat is practically as good as the US going for The Button.
It's all very sad and tragic. And I am sure we'll all miss the US (well, some of us might; not really, but pretend). But it's the wild west nowadays, and the time has at last come for the actual good guy to finally shoot the actual bad guy and be done with it - Han Solo did shoot first - let's not drag the movie out too long and make the audience suffer.
If Russia can't come up with a memorable statement before their "pre-emptive strike", they may just parrot the words of Israel's Golda Meir
[* Meir's statement is not entirely true - though I feel no ethical pangs with the Mossad repaying the islamic murderers of Israeli athletes in kind - but it sounds pretty enough, and history needs a soundbyte from Russia on this - it's one for the books - a la the US' "The day that will live in infamy" excuse.]
Then for a few decades, Russia can do some of the expected/required hand-wringing and feel "deeply sorry" about the "human cost of it all" - Europe may do the usual index-finger-wriggling of "you really shouldn't have, you know". And after the customary mourning period/self-blame/introspection about the inevitable turn of events, in time the world will move on again and the great tragedy will be history (you know how AmeriKKKans always want people to just "get over" the Native Americans already? Well, the world may find it easier to "get over" the AmeriKKKan settlers. Life moves on after all.)
Russia should just Nike with its Nukes already.
Now was it Einstein that said that though he didn't know with what weapons WWIII was going to be fought, he knew that we'll be fighting with sticks and stones thereafter. Confirmed:
------
Personally, I don't see that AmeriKKKans will all be okay with nuking Russia. The white supremacists of the US - who are always on about how "white" people are becoming a minority and their "phenotypic diversity is under threat" owing to "immigration" - will not want the best of the European phenotype to be nuked out of existence (Russia/Slavic Europe has the most attractive and diverse "European" looks compared to NW Europe, after all).
That - if nothing else - will hopefully stop Palin-type stupidity. I doubt more humane considerations will emanate from the Amerikkkans - such a largely christo-population as the US is, with Palin echoing not just the sentiments of the NRA/National Rifle Association, but most if not all US christos - so must hope that the loser white supremacist AmeriKKKans will for once accidentally serve a useful purpose and prevent the US from genociding another people for a change.
(Admittedly, the Irish and Slavs were only recently allowed into the "White" and "Oryan" clique, and though their acceptance in the clique hasn't completely caught on yet, it's getting there.)
The actual news:
news.yahoo.com/sarah-palin-nukes-best-putin-containment-strategy-005149323.html
The native loyalists and Russians aren't willing to let their identity fall apart.
And so here come the AmriKKKans (who asked them):
news.yahoo.com/sarah-palin-nukes-best-putin-containment-strategy-005149323.html
Quote:Sarah Palin: nukes are best Putin containment strategy
View photo
Former vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin speaks during the 41st annual Conservative Political Action Conference at the Gaylord International Hotel and Conference Center on March 8, 2014 in National Harbor, Maryland (AFP Photo/T.J. Kirkpatrick)
National Harbor (United States) (AFP) - Sarah Palin offered unsolicited advice Saturday to President Barack Obama on containing Russian aggression, saying "the only thing that stops a bad guy with a nuke is a good guy with a nuke."
The Republican former vice presidential candidate used a predominantly crass tone throughout her appearance at the Conservative Political Action Conference.
But she hit home by attacking what she called a feckless Obama foreign policy that she said has helped embolden Russian President Vladimir Putin.
Failing to show peace through strength has allowed some "very, very, very bad dudes (to) gain ground," said Palin, who remains a darling of the far-right.
Obama "would gut our arsenal while he allows others -- enemies -- to enrich theirs, she said.
"Mr. President, the only thing that stops a bad guy with a nuke is a good guy with a nuke."
The comments follow Russia's invasion of neighboring Ukraine last month, action which sent tensions soaring and US-Russia relations to perhaps their lowest point since the end of the Cold War.
The remark may have sounded flippant, but it was red meat to conservatives mindful of similar language used by the head of the National Rifle Association, America's largest gun lobby.
In the aftermath of a December 2012 mass shooting in Connecticut, NRA executive vice president Wayne LaPierre poured fuel on the gun control debate by saying that "the only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun."
Quote:"Mr. President, the only thing that stops a bad guy with a nuke is a good guy with a nuke."Who'd have thought Palin would say the right thing for a change?
It's true. Since
- the Bad Guy is obviously Palin and gang/the US.
- the Good Guy is obviously Putin/Russia/Ukraine/everyone else minding their own business ("Ra Ra Ras-Putin, lover of the Russian Queen. They wouldn't quit, they wanted his head". OK, I'm not very familiar with Boney-M, but even I have heard a couple of their songs, and this just seemed to fit.)
Now dimwitted Palin's threat puts Putin and the Russians in general into a deep moral quandary, with only one answer - however ugly - staring them in the face.
The US - which, unlike Russia, does not have nukes for deterrence but in order to use them against other populations (e.g. as already seen in Hiroshima, Nagasaki) - has effectively threatened to bring out their nukes on this one. AmriKKKan nukes are obviously not for show.
The mathematics Russia is now faced with is an unpleasant but inevitable one. It's "nuke them before they nuke you". Because - and clearly - the US will nuke Russia (that's what the US *does* right?)
Russians are - certainly in comparison - a very ethical and humane people, and while they don't seem the kind to nuke others as an offensive, in this case they are forced to having to nuke the US on the Principle Of Defence. Aka Total War. There's really no choice for Russia. The US has given them none. US is a self-righteous trigger-happy nightmare. And the fact that Palin brings up the threat is practically as good as the US going for The Button.
It's all very sad and tragic. And I am sure we'll all miss the US (well, some of us might; not really, but pretend). But it's the wild west nowadays, and the time has at last come for the actual good guy to finally shoot the actual bad guy and be done with it - Han Solo did shoot first - let's not drag the movie out too long and make the audience suffer.
If Russia can't come up with a memorable statement before their "pre-emptive strike", they may just parrot the words of Israel's Golda Meir
Quote:"Every civilization finds it necessary to negotiate compromises with its own values" *IIRC uttered by Meir when the Mossad went after the islamic murderers of Israeli athletes?), and then Russia can follow the Nike slogan: Just Do It.
[* Meir's statement is not entirely true - though I feel no ethical pangs with the Mossad repaying the islamic murderers of Israeli athletes in kind - but it sounds pretty enough, and history needs a soundbyte from Russia on this - it's one for the books - a la the US' "The day that will live in infamy" excuse.]
Then for a few decades, Russia can do some of the expected/required hand-wringing and feel "deeply sorry" about the "human cost of it all" - Europe may do the usual index-finger-wriggling of "you really shouldn't have, you know". And after the customary mourning period/self-blame/introspection about the inevitable turn of events, in time the world will move on again and the great tragedy will be history (you know how AmeriKKKans always want people to just "get over" the Native Americans already? Well, the world may find it easier to "get over" the AmeriKKKan settlers. Life moves on after all.)
Russia should just Nike with its Nukes already.
Quote:"Mr. President (Vladmir Putin), the only thing that stops a bad guy [=US] with a nuke is a good guy [=Russia] with a nuke."
Now was it Einstein that said that though he didn't know with what weapons WWIII was going to be fought, he knew that we'll be fighting with sticks and stones thereafter. Confirmed:
Quote:(EinsteinI guess the Return of the Stone Age is what it will take to get the Americas returned to the native Americans. Well, since that's what it takes and since the US gives Russia no alternatives... what can ya do, right?'I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.'
------
Personally, I don't see that AmeriKKKans will all be okay with nuking Russia. The white supremacists of the US - who are always on about how "white" people are becoming a minority and their "phenotypic diversity is under threat" owing to "immigration" - will not want the best of the European phenotype to be nuked out of existence (Russia/Slavic Europe has the most attractive and diverse "European" looks compared to NW Europe, after all).
That - if nothing else - will hopefully stop Palin-type stupidity. I doubt more humane considerations will emanate from the Amerikkkans - such a largely christo-population as the US is, with Palin echoing not just the sentiments of the NRA/National Rifle Association, but most if not all US christos - so must hope that the loser white supremacist AmeriKKKans will for once accidentally serve a useful purpose and prevent the US from genociding another people for a change.
(Admittedly, the Irish and Slavs were only recently allowed into the "White" and "Oryan" clique, and though their acceptance in the clique hasn't completely caught on yet, it's getting there.)
The actual news:
news.yahoo.com/sarah-palin-nukes-best-putin-containment-strategy-005149323.html
Quote:Sarah Palin: nukes are best Putin containment strategy
National Harbor (United States) (AFP) - Sarah Palin offered unsolicited advice Saturday to President Barack Obama on containing Russian aggression, saying "the only thing that stops a bad guy with a nuke is a good guy with a nuke."
[...]
[color="#0000FF"]"Mr. President, the only thing that stops a bad guy with a nuke is a good guy with a nuke."[/color]
The comments follow Russia's invasion of neighboring Ukraine last month, action which sent tensions soaring and US-Russia relations to perhaps their lowest point since the end of the Cold War.
The remark may have sounded flippant, but it was red meat to conservatives mindful of [color="#0000FF"]similar language used by the head of the National Rifle Association, America's largest gun lobby.[/color]
In the aftermath of a December 2012 mass shooting in Connecticut, NRA executive vice president Wayne LaPierre poured fuel on the gun control debate by saying that "the only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun."
Death to traitors.