The following further proves what was already more than merely suspected: that the rape focus was entirely with the aim on evangelism of women.
indiafacts.co.in/missionary-deception-named-veil-tears/
To get back to that final statement (and other such made throughout the article):
[color="#0000FF"]No. The crucial point is that Hindus do not know how to fight this evangelical blitzkrieg. Being Hindoo men - with a natural abhorrence for rape crimes and crimes against women - writers like the above Shiva Kumar and the rest of the hapless Male Hindu Internet Activist response is to be too stunned by the horrific nature of the crimes against their women that they do not know to fingerpoint the actual perpetrators (=exclusively christoislamicommunism) and rather blame "some" ideologically-anonymous "men". (Next Hindu nationalist men will start blaming themselves in some moronic collective mea-culpa, even though they *know* they and their kind are innocent across the board and have never harmed women. And that's exactly the programmed response christianism expected and wanted from Hindu men.) Hopeless. Most Indian nationalist/Hindu men can't argue. The more intellectual they are, the less they are able to respond to christoislamaniac baiting. The response should be to Attack First when retorting, then - when the christoislamaniacs don't know how to respond - can take the time to make a clean defense, and with that seal the case.[/color]
Internet activist Hindus are useless in fighting such christian tactics (and accusations of culturally institutionalised rape IS a christian tactic). Christianism has Hindu men on the backfoot yet again, and Hindu men - Hindooism's online vanguard against christoislamicommunism (which is why Hindu men were singled out for attack and alienation from "Indian" women in the first place, btw) - typically don't know how to respond.
But Internet activist Hindus are also useless when it comes to the kind of clear-cut arguments they need to make in this case. Again, they refuse to document how practically all the rape cases - including the sensationalised ones - have been by christoislamics and communists against Hindu women. Make that known - along with the news snippets that document it - and organise mass rallies of Hindoo women against "christoislamic and communist and psecular rapists". Make these rallies get covered by the news - at least one English paper, say the Pioneer. Then eventually they may make it to international news, else online Hindu activists can keep referring to this for evidence of how the real perpetrators are christoislamicommunists and the real victims are Hindoo women=heathenism. And then use that to slam the systematic christian and islamic rape of Hindoo women in India, which is exactly what gets silenced repeatedly in the news by Indian christomedia, as this usually refuses to name the "minority" perpetrators whereas some other papers do name them, so Hindus are forced to read 20 different news articles on the same crime to get the actual news/names of the perps.
Upon first learning that the main perpetrator of the Delhi case was an islamic, it was natural to suspect that that rape was a deliberate set up: the extent of the sensationalising media response even in international news was way too disproportionate, since earlier equally-horrific gangrapes by islamic men against Hindoo women went utterly under-reported, so the suspicion was that the christo powers that be in India orchestrated the brutal rape and murder of some poor Hindu girl for the purpose of manufacturing consent and evangelism. And then, when it was made known that the islamic footsoldier and ringleader was let off the hook for being "underage", it only further underscored that the entire thing was a set up: consider that no other rape case in India before it had got such a massive coverage in national let alone international media, or even major rallies organised about "rape" that actually got covered by the christomedia. Obviously the islamic "minor" that was hired by christian evangelical organisations already knew he would not do time for the gangrape he was given a free hand to commit - his going free was probably part of the deal. And being an islamic demon he was already more than game to rape the Hindoo to death and brought his christoconditioned pals, who were so obviously handpicked to get their heathen names in print, despite it being a commonly known fact that Hindus *never* - but never - even associate with christoislamics in general, let alone with christoislamicommunist criminals, let alone in hurting one of their own.
(That didn't stop alien Hindu "convert" internet activists from chiming in with the evangelical agenda that "India was indeed rape central". Even well-meaning converts are no more than a liability at best, and care only that they be accepted as "Hindus" and would smear actual (i.e. native) Hindus and the Hindoo homeland, all in order to cement this sense of alien entitlement to Hindoo religion.)
The wackypedia page on Sagarika Ghose - the relevant excerpt was a few posts up - provided further evidence that the whole Rape Coverage was a pre-meditated christian attack by the christo-media (masterminded by opus-dei types aka specially appointed catholic on-fire-for-christ media entities) against Hindu men with an eye on converting Hindu women: in 2006, when this christian plot was not yet hatched, Sagarika still screeched that the Hindoos who supposedly 'threatened' her were "elderly Hindoo women". Suddenly, in July 2013 - within months after the media had focused on India as 'rape central' and international talkshows hired Indian-origin hirelings like Padme Lakme - as per Rajeev2004 newsbytes of the time - to "testify" that Hindooism was "to blame" (<- shows it was obviously orchestrated psy-ops if ever there was one), the cryptochristist* Sagarika Ghose was suddenly interviewed by BBC - for pre-meditated intenational propagation - where she declared/read from the script that she and the islamic Barka Dutt and other christoislamic Hindu-baiting women frequently featured in Indian christomedia were being terrorised by "Indian men/patriarchy" and not the previous canard of "elderly Hindoo women" that Sagarika Ghose had gone on record about in 2006.
Clearly this was a deliberate change of tack owing to a change in instruction by christianism: Indian christomedia was told to not just report on (exclusively these new) rapes in India to boiling point and further insinuate that Indian culture was 'to blame' (by which the majority religio-culture of Hindoo-ism was insinuated), but to further pretend that Indian christomedia's female christoterrorists as well as its hired female islamic footsoldiers like Barka Dutt were "persecuted" and "threatened" by Indian men/patriarchy - the way Nussbaum pretended that Doniger and others were "threatened", also without evidence.
Sagarika even went so far as a great christo diatribe on twitter against "Indian men" being "ugly" - as per [color="#0000FF"]ekakizunj.com/Sagarika_Ghose[/color] again.
*Sagarika Ghose is widely rumoured to be a christist. Rumour on its own means little of course. Even her catholic schooling in St Stephens does not prove anything. (Though christians do have a specific modus operandi, indicated in pseculars who are exclusively anti-Hindu and deliberately lie against Hindoo-ism and negate the christoislamic genocide of Hindus. Not to mention that pseculars who work for christomedia are obviously christian, usually catholic, often cryptochristians to boot: i.e. they actively try to maintain their "secular"/ideology-free cover for attacking Hindu religion under.)
[color="#0000FF"]But, that Sagarika IS a christian - and a cryptochristian what's more - became obvious in a niticentral piece authored by some christist.[/color] And quite contrary to its intention. Apparently Sagarika had wished a "happy easter" and something about chocolate eggs to the Indian christomoronic community. Quick as lightning, a christist got an article published at niticentral, ostensibly to "educate" Sagarika about easter and how the first days are not really a happy time for devout christians and why they won't be eating easter eggs on those days. The purpose of the christist piece was clearly two-fold: 1. a public pretence by Sagarika and the christian respondent that Sagarika was not christian/could not be a christian because she was obviously too ignorant about christianism to be a christian, and 2. the christist writing at niticentral spent a zillion words in her essay explaining the odious details of christians' plagiarised concocted mysticism called "Easter" to the largely Hindoo audience of niticentral. The two goals were achieved/set in motion: some "Hindus" specifically remarked in the comments that they "appreciated" learning about the "deep" meaning of the plagiarised easter of the christians. I'm not sure if these "Hindu" comments were by the usual moronic types or by crypto plants, but then a definite plant showed up in the comments section to specifically declare that 'This proves that Sagarika is obviously not a christian, contrary to claims being made (on the internet)'. Their need for a plant's comment to drive the point home - in case niticentral readers missed it - was a further tell-tale sign, when actually, the whole show was what finally proved that Sagarika is a cryptochristian: it was a way too stagey and convenient and unlikely a "public proof" for how she *can't* be a christian, all because she got the details [possibly deliberately] wrong (though: even many western catholics get the details about catholic easter wrong too, so that would have proved nothing in itself. Plus the christist writer was herself wrong about some details). The whole charade was so obviously staged for the purpose of publicly dissociating Sagarika from having an ideological impetus (=christianism) driving her in her pointed hounding of Hindus and especially her *lying* against Hindus and her silencing of the christoislamic genocide of Hindoos.
Oh, and of course, Sagarika and her husband - the "ugly Indian male" (=Sagarika's words, not mine) and who is a fellow-convert and Hindu-baiter, aka Rajdeep Sardesai - are of course major players in propping up the christocommunist party of India, AAP:
indiafacts.co.in/rajdeep-sardesais-den-of-double-standards/
But what to expect from church-appointees in the christomedia. Naturally they will work for the church's latest political party. (And catholics all vote en-masse for whomever the vatican roots for: also seen when the catholics unanimously voted Rijkskanselaar Hitler on Vatican-mandate, or when catholics were told to specifically NOT vote for fellow-catholic John Kerry by the Vatican since he was pro-birth control. All such voting mandates contain implicit threats of excommunication, BTW.)
Things are in fact so obvious, even a foreign "convert"** noticed the christoislamic bias in the christomedia's reporting:
indiafacts.co.in/the-sinister-motive-behind-media-focus-on-rapes-in-india/
Christowest is aiming for the breakup of the Hindu family system by alienating (and converting) Indian Hindu-origin women from Indian Hindu-origin men.
(No, I *don't* remotely care about Hindu-origin entities. But somewhere in that spectrum are also actually Hindoo men and women, i.e. actual heathens, whom I do care about. They too can get affected.)
The real/larger goal is - of course - population reduction.
A new wave of alarmist western books (e.g. "the 6th extinction" or something) all project a bleak future owing to over-population. Rather like similar alarmist works from earlier decades that led to "Make Room! Make Room!" (aka cinematised in the Soylent Green movie). The latest book projects that drinking water will be the first primary source that will become too scarce and not be enough to support everyone.
For this purpose - since overpopulation is ever on the back of the west's minds - the west has once more stepped up its schemes for preventing people in India and China from reproducing at a normal rate. They target heathens in India because heathens are the majority. And India's heathen society (still) has a healthy i.e. positive reproductive rate. Alienation of the two genders is intended to neutralise that reproductive rate and ideally make it negative.
Why the christowest or the west in general feels compelled to meddle in Indian affairs is the question. They never think how the "white" population has overpopulated the world: the Americas were never theirs, yet alien invaders invaded the Americas, genocided the natives and then exploded into - what was it now, 300+ million "white" people in the USA alone? Having thus illegally exploded population-wise - i.e. illegally proportionally-overpopulated space far beyond their home region of Europe - they have the gall to try to control how many heathens may be born in India and China, never mind that most of these people will never move to Europe or USA let alone want to.
Instead of
1. "native converts" aka christoislamics being prevented from overpopulating in heathens' homelands (rather, the US and Indian christogovt keeps encouraging christos and islamics to produce more offspring in India) yet they simultaneously prevent - with laws - Hindus maintaining normal-sized families,
2. let alone the western settlers in the Americas etc being chased back to Europe where they belong a.o.t. allowing the so-called "white" population to proliferate uncontrolled in heathen (and "non-white") spaces like USA,
instead of all that, the christowest wants to illegally have a disproportionate right of access to the world's resources for christo "white" populations, and prevent anyone else from having access to their own legitimate resources. Yet India and China and much of SE Asia were always able to support large populations. Christowest never bothered to regulate itself (not even in lands they occupied) and want to regulate heathens in heathen spaces.
Christowestern thieves stole the Americas, multiplied disproportionately there, then have stolen the world's resources disproportionately for themselves and now want to control the demographics all the way in India and China etc. Add to this the wretched white supremacists' typical fears that "white" people may disappear from the planet/become "numerically obscured" by not just the dreaded "immigrants" but by "people of colour" (what?) existing in the rest of the world, since western countries are not reproducing at a positive rate of growth. Not our problem.
Besides, the only ones overpopulating the planet are catholics and many other types of christos and islamaniacs - though the latter mainly do that in India. The christowest should focus on alienating islamaniac genders (and christian genders) from each other: both are on a demographics rampage in India. If christoislamaniacs don't aim to overtake Hindus in India as the majority, then Hindus can naturally also reduce the number of children they have to about two. But until christoislamicommunists and other morons in India decide to stop reproducing altogether, Hindus are forced to have larger numbers of kids.
So christowest needs to decide what's more important for them: continuing to promote a monotheist India, or a heathen Hindoo India with a reasonably-sized self-maintained population.
I'm sure the christowest will choose the first. Since they know that E Timor will result: christoislamics of a monotheist India will genocide each other, and the christos of the west won't even pretend to care about the converts they made in India (just like they never cared about the christo converts they'd made in E Timor. Indian christians are *seriously* delusional if they think the christowest cares about Indian converts to christianism past the conversion of India to monotheism, when they'll have more immediate access to Indian resources. Christowestern US doesn't even care about the converts to American christian cults in S America or Ukraine or Russia. Such 2nd world converts are *only* ever local agents working in their host nations for US/western interests. And all such converts are expendable from the christowestern POV. But why expect 3rd world converts to understand that the christowest really does not care, when even 2nd world E European ex-orthodox converts to neo-christian cults - or 2nd world S American ex-catholic converts to American christianisms - don't see that?)
indiafacts.co.in/missionary-deception-named-veil-tears/
Quote:A Missionary deception named Veil of Tears
Posted by IndiaFacts Staff / March 16, 2014 / Posted in Distortion Watch, Headline, Hinduism, Media, Politics / 6 Comments
This is a guest article by IndiaFacts reader Shiva Kumaran, an IT professional from Bangalore.
[color="#0000FF"]Recently, I came across the announcement for an upcoming documentary movie entitled Veil of Tears: veiloftearsmovie.com/[/color]
The movie is scheduled for release in the US on 28 March, 2014.
[color="#FF0000"]The official trailer mentions about the horrible incident in Delhi-2012 and generalizes it to ââ¬Åviolence and oppression of women of Indiaââ¬Â as well as to ââ¬Åcultural persecution [of Indian women] follows from their birth to death.ââ¬Â So how far is this description accurate?[/color]
Speaking for myself, Iââ¬âand crores of Indian men and womenââ¬âdo not feel or view Indian women or any other women in this manner. One can even extend this beyond even human beings, but that would be a digression from the purpose at hand.
The storyline of the movie is captured below:
ââ¬ÅThis gripping new documentary film tells the untold story of millions of women in India who are culturally persecuted for no other reason than the fact that they are women (emphasis mine).ââ¬Â
In many of our understanding, India is a Bhoomi (sacred land) whose people have deified their women. I havenââ¬â¢t studied Hindu theology/Itihasa much, but from the little that has been handed to me through civilizational memory, innumerable number of sagely women have been celebrated in this land and worship divinity in a multitude of forms ââ¬â womanhood included.
If so, how can such an aspersion be cast on the people of an entire civilization? Why the broadbrush? What is the itch which causes people to look at our nook and corner and focus on the exception and display it as the norm? What is the agenda?
Rajiv Malhotra (and many others like him such as Sitaram Goel, and Arun Shourie in the past) had discussed several aspects of whatââ¬â¢s known as ââ¬ÅAtrocity Literatureââ¬Â in his original treatise ââ¬ÅBreaking Indiaââ¬Â (co-authored with Aravindan Neelakantan).
At the heart of movies like Veil of Tears lies both overt and cover Evangelical agenda.
Apart from urban slum dwellers, the rural poor, and the tribals, one of the target groups for evangelism are vulnerable Hindu widows. It is therefore my educated guess that this movie too is likely to make it appear, to its intended audience, that there is something rotten about Indian (read: Hindu) culture which oppresses and violates its women. On the contrary, within the traditional joint family system of India (if one could suppose that as a cultural norm), the mother was the head of the home. Thus, how is it justified to blame Indian culture itself for a few terrible but stray, incidents?
[color="#800080"](Utterly incompetent line of argumentation by the writer: he forgets to mention that even all the rape cases that finally got mass-media attention were committed exclusively by christian and communist friends (e.g. in W Bengal case) against Hindu women, and by islamics with their psecular friends (e.g. in Delhi) also against Hindu women.
And that's not even covering the frequently underreported systematic rapes of Hindoo women by
1. christoislamics such as by the christian NLFT in the NE - see BBC news on how NLFT is using 'porn' movies featuring their gangrape victims as "stars" to further their agenda of Tripura for christ. And by
2. islamic gangrapists against Hindoo women of so-called "Dalit" communities, after which the islamic criminals often set the Hindoo woman on fire.
Hindus really need to proliferate on the web the crucial information that the criminals in even the famous rape cases were in each case by named christians, islamics, communists along with christoconditioned hangers-on - since no Hindu associates with christoislamicommunists after all - and the victims were practically always Hindoo women.)[/color]
In this specific instance, we learn that the ââ¬Åproceeds of this film will be donated toward our continued efforts to change lives on a social, educational, health and spiritual level.ââ¬Â
Letââ¬â¢s decipher this noble-sounding statement with the aid of the facts which the movie makers have themselves put in the public domain.
ââ¬ÅOurââ¬Â here refers to the multinational charity organization/NGO, ââ¬ÅGospel For Asiaââ¬Â (GFA) (Indian site) or ââ¬ÅGospel For Asiaââ¬Â (US website). According to its website, GFA is a charitable trust which works under the leadership of the Believersââ¬â¢ Church. Its Founder and President is Rev. Dr. K.P. Yohannan. Both the organizations are located in Thiruvalla, Kerala. And Rev. Yohannan is interviewed by a News Agency on this movie here, a pretty revealing interview at that.
The foreign money received by these organizations over the last seven years, as filed with the Ministry of Home Affairs under the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act (FCRA) is summarized in the chart below:
Gospel for Asia Foreign Funding
An example of Foreign Contributions (FC) returns filed by GFA is here and by Believers Church India is here. Noticeably, both have received funds from ââ¬ÅGospel For Asia Incââ¬Â located in Carrolton, Texas-75010.
And all these fund flows are perfectly legal in India.
Now let us return to a slightly detailed examination of the proceeds of the Veil of Tears that will be donated to GFA and see what is at work here.
Quote:Continue to showcase poverty, oppression, structured inequality, injustice elsewhere so that individual donors (mostly in Europe & USA) can be made to feel that they are contributing to a ââ¬Åjustââ¬Â cause. Donors can become complacent in their belief systems and may not donate purely on the basis of expansion of their brotherhood/sisterhood. Thus, a ââ¬Åsecularââ¬Â case for saving these unfortunate souls has to be made and such movies and mainstream articles serve this purpose.
This movie is one among the many ways by which I can be made to feel guilty of myself as a Hindu. If we are made to feel bad about our selves, will that not make the path for mass conversion that much easier? Those who migrate will not feel bad about going out of their traditions, their culture, their heritage, their ancient wisdom, as all of that is something to be ashamed of, anyway.It gives me a queasy feeling that my name is being possibly besmirched and the money that this activity raises is funnelled back to change my culture ââ¬â of which I am justifiably proud.
But the crucial question remains: are there enough Indians who are proud of their culture of worshipping the feminine and are repulsed by such a caricature?
Quote:Ohm March 16, 2014 10:40 pm Reply
Read this please [color="#0000FF"]rajeev2004.blogspot.in/2008/06/kp-yohannan-makes-megabucks-as.html[/color]
sighbaboo (@sighbaboo) March 17, 2014 9:44 am Reply
The producer of the documentary, Mr. Kenny Saylors interviewed here says, ââ¬ÅThe hope is really coming from Christian women who are changing the culture from the inside outââ¬Â.
[color="#FF0000"]Given these, the agenda of this documentary should not leave anyone in doubt. It is Soul Harvest of Indian women.[/color]
[color="#800080"](This is a serious matter. Remember that in Rome too, christianism initially evangelised among the gullible, poor and *women*. Also remarked on for e.g. by the 4th century Porphyrius in his work exposing christianism.)[/color]
Sigh Baboo March 17, 2014 10:36 am Reply
Sorry, there was an error in that URL. Here is the correct one: heraldbanner.com/features/x1974700029/Seeking-to-pierce-the-veil-of-tears
tapan March 17, 2014 2:11 pm Reply
I am waiting for the day Modi becomes PM and rids India of these anti nationals
Mahesh March 17, 2014 8:33 pm Reply
Why are Hindu temples under government and why not Churches or Dargahs? This shows that Hindus have become paraihs in their own land.
Jayesh March 18, 2014 1:05 pm Reply
US use these types of issues to undermine Hindus of India a good example is I AM MALALA used as soft attack on Islamic terror
To get back to that final statement (and other such made throughout the article):
Quote:But the crucial question remains: are there enough Indians who are proud of their culture of worshipping the feminine and are repulsed by such a caricature?
[color="#0000FF"]No. The crucial point is that Hindus do not know how to fight this evangelical blitzkrieg. Being Hindoo men - with a natural abhorrence for rape crimes and crimes against women - writers like the above Shiva Kumar and the rest of the hapless Male Hindu Internet Activist response is to be too stunned by the horrific nature of the crimes against their women that they do not know to fingerpoint the actual perpetrators (=exclusively christoislamicommunism) and rather blame "some" ideologically-anonymous "men". (Next Hindu nationalist men will start blaming themselves in some moronic collective mea-culpa, even though they *know* they and their kind are innocent across the board and have never harmed women. And that's exactly the programmed response christianism expected and wanted from Hindu men.) Hopeless. Most Indian nationalist/Hindu men can't argue. The more intellectual they are, the less they are able to respond to christoislamaniac baiting. The response should be to Attack First when retorting, then - when the christoislamaniacs don't know how to respond - can take the time to make a clean defense, and with that seal the case.[/color]
Internet activist Hindus are useless in fighting such christian tactics (and accusations of culturally institutionalised rape IS a christian tactic). Christianism has Hindu men on the backfoot yet again, and Hindu men - Hindooism's online vanguard against christoislamicommunism (which is why Hindu men were singled out for attack and alienation from "Indian" women in the first place, btw) - typically don't know how to respond.
But Internet activist Hindus are also useless when it comes to the kind of clear-cut arguments they need to make in this case. Again, they refuse to document how practically all the rape cases - including the sensationalised ones - have been by christoislamics and communists against Hindu women. Make that known - along with the news snippets that document it - and organise mass rallies of Hindoo women against "christoislamic and communist and psecular rapists". Make these rallies get covered by the news - at least one English paper, say the Pioneer. Then eventually they may make it to international news, else online Hindu activists can keep referring to this for evidence of how the real perpetrators are christoislamicommunists and the real victims are Hindoo women=heathenism. And then use that to slam the systematic christian and islamic rape of Hindoo women in India, which is exactly what gets silenced repeatedly in the news by Indian christomedia, as this usually refuses to name the "minority" perpetrators whereas some other papers do name them, so Hindus are forced to read 20 different news articles on the same crime to get the actual news/names of the perps.
Upon first learning that the main perpetrator of the Delhi case was an islamic, it was natural to suspect that that rape was a deliberate set up: the extent of the sensationalising media response even in international news was way too disproportionate, since earlier equally-horrific gangrapes by islamic men against Hindoo women went utterly under-reported, so the suspicion was that the christo powers that be in India orchestrated the brutal rape and murder of some poor Hindu girl for the purpose of manufacturing consent and evangelism. And then, when it was made known that the islamic footsoldier and ringleader was let off the hook for being "underage", it only further underscored that the entire thing was a set up: consider that no other rape case in India before it had got such a massive coverage in national let alone international media, or even major rallies organised about "rape" that actually got covered by the christomedia. Obviously the islamic "minor" that was hired by christian evangelical organisations already knew he would not do time for the gangrape he was given a free hand to commit - his going free was probably part of the deal. And being an islamic demon he was already more than game to rape the Hindoo to death and brought his christoconditioned pals, who were so obviously handpicked to get their heathen names in print, despite it being a commonly known fact that Hindus *never* - but never - even associate with christoislamics in general, let alone with christoislamicommunist criminals, let alone in hurting one of their own.
(That didn't stop alien Hindu "convert" internet activists from chiming in with the evangelical agenda that "India was indeed rape central". Even well-meaning converts are no more than a liability at best, and care only that they be accepted as "Hindus" and would smear actual (i.e. native) Hindus and the Hindoo homeland, all in order to cement this sense of alien entitlement to Hindoo religion.)
The wackypedia page on Sagarika Ghose - the relevant excerpt was a few posts up - provided further evidence that the whole Rape Coverage was a pre-meditated christian attack by the christo-media (masterminded by opus-dei types aka specially appointed catholic on-fire-for-christ media entities) against Hindu men with an eye on converting Hindu women: in 2006, when this christian plot was not yet hatched, Sagarika still screeched that the Hindoos who supposedly 'threatened' her were "elderly Hindoo women". Suddenly, in July 2013 - within months after the media had focused on India as 'rape central' and international talkshows hired Indian-origin hirelings like Padme Lakme - as per Rajeev2004 newsbytes of the time - to "testify" that Hindooism was "to blame" (<- shows it was obviously orchestrated psy-ops if ever there was one), the cryptochristist* Sagarika Ghose was suddenly interviewed by BBC - for pre-meditated intenational propagation - where she declared/read from the script that she and the islamic Barka Dutt and other christoislamic Hindu-baiting women frequently featured in Indian christomedia were being terrorised by "Indian men/patriarchy" and not the previous canard of "elderly Hindoo women" that Sagarika Ghose had gone on record about in 2006.
Clearly this was a deliberate change of tack owing to a change in instruction by christianism: Indian christomedia was told to not just report on (exclusively these new) rapes in India to boiling point and further insinuate that Indian culture was 'to blame' (by which the majority religio-culture of Hindoo-ism was insinuated), but to further pretend that Indian christomedia's female christoterrorists as well as its hired female islamic footsoldiers like Barka Dutt were "persecuted" and "threatened" by Indian men/patriarchy - the way Nussbaum pretended that Doniger and others were "threatened", also without evidence.
Sagarika even went so far as a great christo diatribe on twitter against "Indian men" being "ugly" - as per [color="#0000FF"]ekakizunj.com/Sagarika_Ghose[/color] again.
*Sagarika Ghose is widely rumoured to be a christist. Rumour on its own means little of course. Even her catholic schooling in St Stephens does not prove anything. (Though christians do have a specific modus operandi, indicated in pseculars who are exclusively anti-Hindu and deliberately lie against Hindoo-ism and negate the christoislamic genocide of Hindus. Not to mention that pseculars who work for christomedia are obviously christian, usually catholic, often cryptochristians to boot: i.e. they actively try to maintain their "secular"/ideology-free cover for attacking Hindu religion under.)
[color="#0000FF"]But, that Sagarika IS a christian - and a cryptochristian what's more - became obvious in a niticentral piece authored by some christist.[/color] And quite contrary to its intention. Apparently Sagarika had wished a "happy easter" and something about chocolate eggs to the Indian christomoronic community. Quick as lightning, a christist got an article published at niticentral, ostensibly to "educate" Sagarika about easter and how the first days are not really a happy time for devout christians and why they won't be eating easter eggs on those days. The purpose of the christist piece was clearly two-fold: 1. a public pretence by Sagarika and the christian respondent that Sagarika was not christian/could not be a christian because she was obviously too ignorant about christianism to be a christian, and 2. the christist writing at niticentral spent a zillion words in her essay explaining the odious details of christians' plagiarised concocted mysticism called "Easter" to the largely Hindoo audience of niticentral. The two goals were achieved/set in motion: some "Hindus" specifically remarked in the comments that they "appreciated" learning about the "deep" meaning of the plagiarised easter of the christians. I'm not sure if these "Hindu" comments were by the usual moronic types or by crypto plants, but then a definite plant showed up in the comments section to specifically declare that 'This proves that Sagarika is obviously not a christian, contrary to claims being made (on the internet)'. Their need for a plant's comment to drive the point home - in case niticentral readers missed it - was a further tell-tale sign, when actually, the whole show was what finally proved that Sagarika is a cryptochristian: it was a way too stagey and convenient and unlikely a "public proof" for how she *can't* be a christian, all because she got the details [possibly deliberately] wrong (though: even many western catholics get the details about catholic easter wrong too, so that would have proved nothing in itself. Plus the christist writer was herself wrong about some details). The whole charade was so obviously staged for the purpose of publicly dissociating Sagarika from having an ideological impetus (=christianism) driving her in her pointed hounding of Hindus and especially her *lying* against Hindus and her silencing of the christoislamic genocide of Hindoos.
Oh, and of course, Sagarika and her husband - the "ugly Indian male" (=Sagarika's words, not mine) and who is a fellow-convert and Hindu-baiter, aka Rajdeep Sardesai - are of course major players in propping up the christocommunist party of India, AAP:
indiafacts.co.in/rajdeep-sardesais-den-of-double-standards/
But what to expect from church-appointees in the christomedia. Naturally they will work for the church's latest political party. (And catholics all vote en-masse for whomever the vatican roots for: also seen when the catholics unanimously voted Rijkskanselaar Hitler on Vatican-mandate, or when catholics were told to specifically NOT vote for fellow-catholic John Kerry by the Vatican since he was pro-birth control. All such voting mandates contain implicit threats of excommunication, BTW.)
Things are in fact so obvious, even a foreign "convert"** noticed the christoislamic bias in the christomedia's reporting:
indiafacts.co.in/the-sinister-motive-behind-media-focus-on-rapes-in-india/
Quote:The deluge of rape reports on India started with the shameful gang rape of a young woman, Jyoti, in a bus in Delhi on December 16th, 2012. Jyoti died. The six culprits were convicted. One committed either suicide (official version) or was killed by prison inmates. Four got death sentence. The sixth was a minor, six months short of his 18th birthday. He got away with 3 years in a reprimand home. As he allegedly was the most brutal of all and responsible for the death of Jyoti, efforts are on to try him as an adult.
[...]
...to portray [Traditional Indian society] in a poor light, ââ¬Åanother rapeââ¬Â makes headlines every other day. Care is taken that only rapes committed by men with Hindu names reach the limelight and are discussed on TV. India has some 200 million Muslims and some 50 million Christians and they also commit rapes and very cruel ones, as well. For example the minor in the rape case of Jyothi is a Muslim. This news, however, did not make it to the mainstream media. There seems to be communalism in regard to broadcasting crimes, and maybe even in registering them. This makes sense, if the objective is to demean Hindu culture and thereby propel it to reform and open up. It is expected to leave those old fashioned family values behind, to have condom vending machines in colleges, to consider free sex as normal. What better start than to talk of rape? It prepares the ground for allowing westerners to prepare the syllabus for ââ¬Ëadolescent educationââ¬â¢. And once the youth is convinced, the ââ¬Ëbackwardââ¬â¢ Hindu society will be a thing of the past.
Christowest is aiming for the breakup of the Hindu family system by alienating (and converting) Indian Hindu-origin women from Indian Hindu-origin men.
(No, I *don't* remotely care about Hindu-origin entities. But somewhere in that spectrum are also actually Hindoo men and women, i.e. actual heathens, whom I do care about. They too can get affected.)
The real/larger goal is - of course - population reduction.
A new wave of alarmist western books (e.g. "the 6th extinction" or something) all project a bleak future owing to over-population. Rather like similar alarmist works from earlier decades that led to "Make Room! Make Room!" (aka cinematised in the Soylent Green movie). The latest book projects that drinking water will be the first primary source that will become too scarce and not be enough to support everyone.
For this purpose - since overpopulation is ever on the back of the west's minds - the west has once more stepped up its schemes for preventing people in India and China from reproducing at a normal rate. They target heathens in India because heathens are the majority. And India's heathen society (still) has a healthy i.e. positive reproductive rate. Alienation of the two genders is intended to neutralise that reproductive rate and ideally make it negative.
Why the christowest or the west in general feels compelled to meddle in Indian affairs is the question. They never think how the "white" population has overpopulated the world: the Americas were never theirs, yet alien invaders invaded the Americas, genocided the natives and then exploded into - what was it now, 300+ million "white" people in the USA alone? Having thus illegally exploded population-wise - i.e. illegally proportionally-overpopulated space far beyond their home region of Europe - they have the gall to try to control how many heathens may be born in India and China, never mind that most of these people will never move to Europe or USA let alone want to.
Instead of
1. "native converts" aka christoislamics being prevented from overpopulating in heathens' homelands (rather, the US and Indian christogovt keeps encouraging christos and islamics to produce more offspring in India) yet they simultaneously prevent - with laws - Hindus maintaining normal-sized families,
2. let alone the western settlers in the Americas etc being chased back to Europe where they belong a.o.t. allowing the so-called "white" population to proliferate uncontrolled in heathen (and "non-white") spaces like USA,
instead of all that, the christowest wants to illegally have a disproportionate right of access to the world's resources for christo "white" populations, and prevent anyone else from having access to their own legitimate resources. Yet India and China and much of SE Asia were always able to support large populations. Christowest never bothered to regulate itself (not even in lands they occupied) and want to regulate heathens in heathen spaces.
Christowestern thieves stole the Americas, multiplied disproportionately there, then have stolen the world's resources disproportionately for themselves and now want to control the demographics all the way in India and China etc. Add to this the wretched white supremacists' typical fears that "white" people may disappear from the planet/become "numerically obscured" by not just the dreaded "immigrants" but by "people of colour" (what?) existing in the rest of the world, since western countries are not reproducing at a positive rate of growth. Not our problem.
Besides, the only ones overpopulating the planet are catholics and many other types of christos and islamaniacs - though the latter mainly do that in India. The christowest should focus on alienating islamaniac genders (and christian genders) from each other: both are on a demographics rampage in India. If christoislamaniacs don't aim to overtake Hindus in India as the majority, then Hindus can naturally also reduce the number of children they have to about two. But until christoislamicommunists and other morons in India decide to stop reproducing altogether, Hindus are forced to have larger numbers of kids.
So christowest needs to decide what's more important for them: continuing to promote a monotheist India, or a heathen Hindoo India with a reasonably-sized self-maintained population.
I'm sure the christowest will choose the first. Since they know that E Timor will result: christoislamics of a monotheist India will genocide each other, and the christos of the west won't even pretend to care about the converts they made in India (just like they never cared about the christo converts they'd made in E Timor. Indian christians are *seriously* delusional if they think the christowest cares about Indian converts to christianism past the conversion of India to monotheism, when they'll have more immediate access to Indian resources. Christowestern US doesn't even care about the converts to American christian cults in S America or Ukraine or Russia. Such 2nd world converts are *only* ever local agents working in their host nations for US/western interests. And all such converts are expendable from the christowestern POV. But why expect 3rd world converts to understand that the christowest really does not care, when even 2nd world E European ex-orthodox converts to neo-christian cults - or 2nd world S American ex-catholic converts to American christianisms - don't see that?)