Post 2/2
AAP etc
1. rajeev2004.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/christian-terrorists-massacre-security.html
Tuesday, March 11, 2014
Related to rajeev2004.blogspot.com/2014/03/aap-is-front-for-christrian-terrorism.html
which was on Sabyasachi Panda - the christian "maoist" murderer of Swami Lakshmananda - having been welcomed into the AAP with open arns.
2. rajeev2004.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/aap-anarchist-anti-national-thugs-in.html
But the AAP manifesto did promise mob-rule. Speaking of how the mob will create a revolution and take over the state etc etc. Aka Communism.
No wonder christians - not just the liberation theology variety - are all signed up into AAP: they certainly want to take over the Indian state. And since KKongress doesn't have what it takes to provide the free ticket, christians have moved into the KKKongress spin-off, the AAP (People's Party of India, Communist).
Repeat:
indiafacts.co.in/arvind-kejriwals-anti-national-revolution/
3. rajeev2004.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/quick-notes-rally-mystery-colonizers.html
4. indiafacts.co.in/sushma-swaraj-bats-congress
The comments are also curious.
5. No longer about AAP:
indiafacts.co.in/hindu-dharma-good-hindutva-bad/
First, concerning this from the above:
-> No ethnic Indian of direct (unconverted) Hindu ancestry in India who has a foreign spouse is a Hindu or would be accepted by anyone who is a Hindoo. So I don't know why their ridiculing "Hinduism" - or their alien spouses ridiculing Hindu religion - should come as a shock, let alone to alien "converts". Aliens and those that marry aliens are well... aliens. And only aliens and subvertibles would associate with them.
In foreign climes, due to scarcity of Hindoo heathens - a.o.t. any entity that calls itself a "Hindu" and is actually 'secular', 'atheist', and otherwise subvertible - a handful of Hindus have out of what must be desperation married foreign atheists/agnostics (never "converts" though, or those that threaten to "convert"; and the Hindu spouse specifically never wants their unreligious spouse to "convert" to Hinduism, since it is an ethnic religion and there is nothing wrong with the ex-christian foreigners having deconverted to atheism; at least their development arc is positive compared to the regression-arc of ethnic Indians de-heathenising into seculars calling themselves "Hindus"). Also in certain foreign climes, some hardcore Hindoo heathens can be seen married to E Asian hyper-heathens (E Asian hyper-heathens were also forced by scarcity of their own kind into looking beyond their local heathenism, since actually they are also strictly endogamous).
But there are no "Hindus" in India married to aliens. There's no such thing.
And as for the example Maria Wirth provides of "when I .... connected with the English speaking middle class including some foreign wives, I was shocked that several of my new friends with Hindu names were ridiculing Hinduism without knowing much about it"
you already know that all the children of these unHindus will turn out to be like Mira Kamdar. Elst once had an article on Mira Kamdar: koenraadelst.bharatvani.org/articles/fascism/kamdar.html
Her dad's a Gujarati Indian of Hindu ancestry and her mother's some kind of non-Indian (Brit IIRC), and Mira Kamdar spewed hate all over Hindus by using her dad as an example of why Hindus are to be hated.
So getting spit on by their even more unHindu and anti-Hindu kids is something for all these unHindu Indians - who are settled in India yet married to alien spouses - to look forward to. And that's not all the prizes to be won: they will be imposing more such Hindu-baiting terrorists as Mira Kamdar on the native Hindus of India in the future. For which imposed misery Hindoos will no doubt be grateful and fondly remember them (like Jaichand is 'fondly' remembered).
I don't get why ethnic Hindus with tendencies towards the west don't marry native Americans instead. I can see how they would be an asset.
Info from 2 degrees of separation: I know of a Gujarati business man (very rich) who married a Lithuanian. She was - from the account I heard of the match - a goodlooking woman (and probably a nice person too, though my source did not know her) but could not speak a word of any language her Indian husband knew - which, by implication, tells you he could not speak Lithuanian either. Essentially, he married her because she was pretty and willing, and she married him because he had money and could look after her.
Not saying it's invalid. But it's not ideal either. But at least he lives overseas and doesn't live in India, so I don't care. Living overseas is largely a graveyard for Hindoos and their heathenism anyway. Marrying fellow arch-heathens from E Asia might perhaps allow heathenism to continue for longer, or in a different direction, and perhaps even somehow survive. <- But this is an untested theory, since all the couples of this kind that I know of are young, i.e. only one generation. Still, an overseas ethnic Hindoo marrying an E Asian heathen is better (i.e. >) than marrying a western atheist/agnostic > marrying an Indian non-heathen calling itself a 'Hindu' > marrying a western or Indian christoislamic > than an Indian in India marrying an alien >= a Hindu-origin Indian in India or overseas marrying an alien "convert". The last is the absolute worst. Because that will eat into larger Hindoo-dom and is no longer a "private choice" matter. C.f. a 'Hindu' married into christoislam: they are openly rejected by Hindu-dom anyway and so can't be foisted on traditional Hindoos by new-agey 'Hindus' wanting traditional Hindoos to be "less orthodox" and "accept" the christoislamic spouse. Whereas new-agey 'Hindus' always try to force traditional Hindoos and temples to accept the alien spouses of 'Hindus'. I.e. alien "converts" are insidiously forcibly inserted into Hindoo-dom and thereby invariably, gradually turn the heathenism into an alienism.)
Another thing that eats into Hindoo religion is accepting alien converts in general. And teaching them "mantras" like Maria Wirth states above:
I never cease to be amazed at how easily Indian "Hindus" - some strange kind of orthodox of course (new-age Hindus don't know to get mantras to work) but of a sudden modern variety - will teach aliens (but largely only westerners, as far as I can tell) yet never display such an interest in inducting the masses of loyal Hindoos into mantras, including many Hindoo women often kept away from mantras (and often by the very types that will readily sell the same to alien women).
One day - assuming there is any justice (one likes to impute subjectivity to the objective universe and pretend it cares about balance and retribution) - it will all backfire. And I can't see that Hindoos need have any pity for the traitors who brought all of Hindoo-dom down by inducting mleccha demons to puke all over sacred Hindoo religion/Gods with their dabbling (and they are demons if they're the kind that would "convert" to Hinduism, since if they were heathens they'd be in their *own* ancestral religions, nah?). If they cared about Hindoo or any ethnic heathen religion, they'd leave these alone. But alien dabblers "converts" care only about themselves: that they should be able to dabble [in others' ancestral religion]. Which further underscores that alien "converts" - aka dabblers - are not and never were heathens.
Half the time I find myself plotting revenge. But while there are still orthodox Hindoos who would never countenance aliens in their families let alone accept them as "Hindoos" or teach aliens mantras and Hindoo religion, I suppose one must still be loyal. But they're a greying people and when they're gone, I think I will switch over to revenge, or at least passive gloating whenever the 'Hindus' that remain get beaten down by their own (alien) creations. One good turn deserves another, after all.
A few 'Hindus' a bit earlier on - the period when this disease seems to have started - thought it was a similarly 'brilliant' idea to teach the colonial Brit going by the pseudonym "Arthur Avalon" how to dabble, since he also seemed really "sincere" and "deserving" (but they generally did not teach native Hindoos, of course: native Hindoos after all were not western enough to be thought deserving, even though they were actually sincere and insubvertible and despite Hindoo religion being their own ancestral religion). And for a brief time, Arthur infatuated himself with Hindu religion, as many more do today. But just as *every* other dabbling alien does given enough time (and as Maria Wirth will too if she outlives her present infatuation), Arthur eventually "recanted" - as christians would say - and ran back to where he belonged: swearing fealty to catholicism. I know it was catholicism and not some other christocult because, as a nice present for Hindus from that dabbling love affair, "Arthur Avalon"'s legacy is visible on the internet: I recall seeing several alien catholic sites dabbling hardcore in the path paved by Arthur, who were claiming that sacred Shakta literature and practices and mantras are "actually" about Mary/Jeebusism. And these alien catholics are not just dabbling hard in this but, for all I know, may tomorrow induct Indian christoterrorists to inculturate on this as well.
[color="#0000FF"]So yet another hearty Thank You To All The Traitors[/color] (can they please be made to publish their full names and permanent addresses in future along with their crimes?)
AAP etc
1. rajeev2004.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/christian-terrorists-massacre-security.html
Tuesday, March 11, 2014
Quote:Christian terrorists massacre security personnel in Chattisgarh
Will [color="#FF0000"]AAP[/color] nominate the "Maoist" perpetrators to contest on their party's ticket from Chattisgarg in the forthcoming Parliamentary elections?
They already have [color="#FF0000"]Christist murderers
"Binayak Sen" and "Sabyasachi Panda"
in their midst[/color], as well as seditious Jihadi bootlickers like Ashant Bhushan.
[color="#0000FF"]m.thehindu.com/news/national/maoists-kill-16-in-chhattisgarh/article5773315.ece/?maneref=http%3A%2F%2Fnews.google.co.in%2F[/color]
Posted by karyakarta92 at 3/11/2014 02:18:00 PM
Related to rajeev2004.blogspot.com/2014/03/aap-is-front-for-christrian-terrorism.html
which was on Sabyasachi Panda - the christian "maoist" murderer of Swami Lakshmananda - having been welcomed into the AAP with open arns.
2. rajeev2004.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/aap-anarchist-anti-national-thugs-in.html
Quote:Wednesday, March 05, 2014
AAP anarchist anti-national thugs in action
[IMG 1]
[IMG 2]
The pictures are of BJP workers severely injured in the AAP "direct action."
Showing their true FASCIST colours.
The mob of anti-national anarchist scum attacking the BJP headquarters in New Delhi was led by the dangerous Naxalite AAPtard Ashutosh and the Moslem banshee Shazia Ilmi.
(Beware of attractive women in white caps peddling "Aam Admi" rhetoric!)
Apparently, with the active participation of the "eminent Gandhian" Rajmohan Ghandy. The picture below is of Rajmohan Ghandy directing? the mob attack on the BJP office. (See the idiot in GREEN standing 3rd from the left in the picture below, right behind the lunatic in blue that has a missile in his hand.)
[IMG 3]
I have zero respect for the dead fascist Ghandy, leave alone contemporary opportunist members of his clan - Rajmohan Ghandy,
Tushar Ghandy, Gopalkrishna Ghandy et al are willing accomplices and collaborators
of the most corrupt, anti-national, seditious scum of the land. They are also exponents of "dynastic democracy" - only far less successful than the Nehru clan.
Will there ever be deliverance or liberation
from the seemingly never ending atrocities, decadence and debauchery of Nehru, Gandhi and their extended
litter?
Where is the obligatory media orgasm about "non-violence", "freedom of speech" etc.? There is none.
The likes of Burka Dutt and Sagarika Ghose practise Christian abstinence when it comes to condemning or even reporting violence by mobs that share their political persuasion.
[color="#0000FF"]m.niticentral.com/2014/03/05/violent-aap-workers-attack-bjp-headquarters-in-delhi-196352.html[/color]
Posted by karyakarta92 at 3/05/2014 01:32:00 PM
But the AAP manifesto did promise mob-rule. Speaking of how the mob will create a revolution and take over the state etc etc. Aka Communism.
No wonder christians - not just the liberation theology variety - are all signed up into AAP: they certainly want to take over the Indian state. And since KKongress doesn't have what it takes to provide the free ticket, christians have moved into the KKKongress spin-off, the AAP (People's Party of India, Communist).
Repeat:
indiafacts.co.in/arvind-kejriwals-anti-national-revolution/
Quote:AAPââ¬â¢s ââ¬Ågovernance modelââ¬Â was an unmitigated nightmare for the national capital, Delhi, where their government was in power for 49 days. Shekhar Gupta who read Kejriwalââ¬â¢s manifesto ââ¬ËSwarajââ¬â¢, was shocked to find their dangerous model in black and white: [color="#0000FF"]ââ¬ÅThe instruments of governance, law enforcement, judiciary, executive, parliament, as we know them, shall cease to exist, or at least, to matter. The mob will be sovereign. The police will have to take orders from the mob. The mob, or the gram sabha or the mohalla sabha, will be able to levy and collect its own taxes. No decision will be taken unless the ââ¬Åpeopleââ¬Â decide. No wonder Prashant Bhushan wants a referendum in Kashmir on whether the army should stay thereââ¬Â¦Ã¢â¬Â[/color]
3. rajeev2004.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/quick-notes-rally-mystery-colonizers.html
Quote:Friday, March 14, 2014
Quick notes: Rally mystery, Colonizers face the heat..
[color="#0000FF"]ââ¬Â¢Whose rally? Anna Hazare was told it was Mamta's rally and Mamta was told it was Anna's rally.. so, who organized it? The CIA?
livemint.com/Politics/fkdXqZES2Q7tyJd0afuxpI/Anna-does-a-Uturn-rules-out-support-to-Mamata-in-Lok-Sabh.html[/color]
[...]
ââ¬Â¢14 Caribbean Nations Sue Former Colonizers for Slave Trade: The lawsuit will demand reparations from the governments of Britain, France and the Netherlands
Posted by Pagan at 3/14/2014 08:51:00 PM Labels: colonialism, medicine, politics, racism, technology
4. indiafacts.co.in/sushma-swaraj-bats-congress
Quote:Sushma Swaraj bats for Congress
Posted by Ravi Shanker Kapoor / March 12, 2014 / Posted in Commentary, Headline / 8 Comments
The comments are also curious.
5. No longer about AAP:
indiafacts.co.in/hindu-dharma-good-hindutva-bad/
Quote:Is Hindu Dharma good and Hindutva bad?
Posted by Maria Wirth / March 10, 2014 / Posted in Distortion Watch, Headline, Hinduism, Intelligentsia, Media, Politics / 6 Comments
For many years I lived in ââ¬Ëspiritual Indiaââ¬â¢ without any idea how important the terms ââ¬Ëââ¬â¢secularââ¬â¢ and ââ¬â¢communalââ¬â¢ were. The people I met were appreciative of Indiaââ¬â¢s great heritage. They gave me tips which texts to read, which sants to meet, [color="#FF0000"]which mantras to learn[/color], etc., and I wrote about it for German readers. I used to think that all Indians are genuinely proud of their ancestors, who had stunningly deep insights into what is true about us and the universe and who left a huge legacy of precious ancient texts unparalleled in the world.
However, [color="#0000FF"]when I[/color] settled in a ââ¬Ënormalââ¬â¢ environment away from ashrams and pilgrimage places and [color="#0000FF"]connected with the English speaking middle class including some foreign wives, I was shocked that several of my new friends with Hindu names were ridiculing Hinduism without knowing much about it.[/color] They had not even read the Bhagavad-Gita, but pronounced severe judgment on it. They gave the impression as if Hinduism was the most depraved and violent of all religions and responsible for all the ills India is facing. The caste system and crude rules of Manusmiti were quoted as proof. Reading newspapers and watching TV, I also discovered an inexplicable, yet clear anti Hindu stand.
My new acquaintances had expected me to join them in denouncing ââ¬Ëprimitiveââ¬â¢ Hinduism which I could not do as I knew too much, not only form reading extensively, but also from doing sadhana. They were not amused and declared that I had read the wrong books. They asked me to read the right books, which would give me the ââ¬Ëcorrectââ¬â¢ understanding. They obviously did not doubt their own view to be the correct one. However, instead of coming around by reading Romila Thapar and co, I rather got the impression that there was an intention behind the negative portrayal of Hinduism: Christianity and Islam were meant to look good in comparison. My neighbour, a writer with communist leanings, henceforth introduced me to his friends as ââ¬Åthe local RSS pracharakââ¬Â. Many ââ¬Ësecularââ¬â¢ Indians consider the RSS as Hindu fundamentalists, occasionally equating it even with Islamic terror groups. So no surprise that an elderly lady once retorted, ââ¬ÅIn this case I am not pleased to meet you.ââ¬Â
First, concerning this from the above:
Quote:"the English speaking middle class including some foreign wives, I was shocked that several of my new friends with Hindu names were ridiculing Hinduism without knowing much about it"
-> No ethnic Indian of direct (unconverted) Hindu ancestry in India who has a foreign spouse is a Hindu or would be accepted by anyone who is a Hindoo. So I don't know why their ridiculing "Hinduism" - or their alien spouses ridiculing Hindu religion - should come as a shock, let alone to alien "converts". Aliens and those that marry aliens are well... aliens. And only aliens and subvertibles would associate with them.
In foreign climes, due to scarcity of Hindoo heathens - a.o.t. any entity that calls itself a "Hindu" and is actually 'secular', 'atheist', and otherwise subvertible - a handful of Hindus have out of what must be desperation married foreign atheists/agnostics (never "converts" though, or those that threaten to "convert"; and the Hindu spouse specifically never wants their unreligious spouse to "convert" to Hinduism, since it is an ethnic religion and there is nothing wrong with the ex-christian foreigners having deconverted to atheism; at least their development arc is positive compared to the regression-arc of ethnic Indians de-heathenising into seculars calling themselves "Hindus"). Also in certain foreign climes, some hardcore Hindoo heathens can be seen married to E Asian hyper-heathens (E Asian hyper-heathens were also forced by scarcity of their own kind into looking beyond their local heathenism, since actually they are also strictly endogamous).
But there are no "Hindus" in India married to aliens. There's no such thing.
And as for the example Maria Wirth provides of "when I .... connected with the English speaking middle class including some foreign wives, I was shocked that several of my new friends with Hindu names were ridiculing Hinduism without knowing much about it"
you already know that all the children of these unHindus will turn out to be like Mira Kamdar. Elst once had an article on Mira Kamdar: koenraadelst.bharatvani.org/articles/fascism/kamdar.html
Her dad's a Gujarati Indian of Hindu ancestry and her mother's some kind of non-Indian (Brit IIRC), and Mira Kamdar spewed hate all over Hindus by using her dad as an example of why Hindus are to be hated.
So getting spit on by their even more unHindu and anti-Hindu kids is something for all these unHindu Indians - who are settled in India yet married to alien spouses - to look forward to. And that's not all the prizes to be won: they will be imposing more such Hindu-baiting terrorists as Mira Kamdar on the native Hindus of India in the future. For which imposed misery Hindoos will no doubt be grateful and fondly remember them (like Jaichand is 'fondly' remembered).
I don't get why ethnic Hindus with tendencies towards the west don't marry native Americans instead. I can see how they would be an asset.
Info from 2 degrees of separation: I know of a Gujarati business man (very rich) who married a Lithuanian. She was - from the account I heard of the match - a goodlooking woman (and probably a nice person too, though my source did not know her) but could not speak a word of any language her Indian husband knew - which, by implication, tells you he could not speak Lithuanian either. Essentially, he married her because she was pretty and willing, and she married him because he had money and could look after her.
Not saying it's invalid. But it's not ideal either. But at least he lives overseas and doesn't live in India, so I don't care. Living overseas is largely a graveyard for Hindoos and their heathenism anyway. Marrying fellow arch-heathens from E Asia might perhaps allow heathenism to continue for longer, or in a different direction, and perhaps even somehow survive. <- But this is an untested theory, since all the couples of this kind that I know of are young, i.e. only one generation. Still, an overseas ethnic Hindoo marrying an E Asian heathen is better (i.e. >) than marrying a western atheist/agnostic > marrying an Indian non-heathen calling itself a 'Hindu' > marrying a western or Indian christoislamic > than an Indian in India marrying an alien >= a Hindu-origin Indian in India or overseas marrying an alien "convert". The last is the absolute worst. Because that will eat into larger Hindoo-dom and is no longer a "private choice" matter. C.f. a 'Hindu' married into christoislam: they are openly rejected by Hindu-dom anyway and so can't be foisted on traditional Hindoos by new-agey 'Hindus' wanting traditional Hindoos to be "less orthodox" and "accept" the christoislamic spouse. Whereas new-agey 'Hindus' always try to force traditional Hindoos and temples to accept the alien spouses of 'Hindus'. I.e. alien "converts" are insidiously forcibly inserted into Hindoo-dom and thereby invariably, gradually turn the heathenism into an alienism.)
Another thing that eats into Hindoo religion is accepting alien converts in general. And teaching them "mantras" like Maria Wirth states above:
Quote:They gave me tips which texts to read, which sants to meet, which mantras to learn
I never cease to be amazed at how easily Indian "Hindus" - some strange kind of orthodox of course (new-age Hindus don't know to get mantras to work) but of a sudden modern variety - will teach aliens (but largely only westerners, as far as I can tell) yet never display such an interest in inducting the masses of loyal Hindoos into mantras, including many Hindoo women often kept away from mantras (and often by the very types that will readily sell the same to alien women).
One day - assuming there is any justice (one likes to impute subjectivity to the objective universe and pretend it cares about balance and retribution) - it will all backfire. And I can't see that Hindoos need have any pity for the traitors who brought all of Hindoo-dom down by inducting mleccha demons to puke all over sacred Hindoo religion/Gods with their dabbling (and they are demons if they're the kind that would "convert" to Hinduism, since if they were heathens they'd be in their *own* ancestral religions, nah?). If they cared about Hindoo or any ethnic heathen religion, they'd leave these alone. But alien dabblers "converts" care only about themselves: that they should be able to dabble [in others' ancestral religion]. Which further underscores that alien "converts" - aka dabblers - are not and never were heathens.
Half the time I find myself plotting revenge. But while there are still orthodox Hindoos who would never countenance aliens in their families let alone accept them as "Hindoos" or teach aliens mantras and Hindoo religion, I suppose one must still be loyal. But they're a greying people and when they're gone, I think I will switch over to revenge, or at least passive gloating whenever the 'Hindus' that remain get beaten down by their own (alien) creations. One good turn deserves another, after all.
A few 'Hindus' a bit earlier on - the period when this disease seems to have started - thought it was a similarly 'brilliant' idea to teach the colonial Brit going by the pseudonym "Arthur Avalon" how to dabble, since he also seemed really "sincere" and "deserving" (but they generally did not teach native Hindoos, of course: native Hindoos after all were not western enough to be thought deserving, even though they were actually sincere and insubvertible and despite Hindoo religion being their own ancestral religion). And for a brief time, Arthur infatuated himself with Hindu religion, as many more do today. But just as *every* other dabbling alien does given enough time (and as Maria Wirth will too if she outlives her present infatuation), Arthur eventually "recanted" - as christians would say - and ran back to where he belonged: swearing fealty to catholicism. I know it was catholicism and not some other christocult because, as a nice present for Hindus from that dabbling love affair, "Arthur Avalon"'s legacy is visible on the internet: I recall seeing several alien catholic sites dabbling hardcore in the path paved by Arthur, who were claiming that sacred Shakta literature and practices and mantras are "actually" about Mary/Jeebusism. And these alien catholics are not just dabbling hard in this but, for all I know, may tomorrow induct Indian christoterrorists to inculturate on this as well.
[color="#0000FF"]So yet another hearty Thank You To All The Traitors[/color] (can they please be made to publish their full names and permanent addresses in future along with their crimes?)