Post 3/3
Note, none of the above is positive discrimination in favour of Hindus:
- no special grants to Hindu temples requested. Only temples to be freed from takeover and their lands returned, and their land wealth never again to be put to use for other ideologies. (Though stolen temple wealth ought returned, and ought to be returned from the christoislamic pockets they disappeared into)
- no special rights for Indian Hindus requested: only that tax-money previously diverted to propping up christoislamics and used for christianising/islamising India now be returned to the government. (This money should actually be used to balance the ledger by being redirected at the Hindus thus-far deliberately disfavoured at the direct expense of christianism/islam)
Yet I predict christoislam will whine "persecution" when they lose their special privileges - such as their demand to vampirically drain Hindu temple for hajj and jerusalem subsidies, for building churches and mosques and for subsidies for christoislamic families.
However, and nevertheless, Hindoo (i.e. Vedic) religion in India deserves special status and recognition as the native ancestral heathen religion of the subcontinent, and for being the identity of the original natives.
And there should be a constitutional law enacted to ban any attempt to dislodge Hindu (Vedic) religion from India and Indians, and a ban of any conspiracy against the Hinduness of the nation. [Regardless of whether it remains a majority.] The judiciary (e.g. justice bannerjee, sachar etc) and government and armed forces may not conspire against the Hindu identity of the country.
Nativeness must be defined by adherence to ancestral Indic religion, not just ethnicity, otherwise converts get to run away with everything (land and identity) both now and in the future, as they have done in Kashmir, Nagaland and Mizoram by claming "nativeness" while adhering to alien terrorist ideologies that directly destroy native religions.
Christians and muslims will not lose by this, but - being ingrates with their own objectives to christoislamise the nation - they will ever conspire. So development must be done with or without them. Just as the BJP came to power despite christoislamic treachery, such as that of John Dayal and gang colluding with AmriKKKa against Modi, and other christoislamics and communists similarly colluding with AmeriKKKa against BJP's installation.
In contrast, the Bonpos who have found refuge in India are not ingrates and are consequently not antagonising native Hindus. And Tibetan Buddhists and Iranian Parsees are also not discriminated against. So either christoislamics live and let live too, or the rest of Indian society is allowed to ignore them and leave them to their own devices/leave them behind during development.
NOTE: Hindus owe christians and muslims absolutely nothing, and less than nothing. Yet in the run-up to and after the BJP victory, several articles (e.g. one by George Augustine at indiafacts) have numerous comments by amnesiac Hindus ready to welcome christoislamic traitors back into their bosom. There's a time to be a gracious winner, and being magnanimous in victory is only sane if the recipient is grateful and not a treacherous backstabber (and repeat offender at it) and a terrorism like christoislam is. The heathen Arabians, when they won the battle against the early muslims in the "War of Apostasy", were repaid for their ill-advised and ill-fated benignity to the undeserving losers, with a repeat attack and a final forced conversion/convert-or-kill spree. The Romans too were repaid in similar manner for giving christianism one too many second chances. But Hindus will supply an infinitude of second chances to the christoclass virus and are determined never to learn from their own past - even from christianism and islam under congress rule - or the past of others, and with such an infinity of opportunities to destroy the Hindus and install monotheism in India, christoislam will surely succeed on day.
As I said, except for the special recognition of Hindu religion as the identity of the Hindu subcontinent, none of the above constitutes special privileges for Indian Hindus.
But anyone wanting to *revert* India to heathenism would and should do far more politically: directly disfavour christoislam and any other ideologies that threaten Hindu religion (e.g. communism), as well as directly act in favour of promoting Hindu religion. (C.f. how the obviously crypto-*christian* party directly acted to disfavour Hindus and to promote christianisation and islamisation of Hindu India.) But expecting a nationalist government to aim to revert India to heathenism is of course too much to ask for. Can't even expect it of most Hindu nationalist vocalists, and political parties tend to be more prudent still.
Indeed, I think it's too much to ask for even the above requests for justice and restitution.
Wish Modi would personally see to it that Dara Singh though. I like to imagine Modi might. Dara was innocent, as even the courts admitted on record, even as they sentenced him for life to please the CBI demands for Dara's blood.
* And Swamis Amritananda and Aseemanand to the Sadhvi should be freed etc.
People can speak of no political victory of "Hindu nationalism" unless Hindu innocents - whose only "crimes" were to tirelessly prevent conversions - are freed and restored to their families and life. Broken though they must be by now. And part of the blame lies at Hindu nationalists' feet: for having stood their misery for so long. But when in power now at last, at least the earlier wrongs - of inaction to protect and rescue Hindoo innocents from the christian inquisition - must be righted.
Actually, it's a not a political victory of Hindu nationalism - or the Hindu majority - unless reversion is achieved or the process of reversion at least begun.
If all that results is mere "development" (and for *all* Indians, traitors included) - and if that really is what most of the nationalist authors who vocalised in recent articles were aiming for - then this election too was a loss, not a win. And it represents another landmark moment in Indian history: the first time Hindu nationalist parties come to power and do absolutely nothing for Hindu-dom. I really hope the earlier mentioned (and other) authors' bland predictions of what the BJP's aims are are incomplete and missed out on the important objectives.
Heathens can and do achieve anything, when freed from the oppression and threat of missionary religions. They will always achieve "development" - they are the repositories of industry, wealth and creativity - but they can achieve security for their heathenism (which is the life's blood of the heathen) only for a small window of time, which window still exists now.
But it's too much to ask anything of modern Indians with Hindu ancestry though. Too much to ask that modern Indians of Hindu parentage remain heathen and retain heathen views. Too much to ask that they be active in favour of heathenism. The one thing one can reliably expect of them - with the west as the pre-eminent example of the footsteps Indians will be retreading - is that when Hindoo-dom is dead, they will try to "reconstruct" it after lamenting it. (Sort of like that anti-Hindu terrorist turned hormonal wreck Yoginder Sikhand tried - with eternal failure - to recapture the heathenism he spent his life kicking to death.)
It would be nice if Modi was different. I would that for him his heathenism wasn't a personal religion - at this juncture, Hindoos can't afford Hindu leaders who are secular in governance - and that he plans actively in favour of his heathenism and his heathens.
Note, none of the above is positive discrimination in favour of Hindus:
- no special grants to Hindu temples requested. Only temples to be freed from takeover and their lands returned, and their land wealth never again to be put to use for other ideologies. (Though stolen temple wealth ought returned, and ought to be returned from the christoislamic pockets they disappeared into)
- no special rights for Indian Hindus requested: only that tax-money previously diverted to propping up christoislamics and used for christianising/islamising India now be returned to the government. (This money should actually be used to balance the ledger by being redirected at the Hindus thus-far deliberately disfavoured at the direct expense of christianism/islam)
Yet I predict christoislam will whine "persecution" when they lose their special privileges - such as their demand to vampirically drain Hindu temple for hajj and jerusalem subsidies, for building churches and mosques and for subsidies for christoislamic families.
However, and nevertheless, Hindoo (i.e. Vedic) religion in India deserves special status and recognition as the native ancestral heathen religion of the subcontinent, and for being the identity of the original natives.
And there should be a constitutional law enacted to ban any attempt to dislodge Hindu (Vedic) religion from India and Indians, and a ban of any conspiracy against the Hinduness of the nation. [Regardless of whether it remains a majority.] The judiciary (e.g. justice bannerjee, sachar etc) and government and armed forces may not conspire against the Hindu identity of the country.
Nativeness must be defined by adherence to ancestral Indic religion, not just ethnicity, otherwise converts get to run away with everything (land and identity) both now and in the future, as they have done in Kashmir, Nagaland and Mizoram by claming "nativeness" while adhering to alien terrorist ideologies that directly destroy native religions.
Christians and muslims will not lose by this, but - being ingrates with their own objectives to christoislamise the nation - they will ever conspire. So development must be done with or without them. Just as the BJP came to power despite christoislamic treachery, such as that of John Dayal and gang colluding with AmriKKKa against Modi, and other christoislamics and communists similarly colluding with AmeriKKKa against BJP's installation.
In contrast, the Bonpos who have found refuge in India are not ingrates and are consequently not antagonising native Hindus. And Tibetan Buddhists and Iranian Parsees are also not discriminated against. So either christoislamics live and let live too, or the rest of Indian society is allowed to ignore them and leave them to their own devices/leave them behind during development.
NOTE: Hindus owe christians and muslims absolutely nothing, and less than nothing. Yet in the run-up to and after the BJP victory, several articles (e.g. one by George Augustine at indiafacts) have numerous comments by amnesiac Hindus ready to welcome christoislamic traitors back into their bosom. There's a time to be a gracious winner, and being magnanimous in victory is only sane if the recipient is grateful and not a treacherous backstabber (and repeat offender at it) and a terrorism like christoislam is. The heathen Arabians, when they won the battle against the early muslims in the "War of Apostasy", were repaid for their ill-advised and ill-fated benignity to the undeserving losers, with a repeat attack and a final forced conversion/convert-or-kill spree. The Romans too were repaid in similar manner for giving christianism one too many second chances. But Hindus will supply an infinitude of second chances to the christoclass virus and are determined never to learn from their own past - even from christianism and islam under congress rule - or the past of others, and with such an infinity of opportunities to destroy the Hindus and install monotheism in India, christoislam will surely succeed on day.
As I said, except for the special recognition of Hindu religion as the identity of the Hindu subcontinent, none of the above constitutes special privileges for Indian Hindus.
But anyone wanting to *revert* India to heathenism would and should do far more politically: directly disfavour christoislam and any other ideologies that threaten Hindu religion (e.g. communism), as well as directly act in favour of promoting Hindu religion. (C.f. how the obviously crypto-*christian* party directly acted to disfavour Hindus and to promote christianisation and islamisation of Hindu India.) But expecting a nationalist government to aim to revert India to heathenism is of course too much to ask for. Can't even expect it of most Hindu nationalist vocalists, and political parties tend to be more prudent still.
Indeed, I think it's too much to ask for even the above requests for justice and restitution.
Wish Modi would personally see to it that Dara Singh though. I like to imagine Modi might. Dara was innocent, as even the courts admitted on record, even as they sentenced him for life to please the CBI demands for Dara's blood.
* And Swamis Amritananda and Aseemanand to the Sadhvi should be freed etc.
People can speak of no political victory of "Hindu nationalism" unless Hindu innocents - whose only "crimes" were to tirelessly prevent conversions - are freed and restored to their families and life. Broken though they must be by now. And part of the blame lies at Hindu nationalists' feet: for having stood their misery for so long. But when in power now at last, at least the earlier wrongs - of inaction to protect and rescue Hindoo innocents from the christian inquisition - must be righted.
Actually, it's a not a political victory of Hindu nationalism - or the Hindu majority - unless reversion is achieved or the process of reversion at least begun.
If all that results is mere "development" (and for *all* Indians, traitors included) - and if that really is what most of the nationalist authors who vocalised in recent articles were aiming for - then this election too was a loss, not a win. And it represents another landmark moment in Indian history: the first time Hindu nationalist parties come to power and do absolutely nothing for Hindu-dom. I really hope the earlier mentioned (and other) authors' bland predictions of what the BJP's aims are are incomplete and missed out on the important objectives.
Heathens can and do achieve anything, when freed from the oppression and threat of missionary religions. They will always achieve "development" - they are the repositories of industry, wealth and creativity - but they can achieve security for their heathenism (which is the life's blood of the heathen) only for a small window of time, which window still exists now.
But it's too much to ask anything of modern Indians with Hindu ancestry though. Too much to ask that modern Indians of Hindu parentage remain heathen and retain heathen views. Too much to ask that they be active in favour of heathenism. The one thing one can reliably expect of them - with the west as the pre-eminent example of the footsteps Indians will be retreading - is that when Hindoo-dom is dead, they will try to "reconstruct" it after lamenting it. (Sort of like that anti-Hindu terrorist turned hormonal wreck Yoginder Sikhand tried - with eternal failure - to recapture the heathenism he spent his life kicking to death.)
It would be nice if Modi was different. I would that for him his heathenism wasn't a personal religion - at this juncture, Hindoos can't afford Hindu leaders who are secular in governance - and that he plans actively in favour of his heathenism and his heathens.