Post 4/?
E Timor was just another case where AmriKKKan and general western missionising - which has continued after the colonial era - works directly hand-in-hand with resource theft, destabilisation, extra-national allegiances being contracted (this is where the Amartya Sens and Romila Tapars, Sagarika Ghoses come from). These extra-national allegiances - mostly with christians else cryptochristians where possible, and in India's case using islamaniac footsoldiers as willing mercenaries to force the hand - are specifically created for the west to have natives on the ground that will act to further daylight robbery of another nations' resources (e.g. thorium at Ramarsethu, stolen Iridium dome), their wealth (much of stolen Hindu temple wealth drained to alien climes), forcing nuclear or other contracts on them that the victim nation only loses by, or turning large populations into a market/dumping ground for alien-produced ware and local 'manufacturing/production' that only fills alien nations' pockets (see Banana Republics again, where this was pioneered), preventing autonomy and hijacking their economy for filling alien purses.
The whole FDI fraud - see also Banana Republics post - is only to turn India into a mass consumer market and prevent its natural state of being a mass producer (all of which is the same as christocolonial Britain had done), AND to hijack any local manufacturing that does happen to line the purses of foreign corporations and hence foreign countries.
And can recall AmriKKKan government used to work with the Vatican's conversion agenda in Asia. IIRC also seen in Vietnam's case when AmriKKKa interceded happily in Vatican's interest and the US' own more 'secular' fear of communism then, despite the communist north being hyper christian and catholicism schemed to send catholic christians from the north to flood Southern Vietnam which was under the iron grip of a trio of christian dictatorship, as per journalist Avro Manhattan.
web.archive.org/web/20130602160744/http://freetruth.50webs.org/D3.htm#Vietnam
Who also wrote:
Etc Etc.
The point is not that the west is not anti-Hindu, but it is also anti Hindu-nationalism (which in our modern era is simply an authentically-secular nationalism by Hindus but not necessarily for Hindoodom as its main or even minor objective). Also, the reason an Indian government led by Modi is considered a threat to the west/western interests is because he is indeed Hindu nationalist placing India first. Meaning he cannot be co-opted for western interests - as Indian politicians were so far: ALL of the KKKangress is in AmriKKKan pocket - and so the west finds Modi and all that such (Hindu nationalists) stand for inherently dangerous. It represents autonomy, you see. And autonomy is a threat to hegemony.
While pro-Hindu (actively Hindu) leaders would be considered even more dangerous - since nationalists' interests are by and large a subset of Hindu interests, and Hindu and other heathen interests are even more of an antagonism to christo-western plans for the continent to roll over -
the fact remains that I have seen no signs of a pro-Hindu government yet. A nationalist government itself is considered threat enough for the west.
The christocolonial Brits for the same reason hated Hindus and forged alliances with islam: the latter were brethren in monogawdism, but all mindvirus victims are natural slaves to authority, and Brits found they merely needed to direct islam's jihad to get it to serve British interests beautifully.
In contrast, Hindus and their Hindu Nationalism represented a direct threat to British hegemony in India, as it would not submit (unlike islam, which literally means submission).
Hindu nationalism represented a struggle by the natives to retake their country and their nation's economy and make it autonomous and therewith bring down the British economy which underpinned British wealth and global tyranny.
The KKKangress was the US' puppet government: regularly keeping Indian national interests suppressed by measures that KKKangressi politicos were clearly TOO STUPID to have come up with themselves (and which indicates puppeting), they were eagerly signing nuclear contracts entirely to AmriKKKan dictation, with KKKangress signing over Indians' rights to the US with utter contempt for the interests of Indians and India. KKKangress was also the local organiser of christo-looting the temples of the nation (stolen vigrahas and temple jewels) to convert the nation faster as well as to hand wealth to the foreign countries that kept KKKangress in power (handed India on a platter for KKKangress to rule) and kept KKKangressi pockets full and managed their bank accounts.
And so when the KKKangress showed early and then clear signs of not standing much chance in the current elections, the west quickly shuffled the usual puppets** into a new political formation - the AAP - hijacking a local popular native movement (anti-corruption headed by Swami/Baba/Yogi Ramdev) for foreign interests. <- Another CLEAR western intelligence tactic right there. [Could see the west leverage minority gay and christian and gay-christian groups in Arab nations during the Arab Springs.]
** The usual puppets being the communists and christo hirelings, including famous European favourite/beneficiary Binayak Sen throwing in their sympathies into AAP. Every anti-Hindu joined the bandwagon in what exceeded predictability and went directly into Clearly Desperate territory in its transparency of foreign meddling and the usual anti-Hindu ("anti-Indian Nexus") collusion. So faster than lightning, the Indian christomedia - almost all entirely owned by alien corporations - switched over to advertising for the AAP after having played the fiddle for the KKKangress until then. Since of course, the KKKangress was merely the local arm of the west and as the AAP was too, such switching was within the same body.
So Elst is very much dissembling to his Indian audience when he aims to convince them that modern Hindu nationalism - nationalist for sure, albeit secularly so - is not perceived as a threat by the west and only an actively Hindu leader would be.
But even Modi (Hindu though he be from what I gather) is no Julian, unless - like Julian - he is plotting in his heart to destroy the christoclass virus as a non-negotiable part of the means to revert the empire to heathenism/the Gods. But Julian declared his *active promotion* of heathenism openly, not merely his *allegiance* to heathenism on ascending to the Purple. And this is a key difference. His first goal was to ensure the Temples were safe, and he acted directly on objective. So the west has no Emperor Julian to fear in modern India. [Julians there are aplenty - Hindu heathens who aim for reverting the nation and safeguarding Hindu-dom - but they don't seem to become rulers anymore. Not since Shivaji and the like.] It's a pity of course (and regardless of my wishful thinking again), but India is not what it was and shan't be again either. But it can be safe and prosperous hereafter. And that should suffice for unsaved kufr Indians. But even that is unacceptable to the west. From their POV, for the west to retain its hegemony, India must remain poor yet be made into a sink to buy western junk/products and the wealth India generates itself must also be channeled into the west. All of Asia must remain controllable and controlled and under the western heel. Although too much of Asia has already broken off to become alarmingly autonomous: China being a major unpredictable offender. Not even christendom has brought China to heel yet.
Elst has written articles that have put him on Hindus' good side. And then he repeatedly seeks to use that influence to deny sane analysis of the facts on the ground, by denying and concealing the real situation and inverting them where western meddling is concerned. It can do no good for Hindu nationalists' interests. The powers that be in the west are - sadly - simply NOT good for non-western and particularly heathen populations' interests, especially in the case of India etc.
The good guys in the west are NOT the ones in charge and so they have no control over foreign policy including foreign policy against India. India needs to become autonomous to become anything at all. To be autonomous it has to remove the western shackles restraining it. The west *is* hostile. So India can cold-shoulder them or use them when needed.
It sounds mercenary and selfish but they're the ones meddling in other nations. And this is the least of what they deserve. Make friends with heathen nations. If I had my way, all of Asia and Africa would close off entirely to the west.
E Timor was just another case where AmriKKKan and general western missionising - which has continued after the colonial era - works directly hand-in-hand with resource theft, destabilisation, extra-national allegiances being contracted (this is where the Amartya Sens and Romila Tapars, Sagarika Ghoses come from). These extra-national allegiances - mostly with christians else cryptochristians where possible, and in India's case using islamaniac footsoldiers as willing mercenaries to force the hand - are specifically created for the west to have natives on the ground that will act to further daylight robbery of another nations' resources (e.g. thorium at Ramarsethu, stolen Iridium dome), their wealth (much of stolen Hindu temple wealth drained to alien climes), forcing nuclear or other contracts on them that the victim nation only loses by, or turning large populations into a market/dumping ground for alien-produced ware and local 'manufacturing/production' that only fills alien nations' pockets (see Banana Republics again, where this was pioneered), preventing autonomy and hijacking their economy for filling alien purses.
The whole FDI fraud - see also Banana Republics post - is only to turn India into a mass consumer market and prevent its natural state of being a mass producer (all of which is the same as christocolonial Britain had done), AND to hijack any local manufacturing that does happen to line the purses of foreign corporations and hence foreign countries.
And can recall AmriKKKan government used to work with the Vatican's conversion agenda in Asia. IIRC also seen in Vietnam's case when AmriKKKa interceded happily in Vatican's interest and the US' own more 'secular' fear of communism then, despite the communist north being hyper christian and catholicism schemed to send catholic christians from the north to flood Southern Vietnam which was under the iron grip of a trio of christian dictatorship, as per journalist Avro Manhattan.
web.archive.org/web/20130602160744/http://freetruth.50webs.org/D3.htm#Vietnam
Quote:Asia: Vietnam
The Vietnam War was declared as a crusade by the American bishops. Those same bishops also declared, in the second Vaticanum, that one should use the atomic bomb(!) against Vietnam to defend the Catholism there (Deschner 1986).
-- Kriminalgeschichte des Christentums - Band 1. Die Frühzeit, by Karlheinz Deschner ("The criminal history of Christianity - Volume 1. The early times")
Link
In the case of Vietnam, the role played by the Catholic Church has been paramount. The Pope ... [consecrated] the WHOLE of Vietnam ââ¬â that is the North and the South to the Virgin Mary.
-- Chapter 23 of The Vatican's Holocaust by Avro Manhattan
This was done by conveniently ignoring the fact that Vietnam was by far a Buddhist country.
In the case of Vietnam a couple of centuries ago, closely knit Catholic groups cemented themselves into the surrounding non-Christian Buddhist environment. Once well established they assert themselves over their Buddhist neighbors as independent economic and political factions.
Their assertions required not only bold, religious self confidence, but also the imposition of Catholic authority upon their Buddhist co-religionists. Such imposition led to punitive legislation, which, when resisted brought repression, leading in time to the use of brute force.
In the case of President Diem and his Catholic junta [in the mid 20th century] they established themselves and their authority first with gradual legal discrimination against the Buddhist majority. The unrestricted use of terror followed when the Buddhist population refused to submit. Diem's approach was not just a freak example of contemporary Catholic aggressiveness in a largely non-Christian society. It has been repeated on the Asian continent for three hundred years.
-- Chapter 17 of Vietnam: Why did we go? by Avro Manhattan
Who also wrote:
Quote:... the Vietnamese tragedy had its origin in the religious and ideological influence exercised by the Catholic Church in the affairs of that country from its very beginning. We are not here dealing with the rights or wrongs of the Vietnamese war. But only with the paramount role which religion, with particular reference to the Catholic Church, has played in its inception. The Vietnamese tragedy was precipitated by a zealous Catholic trio formed by a Catholic President, a Catholic Head of the Secret Police, and a Catholic Archbishop. All were determined to impose the religious and political writ of the Church upon a non-Christian culture.
How did it happen, particularly in view of the fact that South Vietnam was an Asian Buddhist land?
Etc Etc.
The point is not that the west is not anti-Hindu, but it is also anti Hindu-nationalism (which in our modern era is simply an authentically-secular nationalism by Hindus but not necessarily for Hindoodom as its main or even minor objective). Also, the reason an Indian government led by Modi is considered a threat to the west/western interests is because he is indeed Hindu nationalist placing India first. Meaning he cannot be co-opted for western interests - as Indian politicians were so far: ALL of the KKKangress is in AmriKKKan pocket - and so the west finds Modi and all that such (Hindu nationalists) stand for inherently dangerous. It represents autonomy, you see. And autonomy is a threat to hegemony.
While pro-Hindu (actively Hindu) leaders would be considered even more dangerous - since nationalists' interests are by and large a subset of Hindu interests, and Hindu and other heathen interests are even more of an antagonism to christo-western plans for the continent to roll over -
the fact remains that I have seen no signs of a pro-Hindu government yet. A nationalist government itself is considered threat enough for the west.
The christocolonial Brits for the same reason hated Hindus and forged alliances with islam: the latter were brethren in monogawdism, but all mindvirus victims are natural slaves to authority, and Brits found they merely needed to direct islam's jihad to get it to serve British interests beautifully.
In contrast, Hindus and their Hindu Nationalism represented a direct threat to British hegemony in India, as it would not submit (unlike islam, which literally means submission).
Hindu nationalism represented a struggle by the natives to retake their country and their nation's economy and make it autonomous and therewith bring down the British economy which underpinned British wealth and global tyranny.
The KKKangress was the US' puppet government: regularly keeping Indian national interests suppressed by measures that KKKangressi politicos were clearly TOO STUPID to have come up with themselves (and which indicates puppeting), they were eagerly signing nuclear contracts entirely to AmriKKKan dictation, with KKKangress signing over Indians' rights to the US with utter contempt for the interests of Indians and India. KKKangress was also the local organiser of christo-looting the temples of the nation (stolen vigrahas and temple jewels) to convert the nation faster as well as to hand wealth to the foreign countries that kept KKKangress in power (handed India on a platter for KKKangress to rule) and kept KKKangressi pockets full and managed their bank accounts.
And so when the KKKangress showed early and then clear signs of not standing much chance in the current elections, the west quickly shuffled the usual puppets** into a new political formation - the AAP - hijacking a local popular native movement (anti-corruption headed by Swami/Baba/Yogi Ramdev) for foreign interests. <- Another CLEAR western intelligence tactic right there. [Could see the west leverage minority gay and christian and gay-christian groups in Arab nations during the Arab Springs.]
** The usual puppets being the communists and christo hirelings, including famous European favourite/beneficiary Binayak Sen throwing in their sympathies into AAP. Every anti-Hindu joined the bandwagon in what exceeded predictability and went directly into Clearly Desperate territory in its transparency of foreign meddling and the usual anti-Hindu ("anti-Indian Nexus") collusion. So faster than lightning, the Indian christomedia - almost all entirely owned by alien corporations - switched over to advertising for the AAP after having played the fiddle for the KKKangress until then. Since of course, the KKKangress was merely the local arm of the west and as the AAP was too, such switching was within the same body.
So Elst is very much dissembling to his Indian audience when he aims to convince them that modern Hindu nationalism - nationalist for sure, albeit secularly so - is not perceived as a threat by the west and only an actively Hindu leader would be.
But even Modi (Hindu though he be from what I gather) is no Julian, unless - like Julian - he is plotting in his heart to destroy the christoclass virus as a non-negotiable part of the means to revert the empire to heathenism/the Gods. But Julian declared his *active promotion* of heathenism openly, not merely his *allegiance* to heathenism on ascending to the Purple. And this is a key difference. His first goal was to ensure the Temples were safe, and he acted directly on objective. So the west has no Emperor Julian to fear in modern India. [Julians there are aplenty - Hindu heathens who aim for reverting the nation and safeguarding Hindu-dom - but they don't seem to become rulers anymore. Not since Shivaji and the like.] It's a pity of course (and regardless of my wishful thinking again), but India is not what it was and shan't be again either. But it can be safe and prosperous hereafter. And that should suffice for unsaved kufr Indians. But even that is unacceptable to the west. From their POV, for the west to retain its hegemony, India must remain poor yet be made into a sink to buy western junk/products and the wealth India generates itself must also be channeled into the west. All of Asia must remain controllable and controlled and under the western heel. Although too much of Asia has already broken off to become alarmingly autonomous: China being a major unpredictable offender. Not even christendom has brought China to heel yet.
Elst has written articles that have put him on Hindus' good side. And then he repeatedly seeks to use that influence to deny sane analysis of the facts on the ground, by denying and concealing the real situation and inverting them where western meddling is concerned. It can do no good for Hindu nationalists' interests. The powers that be in the west are - sadly - simply NOT good for non-western and particularly heathen populations' interests, especially in the case of India etc.
The good guys in the west are NOT the ones in charge and so they have no control over foreign policy including foreign policy against India. India needs to become autonomous to become anything at all. To be autonomous it has to remove the western shackles restraining it. The west *is* hostile. So India can cold-shoulder them or use them when needed.
It sounds mercenary and selfish but they're the ones meddling in other nations. And this is the least of what they deserve. Make friends with heathen nations. If I had my way, all of Asia and Africa would close off entirely to the west.