Islamism - 7

[Husky]

There seems to me something more sinister about the following than is apparent from what the news admits:



telegraphindia.com/1140608/jsp/frontpage/story_18490435.jsp#.U5QD83bSt0t

The Telegraph, calcutta, india (sic)

Sunday 8 June 2014



Child trafficking plot thickens

- Under ally pressure, Kerala govt shies away from launching full-fledged investigation ANANTHAKRISHNAN G.

Mukkam Muslim Orphanage in Kozhikode where the children were being taken to



Thiruvananthapuram, June 7: Nearly a fortnight after over 500 children were found stuffed in trains that arrived in Kerala late last month, investigators are yet to press trafficking charges against the orphanages that are under the scanner or even question its officials.



Many of the children, over 160 from Jharkhand alone, had gone without food and water for hours together and were travelling ticketless.



Some of them were travelling with their parents. Yet all were going to Mukkam Muslim Orphanage in Kozhikode.



In terms of action, there have been only a few cursory arrests of alleged agents who brought the children along. And if the Kerala government is seen to be dithering on moving quickly to bring the culprits to book, there are reasons.



The chairman of the orphanage is Syed Hyederali Shihab Thangal, the tallest leader of the Indian Union Muslim League, which is also an ally of the ruling Congress-led United Democratic Front government.



“The railway police division of Kerala police has registered a case under Section 370(5) of the IPC. The charge relates to trafficking of minor children and they are investigating,’’ Palakkad district collector K. Ramachandran told The Telegraph.



But what he does not say is that this has been the position since May 25 when the children were found in the trains that arrived at the Olavakkode railway station in Palakkad.

Around 500 children, mostly from Bihar and Jharkhand, were found hoarded — some of them had gone without food and water for hours — in three compartments of the Patna Kochi Express, which reached Palakkad on May 24.



Another 123 children from West Bengal had arrived by another train a day later. The first batch of children was to be taken to Mukkam orphanage, while the 123 were to be sent to Anwarul Huda orphanage in Malappuram district.



A high-level crime branch team constituted to probe the incident has so far arrested 10 persons, allegedly agents.



While four of them are from Malda in West Bengal, the rest belong to Godda in Jharkhand.



The last arrest, that of 30-year-old Shafeek Sheikh of Persia village in Godda, was carried out yesterday. Police say he was in the train with the children but had fled the scene on seeing them. He has been working in the Mukkam orphanage as a cook since the last three years and had helped bring at least a dozen children to Kerala in the past.



His wife Rubic Hatoom is a cleaner in the orphanage.



However, even the crime branch team is yet to take any of the orphanage officials into custody for questioning. The reasons are obvious.



The IUML is upset at the manner in which the investigation was proceeding and wanted the state to drop the trafficking angle.



Party MP E.T. Mohammed Basheer said neither the officials of the states to which the children belong, nor their parents, had complained to the Kerala government of any illegality and hence it could not be termed child trafficking.



Orphanage authorities also maintain that it was only a case of lack of understanding of the legal provisions and that there was nothing wrong in trying to give children from poverty-stricken areas in Jharkhand, Bihar and West Bengal food and education.



But the answer fails to explain why children whose parents were alive were labelled as orphans and admitted to the orphanage.



The ally pressure seemed to show on the ruling Congress too, with Kerala chief minister Oommen Chandy terming it procedural lapse and home minister Ramesh Chennithala saying he did not want to comment for fear of influencing the investigation.



Not many seem to agree with their versions.



The state child welfare committee has written to the railway police seeking legal action against the perpetrators and demanding a report at the earliest.



The nodal officer of the State Human Rights Commission (SHRC), DIG S. Sreejith, was one of the first to examine the issue and had gone on record to say that it was a “clear case of child trafficking’’.



The rules for inter-state transfer of children did not seem to have been observed, he had said.



Rights commission chief Justice J.B. Koshy said he would wait till the inquiry was over before reaching any conclusion, but added that several suspicions like the likelihood of the children being subjected to organ trade or sexual abuse needed to be probed in detail.



He revealed that some of the orphanages had resisted when the commission tried to conduct an audit of their activities in the past.



One institution from Malappuram had even approached the state high court against this.



But just as the government appeared to be chickening out, there was hope from Kerala High Court. Acting on a plea by an NGO, a bench of Chief Justice Manjula Chellur and Justice P.R. Ramachandra Menon has called for a “serious investigation’’ into why such large number of children had come to Kerala.



The court has also issued notices to Jharkhand, Bihar and West Bengal. The Union ministry of social welfare and railways were also impleaded in the petition. The hearing is on June 19.

167 from Jharkhand

Eight-member team from Jharkhand, including labour commissioner Manish Ranjan, is in Kerala to bring back the children. Till last count, the state authorities have established the identities of 167 children

* [color="#FF0000"]To return:[/color] 129

* [color="#FF0000"]With parents:[/color] 31

* [color="#FF0000"]With Kerala authorities:[/color] 7



ON AUTHORITY:

Some of the kids from Jharkhand were taken back by their parents who arrived after hearing the news. The Kerala government will bear the expense for sending the rest of the children back to their state



K. Ramachandran

Palakkad district collector

Adoption is not allowed in Islam (because of mohammed's sudden laws, after he wanted to sleep with his adopted son's intended/wife). Will find a link.



I suspect that the above islamic instance is actually exactly the same as regularly happens with the christian orphanages in Kerala and Tamilnadu that regularly abduct Hindu children from Hindu families as far as Nepal and take them hostage for conversion, abuse and resale to aliens. The reason for kidnapping children who have parents and placing them in such distant orphanages then also makes sense: it is so that heathen children and their parents can't find each other: language is different, no one knows where the kids have gone missing to, even when Hindu parents from Bengal and Jharkhand know that islamaniacs abducted their children.



The islamaniac adults accompanying the children to these islamic "orphanages" also make more sense in this light: islamic parents are less likely to dump their kids in orphanages than islamaniacs would be willing to dump Hindu children they kidnapped in madrassas.



There is no mention in the christo ragazine above of the names of the children or the few parents who have retrieved the kids. The deliberate impression that the news item as well as the christocommunist Kerala govt (which is always in collusion with the jihadis in Kerala) give are that the children "must be" islamic. But they have taken care not to perjure themselves by saying so.

And the readiness of the Kerala govt to collude - and their reluctance to nail the crime - starts making mores sense when you remember that the Kerala govt is christo-communist and has long been all too eager to preside over having heathen Hindu children abducted from their loving Hindoo families and convert-or-killed (convert-and-abused) by christoislamania, same as how the christogovt of Kerala and TN has allowed "christian orphanages" to do the same so far.



Also, the children are specifically abducted from regions where islamania is waging jihad against Hindus and regularly abducting Hindu children (and women): W Bengal, Jharkhand, etc.



"The IUML is upset at the manner in which the investigation was proceeding and wanted the state to drop the trafficking angle."

-> The ummah league "being upset" that the trafficking is being popularised also tallies: as it alerts - as it has already alerted - parents in their home states to come looking for abducted children in these madrassas. If islamic parents had voluntarily relinquished their kids as orphans, why would the ummah be afraid of the news getting out: surely the parents "already knew", as per their argument? But their resistance is far more likely to be to not wanting the Hindu masses to know that this is another demographic-jihad operation, let alone that robbed Hindu parents should find and retrieve their beloved kids. That explains why they're opposed to the publicity and government interference.





And another thing is that if you google for abducted children in Jharkhand, you find that it is "tribal" (Vanavasi) Hindu families whose children have been abducted: there is a big racket going on. Oftentimes it is maoists abducting them to recruit them for christianism I mean maoism. There's another reason that christo-communist Kerala govt would be most happy to collude with and protect islamaniac theft of Hindu children.



indiafacts.co.in/isi-hand-maoist-insurgency-subvert-india/

which is on the untold story of the growing nexus between the ISI and the Maoists.



And Kerala islamania is a known hotbed of TSP's ISI.







Here, found support for how islam does not accept adoption (hence "islamic orphanages" don't make sense), clearly pointing to not merely plain vanilla child-trafficking (i.e. of their own kids) but of largescale islamic abduction and abuse of Hindu children:



faithfreedom.org/Articles/SKM/zeinab.htm

Adoption in Islam and History of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) Marriage to Zainab Bint Jahsh.



By Syed Kamran Mirza







Adoption in Islam:

Islam prohibits adopting children. Period. Adoption in the technical sense is not allowed in Muslim Shriah law. This is because Allah does not like this gesture of adopting orphan children. Muhammad Rushed Ridha states, "Allah prohibited adoption in Islam and annulled all the judgements pertaining to adoption. The most important one of which was the prohibition of the wife of the adopted son to the fostering father as though he is the natural father. So Allah commanded his prophet to marry Zainab Bint Jahsh in order to abolish [color="#FF0000"]pagan custom[/color] (Fatawa al-Imam)." Al-sabuni states, "As to Zainab Bint Jahsh, the Messenger of Allah married for no higher wisdom than to [color="#FF0000"]abolish the heresy of adoption (A-sabuni)[/color]."



[...]

Pre-Islamic Arab Custom: Adoption of orphan/helpless child was a very popular and moral practice amongst pre-Islamic Arabs. By adopting orphan/helpless child, they used to consider adopted child as their own. And they used to pass onto them the adopter's genealogy and name, his investment of them with all the rights of the legitimate son including that of inheritance and the prohibition of marriage on grounds of consanguinity.



(Of course, as everyone knew already, the ventriloquist Mohammed only made his invisible=non-existent puppet - allah - declare adoption illegal in islam because Mohammed lusted after his adopted son's wife and had to make his aquisition of her legal and religiously islamically moral



Post-Islamic Custom: The all-wise legislator of Islam willed to undo the above mentioned Arab practice of adopting children. The divine legislator willed to give the adopted son only the right of a client and co-religionist. For that reason a verse was revealed: "God did not make your adopted son as your own sons. To declare them so is your empty claim. God's word is righteous and constitutes true guidance. (Q.33: 4)." It follows from this revelation that the adopter may marry the ex-wife of his adopted son and vice-versa. Thus Muhammad married Zainab in order to provide a good example of what the All-wise legislator was seeking to establish by way of rights and privileges for adoption. In this regard God further said: "After a term of married life with her husband, We permitted you to marry her so that it may hence be legitimate and morally blameless for a believer to marry the wife of his adopted son provided that wife has already been divorced. That is God's commandment which must be fulfilled (Q.33: 37)." Who, among the Arabs, could implement this noble legislation and thereby openly repudiate the ancient traditions? The truth is, however, that Muhammad was the exemplar of obedience to God; his life was the implementation of that which he was entrusted to convey to mankind. His life constitutes the highest ideal, the perfect example, and the concrete instance of his Lord's command (M.H. Haykal, page-296-297).



Those who are Muslims and are obedient to the Qur'an will not have adopted sons.

Indians are becoming very impotent (what was that word, napumsaka or something?) Unable to protect their women from christo-islamaniac rapists. Parents unable to protect their children from abduction and sexual abuse by christoislamania.

I wonder when Indians will finally get a spine and send christoislamicommunists back to TSP-W and E where they belong. Or preferrably Afghanistan, in the midst of the Taliban.

I think it is secularism and de-heathenisation that is Hindu-majority India impotent. There's a direct correlation in the numbers.