The article alluded to in the above post:
sunday-guardian.com/news/isi-plans-to-use-us-un-to-tar-modi
via rajeev2004.blogspot.co.uk/2014/08/fwd-isi-plans-to-use-us-un-to-tar-modi.html
on 'ISI plans to use US and UN to tar Modi'
Hadn't actually read it, but going by the title, can't work out why they want to present this as being exclusively an ISI gig. The US and UN are past masters at these very tactics. Seen in their previous attempts to bring up "casteism is slavery" at the UN. And US always hosting Human Rights 'Religious Freedom' shows only to insinuate "violence by Hindus against minorities" - no mention of christian terrorism against Hindu and Buddhist natives in India's northeast. And of course, US had already since long ago been active about "women's (lack of) rights" in "patriarchal" "Hindu" India. Etc.
When has the US and its universities and think tanks NOT been into this? And when have they not had their native ("secular") arm acting on their behalf? (<- Another obvious give-away: they always use native voices to sentence heathen nations.) E.g. IIRC South African "Indian" Navi Pillay of the UN - about to step down, I think - was their previous means to attack India on the "casteism" issue.
As if ISI doesn't already work intimately with the US and do their bidding wherever India is concerned. Rather like the Taliban used to do America's bidding back when Russia was trying to keep a toehold in Afghanistan.
So why this elaborate attempt by Indians(?) to exclusively blame the ISI and keep US/UN (NATO) innocent?
It seems the Sunday Guardian - the paper whose article readily blames the ISI but overlooks Indian islamania and Indian christomania and especially the US and UN - is more curioso than I guessed:
MJ Akbar merely gone senile or schizo or what's his deal now?
Creepier still: MJ Akbar - last seen peddling St Thomas myths - has suddenly morphed into a spokesperson for the BJP, as per wackypedia:
Seems every anti-Hindu peddler of christoislamania from Yesterday has Today converted to a nationalist and joined the BJP. <- Could explain why there's no Rama temple in Ayodhya yet (nor likely to be under BJP rule - am I wrong?) Then again, that last could just be because of modern loser Indians not being vertebrates anymore. :Zama miro:
Speaking of Yesterday though, the following is from the Ishwar Sharan "Myth of Saint Thomas" pages (the article "A rejoinder to Paulo Coelhoââ¬â¢s paean to Francis Xavier"):
Tomorrow I have every expectation (hope?) that christo-communist murderers Binayak Sen and Sabyasachi Panda will join the BJP, and so too AAP's Aravind Kejriwal. And the day after tomorrow I look forward to seeing all the congress goons including their queen Antonia Maino sign on to the BJP as well. I hear the lashkar-e-toiba and taliban have already submitted their requests, and their application to enter the BJP is being considered in earnest, though ISI's application is still in quarantine (:discrimination: - "It's 'cause they're Pakis, init?")**
Good grief.
** Though admittedly, if I was the ISI or Indian christoislamania or communism, I would totally be trying to infiltrate-and-hijack the BJP for christoislamania/communism [dubbed "secularism"]. I mean, why only bet on one horse (the UPA) when you can bet on all those in the race? Surely?
sunday-guardian.com/news/isi-plans-to-use-us-un-to-tar-modi
via rajeev2004.blogspot.co.uk/2014/08/fwd-isi-plans-to-use-us-un-to-tar-modi.html
on 'ISI plans to use US and UN to tar Modi'
Hadn't actually read it, but going by the title, can't work out why they want to present this as being exclusively an ISI gig. The US and UN are past masters at these very tactics. Seen in their previous attempts to bring up "casteism is slavery" at the UN. And US always hosting Human Rights 'Religious Freedom' shows only to insinuate "violence by Hindus against minorities" - no mention of christian terrorism against Hindu and Buddhist natives in India's northeast. And of course, US had already since long ago been active about "women's (lack of) rights" in "patriarchal" "Hindu" India. Etc.
When has the US and its universities and think tanks NOT been into this? And when have they not had their native ("secular") arm acting on their behalf? (<- Another obvious give-away: they always use native voices to sentence heathen nations.) E.g. IIRC South African "Indian" Navi Pillay of the UN - about to step down, I think - was their previous means to attack India on the "casteism" issue.
As if ISI doesn't already work intimately with the US and do their bidding wherever India is concerned. Rather like the Taliban used to do America's bidding back when Russia was trying to keep a toehold in Afghanistan.
So why this elaborate attempt by Indians(?) to exclusively blame the ISI and keep US/UN (NATO) innocent?
It seems the Sunday Guardian - the paper whose article readily blames the ISI but overlooks Indian islamania and Indian christomania and especially the US and UN - is more curioso than I guessed:
Quote:The Sunday Guardian - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunday_Guardian
The Sunday Guardian is an independent Sunday newspaper, edited by journalist M.J. Akbar. It was launched on 31 January 2010 from New Delhi and is printed in New Delhi ...
Content ÷ Columnists
.
MJ Akbar merely gone senile or schizo or what's his deal now?
Creepier still: MJ Akbar - last seen peddling St Thomas myths - has suddenly morphed into a spokesperson for the BJP, as per wackypedia:
Quote:Mobashar Jawed "M.J." Akbar (Bengali: à ¦®à ¦¬à ¦¾à ¦¸à §â¡Ã ¦° à ¦Åà ¦¾à ¦¬à §â¡Ã ¦¦ à ¦Âà ¦â¢Ã ¦¬à ¦¾à ¦°) (born 11 January 1951) is a leading Indian journalist and author and national spokesperson of the Bharatiya Janta Party.
Seems every anti-Hindu peddler of christoislamania from Yesterday has Today converted to a nationalist and joined the BJP. <- Could explain why there's no Rama temple in Ayodhya yet (nor likely to be under BJP rule - am I wrong?) Then again, that last could just be because of modern loser Indians not being vertebrates anymore. :Zama miro:
Speaking of Yesterday though, the following is from the Ishwar Sharan "Myth of Saint Thomas" pages (the article "A rejoinder to Paulo Coelhoââ¬â¢s paean to Francis Xavier"):
Quote:For sucking up to the Catholic clergy, the Deccan Chronicle is the leader among Indian newspapers. Its editors (this article was written in 2006), M.J. Akbar and Naazreen Bhura, both self-righteous secularists of the Nehruvian school, assiduously follow the Christian practice of treating Christian legend as history and Hindu history as mythology (or put another way, treating Christian superstition as tradition and Hindu tradition as superstition). In true Indian secularist fashion, they do not tolerate dissent, and letters to the editor concerning Paulo Coelhoââ¬â¢s eulogy of the criminal Xavier or Sivarajanââ¬â¢s treatment of the St. Thomas legend as Indian history, are not published. For Akbar and Bhura, criticism of themselves or their ââ¬Åeminentââ¬Â contributors is a manifestation of Hindu communalism.
Tomorrow I have every expectation (hope?) that christo-communist murderers Binayak Sen and Sabyasachi Panda will join the BJP, and so too AAP's Aravind Kejriwal. And the day after tomorrow I look forward to seeing all the congress goons including their queen Antonia Maino sign on to the BJP as well. I hear the lashkar-e-toiba and taliban have already submitted their requests, and their application to enter the BJP is being considered in earnest, though ISI's application is still in quarantine (:discrimination: - "It's 'cause they're Pakis, init?")**
Good grief.
** Though admittedly, if I was the ISI or Indian christoislamania or communism, I would totally be trying to infiltrate-and-hijack the BJP for christoislamania/communism [dubbed "secularism"]. I mean, why only bet on one horse (the UPA) when you can bet on all those in the race? Surely?