03-27-2005, 07:16 PM
Letter to pionner..
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Monumental absurdity
SirâApropos the editorial, âWhose Taj Mahal?â (March 23), âclaimsâ by Muslim bodies to âownershipâ of the Taj Mahal are both illogical and unjustified. But they also seem the product of some deeper conspiracy against Indiaâs democratic and secular foundations in general and the Hindu community in particular. The Taj Mahal is a monument of great historical and architectural importance. Though built by a Mughal emperor, it is yet cherished as a monument to national pride by all Indians irrespective of their caste or creed. The Taj is national property, and its upkeep a collective responsibility. No particular individual or community, be it Sunnis, Shiasâor even the descendants of Shah Jahan!âhave any usurpation rights over the monument. As for I&B Minister Jaipal Reddyâs statement that âthe claim is not objectionable at allâ, I can only say that he belongs to the very pseudo-secular breed that never tires of minority appeasement and Hindu-bashing. Would he ever consider the legitimate claim of Hindus to their temples in Ayodhya, Kashi or Mathura? It would not come as a surprise to me if the UPAâs self-proclaimed âsecularistsâ actually allowed a takeover of the Taj Mahal.
Atri Joshi
via e-mail<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Monumental absurdity
SirâApropos the editorial, âWhose Taj Mahal?â (March 23), âclaimsâ by Muslim bodies to âownershipâ of the Taj Mahal are both illogical and unjustified. But they also seem the product of some deeper conspiracy against Indiaâs democratic and secular foundations in general and the Hindu community in particular. The Taj Mahal is a monument of great historical and architectural importance. Though built by a Mughal emperor, it is yet cherished as a monument to national pride by all Indians irrespective of their caste or creed. The Taj is national property, and its upkeep a collective responsibility. No particular individual or community, be it Sunnis, Shiasâor even the descendants of Shah Jahan!âhave any usurpation rights over the monument. As for I&B Minister Jaipal Reddyâs statement that âthe claim is not objectionable at allâ, I can only say that he belongs to the very pseudo-secular breed that never tires of minority appeasement and Hindu-bashing. Would he ever consider the legitimate claim of Hindus to their temples in Ayodhya, Kashi or Mathura? It would not come as a surprise to me if the UPAâs self-proclaimed âsecularistsâ actually allowed a takeover of the Taj Mahal.
Atri Joshi
via e-mail<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
