Archiving. News some months old. Found linked off one of the Indian sites visited - didn't keep track of which of them it was, else would credit with a 'via' link.
Sonia stooge unsatisfied (feels left out in the cold?) and barks against the empress, spilling a few beans. But is the confession enough to deport the stooge, the empress and the minister to Pakistan? Really should bring back deportation. Like the Brits used to send Hindoos willy nilly to Andaman, India should airdrop traitors and terrorists into TSP or better yet, into Afghanistan: I doubt they'll make it back to India from there. Sonia's snatches of "Hindustani" won't help in Dari/Pashto-speaking Afghanistan and among the Arab-speaking Taliban, I think. Plus the Taliban don't like women. Or rather, they do... -> Sonia is Of The Book, and a promoter of jihad, so she should feel right at home with the Taliban, safely locked away in one of their harems. She can continue to enact her "empress of India" delusions there.
indiatoday.intoday.in/story/natwar-singh-cia-upa-sonia-gandhi-manmohan-singh-congress/1/375570.html
One of the comments:
As for Rajiv Gandhi, he *chose* to marry Sonia/Antonia Maino and thereby imposed her on Indians. Makes him responsible for her. Else every traitor married to a terrorist can plead immunity and innocence.
Besides, Rajiv converted to catholicism. Whether this was by conviction or to keep wifey and the pope happy becomes irrelevant.
But the mention of anglo indians reminds me of some journal articles by missionaries on converting India of which I had excerpted interesting bits. Should put them up. Relevant to the conversion vs reversion 'debate' (or rather, the one-sided christoislamic hysteria over reversions).
Sonia stooge unsatisfied (feels left out in the cold?) and barks against the empress, spilling a few beans. But is the confession enough to deport the stooge, the empress and the minister to Pakistan? Really should bring back deportation. Like the Brits used to send Hindoos willy nilly to Andaman, India should airdrop traitors and terrorists into TSP or better yet, into Afghanistan: I doubt they'll make it back to India from there. Sonia's snatches of "Hindustani" won't help in Dari/Pashto-speaking Afghanistan and among the Arab-speaking Taliban, I think. Plus the Taliban don't like women. Or rather, they do... -> Sonia is Of The Book, and a promoter of jihad, so she should feel right at home with the Taliban, safely locked away in one of their harems. She can continue to enact her "empress of India" delusions there.
indiatoday.intoday.in/story/natwar-singh-cia-upa-sonia-gandhi-manmohan-singh-congress/1/375570.html
Quote:CIA penetrated every sphere of UPA: Natwar Singh
IndiaToday.in New Delhi, August 4, 2014 | UPDATED 00:32 IST
Former external affairs minister Natwar Singh, whose book has already triggered a big controversy, has alleged that the US exerted pressure on then prime minister Manmohan Singh in the choice of his ministers and also claimed that CIA agents had "penetrated deep into every sphere of decision and policy making of the UPA regime".
"At one stage when Manmohan Singh was trying to dissuade me from becoming the foreign minister because of Washington's active opposition to my name, he confided in me about the all-pervasive influence of the Americans in the Indian power set-up," Natwar Singh said in an interview to a news channel.
Natwar Singh's autobiography "One Life is not Enough" has already created a stir in political circles by claiming Congress president Sonia Gandhi had access to key government files and that her decision to not accept the prime minister's post was influenced by her son Rahul Gandhi, who feared she might be assassinated like his father Rajiv Gandhi and grandmother Indira Gandhi were.
Natwar Singh also alleged that Washington tried its best to stop Pranab Mukherjee from becoming the finance minister in the Manmohan Singh government.
"They (US diplomats) were lobbying hard for Montek Singh Ahluwalia but somehow could not succeed in making him the finance minister," he said.
Natwar Singh, who had been a close confidante of Sonia Gandhi in the past, said that both Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi cannot escape the responsibility of bringing the party to its present hopeless tally of 44 MPs in the Lok Sabha - the lowest ever.
He, however, contended that a Congress minus the Gandhi family would fare worse.
"But remove the Gandhis from the scene and the party would be reduced to just four MPs," Natwar Singh said.
Natwar Singh, who has described Sonia Gandhi with harsh words such as "secretive" and "Machiavellian" in his autobiography, further criticised her for surrounding herself with sycophants.
He questioned the continuation of Ahmed Patel as her principal political advisor for long.
"What qualifications and experience Ahmed Patel has to be the principal political advisor to the Congress president? What is his vision of India... he has no vision! It's people like these who have brought the Congress party to this sorry state," Natwar Singh said.
One of the comments:
Quote:Posted by: SUNNY
August 5, 2014
leave rajiv out of it also, as he is no longer alive and sonia gandhi wouldnt have dared step out of line if he was. the CIA have been spying on india for decades because of the close relations the country shares with the soviet union USSR,mrs indira gandhi and the IB used to catch and deport these elements during the 70s and early 80s who were based in the american embassy new dehli and used anglo indians and other corrupt indians to spy for them in exchange for dollars and even american citizenship no surprises there then considering indias craze of everything western. (Especially western "converts". And spouses. And the replacement lingo.)
As for Rajiv Gandhi, he *chose* to marry Sonia/Antonia Maino and thereby imposed her on Indians. Makes him responsible for her. Else every traitor married to a terrorist can plead immunity and innocence.
Besides, Rajiv converted to catholicism. Whether this was by conviction or to keep wifey and the pope happy becomes irrelevant.
But the mention of anglo indians reminds me of some journal articles by missionaries on converting India of which I had excerpted interesting bits. Should put them up. Relevant to the conversion vs reversion 'debate' (or rather, the one-sided christoislamic hysteria over reversions).