2. haindavakeralam.com/HKPage.aspx?PageID=19354
Christianism is known to exaggerate (a lot) when it comes to counting converts (but did it do so now?). E.g.
a. As seen in Rome, see web.archive.org/web/20131228235519/http://freetruth.50webs.org/Appendix1.htm#PopulationStats
Where Joseph McCabe reviews the christian estimates of the number of converts at the start of the 4th century (when Constantine was about to take over), which estimates ranged wildly between 5 million (or 5% of the Roman empire) to 50 million (50% of the empire's population). Then Joseph McCabe argues how all of this was too optimistic and refers to his own work on the subject before concluding in summary that:
But that concerned a matter where McCabe had to correct the estimates of later christian "historians" concerning the Roman empire that Constantine acquired.
b. More relevant are the christian estimates claimed for modern China: a few years back, christians claimed to having roped in at least 100 million sheep. Now the international media claims it is 80 million at least. If accurate - neither under reported nor exaggerated - then it's 8-10% of China.
Indians kept thinking China was in a worse state than India, but as per christian claims, India now has magically got 150 million christians or 15% of India. While just a few years back, christian missions in America claimed 6%, despite Indian christians and christomedia and the erstwhile KKKongress govt having repeated "2 to 3%" all this while. That was obviously a ruse, but one still maintained by every christian commenting against Hindu protestations to christian conversion, subversion and terrorism: "we're only 2%-3%, we're no threat, islam is your enemy". Islam was 13%, with infiltration it would be 15%, say. Assuming it isn't the usual christian missionary exaggerations to their sponsors to plead for more funds using success stories, christianism has therefore converted huge numbers of Indians Faster than islam has bred, converted, rape jihad-ed and infiltrated: christianism went from 2% to 15% and is waiting to crusade the nation as it has already done in the NE.
Christianism has got away with it all, even as some idiot 'Hindus' deliberately only pinpoint islamania, but treat christianism as an ally (never mind that Leela Samson is just the latest in line of institutionalised christian defence of jihad against Hindus: i.e. more proof that in India christoislam is in bed together against Hindus). There were actually Indian 'Hindu' morons arguing in comment sections of news reports that India take in christians from Syria and Iraq - not just the suggestion that India take in Yezidis - because of the "persecution" of christians by ISIS. Who CARES. Any further Syrian christians imported to India will be persecuting Hindus in India tpp, as Kerala's Syrian christians have made a long career out of.
Another thing to note is that if only 2% are officially out as christians, then the remaining 13% are cryptochristians. And that is 130 million of them, which would account for the countless Hindu-named "secular" sounding anti-Hindus visible everywhere, from high up in the political circles of congress and in the communist govt and of course among the naxalites and all communists in India. Not to mention every peculiarly-Hindu-baiting psecular. Everyone is now suspect, from Meera Nanda to Romila Thapar: need to account for the 130 million crypto-christians, after all.
Further, if christoislamania is indeed evenly balanced at around 15% each, then any inter-christoislamic flare ups must certainly NOT be suppressed but should be left to follow through to their logical end. And it is guaranteed that, as christianism increases in % in India - despite the christoislamic treaty to work together to convert Hindu India to mono-moronism - there will be friction between the two monotheisms *because* they are now competing: christianism is becoming a significant proportion of the Indian population, so it will *very* much gain become a target of islamania. Islamania has an itchy finger - and the hardcore jihadis like ISIS types and supporters moreso - and will not honour the christoislamic deal to split India between the 2 monotheisms. Christianism will become an increasingly larger target of love jihad, a significant target of islamic terror and every other goodie that islamania has so far thrown near-exclusively Hindoos' way and which christianism has supported and whitewashed and silenced through christomedia, politics and the law. When the jihad starts heavily targeting christianism too, the christomedia will start whining about "islamic terror" and suppress spinning fictions about 'Hindu terror' and will look in Hindus' direction for help. (As has already started to happen.) Hindus should at that stage do Absolutely Nothing, but let islamania have its way with christianism. After all: if anything deserves to be silenced by islamic "peace" it is christianism. Let them destroy each other - fewer enemies of either kind to contend with when the dust settles. People are free to convert away, but can't expect solidarity from Hindus after their treachery, genocide, ethnic cleansing and psyops (and their conspiring with jihad). Until they revert, give christovictims of islamania No support.
As seen in the first article, the west very much intends for Indian christians to keep islamania occupied, to become foot soldiers in a war against islam, to keep islam occupied in prolonged bloody wars/strife, to keep the west from having to get into a messy fight with islam and to christoislamise India (which turns it into a nation paying tribute to the west and a permanent 3rd world hell-hole like Iraq now and TSP). At 150 million and expected to grow, Indian christians are large in number and the west always considered Indians - convert or not - expendable and merely a means to an end. (More fool Indian converts to christianism if they didn't know this. Even in the colonial era, several missionaries are documented as speaking haughtily about their converts whom they didn't even like. And you can find American missionaries still writing among themselves that the African and Indian converts they have made are 'idiots, but at least they're christian.' Nothing much has changed from the colonial era.)
There are missionary journal articles on why the Brits were so interested in converting Travancore's population to christianism: missionaries set up plantations to take over the region's famous wealth and converted bonded labourers working in agro into willing slaves for christian plantation missions instead (which seemed like no change in their circumstances, except their situation actually went from bad to worse, as admitted by missionaries themselves) - all in order to redirect the wealth into British hands instead of leaving it in the hands of independent Travancore, and to let the Brits control this wealth and send it back to Britain, depleting even the wealth of a part of India outside British rule. Moreover, converts would allow Britain to takeover Travancore if the chance arose/if it became necessary or useful, as sheep were always loyal to their christomasters, however alien. The same way that Indian christos have loyalty to their western masters now and are regularly remote controlled by the US.
Similarly, the Portuguese were interested in converting the Paravas, because the latter's pearl industry was worth a fortune, which Portugal eyed for itself: once again the indigenous wealth (indigenous while the Paravas were Hindu) was diverted to foreign christian nations by converting the wealth-generating Parava community into sheep. When a fight broke out between Jesuits and the Portuguese catholic rule in Goa about who could control the Paravas (for the wealth they generated), the Jesuits and Portuguese nearly destroyed the converted community by stoking civil war within the Parava community. Sheep are THAT stupid: they played right into the hands of both the Jesuits and the catholic Portuguese infesting Goa at the time. Non-existent jeebus was always a convenient fiction to rob the nitwitted converts blind.
The point being that christowest does not care about Indian converts and never did. They view them in terms of the resources, wealth and labour that they represent, and now also as a buttress against islamic jihad. Europe does not have the numbers it is willing to sacrifice against ISIS and AQ, let alone if either spreads to populous TSP-E/W or Indonesia. Indian christian converts make good footsoldiers for the west - plus christians love nothing better than to be "persecuted" and play "martyr" - plus the west always wanted to reduce the subcontinent's population. So christian converts are already marked as expendables, meant to be expended a.o.t. to survive.
The 2 articles were:
1. haindavakeralam.com/HkPage.aspx?PAGEID=19358
(Also about how the christo LTTE operation will now continue in TN)
2. haindavakeralam.com/HKPage.aspx?PageID=19354
Quote:Christian group claims, over 80,000 new believers baptized in India this year.No secular outrage
26/12/2014 20:30:59 MediaInput
New Delhi: At a time when Indiaââ¬â¢s Parliament proceedings are disrupted over the contentious issue of religious conversions, a North American organisation is planning an event in Chandigarh called ââ¬ËIndia Journey of Compassionââ¬â¢ to mark the claim of its partners in North India that they have baptized over 80,000 new believers this year.
The organisation has invited people from all over the world to participate in one of the largest house church movements. The event, organised by Impact Nations, is proposed to be held at Chandigarh from March 15 to 27 next year.
Impact Nations is a Christian organization that claims bringing hope and restoration to the poor and vulnerable in the developing world through both supernatural and practical expressions of the God.
The organisation has fixed USD 1,850 as early registration fees, for which the last date is January 8. Regular registration will cost USD 1,995, as per the information available on its website.
The organisation has its offices at 860 E 53rd Ave, Vancouver (Canada) and 4830 Pan American FWY NE, Albuquerque, New Mexico (USA).
ââ¬ÅIndia, soon to be the most populous nation on earth, is a country like no other. It is estimated that there are now over 150 million believersââ¬âbut more than a billion have yet to turn to Christ. India is in revival. Our partners in north India have baptized over 80,000 new believers this year. They have seen over 200 people raised from the dead. (<- Christo-nonsense makes the other numbers suspect too, as being but more christo delirium.) What is happening is historic; Impact Nations has been invited to take partââ¬âand we are extending this invitation to you,ââ¬Â the description given on the website reads.
Source: indiatvnews.com/news/india/over-80000-new-believers-baptized-in-india-this-year-45443.html
Christianism is known to exaggerate (a lot) when it comes to counting converts (but did it do so now?). E.g.
a. As seen in Rome, see web.archive.org/web/20131228235519/http://freetruth.50webs.org/Appendix1.htm#PopulationStats
Where Joseph McCabe reviews the christian estimates of the number of converts at the start of the 4th century (when Constantine was about to take over), which estimates ranged wildly between 5 million (or 5% of the Roman empire) to 50 million (50% of the empire's population). Then Joseph McCabe argues how all of this was too optimistic and refers to his own work on the subject before concluding in summary that:
Quote:In short, it is liberal to grant, in the year 310, three million nominal Christians amongst the hundred millions of the Roman Empire; and the persecution had driven most of these back to the temples. Moreover, the vast majority were in rural Armenia (to which Schultze assigns no less than two million out of his three million seven hundred and fifty thousand), Syria, and Asia Minor. The gospel, after nearly three centuries of propaganda, was a failure.
But that concerned a matter where McCabe had to correct the estimates of later christian "historians" concerning the Roman empire that Constantine acquired.
b. More relevant are the christian estimates claimed for modern China: a few years back, christians claimed to having roped in at least 100 million sheep. Now the international media claims it is 80 million at least. If accurate - neither under reported nor exaggerated - then it's 8-10% of China.
Indians kept thinking China was in a worse state than India, but as per christian claims, India now has magically got 150 million christians or 15% of India. While just a few years back, christian missions in America claimed 6%, despite Indian christians and christomedia and the erstwhile KKKongress govt having repeated "2 to 3%" all this while. That was obviously a ruse, but one still maintained by every christian commenting against Hindu protestations to christian conversion, subversion and terrorism: "we're only 2%-3%, we're no threat, islam is your enemy". Islam was 13%, with infiltration it would be 15%, say. Assuming it isn't the usual christian missionary exaggerations to their sponsors to plead for more funds using success stories, christianism has therefore converted huge numbers of Indians Faster than islam has bred, converted, rape jihad-ed and infiltrated: christianism went from 2% to 15% and is waiting to crusade the nation as it has already done in the NE.
Christianism has got away with it all, even as some idiot 'Hindus' deliberately only pinpoint islamania, but treat christianism as an ally (never mind that Leela Samson is just the latest in line of institutionalised christian defence of jihad against Hindus: i.e. more proof that in India christoislam is in bed together against Hindus). There were actually Indian 'Hindu' morons arguing in comment sections of news reports that India take in christians from Syria and Iraq - not just the suggestion that India take in Yezidis - because of the "persecution" of christians by ISIS. Who CARES. Any further Syrian christians imported to India will be persecuting Hindus in India tpp, as Kerala's Syrian christians have made a long career out of.
Another thing to note is that if only 2% are officially out as christians, then the remaining 13% are cryptochristians. And that is 130 million of them, which would account for the countless Hindu-named "secular" sounding anti-Hindus visible everywhere, from high up in the political circles of congress and in the communist govt and of course among the naxalites and all communists in India. Not to mention every peculiarly-Hindu-baiting psecular. Everyone is now suspect, from Meera Nanda to Romila Thapar: need to account for the 130 million crypto-christians, after all.
Further, if christoislamania is indeed evenly balanced at around 15% each, then any inter-christoislamic flare ups must certainly NOT be suppressed but should be left to follow through to their logical end. And it is guaranteed that, as christianism increases in % in India - despite the christoislamic treaty to work together to convert Hindu India to mono-moronism - there will be friction between the two monotheisms *because* they are now competing: christianism is becoming a significant proportion of the Indian population, so it will *very* much gain become a target of islamania. Islamania has an itchy finger - and the hardcore jihadis like ISIS types and supporters moreso - and will not honour the christoislamic deal to split India between the 2 monotheisms. Christianism will become an increasingly larger target of love jihad, a significant target of islamic terror and every other goodie that islamania has so far thrown near-exclusively Hindoos' way and which christianism has supported and whitewashed and silenced through christomedia, politics and the law. When the jihad starts heavily targeting christianism too, the christomedia will start whining about "islamic terror" and suppress spinning fictions about 'Hindu terror' and will look in Hindus' direction for help. (As has already started to happen.) Hindus should at that stage do Absolutely Nothing, but let islamania have its way with christianism. After all: if anything deserves to be silenced by islamic "peace" it is christianism. Let them destroy each other - fewer enemies of either kind to contend with when the dust settles. People are free to convert away, but can't expect solidarity from Hindus after their treachery, genocide, ethnic cleansing and psyops (and their conspiring with jihad). Until they revert, give christovictims of islamania No support.
As seen in the first article, the west very much intends for Indian christians to keep islamania occupied, to become foot soldiers in a war against islam, to keep islam occupied in prolonged bloody wars/strife, to keep the west from having to get into a messy fight with islam and to christoislamise India (which turns it into a nation paying tribute to the west and a permanent 3rd world hell-hole like Iraq now and TSP). At 150 million and expected to grow, Indian christians are large in number and the west always considered Indians - convert or not - expendable and merely a means to an end. (More fool Indian converts to christianism if they didn't know this. Even in the colonial era, several missionaries are documented as speaking haughtily about their converts whom they didn't even like. And you can find American missionaries still writing among themselves that the African and Indian converts they have made are 'idiots, but at least they're christian.' Nothing much has changed from the colonial era.)
There are missionary journal articles on why the Brits were so interested in converting Travancore's population to christianism: missionaries set up plantations to take over the region's famous wealth and converted bonded labourers working in agro into willing slaves for christian plantation missions instead (which seemed like no change in their circumstances, except their situation actually went from bad to worse, as admitted by missionaries themselves) - all in order to redirect the wealth into British hands instead of leaving it in the hands of independent Travancore, and to let the Brits control this wealth and send it back to Britain, depleting even the wealth of a part of India outside British rule. Moreover, converts would allow Britain to takeover Travancore if the chance arose/if it became necessary or useful, as sheep were always loyal to their christomasters, however alien. The same way that Indian christos have loyalty to their western masters now and are regularly remote controlled by the US.
Similarly, the Portuguese were interested in converting the Paravas, because the latter's pearl industry was worth a fortune, which Portugal eyed for itself: once again the indigenous wealth (indigenous while the Paravas were Hindu) was diverted to foreign christian nations by converting the wealth-generating Parava community into sheep. When a fight broke out between Jesuits and the Portuguese catholic rule in Goa about who could control the Paravas (for the wealth they generated), the Jesuits and Portuguese nearly destroyed the converted community by stoking civil war within the Parava community. Sheep are THAT stupid: they played right into the hands of both the Jesuits and the catholic Portuguese infesting Goa at the time. Non-existent jeebus was always a convenient fiction to rob the nitwitted converts blind.
The point being that christowest does not care about Indian converts and never did. They view them in terms of the resources, wealth and labour that they represent, and now also as a buttress against islamic jihad. Europe does not have the numbers it is willing to sacrifice against ISIS and AQ, let alone if either spreads to populous TSP-E/W or Indonesia. Indian christian converts make good footsoldiers for the west - plus christians love nothing better than to be "persecuted" and play "martyr" - plus the west always wanted to reduce the subcontinent's population. So christian converts are already marked as expendables, meant to be expended a.o.t. to survive.
The 2 articles were:
1. haindavakeralam.com/HkPage.aspx?PAGEID=19358
Quote:North East Terror And Liberation Theology- Understanding Ideodynamics Of Tribal Bloodbath On Christmas Eve
31/12/2014 15:37:26 Aron
(Also about how the christo LTTE operation will now continue in TN)
2. haindavakeralam.com/HKPage.aspx?PageID=19354
Quote:Christian group claims, over 80,000 new believers baptized in India this year.No secular outrage
26/12/2014 20:30:59 MediaInput
[...]
ââ¬ÅIndia, soon to be the most populous nation on earth, is a country like no other. It is estimated that there are now over 150 million believersââ¬âbut more than a billion have yet to turn to Christ. India is in revival. Our partners in north India have baptized over 80,000 new believers this year.
[...]