The previous post, particularly the news items therein, are what's relevant. This post is just me thinking out loud.
So, based on all the above:
- Sunanda murdered by at least one poison that would (generally) not be detected in Indian labs, as per the news summarising the medical investigation's findings
- Tharoor stayed with Tarar in Dubai as per a witness in the inquest (i.e. she'd be stating for the record, and hence it's not a casua). And journalist Nalini Singh has stated that Sunanda had said how she had proof of "Tharoor and Tarar having spent 3 nights in Dubai".
The above two points taken together => ISI hand
[Not sure about what the 3rd woman angle says, other than that Sunanda was tired of Tharoor's philandering. Still can't work out why she married him: he was never a model of constancy...]
- Tharoor's housekeeper hadn't just overheard Tharoor and wife #3 fighting, but her threatening that she it was all over for Tharoor because of her interview.
- Tharoor had tried to make his wife's death look like a suicide by introducing the bogey of lupus/"she bruised easily", whereas the medical examination revealed Sunanda did NOT have lupus at all. (Tharoor caught in a lie, as well as the two "doctors" he hired and the spokesperson of the Kerala hospital that Tharoor or KKKangress had appointed to chime in with the "Sunanda had lupus" story.)
I.e. Tharoor had seriously interfered with the investigation to throw the scent off his trail. He wouldn't have had to do this if he were innocent.
The above two points taken together => Not just KKKangress/ISI but Tharoor himself had a motive in wanting Sunanda out of the way. And not for her nagging him about his extramarital affairs or for his kicking him. AND Tharoor knew it was murder from the start, which is *why* he tried to conceal that it was murder by trying to make it look like an accidental suicide (by drug overdose): aka he is involved in the murder. Also, he seems to have known that the prominent poison would not be detected by Indian labs, else why his elaborate sharade to throw investigators off the trail?
- Then there's Sunanda's tweet before her death-by-murder that if she brought up the issue of the ethnic cleansing of Hindus from Kashmir she would be "sambolo-ed" (sp?) [silenced? done away with?] and that Tharoor and KKKangress expected her to play Good-wifey, Silent-wifey.
- Sunanda was going to 'reveal all' in some interview as per her tweets.
- Also according to tweets between her and her correspondents on twitter, Sunanda's interview was going to be with Barkha Dutt, known islamaniac and wife of some islamist (IIRC wife of some terrorist from Kashmir)
- As per what the housekeeper (Narayan Singh) had overheard, Sunanda had said that she had *already* given her interview to the media.
- Yet nothing in the media about the "great revelation" that Sunanda had intimated and the housekeeper had overheard
=> Taken together, it's not just the KKKangress and Tharoor and ISI/islamania that were involved, but also points to how the interviewer - a known fascist islamaniac Barkha Dutt, who regularly silences islamic genocide of Hindus - should be silently investigated by the police. As also NDTV or whatever christist channel Barkha Dutt works for.
Though I'm sure Barkha and her jihadi husband (not to mention the christomedia) would have got rid of any incriminating evidence long before now.
That Tharoor was having an affair with Tarar (and another woman and who knows who else) is not really in question anymore - notwithstanding any fake tears by Ms ISI, which will no doubt be produced in time, along with her denial and a plea for public/police credulity in her favour.
That Tharoor and KKKangress and ISI did in Sunanda is not the question either.
The real question is: what was the actual news Sunanda was going to announce to the public? If she was just going to air the dirty linen, I doubt it would have been sensationalist enough to warrant threatening Tharoor over. That Tarar was an ISI agent could work for shock value only if Sunanda could prove the ISI angle AND that Tharoor knew it, and if he had blabbed state-level stuff to Tarar/was in deep with Pakiland.
Put otherwise: exactly what details had Tharoor been intimating to Pakiland via his part-time girlfriend Tarar? (She's not there because she was in love with Tharoor, right? Wait, Tharoor probably really does think it was his charm or his looks or some other imaginary quality he doesn't possess.)
And how does this relate back to Sunanda telling her twitter buddies that if she were to make statements about Kashmir's native Hindus, she'd get Sambalo-ed (or whatever the word).
Can already see Tharoor shaking his finger and say "I was NOT having an affair with that woman" a la Clinton. But at least Clinton wasn't sleeping with enemies of his nation... (<- Who knew there was a good side to Clinton?) But then, this wouldn't be the first time with Tharoor. He was last seen married to a Canadian working on nuclear disarmament or something for the US. (One "Christa Giles" was it?) Everyone who was plugging for Tharoor - not a great judge of character were they? I recall the Rajeev2004 blog proudly declaring that Tharoor wasn't into western women. Now did they mean *before* or *after* wife #2, the Canadian? Or did they simply - and conveniently - not know about Giles?
I don't -in [i]theory[/i]- have an issue with western men/women where these are no threat to Hindus/Hindu religion/India and aren't dabblers, but specifically where NRIs who won't be returning to India are concerned. Having said that, I don't trust western persons when it comes to Indians and India: India has a major problem with the magic appearance/insertion of western women wherever high-profile Indian men are involved. Ever since the colonial/independence era, see a recent article by Radha Rajan at indiafacts where she briefly brings up this issue. The west always does infiltrate - and if possible, neutralise, else drag down or reorient targets toward the west/to treachery - every important Indian movement and highly-placed or otherwise important person. Guess ISI wanted in on the action too, seeing as how easy modern Indian men are. (Am sure modern Indian women would be too, but there are not so many in high profile positions. Mayawati and Mumtaz Banshee and Joylolita are of an older less outgoing generation [a generation of females who are more conservative/less likely to marry aliens] and they may not be able to speak sufficient English for it to appear natural to the public for them to find themselves married to western men all of a sudden. Though Mumtaz may be married to an islamaniac for all I know...)
The previous post, particularly the news items therein, are what's relevant. This post is just me thinking out loud.
So, based on all the above:
- Sunanda murdered by at least one poison that would (generally) not be detected in Indian labs, as per the news summarising the medical investigation's findings
- Tharoor stayed with Tarar in Dubai as per a witness in the inquest (i.e. she'd be stating for the record, and hence it's not a casua). And journalist Nalini Singh has stated that Sunanda had said how she had proof of "Tharoor and Tarar having spent 3 nights in Dubai".
The above two points taken together => ISI hand
[Not sure about what the 3rd woman angle says, other than that Sunanda was tired of Tharoor's philandering. Still can't work out why she married him: he was never a model of constancy...]
- Tharoor's housekeeper hadn't just overheard Tharoor and wife #3 fighting, but her threatening that she it was all over for Tharoor because of her interview.
- Tharoor had tried to make his wife's death look like a suicide by introducing the bogey of lupus/"she bruised easily", whereas the medical examination revealed Sunanda did NOT have lupus at all. (Tharoor caught in a lie, as well as the two "doctors" he hired and the spokesperson of the Kerala hospital that Tharoor or KKKangress had appointed to chime in with the "Sunanda had lupus" story.)
I.e. Tharoor had seriously interfered with the investigation to throw the scent off his trail. He wouldn't have had to do this if he were innocent.
The above two points taken together => Not just KKKangress/ISI but Tharoor himself had a motive in wanting Sunanda out of the way. And not for her nagging him about his extramarital affairs or for his kicking him. AND Tharoor knew it was murder from the start, which is *why* he tried to conceal that it was murder by trying to make it look like an accidental suicide (by drug overdose): aka he is involved in the murder. Also, he seems to have known that the prominent poison would not be detected by Indian labs, else why his elaborate sharade to throw investigators off the trail?
- Then there's Sunanda's tweet before her death-by-murder that if she brought up the issue of the ethnic cleansing of Hindus from Kashmir she would be "sambolo-ed" (sp?) [silenced? done away with?] and that Tharoor and KKKangress expected her to play Good-wifey, Silent-wifey.
- Sunanda was going to 'reveal all' in some interview as per her tweets.
- Also according to tweets between her and her correspondents on twitter, Sunanda's interview was going to be with Barkha Dutt, known islamaniac and wife of some islamist (IIRC wife of some terrorist from Kashmir)
- As per what the housekeeper (Narayan Singh) had overheard, Sunanda had said that she had *already* given her interview to the media.
- Yet nothing in the media about the "great revelation" that Sunanda had intimated and the housekeeper had overheard
=> Taken together, it's not just the KKKangress and Tharoor and ISI/islamania that were involved, but also points to how the interviewer - a known fascist islamaniac Barkha Dutt, who regularly silences islamic genocide of Hindus - should be silently investigated by the police. As also NDTV or whatever christist channel Barkha Dutt works for.
Though I'm sure Barkha and her jihadi husband (not to mention the christomedia) would have got rid of any incriminating evidence long before now.
That Tharoor was having an affair with Tarar (and another woman and who knows who else) is not really in question anymore - notwithstanding any fake tears by Ms ISI, which will no doubt be produced in time, along with her denial and a plea for public/police credulity in her favour.
That Tharoor and KKKangress and ISI did in Sunanda is not the question either.
The real question is: what was the actual news Sunanda was going to announce to the public? If she was just going to air the dirty linen, I doubt it would have been sensationalist enough to warrant threatening Tharoor over. That Tarar was an ISI agent could work for shock value only if Sunanda could prove the ISI angle AND that Tharoor knew it, and if he had blabbed state-level stuff to Tarar/was in deep with Pakiland.
Put otherwise: exactly what details had Tharoor been intimating to Pakiland via his part-time girlfriend Tarar? (She's not there because she was in love with Tharoor, right? Wait, Tharoor probably really does think it was his charm or his looks or some other imaginary quality he doesn't possess.)
And how does this relate back to Sunanda telling her twitter buddies that if she were to make statements about Kashmir's native Hindus, she'd get Sambalo-ed (or whatever the word).
Can already see Tharoor shaking his finger and say "I was NOT having an affair with that woman" a la Clinton. But at least Clinton wasn't sleeping with enemies of his nation... (<- Who knew there was a good side to Clinton?) But then, this wouldn't be the first time with Tharoor. He was last seen married to a Canadian working on nuclear disarmament or something for the US. (One "Christa Giles" was it?) Everyone who was plugging for Tharoor - not a great judge of character were they? I recall the Rajeev2004 blog proudly declaring that Tharoor wasn't into western women. Now did they mean *before* or *after* wife #2, the Canadian? Or did they simply - and conveniently - not know about Giles?
I don't -in [i]theory[/i]- have an issue with western men/women where these are no threat to Hindus/Hindu religion/India and aren't dabblers, but specifically where NRIs who won't be returning to India are concerned. Having said that, I don't trust western persons when it comes to Indians and India: India has a major problem with the magic appearance/insertion of western women wherever high-profile Indian men are involved. Ever since the colonial/independence era, see a recent article by Radha Rajan at indiafacts where she briefly brings up this issue. The west always does infiltrate - and if possible, neutralise, else drag down or reorient targets toward the west/to treachery - every important Indian movement and highly-placed or otherwise important person. Guess ISI wanted in on the action too, seeing as how easy modern Indian men are. (Am sure modern Indian women would be too, but there are not so many in high profile positions. Mayawati and Mumtaz Banshee and Joylolita are of an older less outgoing generation [a generation of females who are more conservative/less likely to marry aliens] and they may not be able to speak sufficient English for it to appear natural to the public for them to find themselves married to western men all of a sudden. Though Mumtaz may be married to an islamaniac for all I know...)
The previous post, particularly the news items therein, are what's relevant. This post is just me thinking out loud.