Nexus Between Entities Influencing India

[Husky]

1. Important and eye-opening piece on why it was never a level playing field - why Hindus will never actually be able to compete fairly with missionary religions in India on a practical level because of laws already in place (the latter half of the article is the important part):



realitycheck.wordpress.com/2014/09/17/hinduism-vs-proselytizing-religions-in-the-market-of-ideas/





2. Couple more comments found at RealityCheck related to post 268 on the evangelical psy-ops and libel against Hindoos of Tirunchengode, followed by christomedia's push for freedom to libel Hindoos under a facade of "freedom of speech".

sundar said, on January 17, 2015 at 11:24 am



Jesuis Thiruchengode for sure. Prob with such books claiming to be true but based on hearsay is those very books, works are kept in foreign universities, banned in India, and Mcaulay Putras take such fiction as True history and teach our future generations.



Perumal's work sponsored by one India Arts ... which is in turn affliated to FordFoundation. So, we can safely assume their lopsided view of India reflecting in their sponsorships.

Reply

And a succinct summary of the whole enforced drama:

Sam said, on January 17, 2015 at 2:46 am



An interesting affair that is typical of the one-sided secularism that exists in India today. A Christian convert writes a fictional account involving his (pre-conversion) Hindu low caste community and a local temple where he insinuates that childless women of this community ritually prostitute themselves at a popular festival in order to conceive. The problem is that the locals have never heard about this manufactured "tradition" and they get quite upset over the book. No Charlie Hebdo-like massacre takes place, no physical violence is inflicted on the writer and his wife, not even a Pope Francis sanctioned punch. But some book copies might have been burned and demonstrations resorted. The locals boycott/shun the writer and his wife -- a la the peaceful Quakers or Shakers -- and they, in turn, attempt to make amends with their neighbors/community to calm the waters. Unfortunately for them the leftists and China's national mouthpiece move in claiming the freedom of speech to libel a community and how dare the locals be offended. Stuck in a no-win situation the writer feels increasingly hemmed in and declares that he no longer exists and that he is withdrawing all his books. At this, the leftists get whipped into an even bigger frenzy and the national media led by the China daily, without digging into the story or trying to ascertain all the facts, mindlessly accuse the RSS and national Hindu movements for being mindless instigators of censorship in the Modi era. A local affair gets nationalized and becomes another stick for the secular left to selectively beat up on Hindus in their desperate attempt to reverse their recent political losses.

Reply

(Only object to a single phrase, but I don't think it is the commenter's own choice of phrase/own view, but rather that they're trying to present a distant/disinterested external observer's assessment of the overall situation.)



Also I think the final conclusion is not quite complete. While the christomedia has wanted to tar the BJP and RSS etc as well (2 birds with one stone and all), the original core aim was and remains an attempt at psy-ops against the Hindus - it's why the Ford Foundation is involved and why the author is a handpicked christist who made up libel against a Hindoo community, and why Penguin picked up the book for mass publishing. It is intended to hereafter be disseminated as the "received wisdom" about the traditions of the Hindoos in question. As "sundar" observed very correctly above:

Prob with such books claiming to be true but based on hearsay is those very books, works are kept in foreign universities, banned in India, and Mcaulay Putras take such fiction as True history and teach our future generations.

Further new comments have appeared at the link. Among those worth reading is one by an "xyz", who gives a first-hand account of the behaviour of N.Ram of Chindu infamy and the others of the christocommunist fringe, when xyz tried to speak to them in person. N.Ram sounds just like the Sagarikas and Rajdeeps: with a definite agenda, implaccable on how Hindus/Hindoo religion must be dealt with, and of course hypocritical. And they know they can get away with it, too: has the christomedia not successfully silenced practically all news on the arrest (without bail) of lawyer Vijay Gaekwad for allegedly offending islamic sensibilities with some alleged comment about the first Mohammedan aka the puppet? Who or what but a motivated christomedia would avoid all mention of something so important and shocking as warrants much media coverage and protestation?

Mac said, on January 16, 2015 at 2:24 pm



In this context,I would like to draw the attention of the readers, the comments of Pope wrt France episode.

Oh but no. There's one rule for catholics - like N. Ram (a cryptocatholic technically, and communist too, like a good adherent of liberation theology) and one for Hindus.



And the news was:



realitycheck.wordpress.com/2014/09/17/hinduism-vs-proselytizing-religions-in-the-market-of-ideas/

sundar said, on January 17, 2015 at 11:24 am

[...]

Perumal's work sponsored by one India Arts ... which is in turn affliated to FordFoundation.

[...]

Which makes the exact sort of connections as this thread was originally about: a '6 degrees of separation' type connect-the-dots game on how every visitation of "misfortune" upon Hindus always derives from very predictable sources acting with intent: christianism + AmeriKKKan orgs (sometimes via islam/with help of an islamic intermediary, though not in this case).