Messy case. 3 items. Then a 4th on a different topic.
UK.
Rich man accused of rape, who seems to not be without some influence, prosecutes the claimant as having falsely charged him, for which ends he has also brought to light that she was to have been part of an escort service. Unfortunately, such things tend to cause many people to assume that an escort could never be a victim of rape. (Of course they can. Lots of prostitutes too are victims of rape - especially in E/SE Asian countries, where native prostitutes are attacked by western "tourists". <= Where are the English-language documentaries on that?)
Anyway, the woman hangs herself. Amid her statements are that she was ashamed to be British, and that she is afraid his prosecution of her may be successful and that therefore he will reoffend. She is bipolar (these things get mentioned in court cases and again, they influence the jury: "do bipolar people lie, are they suffering from multiple personality disorder" etc? And other biases.)
The woman hanged herself a year ago. (Odd timing.)
Don't know who to believe.
But, the interesting bits - besides the woman's statements about being British - are the timing of this, and the facts that a rich man was involved and that it has all the features of a brewing controversy (unless UK media skips over it fast).
1. news.sky.com/story/1446932/trial-stress-rape-claim-woman-killed-herself
2. Meanwhile, the Telegraph is convinced the rape charge was false:
telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/11478683/Eleanor-de-Freitas-false-rape-case-Escort-rumours-heightened-fear-of-prosecution.html
Quaint reference to "Tantric" massage (wah? never mind, too deep for me) connoting it with escorts.
I'm surprised they didn't throw in yoguh too. Surely there was yoguh? At least some yoghurt? No?
3. And here's the Beeb's version, which pretends to play innocent spectator. Something BBC news can afford to do now, since the matter involves neither heathens that they can stake nor their own Jim Saville or prince Andrew whose criminal actions they need to blot out from public scrutiny/drown out by focusing on India.
The beeb will not be making a documentary on De Freitas et al case, but - like Sky - is not as convinced as the Telegraph as to who is telling the truth.
bbc.com/news/uk-31930196
Lots of mass high-level, and incendiary* rape/sex slavery/paedophilia ring cases in the UK going on.
Besides the evangelical purposes and uses of projecting India as rape central, wonder to what extent the UK hand in the attack on India is an attempt to project attention away from themselves and the quagmire they're in.
* The above sort of case is considered incendiary - it is exactly what sets feminists off - since it is controversial: you know certain groups of people will take sides, convinced of one thing or another. E.g. some were already convinced that the British govt is oppressing its women and treating their witness like 1/4th that of men (rather like sharia), and cases that are somewhat in the grey-area, such as the above, will merely be taken to prove their point that there is a concerted effort to downplay and discredit. Others will rather read the above as further evidence for how those who claim x% of rape claims are false. (Also seen in the way the Telegraph is interested in directing its readers.)
It's a mini powder keg. Actually it's a major powder keg in the west. They've had to "handle" it regularly.
For example:
I remember Down Under news from some years back of how a great number of men in the police force were accused of sexual assault and rape of the populace over the years and yet were still in service. Victims and their supporters were aghast. The protest built up massively, until the police had to post female officers to guard their premises from being vandalised/attacked/stormed or whatever they feared from the angry public (IIRC the photos showed protesters burning effigees of the police force in the end).
But people got even more incensed at the police having posted female police officers in order to protect the institution from the public. Instead of alleviating criticism, it heightened it. People were angry at the female police officers for having chosen the side of the attackers and those in power who abused the system by not putting the attackers behind bars. But IIRC the public was mostly furious that the men had deliberately posted the female officers knowing that the public wouldn't confront them, despite vengeful feelings (in an attempt to prevent them from giving vent to it) since female officers were as per gender part of the wronged population.
No beeb documentary on that either, BTW (then or now). But IIRC the public was convinced it was an epidemic in the police force. Will try to track down the item.
^ But goes to show the other side of high-and-mighty entities (alien and anti-Indian Indians) who project India's police force as "opportunistic rapists too". Well the christoislamic ones in the police and armed forces certainly are rapists or otherwise criminal. But then that's the result of minorityism and the minority quota. Just like a crazy evangelist is using his government service to go about peddling jeebus. Christoislamics are always vilely christoislamic in behaviour in any position, respectable or criminal.
4. Speaking of law enforcement gone shady -
And here is only the nth report in recent times on AmriKKKan police officers bashing persons most noticeably of non-Euro origins.
"Land of the free" was always an odd phrase to attach to the US. Must have been a reference to the AmriKKKans alone, not to the people they kidnapped from their homelands and communities into enslavement and an early grave.
news.sky.com/story/1448219/black-students-bloody-arrest-sparks-outrage
(Graphic pictures of the brutalised man at the link.)
Soon we'll hear -again- how the AmriKKKan cops involved are "really good people"; how it's all a misrepresentation. Etc etc.
But no comment from Obama? No soundbyte? He, so famous for pontificating that intolerance was increasing in India? (As even I had predicted he would: it's dictated by AmeriKKKan foreign policy on India, so it wasn't any brilliant foresight on my part, just as my expectation that the BJP govt wouldn't have foreseen it - and would be caught totally off guard and hapless and left scratching their heads and making comebacks long after the AmeriKKKan hit-and-run - was also nothing clever).
To repeat, where's Obama - who parroted the evangelical/foreign policy script given to him by the real puppet masters - and who lectured on intolerance in India? Actually he's right, but in a different way from the insinuations in his script. There's massive intolerance in India - it's been increasing to extreme levels, all emanating from the monotheist demons (=christoislamicommunists) and their Useful Idiot psecular friends infesting India. <- One day the cannibal that is christoislamism is going to gorge itself on the psecular facilitators' flesh too, and it will all be because of their own doing, and hence totally deserved.
The genocide of the Yezidis - only just now recognised by the UN (probably because Yezidis have now been significantly extincted, else the UN would never have finally publicised that they have taken [prolonged, silent] note of the mass-murder of non-christoislamics)
Again: the christoislamaniac genocide of the Yezidis is what happens to all who refuse to convert to christoislamania. So India's Useful Idiots really should convert readily, before the Khalifate gets a foothold/gets established in India too. The Caliphate will come, whether India is ready or not: Khalifate movements are programmed to involve the global ummah, being a pan-territorial, pan-islamic thing - actually, pan-christoislamic (several Middle-Eastern christians have eagerly joined up too, and no doubt India's Syrian christians will lead the way in treachery - as they did with the Portuguese christo invaders as well - were ISIS to start flying flags in India).
UK.
Rich man accused of rape, who seems to not be without some influence, prosecutes the claimant as having falsely charged him, for which ends he has also brought to light that she was to have been part of an escort service. Unfortunately, such things tend to cause many people to assume that an escort could never be a victim of rape. (Of course they can. Lots of prostitutes too are victims of rape - especially in E/SE Asian countries, where native prostitutes are attacked by western "tourists". <= Where are the English-language documentaries on that?)
Anyway, the woman hangs herself. Amid her statements are that she was ashamed to be British, and that she is afraid his prosecution of her may be successful and that therefore he will reoffend. She is bipolar (these things get mentioned in court cases and again, they influence the jury: "do bipolar people lie, are they suffering from multiple personality disorder" etc? And other biases.)
The woman hanged herself a year ago. (Odd timing.)
Don't know who to believe.
But, the interesting bits - besides the woman's statements about being British - are the timing of this, and the facts that a rich man was involved and that it has all the features of a brewing controversy (unless UK media skips over it fast).
1. news.sky.com/story/1446932/trial-stress-rape-claim-woman-killed-herself
Quote:'Trial Stress': Rape Claim Woman Killed Herself
Eleanor de Freitas said her decision to end her life was "selfish" but she would "bring shame on the family" if she lost the case.
17:29, UK, Tuesday 17 March 2015
Eleanor de Freitas
The cause of Eleanor de Freitas' death was hanging
A woman taken to court for allegedly making a false rape claim killed herself before her trial over fears she would not be believed, an inquest has heard.
Eleanor de Freitas, 23, left a note saying her decision to end her life was "selfish" but said she would "bring shame on the family" if she lost the case.
The coroner Chinyere Inyama recorded that she took her own life and the impending court case was "a significant stressor in her life".
A pathology report recorded the cause of death as hanging.
In her note, Ms Freitas said she felt "ashamed to be British" after the CPS decision to prosecute her, and told her legal team before the trial that "it would be better if I had been run over by a bus".
And the trainee accountant said she felt there was "no way out" after she was taken to court for allegedly perverting the course of justice.
Ms de Freitas' father, David, told the hearing how his daughter began wearing a burka to court appearances through fear of publicity, and would sometimes only leave the house after dark.
The "vivacious, straight-A student", who suffered with bipolar disorder, from Fulham in London, died on 4 April, 2014.
She had previously been sectioned under the Mental Health Act and told her family she feared being readmitted to psychiatric care, West London Coroner's Court heard.
Mr de Freitas said she had some support withdrawn in the months leading up to her death following the decision to prosecute her.
He said: "She had been receiving counselling for rape. But she was denied access to counselling from the moment she received summons (for perverting the course of justice).
"Her behaviour changed. In some instances it made her depressed. In other respects it made her bizarre."
Mr de Freitas also described how his daughter feared being sectioned again and would try to "mask" her feelings.
He said she had been abused mentally and physically during her previous stay in hospital.
The court heard instances of having a panic attack on the day she received a court summons, and later was found throwing packets of crisps in the aisles of a supermarket in September 2013.
On 23 December, 2013, Ms de Freitas drove to Northamptonshire to spend Christmas with her family but took a wrong turn on the A1 and continued driving until she ran out of fuel, the inquest was told.
Her father said: "Eleanor was a very good driver, she had driven that route many times. She must have gone through something very traumatic as to be as disoriented and do what she did."
She said she feared her alleged abuser, who went on to lodge the criminal complaint against Ms de Freitas, would be free to re-offend if he was not brought to book, the court heard.
2. Meanwhile, the Telegraph is convinced the rape charge was false:
telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/11478683/Eleanor-de-Freitas-false-rape-case-Escort-rumours-heightened-fear-of-prosecution.html
Quote:Eleanor de Freitas false rape case: Escort rumours heightened fear of prosecution
A woman who killed herself after making a false rape allegation was afraid to face trial for her lies, fearing lurid rumours about her private life would be publicised
Eleanor de Freitas
Eleanor de Freitas Photo: PA
By Agency
7:56PM GMT 17 Mar 2015
A woman who killed herself after making a false rape allegation was afraid to face trial for her lies, fearing rumours linking her to an escort service would be publicised, an inquest has heard.
The father of Eleanor de Freitas confirmed that his daughter may have been embarrassed about her aspects of her online activity becoming known during a prosecution for perverting the course of justice.
Mr de Freitas said: ââ¬ÅWell there seemed to be some extraneous evidence to do with escort services and tantric massage services.ââ¬Â
Lawyers for the family of Eleanor de Freitas have also demanded answers from the Crown Prosecution Service after the 23-year-old was found dead three days before she was due to appear in court for perverting the course of justice.
ââ¬Â¢ Eleanor de Freitas rape case: complainant wrote of her 'disbelief' at prosecution
Miss de Freitas, from Fulham, southwest London, suffered from bipolar disorder and had complained ex-lover Alexander Economou had attacked her before Christmas 2012.
Mr Economou was never charged due to a lack of evidence.
The 35-year-old son of a Greek shipping magnate then spent thousands bringing a private prosecution against Ms de Freitas.
He assembled an array of evidence including texts and CCTV to show that the former Durham University student had falsified her rape complaint.
David de Freitas, father of Eleanor de Freitas, who killed herself days before going on trial for 'inventing a rape claim'.
The Crown Prosecution Service took over the criminal proceedings, but Ms de Freitas was found dead on April 7 last year, three days before the start of her trial at Southwark Crown Court.
Her death triggered an outcry from anti-rape campaigners, but the Director of Public Prosecutions, Alison Saunders defended the prosecution.
ââ¬Â¢ 109 women prosecuted for false rape claims over the last five years
Following an internal investigation, she said: ââ¬ÅThe evidence was strong and having considered it in light of all of our knowledge and guidance on prosecuting sexual offences and allegedly false rape claims, it is clear there was sufficient evidence for a realistic prospect of conviction for perverting the course of justice.
ââ¬ÅThis was evidence including text messages and CCTV footage that directly contradicted the account Ms de Freitas gave to the police. I am satisfied that the decision-making in this case was correct.ââ¬Â
Leslie Thomas QC, who represents the family read out the note that Miss de Freitas had left for her family.
She wrote: ââ¬ÅI know how selfish it is but I really feel there is no way out.
ââ¬ÅIf I were to lose the case I know that I would have brought huge shame on the family. It's entirely my fault for what has happened and there are many other events which make me make this decision.ââ¬Â
(Interesting how every news source out there excerpts some other part of what she said throughout the period of the law suits.
The above statement - which the telegraph means for people to read in the context of their news story - is meant to imply that she admitted lying.
However, in another context, the same could be spun around to mean that she felt guilty about the fact that her online/escort activities would discredit her.
Alternatively, she feels guilty for not having worked harder to get the man she accused convicted and the fact that if she lost she would be discredited and treated as a liar.)
ââ¬Â¢ Female rape survivors trust Twitter more than the police
West London Coroner Chinyere Inyama ruled Eleanor de Freitas' had committed suicide - and said the upcoming trial was a 'significant stressor'.
The coroner said: ââ¬ÅI am satisfied so that I am sure that Eleanor tied the noose herself.ââ¬Â
ââ¬ÅEntries in her diary make it very clear that this act was meant to end her life.ââ¬Â
Quaint reference to "Tantric" massage (wah? never mind, too deep for me) connoting it with escorts.
I'm surprised they didn't throw in yoguh too. Surely there was yoguh? At least some yoghurt? No?
3. And here's the Beeb's version, which pretends to play innocent spectator. Something BBC news can afford to do now, since the matter involves neither heathens that they can stake nor their own Jim Saville or prince Andrew whose criminal actions they need to blot out from public scrutiny/drown out by focusing on India.
The beeb will not be making a documentary on De Freitas et al case, but - like Sky - is not as convinced as the Telegraph as to who is telling the truth.
bbc.com/news/uk-31930196
Quote: 17 March 2015 Last updated at 23:31
Eleanor De Freitas 'killed herself ahead of rape claim trial'
Eleanor de Freitas Ms De Freitas took her own life three days before she was due in court
Continue reading the main story
Related Stories
Rape claim suicide inquest adjourned
Inquiry into rape allegation case
A woman taken to court for allegedly making a false rape claim killed herself three days before her trial over fears she would not be believed, her inquest has heard.
Eleanor de Freitas, 23, said she felt there was "no way out" after the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) charged her with perverting the course of justice.
Ms De Freitas, 23, of Fulham, London, was found dead in April 2014.
The coroner recorded that Ms de Freitas had taken her own life.
The impending court case had been "a significant stressor in her life at that time", West London coroner Chinyere Inyama said.
He denied a request from the de Freitas family solicitor, Leslie Thomas QC, that the CPS should attend the hearing because of its obligations to Ms de Freitas under the Human Rights Act.
Ms de Freitas's father, David, said they would consider a judicial review challenge.
The director of public prosecutions Alison Saunders had described the case as "one of the most difficult" she had seen.
Private action
Ms de Freitas, a trainee accountant who had bipolar disorder, made a rape complaint to the Metropolitan Police in early 2013.
The police said there was insufficient evidence to pursue the case and the man she said had attacked her took out a private prosecution, accusing her of perverting the course of justice.
Ms de Freitas' solicitors asked the CPS to halt the private action but instead the CPS decided to take it over and continue it.
Three days before Ms De Freitas was due to stand trial in April last year, she was found hanged.
The inquest into her death heard she had felt "ashamed to be British" after the CPS decided to prosecute her and told her legal team "it would be better if I had been run over by a bus".
David De Freitas David de Freitas accused the CPS of "serious failings"
She said she feared her alleged attacker would be free to reoffend, it heard.
Ms de Freitas had previously been sectioned under the Mental Health Act and told her family she feared being readmitted to psychiatric care.
She was found dead by her mother.
In a note left at the scene, read in court, she said her decision to end her life was "selfish" but she would "bring shame on the family" if she lost the case.
'Stacked against her'
Ms de Freitas's father told the hearing how his daughter had had some support withdrawn in the months leading up to her death, following the decision to prosecute her.
Continue reading the main story
ââ¬ÅStart Quote
We are disappointed the coroner did not allow us to explore what we believe are serious failings by a state body - the CPSââ¬Â
David de Freitas
He said: "She had been receiving counselling for rape. But she was denied access to counselling from the moment she received summons (for perverting the course of justice)."
He added: "She felt everything was stacked against her, and that things were just steam-rollering.
"She was massively upset by that."
He said his daughter began wearing a burka to court appearances through fear of publicity and would sometimes only leave the house after dark.
Dr Chris Bench, Ms de Freitas's consultant psychiatrist from 2009 until her death, said he made an assessment of his patient's treatment at every appointment.
Suicidal thoughts
The court heard Ms de Freitas, a former Durham University student, had suicidal thoughts twice, and Dr Bench considered her not fit to appear in court in September 2013.
He said Ms de Freitas was concerned the judge did not seem very sympathetic to her mental state when she appeared as a defendant.
He said she was well enough to attend court again when he saw her on 27 March last year, his final appointment with Ms de Freitas before her death.
Speaking outside the inquest, Mr de Freitas said said: "The coroner has accepted the prosecution was a significant stressor which led to my daughter Eleanor taking her own life.
"We are therefore disappointed the coroner did not allow us to explore what we believe are serious failings by a state body - the CPS.
"The inquest should be an opportunity for scrutiny and to learn lessons from this tragic death."
Lots of mass high-level, and incendiary* rape/sex slavery/paedophilia ring cases in the UK going on.
Besides the evangelical purposes and uses of projecting India as rape central, wonder to what extent the UK hand in the attack on India is an attempt to project attention away from themselves and the quagmire they're in.
* The above sort of case is considered incendiary - it is exactly what sets feminists off - since it is controversial: you know certain groups of people will take sides, convinced of one thing or another. E.g. some were already convinced that the British govt is oppressing its women and treating their witness like 1/4th that of men (rather like sharia), and cases that are somewhat in the grey-area, such as the above, will merely be taken to prove their point that there is a concerted effort to downplay and discredit. Others will rather read the above as further evidence for how those who claim x% of rape claims are false. (Also seen in the way the Telegraph is interested in directing its readers.)
It's a mini powder keg. Actually it's a major powder keg in the west. They've had to "handle" it regularly.
For example:
I remember Down Under news from some years back of how a great number of men in the police force were accused of sexual assault and rape of the populace over the years and yet were still in service. Victims and their supporters were aghast. The protest built up massively, until the police had to post female officers to guard their premises from being vandalised/attacked/stormed or whatever they feared from the angry public (IIRC the photos showed protesters burning effigees of the police force in the end).
But people got even more incensed at the police having posted female police officers in order to protect the institution from the public. Instead of alleviating criticism, it heightened it. People were angry at the female police officers for having chosen the side of the attackers and those in power who abused the system by not putting the attackers behind bars. But IIRC the public was mostly furious that the men had deliberately posted the female officers knowing that the public wouldn't confront them, despite vengeful feelings (in an attempt to prevent them from giving vent to it) since female officers were as per gender part of the wronged population.
No beeb documentary on that either, BTW (then or now). But IIRC the public was convinced it was an epidemic in the police force. Will try to track down the item.
^ But goes to show the other side of high-and-mighty entities (alien and anti-Indian Indians) who project India's police force as "opportunistic rapists too". Well the christoislamic ones in the police and armed forces certainly are rapists or otherwise criminal. But then that's the result of minorityism and the minority quota. Just like a crazy evangelist is using his government service to go about peddling jeebus. Christoislamics are always vilely christoislamic in behaviour in any position, respectable or criminal.
4. Speaking of law enforcement gone shady -
And here is only the nth report in recent times on AmriKKKan police officers bashing persons most noticeably of non-Euro origins.
"Land of the free" was always an odd phrase to attach to the US. Must have been a reference to the AmriKKKans alone, not to the people they kidnapped from their homelands and communities into enslavement and an early grave.
news.sky.com/story/1448219/black-students-bloody-arrest-sparks-outrage
Quote:Black Student's Bloody Arrest Sparks Outrage
The arrest of University of Virginia student Martese Johnson, who needed 10 stitches in his head, stirs calls for a probe.
10:39, UK, Thursday 19 March 2015
Video: Moment Of Martese Johnson's Arrest
By Sky News US Team
The governor of Virginia is calling for an investigation into the arrest of a college student who was shown in a photo with his face bloody as he was held down by an officer.
The arrest of Martese Johnson, a University of Virginia student, by a Virginia Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control Agent outside a pub, is quickly turning into a national controversy.
About 1,000 students gathered at the University of Virginia campus on Wednesday night to demand justice for the student, while Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe asked state police to investigate "the use of force in this matter".
In a video posted on the website of the University of Virginia student newspaper, three apparently white officers are holding Mr Johnson down. "His head is bleeding," a voice yells.
Martese Johnson being restrained by police in Virginia. Pic: Bryan Beaubrun/The Cavalier Daily
This photo sparked outrage. Pic: Bryan Beaubrun/The Cavalier Daily
"I go to UVA," Mr Johnson yells repeatedly, before using an expletive as he calls the officers "racists".
The Alcoholic Beverage Control agent who made the arrest said in the arrest report that Mr Johnson "was very agitated and belligerent".
Video: Campus Rally After Student's Arrest
Mr Johnson was charged with obstruction of justice without force, and public swearing or intoxication.
A statement from a group calling itself "Concerned Black Students," however, claims the arrest was unprovoked and extreme.
Mr Johnson needed 10 stitches in his head, according to his lawyer, who denied earlier reports that his client has been accused of having fake ID.
"Just before handcuffing him, police took Martese to the ground, striking his head on the pavement and causing him to bleed profusely from the gash on his head," said the lawyer, Daniel P Watkins.
"We are preparing to investigate and defend this matter vigorously."
Video: Riots And Racial Tension: A History
Mr Johnson's arrest is the latest incident in which police have injured or killed unarmed African-American men in the United States.
Mr Watkins said the student "is absolutely devastated" by what happened.
He said the 20-year-old, third-year student, majoring in Italian and Media Studies, holds "numerous leadership positions" at the school, and has no criminal record.
Mr Johnson was treated at hospital and then released. He attended the student rally held on campus, where he spoke briefly and at times fought back tears.
"I beg for you guys to please respect everyone here," he told the crowd. "We really are one community."
(Graphic pictures of the brutalised man at the link.)
Soon we'll hear -again- how the AmriKKKan cops involved are "really good people"; how it's all a misrepresentation. Etc etc.
But no comment from Obama? No soundbyte? He, so famous for pontificating that intolerance was increasing in India? (As even I had predicted he would: it's dictated by AmeriKKKan foreign policy on India, so it wasn't any brilliant foresight on my part, just as my expectation that the BJP govt wouldn't have foreseen it - and would be caught totally off guard and hapless and left scratching their heads and making comebacks long after the AmeriKKKan hit-and-run - was also nothing clever).
To repeat, where's Obama - who parroted the evangelical/foreign policy script given to him by the real puppet masters - and who lectured on intolerance in India? Actually he's right, but in a different way from the insinuations in his script. There's massive intolerance in India - it's been increasing to extreme levels, all emanating from the monotheist demons (=christoislamicommunists) and their Useful Idiot psecular friends infesting India. <- One day the cannibal that is christoislamism is going to gorge itself on the psecular facilitators' flesh too, and it will all be because of their own doing, and hence totally deserved.
The genocide of the Yezidis - only just now recognised by the UN (probably because Yezidis have now been significantly extincted, else the UN would never have finally publicised that they have taken [prolonged, silent] note of the mass-murder of non-christoislamics)
Again: the christoislamaniac genocide of the Yezidis is what happens to all who refuse to convert to christoislamania. So India's Useful Idiots really should convert readily, before the Khalifate gets a foothold/gets established in India too. The Caliphate will come, whether India is ready or not: Khalifate movements are programmed to involve the global ummah, being a pan-territorial, pan-islamic thing - actually, pan-christoislamic (several Middle-Eastern christians have eagerly joined up too, and no doubt India's Syrian christians will lead the way in treachery - as they did with the Portuguese christo invaders as well - were ISIS to start flying flags in India).
Death to traitors.