Post 2/2
Still on the subject of the epidemic of rape "jokes" and the casualness with which rape threats are issued in the west, the following actually provides cursory data. Notes I scribbled when I caught this:
Oh here, this programme seems to be on Utoob too (7:59 mins long):
youtube.com/watch?v=fXGs_7Yted8
E.g. 3:45 mins in is a pan of a screenshot with the following Reddit entry:
(With the word Rape highlighted with a red background.)
While the programme focuses on the above screenshot, the Reddit SRS mod interviewee is commenting "All of this terrible misogynistic shit gets upvoted all the way to the top. Like all the time."
Such things were upvoted. 'All the time.' (See again the demography of who uses Reddit.)
=> Western Rape Kulture, including condoning of it. Latent even on the internet.
Around the time of hearing about Dawkins coming out with his unscientific nonsense - pandering to christodawaganda - about Indian "tradition" (attempting to insinuate even Hindoos' heathenism), I read a New Scientist article citing some "study" which found, what was it now, 1/4th of Asian men 'admitted' to having rapist tendencies or something. Whatever the proportion, it was certainly less than the more reliable study ('cause N is way smaller than 'Asia') that found a 1/3rd of mostly white male uni students in AmriKKKa were totally willing to rape if they could get away with it:
independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/a-third-of-male-university-students-say-they-would-rape-a-woman-if-there-no-were-no-consequences-9978052.html
And IIRC BD and Indonesia - havens of islamania - were very much represented in the study on "Asia".* And lumped with the unsaved nations there.
Whereas the study on AmriKKKan uni students above at least knows to differentiate between how it is predominantly white American males (=predominantly christian) who were surveyed, rather than anyone else.
* Well of course "Asia" would sound significantly rapist if one lumps the views of the islamaniac infestation in Asia with the unsaved kaffiri others, i.e. without separating which of those who admitted to rapist tendencies were christoislamic and who all were still unsaved kaffirs.
Here:
Search result snippet tries to contextualise the study's curious interest by relating it back to the Indian rape cases. Though the only admission is that the west's drain inspector interest is to make use of the sensationalised rapes in India to "study" Asia and thereby condemn even the rest of unsaved Asia - by lumping them with christo-islamised regions - to then make the west feel they are more 'civilised'/prove Oryanism is better (white supremacist notions of white male > other males) which is of course the actual goal of the west in this study:
Which links to:
newscientist.com/article/mg21929342.100-a-quarter-of-men-in-some-parts-of-asia-admit-to-rape.html
I still don't get how anyone can do a rape study on parts of Asia without separating each into individual countries and by religion.
I mean, honestly: on questions of propensity to rape, how can Cambodia be grouped in a set that has say Bangladesh in it?
Rather, BD and Indonesia should be grouped together, but results still to be obtained and presented split on christoislamics vs unsaved kaffirs.
China separately again: split on christians/islamics, and unsaved kaffirs again.
Papua New Guinea separate, same thing.
Cambodia separate, same thing.
Sri Lanka separate (split on Buddhists, Hindus and christoislamics).
In all cases in fact, split on christoislamics vs unsaved kaffirs at a minimum.
What the western study on the "Other parts of Asia" has done is essentially what the west has done to India with its news reports and documentary on their hand-selected Indian rape cases (and their unabashedly peddling the Hindu cryptonames assumed by the christoislamic perpetrators):
by refusing to identify christoislamic sexual crimes against (native) females, and lumping these christoislamic criminals with the majority heathen populations, India entire came out looking uniformly rapist (dubbed 'rape kultur') and this was then blamed on the majority native tradition=natural tendency of the populace, i.e. heathenism. So then the west could pretend that it was more naturally civilised - the argument is always based on the core white supremacist belief of the west that the west/"whiteness"=source of civilisation, everything else=barbarism.
Likewise, the study on "other parts of Asia" similarly-deliberately lumped majorly islamic nations like BD and Indonesia and significantly christoised PNG (where rape was typically the highest) with predominantly unsaved kaffiri nations like Cambodia, Sri Lanka, China. And further made no distinction of the religions of the surveyed individuals in each region (since Indonesia has a significant heathen population while China has large christoislamic "minorities").
Of course the results would then be a gobsmacking 25% - though still much, much lower than had only the christoislamic voices in these countries been surveyed.
And once more the west will pretend - with their typical white supremacist pretences to having evolved civilisation in entirety and being the wall of defence against the barbarity that is all other people (mirrored in the very same assumptions in Tolkien's work in Silmarillion and Unfinished Tales) - that the west is better and more naturally civilised than the unsaved east.
The inveterate liars like to delude themselves.
Affected Asians should dare the 'foreign devils' - as the Chinese used to call the demons from the christowest - to redo the study by nation and by religion and it will show how it is very much the christianism and communism dumped on Asia by the west and the islam nurtured and facilitated in Asia by the west that answers for practically the whole of the rapist views expressed/confessed.
Same goes for India. In each case, should identify which of christoislamicommunisecular the perpetrators were and whether the victim was HindOO or Hindu. And then the answer will scream christoislamicommunism, all of which is of course carefully fostered in India and inflicted on the native heathens by the west onlee.
Still on the subject of the epidemic of rape "jokes" and the casualness with which rape threats are issued in the west, the following actually provides cursory data. Notes I scribbled when I caught this:
Quote:Broadcaster: TV channel "PBS" (American public broadcasting station)
Programme: "OffBook"
Episode "The Culture of Reddit"
7+ minutes
Shows:
* 72% (median) of US Reddit users = male
* Users are by far mostly from North American & Europe, which is a fact shown in the final seconds of the episode
* The subsection on Gender Relations on Reddit shows not just rape jokes used to curtail female activity or responses but also threats of violent rape issued by the male users. In their mentalities, it seems these things are a matter of course.
Oh here, this programme seems to be on Utoob too (7:59 mins long):
youtube.com/watch?v=fXGs_7Yted8
E.g. 3:45 mins in is a pan of a screenshot with the following Reddit entry:
Quote:"U BE A MAN, CHASE AFTER HER, AND RAPE HER. NOW." [+76]
(With the word Rape highlighted with a red background.)
While the programme focuses on the above screenshot, the Reddit SRS mod interviewee is commenting "All of this terrible misogynistic shit gets upvoted all the way to the top. Like all the time."
Such things were upvoted. 'All the time.' (See again the demography of who uses Reddit.)
=> Western Rape Kulture, including condoning of it. Latent even on the internet.
Around the time of hearing about Dawkins coming out with his unscientific nonsense - pandering to christodawaganda - about Indian "tradition" (attempting to insinuate even Hindoos' heathenism), I read a New Scientist article citing some "study" which found, what was it now, 1/4th of Asian men 'admitted' to having rapist tendencies or something. Whatever the proportion, it was certainly less than the more reliable study ('cause N is way smaller than 'Asia') that found a 1/3rd of mostly white male uni students in AmriKKKa were totally willing to rape if they could get away with it:
independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/a-third-of-male-university-students-say-they-would-rape-a-woman-if-there-no-were-no-consequences-9978052.html
Quote:A third of male university students say they would rape a woman if there no were no consequences
Jon Stone
Wednesday 14 January 2015
[...]
Roughly one third of male university students who took part in a study would rape a woman if there were no consequences, according to a new scientific study.
The research, published in the scientific journal Violence and Gender, presented mostly white male American participants a questionnaire on how they would act in certain sexual situations.
And IIRC BD and Indonesia - havens of islamania - were very much represented in the study on "Asia".* And lumped with the unsaved nations there.
Whereas the study on AmriKKKan uni students above at least knows to differentiate between how it is predominantly white American males (=predominantly christian) who were surveyed, rather than anyone else.
* Well of course "Asia" would sound significantly rapist if one lumps the views of the islamaniac infestation in Asia with the unsaved kaffiri others, i.e. without separating which of those who admitted to rapist tendencies were christoislamic and who all were still unsaved kaffirs.
Here:
Search result snippet tries to contextualise the study's curious interest by relating it back to the Indian rape cases. Though the only admission is that the west's drain inspector interest is to make use of the sensationalised rapes in India to "study" Asia and thereby condemn even the rest of unsaved Asia - by lumping them with christo-islamised regions - to then make the west feel they are more 'civilised'/prove Oryanism is better (white supremacist notions of white male > other males) which is of course the actual goal of the west in this study:
Quote:5. A quarter of men in some parts of Asia admit to rape
In the aftermath of high-profile trials for rape in India, a study has revealed the extent of sexual violence in other parts of Asia
11 September 2013
From magazine issue 2934 Labelled: News
Which links to:
newscientist.com/article/mg21929342.100-a-quarter-of-men-in-some-parts-of-asia-admit-to-rape.html
Quote:A quarter of men in some parts of Asia admit to rape
11 September 2013
Magazine issue 2934. Subscribe and save
For similar stories, visit the Crime and Forensics Topic Guide
Read more: Click here to read the original, longer version of this story
IT'S a much bigger problem than you might think. A new study reveals the breadth of sexual violence in some countries. A tenth of 10,000 men asked in six countries (Bangladesh, China, Cambodia, Indonesia, Sri Lanka and Papua New Guinea) admitted raping a woman other than a partner. Bougainville Island in Papua New Guinea emerged as possibly the most dangerous place for women ââ¬â nearly 27 per cent of men quizzed there admitted such rapes. The overall figure across the countries rose to a quarter when rape of a partner was included.
(Papua New Guinea/PNG is mostly christianised already. A small proportion of unconverted people remain, but I doubt they'd be living in a place called "Bougainville Island" which sounds like a colonised=christianised place.)
The results, out this week (The Lancet, doi.org/nrd and doi.org/nrf), are an invaluable guide to factors motivating rape, says study author Emma Fulu of Partners for Prevention, a UN programme to tackle gender-based violence.
Of those who had raped, 58 per cent first did so in their teens.
"People begin committing these acts while quite young, so education programmes need to target them," said Scott Berkowitz, of the US Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network.
This article appeared in print under the headline "Rape hotspots"
(That final phrase is indicative of the kind of conscious categorising that actually points to the eternal western supremacist objective to delineate their own kultur from that of Asia as being more superior and moral from the ground up, as being more civilised by nature (of whiteness).
Asian unsaved kaffirs should all set up studies too. Not just to "reverse the gaze", but also to implicate what parts of the rape mentality present in their bounds is entirely due to contact with the west and the imposition of christoislamicommunism and subsequent departure from native heathenisms and other native Asian values.)
I still don't get how anyone can do a rape study on parts of Asia without separating each into individual countries and by religion.
I mean, honestly: on questions of propensity to rape, how can Cambodia be grouped in a set that has say Bangladesh in it?
Rather, BD and Indonesia should be grouped together, but results still to be obtained and presented split on christoislamics vs unsaved kaffirs.
China separately again: split on christians/islamics, and unsaved kaffirs again.
Papua New Guinea separate, same thing.
Cambodia separate, same thing.
Sri Lanka separate (split on Buddhists, Hindus and christoislamics).
In all cases in fact, split on christoislamics vs unsaved kaffirs at a minimum.
What the western study on the "Other parts of Asia" has done is essentially what the west has done to India with its news reports and documentary on their hand-selected Indian rape cases (and their unabashedly peddling the Hindu cryptonames assumed by the christoislamic perpetrators):
by refusing to identify christoislamic sexual crimes against (native) females, and lumping these christoislamic criminals with the majority heathen populations, India entire came out looking uniformly rapist (dubbed 'rape kultur') and this was then blamed on the majority native tradition=natural tendency of the populace, i.e. heathenism. So then the west could pretend that it was more naturally civilised - the argument is always based on the core white supremacist belief of the west that the west/"whiteness"=source of civilisation, everything else=barbarism.
Likewise, the study on "other parts of Asia" similarly-deliberately lumped majorly islamic nations like BD and Indonesia and significantly christoised PNG (where rape was typically the highest) with predominantly unsaved kaffiri nations like Cambodia, Sri Lanka, China. And further made no distinction of the religions of the surveyed individuals in each region (since Indonesia has a significant heathen population while China has large christoislamic "minorities").
Of course the results would then be a gobsmacking 25% - though still much, much lower than had only the christoislamic voices in these countries been surveyed.
And once more the west will pretend - with their typical white supremacist pretences to having evolved civilisation in entirety and being the wall of defence against the barbarity that is all other people (mirrored in the very same assumptions in Tolkien's work in Silmarillion and Unfinished Tales) - that the west is better and more naturally civilised than the unsaved east.
The inveterate liars like to delude themselves.
Affected Asians should dare the 'foreign devils' - as the Chinese used to call the demons from the christowest - to redo the study by nation and by religion and it will show how it is very much the christianism and communism dumped on Asia by the west and the islam nurtured and facilitated in Asia by the west that answers for practically the whole of the rapist views expressed/confessed.
Same goes for India. In each case, should identify which of christoislamicommunisecular the perpetrators were and whether the victim was HindOO or Hindu. And then the answer will scream christoislamicommunism, all of which is of course carefully fostered in India and inflicted on the native heathens by the west onlee.