twitter.com/blog_supplement/status/580242659094192128
via
retweet by twitter.com/SimhaRakesh
They're just like that. It's their thing. And that, by the way, is what was inflicted on the rest of Asia*, and which Indian nationalist Hindus today regularly champion as some great Indian achievement. Many other heathens in Asia - including some Hindu kingdoms in SE Asia - were just bulldozed by this renegade strain that emanated from the Hindoo homeland.
* Buddhism tried to subjugate -"incorporate"- Taoist and Shinto Gods, and even Olympic Gods, into the Buddhist hierarchy using lying too: by means of false and offensive imagery and literature, even as Buddhism parasited on Shinto, Taoism and Hellenismos.
If christianism made idols of jeebus or mary stomping on Hindoo Gods, I suspect not even the most liberal "Hindu" would approve. Of course, christianism is still in the inculturation phase, of laying the longterm groundwork for pretending that inculturated imagery is equally and originally christian. When christianism is ready, it too will repeat the Indic inculturationists' development: of using such inculturated jeebus imagery to denigrate and replace Hindoo Gods with.
Soon
- a certain TN-origin Buddhism-convert blogger/webmaster will pretend that the anti-Hindu Buddhist imagery in these photos is "actually some deep Buddhist tantric view" or some such apologetic spiel
- and Bauddhified "Hindus" will continue repeating how Buddhism is "egalitarian" (since when?), that it is non-distinguishable from Hindoo heathenism ("it's all actually the same") and that Buddhism should have an equal claim on Hindoo Gods (anyone who thinks that, please convert to Buddhism already and paws off the Hindoo Gods, scriptures and all things Hindoo heathenism forever thereafter).
Astikas as "cousins" of Buddhists? Pass. Buddhists and their Shramanic twins are parasitic unwanted spin-offs, not cousins, never missing an opportunity to peddle their backprojected replacement twaddle. They were the first to come up with a re-invented history - complete with twisting of Hindoo texts by means of inculturation and re-interpretation - to brainwash Hindoo heathens and replace Hindoo heathenism with.
And the phrase that "Buddhists requested that the hatchet be buried" is misleading, as it implies a two-way street: but the Shramanas were always the offenders and instigators. It was their missionising on the Hindoo heathen natives that made them carry a hatchet about and plunge it repeatedly into Hindoos. Most of the time Hindoos just ignored them (like they all too often do christian iconoclastic terrorists today), which just fanned what others noted as Shramanas' justified inferiority complex all the more. If Hindoos finally said anything at all or wrote direct criticisms, it was only ever in retaliation.
Hindoos never could deal with missionary religions fully. Never dealt with inculturation successfully either. As a consequence can see Bauddhified "Hindus" peddling even the Hindoo Gods and Vedas and itihaasas as "equally Buddhist/Jain/all Indic". Worry that if it weren't for islam, Buddhism would still have been lingering in India whining away, tearing at its innards like christianism does today. Oh wait, that's what modern including pseudo Buddhism does today in India. And the SL Buddhist Sangha's literature on Hindoo heathenism and its history is still full of blatantly false persecution sobstories and claims on Hindoo temples, which christos infesting TN now repeat and stupid 'Hindus' on the internet parrot in blind faith.
The present problem with christianism is the same as the one Hindoos had before with the other inculturating missionary ideologies: Hindoos could fight off islam - with major losses of course, but nothing in history compares to Hindoos' resistance of and ultimate defeat of islam. But Hindoos could not fight off the passive-aggressive, backstabbing, under-your-skin missionary religions, like the inculturating kind.
Missionary religions. Bah.
But at least India's Buddhists got their just deserts: and with any luck, islam will do to the modern anti-Hindu missionary inculturationists (christianism) what it did to their predecessors. 'Cause in some respects, it feels like a repeat of history.
Some of the comments:
The images are just more proof that Gods in Buddhism were just a means to an end, where the end was always the conversion of the native heathens to the fake (and false) nouveau religion/the replacement theology. That the target was the conversion of the native heathens is obvious from the fact of how Buddhism etc always involves heathens' Gods, either to mask or clone them or to denigrate them, not to mention to encroach on heathen temples/sacred sites. Radha Rajan recently repeated how christian churches are deliberately mushrooming right next to Hindu temples all over TN. <- This is exactly what Buddhism and Jainism did too. And what Buddhism did in other heathen nations too.
GRRRRR. Angry mostly at Hindus still peddling that Buddhism=Jainism=Hinduism="Hindu" (or Buddhism=Vedanta). 'Cause No. They may be other Indic religions, can call them "Dharmic" (where Dharmic seems to mean any religion that uses the word Dharma, and tomorrow christianism will use it too), but that's where the umbrella terminology should end. They were never the same religion.
The important parts of this post are the non-purple text in the quoteblocks and of course the image containing photos.
The rest is angry spam.
via
retweet by twitter.com/SimhaRakesh
Quote:manasataramgini
@blog_supplement
pbs.twimg.com/media/CA1vn6NUkAEgKnr.jpg
bauddhas just before the coming of the Mohammedan apocalypse invented several deities to show their superiority over
10:40 PM - 23 Mar 2015
manasataramgini @blog_supplement Mar 23
Astikas. Here one can see their images of vighnAntaka show slaying vinAyaka &skanda(top right). When the Islamic whirlwind struck them they
11 retweets 3 favorites
manasataramgini @blog_supplement Mar 23
came back to their Astikas cousins asking that the hatchet be buried& the form a common cause against the Mohds; but it was too late by then
10 retweets 3 favorites
![[Image: CA1vn6NUkAEgKnr.jpg]](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CA1vn6NUkAEgKnr.jpg)
They're just like that. It's their thing. And that, by the way, is what was inflicted on the rest of Asia*, and which Indian nationalist Hindus today regularly champion as some great Indian achievement. Many other heathens in Asia - including some Hindu kingdoms in SE Asia - were just bulldozed by this renegade strain that emanated from the Hindoo homeland.
* Buddhism tried to subjugate -"incorporate"- Taoist and Shinto Gods, and even Olympic Gods, into the Buddhist hierarchy using lying too: by means of false and offensive imagery and literature, even as Buddhism parasited on Shinto, Taoism and Hellenismos.
If christianism made idols of jeebus or mary stomping on Hindoo Gods, I suspect not even the most liberal "Hindu" would approve. Of course, christianism is still in the inculturation phase, of laying the longterm groundwork for pretending that inculturated imagery is equally and originally christian. When christianism is ready, it too will repeat the Indic inculturationists' development: of using such inculturated jeebus imagery to denigrate and replace Hindoo Gods with.
Soon
- a certain TN-origin Buddhism-convert blogger/webmaster will pretend that the anti-Hindu Buddhist imagery in these photos is "actually some deep Buddhist tantric view" or some such apologetic spiel
- and Bauddhified "Hindus" will continue repeating how Buddhism is "egalitarian" (since when?), that it is non-distinguishable from Hindoo heathenism ("it's all actually the same") and that Buddhism should have an equal claim on Hindoo Gods (anyone who thinks that, please convert to Buddhism already and paws off the Hindoo Gods, scriptures and all things Hindoo heathenism forever thereafter).
Astikas as "cousins" of Buddhists? Pass. Buddhists and their Shramanic twins are parasitic unwanted spin-offs, not cousins, never missing an opportunity to peddle their backprojected replacement twaddle. They were the first to come up with a re-invented history - complete with twisting of Hindoo texts by means of inculturation and re-interpretation - to brainwash Hindoo heathens and replace Hindoo heathenism with.
And the phrase that "Buddhists requested that the hatchet be buried" is misleading, as it implies a two-way street: but the Shramanas were always the offenders and instigators. It was their missionising on the Hindoo heathen natives that made them carry a hatchet about and plunge it repeatedly into Hindoos. Most of the time Hindoos just ignored them (like they all too often do christian iconoclastic terrorists today), which just fanned what others noted as Shramanas' justified inferiority complex all the more. If Hindoos finally said anything at all or wrote direct criticisms, it was only ever in retaliation.
Hindoos never could deal with missionary religions fully. Never dealt with inculturation successfully either. As a consequence can see Bauddhified "Hindus" peddling even the Hindoo Gods and Vedas and itihaasas as "equally Buddhist/Jain/all Indic". Worry that if it weren't for islam, Buddhism would still have been lingering in India whining away, tearing at its innards like christianism does today. Oh wait, that's what modern including pseudo Buddhism does today in India. And the SL Buddhist Sangha's literature on Hindoo heathenism and its history is still full of blatantly false persecution sobstories and claims on Hindoo temples, which christos infesting TN now repeat and stupid 'Hindus' on the internet parrot in blind faith.
The present problem with christianism is the same as the one Hindoos had before with the other inculturating missionary ideologies: Hindoos could fight off islam - with major losses of course, but nothing in history compares to Hindoos' resistance of and ultimate defeat of islam. But Hindoos could not fight off the passive-aggressive, backstabbing, under-your-skin missionary religions, like the inculturating kind.
Missionary religions. Bah.
But at least India's Buddhists got their just deserts: and with any luck, islam will do to the modern anti-Hindu missionary inculturationists (christianism) what it did to their predecessors. 'Cause in some respects, it feels like a repeat of history.
Some of the comments:
Quote:prasanna @Flyfiddlesticks Mar 23
@blog_supplement at least from the images I saw, the deities were just Monogoloid versions of Hindu ones, isnt it?
0 retweets 0 favorites
(Didn't the original tweet say they were invented Buddhist deities. What's "Hindu" about them? I mean, besides copying the style of imagery, the poses, ideas for ayudhas - that sort of thing - and then transposing these onto Buddhism, to inculturate on, replace and denigrate Hindoo Gods with.
No different from jeebusism cloning Hindoo Gods as replacements - examples of christianism are in the image in the previous post.)
manasataramgini @blog_supplement Mar 23
@Flyfiddlesticks All the deities originated in India but in Tibet,China,Mongolia&Japan they may have been depicted w regional idiosyncracies
2 retweets 2 favorites
Shanmukh @maidros78 May 13
@blog_supplement Is there a reference for this attempt to form a common front?
0 retweets 0 favorites
(More importantly, is there any reference to Hindoos saying: "You're on your own"? That would be a sign that Hindoos had at last learnt their lesson. Imagine if Hindoos had destroyed islam before it destroyed Buddhism in India, so that Buddhism still lingered to continue at its large-scale vampirism on Hindoo heathenism.... Eek.
Hmmmm, Maidros is a name from the Silmarillion. I should know.)
manasataramgini @blog_supplement May 15
@maidros78 It is evident from the unified vision of kAlachakra tantra, its vimalaprabhA commentary, the travelogue of dharmasvAmin&allusions
1 retweet 3 favorites
manasataramgini @blog_supplement May 15
@maidros78 of tAranAtha in the last phase of of history
1 retweet 3 favorites
(Yeah, they even stole the sacred Hindoo term Kaalachakra - e.g. seen in IIRC the Surya ashtottaram of the MBh - and encroached on Kalki avataaram etc etc. Of course, Vishnu's avataarams will become magically kosher to modern Hindus - though from the Buddhist perspective onleee - the minute Buddhism inculturates on them.)
The images are just more proof that Gods in Buddhism were just a means to an end, where the end was always the conversion of the native heathens to the fake (and false) nouveau religion/the replacement theology. That the target was the conversion of the native heathens is obvious from the fact of how Buddhism etc always involves heathens' Gods, either to mask or clone them or to denigrate them, not to mention to encroach on heathen temples/sacred sites. Radha Rajan recently repeated how christian churches are deliberately mushrooming right next to Hindu temples all over TN. <- This is exactly what Buddhism and Jainism did too. And what Buddhism did in other heathen nations too.
GRRRRR. Angry mostly at Hindus still peddling that Buddhism=Jainism=Hinduism="Hindu" (or Buddhism=Vedanta). 'Cause No. They may be other Indic religions, can call them "Dharmic" (where Dharmic seems to mean any religion that uses the word Dharma, and tomorrow christianism will use it too), but that's where the umbrella terminology should end. They were never the same religion.
The important parts of this post are the non-purple text in the quoteblocks and of course the image containing photos.
The rest is angry spam.