Related to the above post but continued from post 154 of the Other Natural Religions thread
which ended with an example of "self-flagellation" seen among Taoists today, among a few Hindus (as seen in an episode in India presented by Asha Gill of Lonely Planet), and ancient Greeks and Romans (it was also seen among heathen pre-christoislamic Middle-Easterners).
This post is still on the subject of cryptochristianism trying now to also get Hindoos' religious firewalking banned as a superstition that promotes "self-harm" (the way it similarly got Hindoo self-piercing for Murugan's Thaipusam banned).
In India, christos will never ban self-flagellation - at least not generally: only among Hindus if ever - because pointless self-flagellation and other self-mortification was one of the major pastimes of the most faithful of priests (especially if they were meant to be celibate but ended up thinking of women instead and doubly so if they ended up sleeping with women: then the "hair shirt" was worn by the erring priest etc.)
And it remains a crazed passtime among the most devout of catholics.
E.g. in christianised Philippines, the catholicised population apparently also self-flagellate, as seen in an image at
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flagellant
The page also contains the following paragraphs:
And the same link also has pictures of very KKK-like hooded catholic self-flagellants.
All that blood is so gory: one picture shows a KKK catholic drenched in so much blood, you'd think he just murdered someone with his bare hands.
It is definitely superstitious self-harm: christianism has no real purpose for self-flagellation other than that it stole this from pre-existing rituals seen among some GrecoRomans (and Middle-Easterners). Hence in christianism, where self-flagellation is not original, it is pointless=superstition. And hence nothing more than self-harm. BAN.
And self-crucifixion is psychotic.
Remember also that European orthodox priest who murdered a nun by some crucifixion ritual in the last decade or so (it was in the news). Here:
Apparently the event is back in the news now that the priest has finally been jailed and a film has been made of this vampiric christian blood sacrifice.
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2692892/Romanian-priest-jailed-killing-young-nun-CRUCIFIED-botched-exorcism-ritual.html
So the minute that cryptochristists in India try to get Hindoos' fire-walking etc banned too, must bring up self-flagellation by catholics and Shia islamics (e.g. in Iraq during "Ashura" IIRC), fraudulent christian nonsense like "christian exorcisms" [inventing and selling a problem - possession by non-existent jeebus=morning-star=satan - and its cure exorcism], other christian cons like "faith healing" (besides speaking in tongues), and demand that all this and of course the inhumane superstitious suicidal monstrosity that is the self-crucifixion nonsense be banned, besides demanding the govt ban the baptism (=water-boarding in some churches like in parts of former-USSR) as mentioned in the above post. After all, the superstitious christian baptism is inflicted on others, including babies who didn't choose it, whereas it is Hindoos themselves who volunteer to self-pierce and firewalk etc.
Hindus must study all the crazy psychotic christian (and islamic) fake rituals and demand all these get banned first if christianism tries to ban any Hindoo religious practises.
which ended with an example of "self-flagellation" seen among Taoists today, among a few Hindus (as seen in an episode in India presented by Asha Gill of Lonely Planet), and ancient Greeks and Romans (it was also seen among heathen pre-christoislamic Middle-Easterners).
This post is still on the subject of cryptochristianism trying now to also get Hindoos' religious firewalking banned as a superstition that promotes "self-harm" (the way it similarly got Hindoo self-piercing for Murugan's Thaipusam banned).
In India, christos will never ban self-flagellation - at least not generally: only among Hindus if ever - because pointless self-flagellation and other self-mortification was one of the major pastimes of the most faithful of priests (especially if they were meant to be celibate but ended up thinking of women instead and doubly so if they ended up sleeping with women: then the "hair shirt" was worn by the erring priest etc.)
And it remains a crazed passtime among the most devout of catholics.
E.g. in christianised Philippines, the catholicised population apparently also self-flagellate, as seen in an image at
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flagellant
The page also contains the following paragraphs:
Quote:Roman Catholic
Modern processions of hooded Flagellants are still a feature of various Mediterranean Catholic countries, mainly in Spain, Italy and some former colonies, usually every year during Lent. They also occur in the Philippines during Holy Week. For example in the commune of Guardia Sanframondi in Campania, Italy, such parades are organized once every seven years.
Some Roman Catholics in Philippines practice flagellation as a form of devout worship, sometimes in addition to self-crucifixion [3][4]
And the same link also has pictures of very KKK-like hooded catholic self-flagellants.
All that blood is so gory: one picture shows a KKK catholic drenched in so much blood, you'd think he just murdered someone with his bare hands.
It is definitely superstitious self-harm: christianism has no real purpose for self-flagellation other than that it stole this from pre-existing rituals seen among some GrecoRomans (and Middle-Easterners). Hence in christianism, where self-flagellation is not original, it is pointless=superstition. And hence nothing more than self-harm. BAN.
And self-crucifixion is psychotic.
Remember also that European orthodox priest who murdered a nun by some crucifixion ritual in the last decade or so (it was in the news). Here:
Apparently the event is back in the news now that the priest has finally been jailed and a film has been made of this vampiric christian blood sacrifice.
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2692892/Romanian-priest-jailed-killing-young-nun-CRUCIFIED-botched-exorcism-ritual.html
Quote:Romanian priest jailed for killing young nun who was CRUCIFIED during botched exorcism ritualLook at all the photos showing the orthodox christian women (nuns?) wearing the full-black hijab - surprisingly non-distinguishable from the islamic hijab. You'd think unfortunate Romania was possessed by IS already. Rather it's its older, no less murderous, twin: christianism.
Father Daniel Corogeanu was jailed for seven years after ritual killed nun, 23
She was strapped to a cross and left without food or water for five days
He promised to build a monastery in her memory when he was released
But he was hounded out of its proposed base in Zapodeni, eastern Romania
He is now hidden in remote wooden hut and refuses to leave, an official said
The disturbing story inspired Cannes prize-winning film Beyond the Hills
By Dan Bloom
Published: 13:16 GMT, 15 July 2014 Updated: 17:15 GMT, 15 July 2014
So the minute that cryptochristists in India try to get Hindoos' fire-walking etc banned too, must bring up self-flagellation by catholics and Shia islamics (e.g. in Iraq during "Ashura" IIRC), fraudulent christian nonsense like "christian exorcisms" [inventing and selling a problem - possession by non-existent jeebus=morning-star=satan - and its cure exorcism], other christian cons like "faith healing" (besides speaking in tongues), and demand that all this and of course the inhumane superstitious suicidal monstrosity that is the self-crucifixion nonsense be banned, besides demanding the govt ban the baptism (=water-boarding in some churches like in parts of former-USSR) as mentioned in the above post. After all, the superstitious christian baptism is inflicted on others, including babies who didn't choose it, whereas it is Hindoos themselves who volunteer to self-pierce and firewalk etc.
Hindus must study all the crazy psychotic christian (and islamic) fake rituals and demand all these get banned first if christianism tries to ban any Hindoo religious practises.
Death to traitors.