First to get this bit out of the way.
Missed this in the above:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malaika_Arora_Khan
How is it that christoislamics keep getting to worm their way to taking over Hindu schools and universities?
Post 1/?
The rest of this sequence of posts are tangentially related to several things I'd come across.
A while back, news on Stephen Hawking's statements mentioned "Zayn Malik" and "New Direction" and "end of the world". I thought it was some professor with some theory.
Turns out New Direction is a Brit boy-band (apparently this is still a thing?) and Malik is some member in it. "The end of the world" bit was just a headline grabber about him leaving the band and presumably leaving fans in tears.
Malik is some badly turned out half-Brit half-Paki hybrid: his British mum converted to islamania and raised the kids as faithful islamics. Malik himself stands to repeat his dad's achievement with his own British fionce, who will doubtless convert or be subtly islamised upon marriage.
More relevant to the purpose of the post is that Malik has been caught tweeting "free palestine" - and apparently retweeting islamic terrorists too - and advertising his islam via uttering the shahada and wishing fans a happy ramzan (which American conservatives read as his attempt to influence his [obviously-western] female fandom into subtle islamisation.
I don't care about islamics peddling islamania in western climes or christians peddling christinsanity in islamic climes.
But I find it interesting that christians and islamics both in India and outside flaunt their religion and - except for extreme American conservatists as above - society thinks it's fine and cool and interesting.
In contrast if you look at bollywho, everyone is allergic to any kind of heathenism. They are all secular, unless they are christoislamic, in which case they happily attend mass or ask their unsaved kaffir spouse to convert and/or baptise the kids.
The overall question of my posts is whether there are any "stars" that are actually Hindu among the younger generations, and whether there is a definite unspoken rule or subconscious influence (secularisation) of how it becomes unacceptable to be Hindu among these, even as it is okay for christoislamics to continue to flaunt - subtly or not - their christoislamism and even their inculturation.
This is comparable to how christos can appear with crosses on programmes (saw some panelist/judge wearing a cross in some Indian idol programme on TV on my last visit to India), but Hindus can't wear the bindi or veebooti or namam etc. Initially the first started as an actual discouragement by higher-ups in the tv programming depts, but now it's self-censorship. Further, as Rajeev Srinivasan also noted in his blog or its twitterfeed, christians in India can be seen on TV wearing Hindu saree and bindi and pretending they are upholders of the culture they have banned with calculation among Hindus on TV.
This trend seems to parallel in how most/all younger actors of Hindu ancestry in bollypoo range from unsympathetic to virulently anti-Hindu (e.g. on Hindu nationalist female on twitter has as twitter description that Deepika "MyChoice/MyVoice" Padukone and Ranbir Something had blocked her or something). In contrast, every christoislamic is a total promoter of christianism.
The western idol above - the British-Paki Malik - is an example of an islamic in the western context. But young American christians "stars" advertising their christianism abound (I can't remember the names but it's always in the news), and this is very much encouraged and fostered by American christianism, as they are eyeing keeping subsequent generations christian via their trash pop-culture.
I'm not advocating that Hindus spread Hindu heathenism via Indian pop-culture in India - seems pointless. But I just want to know to what extent Hindu-origin stars are (original unsubtly, but now more subtly discouraged - via secularism dismissing only heathenism as lowly religion - from being) Hindu in India, and what fallout this has had on the presence of Hindus in "pop-culture" and whether any/what proportion of younger generations of Hindu-origin "stars" are Hindu, and how this may reflect on their fandom and be representative of younger generations in general. It is known that every generation of Hindu-origin youngsters in India beats the previous in being more secular, more anti-Hindu, more de-heathenisend yet always more christoconditioned [including in their atheism], i.e. less able to even properly understand/perceive heathenism, yet more able to understand christoislam (even when critiquing it, as if they're post-christians like the west, having never had a Hindu intermediate stage; they're actually post-Hindus who were christoconditioned and hence are post-christian).
Missed this in the above:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malaika_Arora_Khan
Quote:(catholic) Malaika Arora Khan [...] completed her secondary education at Swami Vivekanand School in Chembur. Her aunt, Grace Polycarp, was the principal of the school.
How is it that christoislamics keep getting to worm their way to taking over Hindu schools and universities?
Post 1/?
The rest of this sequence of posts are tangentially related to several things I'd come across.
A while back, news on Stephen Hawking's statements mentioned "Zayn Malik" and "New Direction" and "end of the world". I thought it was some professor with some theory.
Turns out New Direction is a Brit boy-band (apparently this is still a thing?) and Malik is some member in it. "The end of the world" bit was just a headline grabber about him leaving the band and presumably leaving fans in tears.
Malik is some badly turned out half-Brit half-Paki hybrid: his British mum converted to islamania and raised the kids as faithful islamics. Malik himself stands to repeat his dad's achievement with his own British fionce, who will doubtless convert or be subtly islamised upon marriage.
More relevant to the purpose of the post is that Malik has been caught tweeting "free palestine" - and apparently retweeting islamic terrorists too - and advertising his islam via uttering the shahada and wishing fans a happy ramzan (which American conservatives read as his attempt to influence his [obviously-western] female fandom into subtle islamisation.
- huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/19/zayn-malik-of-popular-british-boy-band-accused-of-advancing-islam_n_1605799.html
- which links to:
- debbieschlussel.com/50331/mega-pop-star-pimping-islam-on-your-daughters/
- (also related: debbieschlussel.com/73588/zayn-malik-one-directioner-loves-hamas-whines-about-death-threats-but-not-those-his-fans-sent-me-michelle-malkin-gushed-over-him-like-child-molester/
I don't care about islamics peddling islamania in western climes or christians peddling christinsanity in islamic climes.
But I find it interesting that christians and islamics both in India and outside flaunt their religion and - except for extreme American conservatists as above - society thinks it's fine and cool and interesting.
In contrast if you look at bollywho, everyone is allergic to any kind of heathenism. They are all secular, unless they are christoislamic, in which case they happily attend mass or ask their unsaved kaffir spouse to convert and/or baptise the kids.
The overall question of my posts is whether there are any "stars" that are actually Hindu among the younger generations, and whether there is a definite unspoken rule or subconscious influence (secularisation) of how it becomes unacceptable to be Hindu among these, even as it is okay for christoislamics to continue to flaunt - subtly or not - their christoislamism and even their inculturation.
This is comparable to how christos can appear with crosses on programmes (saw some panelist/judge wearing a cross in some Indian idol programme on TV on my last visit to India), but Hindus can't wear the bindi or veebooti or namam etc. Initially the first started as an actual discouragement by higher-ups in the tv programming depts, but now it's self-censorship. Further, as Rajeev Srinivasan also noted in his blog or its twitterfeed, christians in India can be seen on TV wearing Hindu saree and bindi and pretending they are upholders of the culture they have banned with calculation among Hindus on TV.
This trend seems to parallel in how most/all younger actors of Hindu ancestry in bollypoo range from unsympathetic to virulently anti-Hindu (e.g. on Hindu nationalist female on twitter has as twitter description that Deepika "MyChoice/MyVoice" Padukone and Ranbir Something had blocked her or something). In contrast, every christoislamic is a total promoter of christianism.
The western idol above - the British-Paki Malik - is an example of an islamic in the western context. But young American christians "stars" advertising their christianism abound (I can't remember the names but it's always in the news), and this is very much encouraged and fostered by American christianism, as they are eyeing keeping subsequent generations christian via their trash pop-culture.
I'm not advocating that Hindus spread Hindu heathenism via Indian pop-culture in India - seems pointless. But I just want to know to what extent Hindu-origin stars are (original unsubtly, but now more subtly discouraged - via secularism dismissing only heathenism as lowly religion - from being) Hindu in India, and what fallout this has had on the presence of Hindus in "pop-culture" and whether any/what proportion of younger generations of Hindu-origin "stars" are Hindu, and how this may reflect on their fandom and be representative of younger generations in general. It is known that every generation of Hindu-origin youngsters in India beats the previous in being more secular, more anti-Hindu, more de-heathenisend yet always more christoconditioned [including in their atheism], i.e. less able to even properly understand/perceive heathenism, yet more able to understand christoislam (even when critiquing it, as if they're post-christians like the west, having never had a Hindu intermediate stage; they're actually post-Hindus who were christoconditioned and hence are post-christian).