As advised by a comment in the indiafacts link of the previous post, looked up the:
defenceforumindia.com/forum/threads/battle-of-bahraich-in-11th-century-india.34872/
Brilliant.
That's how it should always be. And can still be again: If Hindoos from all over India - the kind who yesteryear would have joined the freedom struggle and given their lives for it - would form a pan-Indian native militia (isn't that a right as per the US constitution: what's good for the goose is good for the gander too), ready to be active for the Hindoo cause all over the Hindoo subcontinent, and would make mincemeat out of any christoislamic mobs (or individuals) that terrorise, genocide or otherwise ethnically cleanse Hindus and their heathenism.
INSERT:
And let any secular Indian govt set the secular army on HindOOs (neither of which have done anything useful to protect Hindoo interests in the face of christoislamic ethnic cleansing). It will be the independence struggle all over again. But any Hindoos in the army should know where their priorities lie. Like the Sikh bodyguards of Indira Gandhi, but more so like every christoislamic religionist in the govt who always only act for their own religion's interest and never for secularism/the nation (note how none of them are stupid, but are loyal to their religion alone). And failing to make the right decision, such sepoys in the secular army can consider themselves disinherited forever and make peace with their chosen secularism.
Hindoos have only themselves = their own kind to look after their interests (even basic interests like the right to exist, survival etc). No one else. So Hindoos have a right to do Anything to protect their fundamental rights from all those who threaten this, right such as also of Hindoo temples to be free from the christoislamic stranglehold of "govt" usurpation, and Hindoo vigrahas to be free of christoislamic theft and terrorism.
Hindus should take inspiration from ancient heroic Hindoos' determined safeguarding of Hindoo-dom - their temples=Gods, their fellow Hindoos etc - against all odds. Like their ancestors, today's Hindoos should also care only about Hindoo heathenism and only be loyal to and active for Hindoo-dom. Nothing else. Not secularism. Not any secular govt and its anti-Hindu laws, restraining Hindus more by the day, as Hindoo temples are taken over by state govts and their vigrahas desecrated and stolen in numbers beyond count. HindOOs must ensure justice and restitution, HindOOs must protect Hindoo-dom. Look to no one and nothing else. Not the sham "democracy", not the "nationalism" diversion, or "development" agendas. Let the christomedia whine "persecution" for all justice that Hindoos implement for themselves. Christomedia has as yet no other power but the mentally restraining kind that its viewers give it. Christomedia's just a verbal terrorist.
I like the whole beheading of the Salar Masud. Like Samurai.
defenceforumindia.com/forum/threads/battle-of-bahraich-in-11th-century-india.34872/
Quote:Battle of Bahraich in 11th century India
Discussion in 'Military History' started by Bhoja, Apr 16, 2012.
The battle of Bahraich was fought between the Turkic invader Salar Masud Ghazni and a confederation of several Indian kings led by Raja Sukhdev in the 11th century.
The nephew of Mahmood Ghazni, known as Salar Masud Ghazni, invaded India with an army of more than 100,000 men in may 1031 AD. This time, the army was not a raiding party like that of Mahmud Ghazni who came with intention of raiding, looting and retreating with the loot to Afghanistan . They were backed by the imperial army and came here with the intention of permanent conquest in India.
King Anandpal Shahi tried to check this Gazni advance towards heartland of India . He was helped by King of Sialkot , Rai Arjun. But, this alliance was overwhelmed by superiority of numbers of Turkic army. After defeating Anandpal Shahi and Rai Arjun, Masud advanced towards Malwa and Gujarat . King Mahipal Tomara tried to check their advance here but was defeated too.
After victories across North Indian plains, Masud Ghazni settled at Bahraich near Lucknow . He stayed here up to mid 1033.
Meanwhile, 17 Kings of North India forged an alliance. This is the biggest confederation that have ever existed in India . They were Rai Raib, Rai Saib, Rai Arjun, Rai Bheekhan, Rai Kanak, Rai Kalyan, Rai Makaru, Rai Savaru, Rai Aran, Rai Birbal, Rai Jaypal, Rai Shreepal, Rai Harpal, Rai Hakru, Rai Prabhu, Rai Deo Narayan and Rai Narsinha. Raja Bhoj of Malwa also played an important role in this battle. The head of this confederation was Raja Sukhdev. It would be interesting to know how the alliance was forged and how was the game of chess played before the final showdown on 14th June.
In June 1033, as per Hindu traditions, Masud Ghazni was intimated by Rajput confederation that the land belonged to Rajputs and Hindus and Masud should evacuate these lands. Masud replied that all land belongs to Khuda and hence he would not retreat.
On 13th June, Morning, Rajput army of about 120,000 descended on Ghazni camp of Bahraich. Masud's army was completely besieged and encircled. The battle continued for hours. In the end, each and every man in Masood's camp was killed. No POW's were taken, no mercy was shown on the Turkic army. The location of this battle to be precise was near Chittaura Jheel, a lake about 8 KM away from modern Bahraich on Bahraich-Gond Road . The battle ended on 14th June with Victory of Raja Sukhdev and his Rajput alliance.On the evening of 14 June 1033 AD,Sunday Salar Masud was beheaded by Raja Sukhdev. The battle ended with Victory of Raja Sukhdev and his Rajput alliance.
The invasion was completely crushed and such resounding was this victory that none of the king from Northwest dared to invade India for 160 years..
Brilliant.
That's how it should always be. And can still be again: If Hindoos from all over India - the kind who yesteryear would have joined the freedom struggle and given their lives for it - would form a pan-Indian native militia (isn't that a right as per the US constitution: what's good for the goose is good for the gander too), ready to be active for the Hindoo cause all over the Hindoo subcontinent, and would make mincemeat out of any christoislamic mobs (or individuals) that terrorise, genocide or otherwise ethnically cleanse Hindus and their heathenism.
INSERT:
And let any secular Indian govt set the secular army on HindOOs (neither of which have done anything useful to protect Hindoo interests in the face of christoislamic ethnic cleansing). It will be the independence struggle all over again. But any Hindoos in the army should know where their priorities lie. Like the Sikh bodyguards of Indira Gandhi, but more so like every christoislamic religionist in the govt who always only act for their own religion's interest and never for secularism/the nation (note how none of them are stupid, but are loyal to their religion alone). And failing to make the right decision, such sepoys in the secular army can consider themselves disinherited forever and make peace with their chosen secularism.
Hindoos have only themselves = their own kind to look after their interests (even basic interests like the right to exist, survival etc). No one else. So Hindoos have a right to do Anything to protect their fundamental rights from all those who threaten this, right such as also of Hindoo temples to be free from the christoislamic stranglehold of "govt" usurpation, and Hindoo vigrahas to be free of christoislamic theft and terrorism.
Hindus should take inspiration from ancient heroic Hindoos' determined safeguarding of Hindoo-dom - their temples=Gods, their fellow Hindoos etc - against all odds. Like their ancestors, today's Hindoos should also care only about Hindoo heathenism and only be loyal to and active for Hindoo-dom. Nothing else. Not secularism. Not any secular govt and its anti-Hindu laws, restraining Hindus more by the day, as Hindoo temples are taken over by state govts and their vigrahas desecrated and stolen in numbers beyond count. HindOOs must ensure justice and restitution, HindOOs must protect Hindoo-dom. Look to no one and nothing else. Not the sham "democracy", not the "nationalism" diversion, or "development" agendas. Let the christomedia whine "persecution" for all justice that Hindoos implement for themselves. Christomedia has as yet no other power but the mentally restraining kind that its viewers give it. Christomedia's just a verbal terrorist.
I like the whole beheading of the Salar Masud. Like Samurai.