1. Perhaps the following belongs in the christianism thread. The "nexus" here is the whole gaggle of entities - the entire edifice - that Malhotra is addressing via his response to Nicholson:
swarajyamag.com/culture/dear-andrew-nicholson/
Exactly.
In the article Rajiv Malhotra shows the alien would-be-usurpers for what they are.
Moral: Never Share With The Alien Demons. The west undergoes brainfry whenever faced with anything Indic especially anything Hindu. (Less brainfry is seen even with non-GR western encroachment on Hellenismos.) And only innately anti-Hindu western people (no matter how benign they feel at the start) would ever encroach on Hindu heathenism. Oh and western "studying" of Skt or Indic "philosophy" etc IS encroachment.
Hindus should have kept their religion private, and never but Never let the alien demons in - even an inch - into any part of it.
See the alien demons still grasp about for actual knowledge of Taoism (far more of Taoism being oral than Hindoos' heathenism. Right perception/following traditional views and the benefaction of the Taoist Gods is essential to even understanding let alone practising what texts there are. E.g. basic example: aliens pretend a mere reading of the Tao Te Ching gives them the 'expertise' to deny that the text even concerns the Taoist Gods).
Problem arises from modern India having made knowledge - meant for deserving, worthy students vetted by gurus - into a public/general/free-for-all (to plunder) data. From being taught to the worthy, it has fallen into the hands of alien demons, though these repeatedly show how they can make nothing of it, and only brainfry and vileness results.
All the worthy in the west return to their ancestral religions. None would be dabbling in Hindoos' heathenism (or Taoism etc). By definition.
Hmmm. Why is the word indology still allowed to persist (see Malhotra's article)?
Uh, can we dump the term indology already? Trained Hindoos studying their traditions IS tradition.
Calling it indology makes it sound like advocating Hindus to anthropologise themselves.
There's no sugarcoating possible. And no re-interpreting the term either. Should dump it.
But didn't Elst - and similar nth hand experts in India - get to define for the "Hindus" which Hindu Gods are no longer Gods (but merely apotheosised)? From their great analytical skills, replacing tradition with their replacement for authority and authenticity, and their 'new original' view (I already used that terminology long ago, Malhotra didn't invent it, as it's normal English).
There are all kinds of subversionists. The most dangerous and most unforgivable ones are closest to home.
The Western indologists antagonising Hindus are nowhere near as frightening - or as dangerous to Hindoos' heathenism (i.e. to Hindoos) - as all those persons who can get under Hindus' skin.
Those among them who are Indic may commit sepuku (and take all theirs with them) ere they may dare to even dream of retracting. That is the one thing forbidden to them. Whereas subverting and being a subversionist of others is open to them as to all.
Oh wow, No. This bit near the end:
WHAT.
Isn't Malhotra a millionaire or billionaire? Oh, no way.
This is a legitimate question: How much of the damage is his fault?
Bij Donar. It's always the same thing. The most dangerous people to Hindus are those Indics in love with the west. I'll say it again: if you love them, become blood brothers or form a music band with them or marry them for all I care. But "Hindus" have no right to "share" heathenism with the west. Any alien who wants to dabble is a demon. And any Indian who wants to 'share' with dabblers is a traitor.
Many of the alien demons dabbling in the Vedam also learnt from some 10 to 20 Indian traitors who trained them.
It is a crime. And those who wish to make recompense should know the correction to such crimes may be beyond reach. (It may be easy to kill someone but it is generally next to impossible to revive the dead.)
Malhotra's crime may take a lifetime's work on his part (or that of many people's lives) to undo. And gratitude is NOT to be expected. You break it, you fix it. And fix all that comes from it, too. And expect no gratitude. Nor repatriation as 'reward'.
I see this repeatedly. How all the most vocalist, intellectual, and trained verbalists have a track-record of sharing with the aliens and the most dangerous among them (though all in the west are dangerous aliens; not counting the proper reverts to their own ancestral heathenisms of course, as these are fellow-heathens and not aliens at all.)
Wish I hadn't read the article now. Angry. Again: How much of the western indological attacks were financed by him? And how will he ever manage to undo his crime against Hindus and their heathenism? So glad I'm not him.
Anyway, the valid points still hold (especially that there can be no experts on Hindoo heathenism and other Indic traditions but the traditional Hindoos and other traditional Indics respectively), and these points lose none of their validity just because they are repeated:
swarajyamag.com/culture/dear-andrew-nicholson/
swarajyamag.com/culture/dear-andrew-nicholson/
Exactly.
In the article Rajiv Malhotra shows the alien would-be-usurpers for what they are.
Moral: Never Share With The Alien Demons. The west undergoes brainfry whenever faced with anything Indic especially anything Hindu. (Less brainfry is seen even with non-GR western encroachment on Hellenismos.) And only innately anti-Hindu western people (no matter how benign they feel at the start) would ever encroach on Hindu heathenism. Oh and western "studying" of Skt or Indic "philosophy" etc IS encroachment.
Hindus should have kept their religion private, and never but Never let the alien demons in - even an inch - into any part of it.
See the alien demons still grasp about for actual knowledge of Taoism (far more of Taoism being oral than Hindoos' heathenism. Right perception/following traditional views and the benefaction of the Taoist Gods is essential to even understanding let alone practising what texts there are. E.g. basic example: aliens pretend a mere reading of the Tao Te Ching gives them the 'expertise' to deny that the text even concerns the Taoist Gods).
Problem arises from modern India having made knowledge - meant for deserving, worthy students vetted by gurus - into a public/general/free-for-all (to plunder) data. From being taught to the worthy, it has fallen into the hands of alien demons, though these repeatedly show how they can make nothing of it, and only brainfry and vileness results.
All the worthy in the west return to their ancestral religions. None would be dabbling in Hindoos' heathenism (or Taoism etc). By definition.
Hmmm. Why is the word indology still allowed to persist (see Malhotra's article)?
Uh, can we dump the term indology already? Trained Hindoos studying their traditions IS tradition.
Calling it indology makes it sound like advocating Hindus to anthropologise themselves.
There's no sugarcoating possible. And no re-interpreting the term either. Should dump it.
Quote:Right now, it is western Indologists like you get to define ââ¬Ëcritical editionsââ¬â¢ of our texts and become the primary source and adhikari.
But didn't Elst - and similar nth hand experts in India - get to define for the "Hindus" which Hindu Gods are no longer Gods (but merely apotheosised)? From their great analytical skills, replacing tradition with their replacement for authority and authenticity, and their 'new original' view (I already used that terminology long ago, Malhotra didn't invent it, as it's normal English).
There are all kinds of subversionists. The most dangerous and most unforgivable ones are closest to home.
The Western indologists antagonising Hindus are nowhere near as frightening - or as dangerous to Hindoos' heathenism (i.e. to Hindoos) - as all those persons who can get under Hindus' skin.
Those among them who are Indic may commit sepuku (and take all theirs with them) ere they may dare to even dream of retracting. That is the one thing forbidden to them. Whereas subverting and being a subversionist of others is open to them as to all.
Oh wow, No. This bit near the end:
Quote:For the first 10 years of my work in this area, I gave away a substantial portion of my life savings in an unsuccessful attempt to fund and change the Indologistsââ¬â¢ hearts. But they play the good/bad cop game with skill. I learned a great deal because I was acknowledged as the largest funder of western Indology at one time. Then I stopped and became their harshest critic. I have on file a lot of grant correspondence with Harvard, Princeton, Columbia, to name just a few. Naturally, they worry that I am exposing their secrets. One day I will get someone to organize all that material into a publication.
WHAT.
Isn't Malhotra a millionaire or billionaire? Oh, no way.
This is a legitimate question: How much of the damage is his fault?
Bij Donar. It's always the same thing. The most dangerous people to Hindus are those Indics in love with the west. I'll say it again: if you love them, become blood brothers or form a music band with them or marry them for all I care. But "Hindus" have no right to "share" heathenism with the west. Any alien who wants to dabble is a demon. And any Indian who wants to 'share' with dabblers is a traitor.
Many of the alien demons dabbling in the Vedam also learnt from some 10 to 20 Indian traitors who trained them.
It is a crime. And those who wish to make recompense should know the correction to such crimes may be beyond reach. (It may be easy to kill someone but it is generally next to impossible to revive the dead.)
Malhotra's crime may take a lifetime's work on his part (or that of many people's lives) to undo. And gratitude is NOT to be expected. You break it, you fix it. And fix all that comes from it, too. And expect no gratitude. Nor repatriation as 'reward'.
I see this repeatedly. How all the most vocalist, intellectual, and trained verbalists have a track-record of sharing with the aliens and the most dangerous among them (though all in the west are dangerous aliens; not counting the proper reverts to their own ancestral heathenisms of course, as these are fellow-heathens and not aliens at all.)
Wish I hadn't read the article now. Angry. Again: How much of the western indological attacks were financed by him? And how will he ever manage to undo his crime against Hindus and their heathenism? So glad I'm not him.
Anyway, the valid points still hold (especially that there can be no experts on Hindoo heathenism and other Indic traditions but the traditional Hindoos and other traditional Indics respectively), and these points lose none of their validity just because they are repeated:
swarajyamag.com/culture/dear-andrew-nicholson/