12-12-2005, 01:53 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-ben_ami+Dec 12 2005, 01:30 AM-->QUOTE(ben_ami @ Dec 12 2005, 01:30 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->yes. when gandhi and nehru ganged up on netaji -
This could be partly true, I think it was Nehru than Gandhi who against Netaji. Gandhi had said of Netaji "a patriot of patriots'. Netaji is as much reverred outside Bengal as inside of it.
basically up-bihar-rajasthan and mp ganged up on bengal.
It is unfair to brand the whole state against Bengal. You cannot blame whole population because of political scounderals.That is a typical mis information played by successive state govts.
bengalis can never connect with the gandhi-nehru highjacked congress.
I think there has always been a feeling of vicitmization in Bengal. Some of which could be true but most of it is self fulfilling prophecy.
and now that they have become commie since 77, they have become ever more divorced from the centre.
' danger comes politicians playing upon this vicitimization syndrome and begining ULFAization of Bengal'
if bengal doesnt contribute minister at the centre - its good news now. we dont want what happened to bengal (deindustrialisation) to be repeated at the centre.
'the lever of centre is in the hands of leftists'.
unfortunately for the land that single handedly produced almost half the origina
l leaders of the congress - now not a single congress leader emerges from that state anymore - such has been the clinical hammering of all opposition by the cpim. and MB is nothing like a surendra nath bannerjee.
I thought SS Ray was quite influential.......during Naxalite movement...still remember bombs going on main streets of Kol.
the saving grace is that - after being shunted out of the equation by gandhi and nehru - the antidote of the anglo-socialistic party called the congress has also come from a bengali and was founded in calcutta.
yup SP Mukherjee ........
[right][snapback]42934[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
This could be partly true, I think it was Nehru than Gandhi who against Netaji. Gandhi had said of Netaji "a patriot of patriots'. Netaji is as much reverred outside Bengal as inside of it.
basically up-bihar-rajasthan and mp ganged up on bengal.
It is unfair to brand the whole state against Bengal. You cannot blame whole population because of political scounderals.That is a typical mis information played by successive state govts.
bengalis can never connect with the gandhi-nehru highjacked congress.
I think there has always been a feeling of vicitmization in Bengal. Some of which could be true but most of it is self fulfilling prophecy.
and now that they have become commie since 77, they have become ever more divorced from the centre.
' danger comes politicians playing upon this vicitimization syndrome and begining ULFAization of Bengal'
if bengal doesnt contribute minister at the centre - its good news now. we dont want what happened to bengal (deindustrialisation) to be repeated at the centre.
'the lever of centre is in the hands of leftists'.
unfortunately for the land that single handedly produced almost half the origina
l leaders of the congress - now not a single congress leader emerges from that state anymore - such has been the clinical hammering of all opposition by the cpim. and MB is nothing like a surendra nath bannerjee.
I thought SS Ray was quite influential.......during Naxalite movement...still remember bombs going on main streets of Kol.
the saving grace is that - after being shunted out of the equation by gandhi and nehru - the antidote of the anglo-socialistic party called the congress has also come from a bengali and was founded in calcutta.
yup SP Mukherjee ........
[right][snapback]42934[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->